User talk:Mladifilozof

Archives: Talk 1

Welcome to my talk page

I could not handle it!

Hi, Mladifilozof. I am really sorry our cooperation did not go that well. I started to get a bit nationalistic myself: So I am not editing on any page related to Albanians, nor any other ethnicity in the region, anymore. I am really glad to see you are still contributing though. I was reading about reality some days before. I see you made an edit there. What is Reality? is a great documentary if you haven't seen it yet. —Anna Comnena (talk) 20:54, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Light of the World

Hi, Good suggestion on Light of the World, I had forgotten about it - and it made me remember another title. A point I should probably mention is that we should try to use WP:SECONDARY sources, otherwise people will complain sooner or later. I added then to Light of the World, but thought I would mention it anyway. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 01:17, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bosnian Genocide / Genocide in Bosnia

Hello Mladifilozof

I believe you were the person who originally redirected Genocide in Bosnia to Bosnian Genocide. There's been a heated discussion over the limitations of the Bosnian Genocide article in which I've been involved, suggesting that the article's current form, which emphasises the legal status of the specific expression at the expense of treatment of the substance of allegations of genocide and their continuing legitimacy, is inadequate. The discussion has not taken us much further. Another editor moved the article to the title Genocide in Bosnia. That move has now been blocked by the editor committed to the legal findings treatment, pending referral for discussion of the proposed move. As someone involved with the article in the past and familiar with the subject, yopu might be interested in adding your own comments. Opbeith (talk) 09:40, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Good work Coptic-orthodox (talk) 19:34, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you modify Zhuangzi's picture that you uploaded?

Hello. Firstly, I'm not fluent in English, so I'm sorry if you cannot understand what I say, or if you are offended.

When I searched for the article of Zhuangzi in English, I saw the portrait of him that you uploaded. And I found out that this same picture is uploaded in about 8 different languages. However, this portrait is quite famous in my country, South Korea, as a portrait of Park Jiwon, a scholar in Joseon Dynasty. ((For example, in Korean Wikipedia, you can see almost same portrait-- the HTML is http://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EB%B0%95%EC%A7%80%EC%9B%90_(1737%EB%85%84) )) Also, it seems like that this problem has also been raised as an issue. (( HTML : http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:%E5%BA%84%E5%AD%90 -- I cannot understand Chinese, so I do not know what he/she is talking specifically :( )) Therefore, I ask you if you can remove, or change this picture. This is my very first time writing in Wikipedia, so I don't know how to modify the article and I was terrified if I vandalize the whole article.. so I decided to talk to you.

If you have any question, you can contact to me. Thank you for listening to me and have a nice day. :) Michael0923 (talk) 09:41, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Sorry for delay, but replied to your question re: map [1] on that talk page Slovenski Volk (talk) 05:33, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alkoholijada.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alkoholijada.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:57, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mladen Lorković image

Hi!

Are you able to upload the photo of Mladen Lorković to the Wikimedia Commons, the one that can be found at Mladen Lorković article at the SC Wikipedia? --Wusten fuchs 18:53, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anti-Fascist Council of the People's Liberation of Yugoslavia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tito (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Damjan od Resnika, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ambient, Acoustic and Bass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Map Serbia in the Yugoslav Wars.png

Hi! I recently removed the map you uploaded to the Commons from the Operation Corridor 92 article, meaning to restore it later to the aftermath section - since the map is reportedly depicting territorial extent of RSK/RS-controlled areas of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia. However, there's a problem with accuracy of the map: I'm aware that maps of this size may only be approximate at best, but there's a substantial error in the western Slavonia part of the map. Specifically, the outline found there currently depicts the extent of UNPA Sector West, but the RSK controlled only a small part of the sector in the south (south of Pakrac), while Croatia controlled the most of the sector since December 1991. Could you please fix the map before it is restored to the article?--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:29, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another relatively minor point is that the key entry "Territories controlled by Serb forces 1992-1995" implies fixed lines of control in the period. Truth be told, they changed slightly, but sufficiently to show on the map, especially in areas near Bihać (Velika Kladuša), Zadar, between Šibenik and Drniš and Livno Field at the very least. Perhaps it would be wise to change that particular caption to "Approximate extent of Serb-held areas, 1992-95" or something along those lines. Thoughts?--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:42, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to MILHIST

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Anotherclown (talk) 11:27, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For extending Operation Bora to the Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia and for creating a definitive article clarifying author rights of photography from former Yugoslavia. ◅ PRODUCER (TALK) 10:09, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

◅ PRODUCER (TALK) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Malagurski

Hello there, just wanted to touch base with you regarding your edit on Boris Malagurski. The references that you mentioned in the edit description are Pescanik.net, BBC, and a B92 show. Of the three, only one mentions Malagurski, while the other two have nothing to do with Malagurski, and would be relevant for an article about the murder of the French football fan. As for the Pescanik.net reference, since one of those convicted in the court case writes for Pescanik (a simple Google search of Rastislav Dinic shows him as a columnist), Pescanik can't be considered a reliable source in this particular case. The segment also contains biased POV such as "Malagurski advocates on behalf of criminal groups of hooligans", while the last sentence in the paragraph is pure POV. Since this is an ongoing court case, I'd suggest waiting for the case to come to a conclusion, rather than adding POV and biased comments on it. If you insist on mentioning it in the article, we should stick to the facts on the case itself, without writing about what anyone thinks about it. Regards, --UrbanVillager (talk) 17:45, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just did a little Google search on your name, Damjan Pavlica, are you the one who wrote these two articles on Malagurski? Film-slop Weight of Ideological Chains and The rise of the young and the ruthless Boris Malagurskog? In the latter, the tags described Malagurski as a "liar", "cheat" and "fraud". If you wrote those, I would hope that you won't let your personal opinion outside of Wikipedia affect your wiki-editing. Regards, --UrbanVillager (talk) 17:53, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The World War Barnstar
		Smrt fašizmu! Antidiskriminator (talk) 14:57, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

G'day

G'day Mladifilozof, I have nominated those images you added to the June 1941 uprising in Herzegovina article because, while they would be great if PD, they don't appear to be, as there is no information on znaci about the publishing of the images displayed there. It is a great shame, because there are some great images on that gallery. If you are able to establish when and in what publication they were first published, they might be able to be retained if it was prior to 1966. Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 04:04, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:06, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Blauwe Aanslag.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Blauwe Aanslag.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mladifilozof. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

Nice image...

... at this website. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 15:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2017

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Marijn Haverbeke

Hello Mladifilozof,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Marijn Haverbeke for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:27, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]

Have your say!

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American war crimes has been nominated for renaming

Category:American war crimes, which you created, has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. b uidhe 05:30, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures on wikicommons

Hiya I just saw in my watchlist that https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RampART.jpg was deleted for not having explicit permission to be used, not sure if that was uploaded by you, but then File:Rampart_freeshop.jpg was uploaded by you in 2006. Just wanted to let you know about it, seems like you should have been notified. I'll also post to wikicommons in case you are more active there. Cheers, Mujinga (talk) 09:27, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Old East Slavic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Autonym. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Survey about History on Wikipedia (If you reside in the United States)

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 16:20, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Engolo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Strength and Power.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Mladifilozof! Your additions to Engolo have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:22, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I will rephrase it by my own words. Mladifilozof (talk) 22:39, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nestor Capoeira moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Nestor Capoeira. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 00:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nestor Capoeira (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDb and Goodreads are not reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nestor Capoeira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:02, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mladifilozof! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:02, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Your edit to Mestre (title) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:36, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Engolo

added links pointing to Club and Spirit

Besouro Mangangá

added a link pointing to Santo Amaro

Capoeira

added a link pointing to Congo

Lundu (dance)

added a link pointing to Batuque

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cartwheel (capoeira) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Cartwheel (capoeira). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 15:11, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Capoeira music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ngoma.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Your edit to Engolo has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your third warning. — Diannaa (talk) 12:32, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Diannaa, thanks for warning me. I see that you have indiscriminately invalidated my entire work from the past few weeks. I do not copy other people's material, but convey claims by referring to the source, as this is a common practice. Can you tell me exactly what the problem is, ie which part of my entry is disputed? Mladifilozof (talk) 16:06, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There was quite a bit of overlap with the thesis visible here. You can view some of the overlap by visiting the CopyPatrol report, and the rest I found manually and through the use of Earwig's tool. — Diannaa (talk) 18:19, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. Writing can be challenging when there are only two scientific books available on the subject. I will certainly strive to improve the article, using the guidance and tools you've provided. Mladifilozof (talk) 18:30, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aú, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cartwheel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	for your work on capoeira related articles FuzzyMagma (talk) 13:48, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you very much! Mladifilozof (talk) 08:53, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nestor Capoeira (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nestor Capoeira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Izbica massacre.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Izbica massacre.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nestor Capoeira

Hello, Mladifilozof. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nestor Capoeira, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mladifilozof. Thank you for your work on Rabo de arraia. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cobrinha Verde

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cobrinha Verde requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://capoeira.online/history/mestres/cobrinha-verde/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Hilst [talk] 22:51, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cobrinha Verde.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cobrinha Verde.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:14, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gato Preto

Hello, Mladifilozof

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Zsinj, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Gato Preto, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Zsinj}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Zsinj^Talk 23:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CCI Notice

Hello, Mladifilozof. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 03:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mestre Gato Preto and Mestre Milton.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mestre Gato Preto and Mestre Milton.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chetnik sabotage of Axis communication lines

G'day. I saw that you moved this article without discussion. You can expect that any move of an article in the WWII Balkans space might be contested, and I recommend that a WP:RM is used, or at the very least some discussion on the talk page indicating a consensus, rather than moving it unilaterally, as it is bound to be moved back. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]