User talk:Mooseman7325

~~== January 2023 ==~~

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cody, Wyoming. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 19:16, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mooseman7325, I am striking my warning as I now see this was not vandalism. I apologize for my misunderstanding. I did however ultimately remove the section entirely because the content was at best trivia and was either entirely unsourced or poorly sourced. S0091 (talk) 19:23, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Mooseman7325!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, S0091 (talk) 19:23, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man, Im trying to learn as I go (i learn best by doing that lmao), so I'll keep in mind the whole sandbox feature. Thanks! Mooseman7325 (talk) 19:34, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand but its nice to have some kind of documents in case you get stumped with how to do something. Also, I find WP:ERB an easier guide to follow for how to add citations. If you have questions or need help, you can ask at the Teahouse, even if its just to have someone check if you did something correctly or where to find information about how to do something. S0091 (talk) 19:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, I'm Magnolia677. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Elk Bath, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not add original research. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:49, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm trying to find some reliable sources as to what McColgan (the person who took the photograph) but its kind of difficult. The whole reason I found is was because I was bored one day, saw the photo, and decided I wanted to find it. I found an obscure Treehugger article in which it was stated he took it on a bridge during a fire in the Bitterroot Mountains, specifically the Bitterroot Forrest Fire in August of 2000. I'm a local to the Absaroka Range and the Beartooth Mountains, and I see this photo a LOT, so I went through Google Maps going over every single bridge crossing the Bitterroot River in the general area of the Sula area to find it, and eventually I found it, my proof being the left-leaning pine tree towering above the river on the right side of the photo, with most of the braches on its right side missing, and the lesser developed pine further to the right and in the foreground, cut off by the photo border. I'm 100% sure about this location being the shoot location, but I can't really credit myself doing some Google Maps research, and McColgan hasn't given too many interviews in the past. So how would I go about crediting the shot, with no really credible sources except for myself? Mooseman7325 (talk) 18:34, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is this what you are looking for? I went to Commons to get the image details then chased the URL down on archive.org. S0091 (talk) 18:55, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Cody, Wyoming, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:37, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I'll add some refs and sources right now. Mooseman7325 (talk) 00:22, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mooseman7325/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:16, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thank you for reviewing my article! There isn't to much written about this artist, but its because he's amassed such a following in a relatively short a mount of time. I have an interesting dilema, however. I contacted this person through Twitter, and interviewed them about themselves to add to the article: is there any way that I could use that as a source, or should I find some other method of sourcing, because this artist does deserve to have a Wikipedia page. Mooseman7325 (talk) 20:08, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Original research along with Reliable sources. The only sources that can be used are those from reputable publications. If no such sources have written about a subject, then the subject does not warrant a Wikipedia article. S0091 (talk) 21:11, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mooseman7325! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:16, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Everybody's Worried About Owen (March 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No evidence of notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Everybody's Worried About Owen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 20:42, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Smith Mansion has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Smith Mansion. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:50, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the heads-up. I've added a hatnote, and I plan on having the article itself be named "Smith Mansion (Wyoming" in order to avoid any future confusion. Mooseman7325 (talk) 20:21, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Smith Mansion (Wyoming) has been accepted

Smith Mansion (Wyoming), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 20:16, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Everybody's Worried About Owen

Hello, Mooseman7325. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Everybody's Worried About Owen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:05, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Everybody's Worried About Owen

Hello, Mooseman7325. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Everybody's Worried About Owen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:22, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]