User talk:Mjzudba

January 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Derek Muller, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Hello, I'm Alexcalamaro. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lauren Sánchez have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. —Preceding undated comment added 21:30, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Okay

ok.

Racket

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

Disambiguation pages

Please note that disambiguation pages like Racket are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory
Do not add articles to acronym or initials disambiguation pages unless the person or entity is widely known by that name (in which case it should be stated in the linked article).

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 00:23, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sia (musician). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LiberatorG (talk) 19:17, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I'm sor

I do not approve of your

Edit summaries

Please use more appropriate edit summaries. In recent edits, you have left summaries such as "jijij i ahhhhhh", "mmm hhh mm.", and "wow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!", which are meaningless. Mind matrix 19:56, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SEA games moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, SEA games, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:00, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About Draft:SEA games

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:SEA games a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Paul_012 (talk) 13:57, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Please do not use Amazon as a source, it is not considered reliable. To demonstrate that a book exists, just fill in {{cite book}} with ISBN or OCLC, no citation is necessary. However, to show the notability of an author, you usually have to find book reviews published in reliable sources (magazines, academic journals, etc.) b uidhe 16:47, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I feel weird

I'm trying to stop editing stuff. But I can't... Mjzudba (talk) 17:08, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hold (novel)

An article about the novel Hold should be made.

Don't ask why, because there will probably not be an answer. Mjzudba (talk) 19:25, 6 February 2020 (UTC)Mjzudba[reply]

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require direct sources for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Almost all new additions without references are now being reverted on-sight.

Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages.

Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 18:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page List of topics characterized as pseudoscience has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Please do not disparage others in edit summaries. Toddst1 (talk) 18:55, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense comments and edits

Looking at your edits on this page and the jibberish you're putting in your edit summaries, gives the impression that you are WP:NOTHERE to build an encyclopeda. You need to either start editing in accordance with the way we work here, or I'm afraid you'll be blocked from editing. Toddst1 (talk) 19:00, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 19:00, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was writing your block while another editor was giving you the warning above. But as you ignored the warning you were given, and also after looking at your replies above, I think the block is appropriate. Doug Weller talk 19:03, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]