User talk:Miha2020/Archive 1

Archive 1

Welcome!

Hi Miha2020! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! - Adolphus79 (talk) 21:00, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Ali Moradi, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. There is not currently a page on an individual with the same name in the English Wikipedia, so disambiguation in the title is unnecessary. If a page for the person did exist, it should be demonstrated that the person is the primary topic for the title before usurping a title. Additionally, if disambiguation is needed, the word village should be lowercase. Ost (talk) 19:49, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

I see your more recent edit and edit summary on the page. If you believe that a page should exist for the weightlifter, please consider drafting the article at Draft:Ali Moradi (sports executive) and using the Articles for Creation process to get moved into the mainspace at the appropriate title. Until an article exists in the person and is shown to be the primary use of the term, there is no need to move the village's page. —Ost (talk) 19:58, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Ali Pakdaman

Hi. Until he starts in an event, he can't be listed as competing at the Olympics. He could get COVID and be forced to withdraw, for example. And unless I've missed it, the Tokyo Olympics hasn't actually started yet. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 13:23, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

@Lugnuts: hi.don't remove category in your guess! we actually base the principle on presence, if not we can remove! see : Category:Competitors at the 2020 Summer Olympics for more! your action can waste users time for reworking. thanks.--Miha2020 (talk) 13:39, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Acutally, the WP:BURDEN is with you per WP:CATVER. If you can show the event result/press coverage as of today to show he has infact competed, then re-add the category. But until he actually starts in an event, he has not competed at the 2020 Olympics. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 13:53, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Javad Foroughi

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Javad Foroughi, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 15:02, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Javad Foroughi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DrKay (talk) 15:02, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

DrKay hello.i didn't know what to do. i am new user and helping to improve articles but this ip bothered me. i didn't know wp:three-revert rule policy. i thought It is permissible to fight successive sabotages. this ip is now user:Ghostdog199 according to my talk page history! he violated WP:SUE too. please semi protect the article. i asked for that here. thanks for helping me.--Miha2020 (talk) 15:13, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

I am not willing to semi-protect the article as I have contributed to it and another admin has already declined the request. I do not see a legal threat from Ghostdog199 (or their IP), though I do think that the original addition does not appear to be supported by the sources. I believe the paragraph I've added is supported and does add material of relevance. DrKay (talk) 15:19, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

DrKay your Content is worse than before. that's not true. it's violate WP:NPOV. anything came in any newspaper is not always true! please remove any body's name (N.A). Why are you directing the article? This part has nothing to do with sports. There is no such thing in any sports article.--Miha2020 (talk) 15:28, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Mutliple source that meet WP:RS guidelines have reported on the subject's association with the Republican Guards and the subsequent criticism of the IoC leveled by a human right's group. I don't see any NPOV issues with the sourced content that DrKay has added. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:46, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Barnstars

	Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thanks for your amazing contributions in adding new categories for Olympic medalists on the Tokyo 2020 Summer Olympics Games! ihatethisname 00:08, 03 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi

Hi, sorry who says exactly which version is "better" for nations at the Olympics pages ? is there any guideline about it ? I have no problem with order of sports but I can't see any reason to have a separate column about winter sport medals which Iran never won. I'm going to make some changes unless you give me link to a guidline about how this page should look like differently. Mohsen1248 (talk) 14:07, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Mohsen1248 hi.i said the problem of your edits.it has many problems. see the : Kazakhstan at the Olympics or many other countries (check Template:Nations at the Olympics for better version of this kind of articles!). the similar pages must be like each others (in total formats or contents)! why you reverted all of my edits without any talk? be careful of Wp:3RR. you said about space! two tables near each other is better in space! you omitted coloumn of number of Athletes. user:MEhdi.Olympic had put a lot of time on it. don't change it again. thanks--Miha2020 (talk) 14:31, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

You missed to answer my question, who says which version is better? was there any discussion about it somewhere? is there a guidline about it? as long as there is no rule against it I will make changes and thanks for telling me, I'm well aware of wiki rules. to me it looks ugly the way you consider it good, because people don't always use wide monitors to have enough wide space, it looks very compact in a mobile phone. and I can't see any reason for that where the whole page is not that big. and yes I indeed omitted the coloumn of number of athletes because that's already mentioned somewhere else in the article. I can have that, but still I can't understand the need of having it in the same row. so I will change that part. Mohsen1248 (talk) 14:52, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

we don't need to have for guidlines for every things! we can see similar pages. did you see that? i pointed here and in summary of my edits. we use common format for pages like each others. no need for wide monitors! if it is problem, Japan at the Olympics and South Korea at the Olympics and United States at the Olympics must have problems for many peoples! if you have problem in watching in mobile view, you can say it in WP:VPT.--Miha2020 (talk) 00:28, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Meysam Dalkhani

Hello in the sources of this article, his full name Meysam Karamali Dalkhani Aren't these sources for him?--Modeling ^(talk) 15:19, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

مدلینگ ایرانی hi.that site is not source for name of wrestlers! it has many mistakes. i said that in summary.don't change.--Miha2020 (talk) 15:23, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your answer.--Modeling ^(talk) 15:42, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Help!

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

Hello, I hope you are well. Please review Mehran Ghafourian's draft. I made some changes. If the article is rejected again, write the reason. Thanks for your following up Amir ghpro (talk) 19:32, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2018 FIFA World Cup seeding into 2022 FIFA World Cup seeding. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 03:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Persian Gulf Pro League Highest attended season matches

Don't start an edit war! The accusation that no sources were given is also incorrect. The spectator count of varzesh3 in the game report is from before the game and has not been updated. Varzesh3 sometimes has the correct viewership, but not always. Sources are also given. In a later article, varzesh3 also speaks of OVER 80,000 viewers. And as mentioned, ANA News Agency's stadium reporter says the correct spectator count was 85,000. The stadium reporter from Mehr News also speaks of over 80,000 spectators, almost 90,000 during the celebrations. Incidentally, the only official source is the match reports on iranleague.ir. Unfortunately, they haven't uploaded the reports since last season.

Btw Azadi Stadium has had a seating capacity of 78,116 since the summer of 2016, but it gets crowded in some games. This also coincides with official attendance figures from the Asian Football Association. For example, 90,000 spectators came to the game Esteghlal against Al-Ain in March 2018. There were officially 100,000 fans in the stadium for the 2018 Champions League final. Also in the game between Esteghlal and Naft MIS, it can be seen that almost all the stairs and stairways (where there are actually no seats) were occupied by fans. And as said, according to ANA Press Agency's stadium reporter, 85,000 fans watched the match.

User90fan first of all say hello when you want to speak to me! then sign your message at end! we are talking about this match (esteghlal-Naft MIS) not AFC final's match! your links not show the exact attendances. why we put number 85000 not 90000 or 80000? you add this but i can't find number of spectators so i remove it from article!!! i say again that this part has no refs and you always change this part with no refs! read Wp:RS.--Miha2020 (talk) 13:57, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Miha2020 You contradict yourself. First, they referred to iplstats.com and Azadi Stadium capacity. Iplstats does not have official viewership numbers, just estimates that are partially correct. But often not. Then they referred to the capacity of the stadium and said that a maximum of 80,000 people are allowed in. For this reason, I have explained to you that the official capacity has already been exceeded the number of times. Then they reject the source without justification. As I said, it is the report of the stadium reporter who was in the stadium and noted the number of spectators. Then they refer to the game report from varzesh3, and here the viewer count was simply not updated. The information was there long before kick-off. Sometimes varzesh3 will then update the number with the correct information, but not this time. In a later article, varzesh3 also states that OVER 80,000 fans were present. Then I searched a long time for a suitable source and exact figure and found the details of the stadium reporter. According to him, the number of viewers was 85,000, which corresponds to the figure of over 80,000 viewers from other media and almost 90,000 from Mehr.

User90fan You still do not know that you should not ping me on my talk page! please respect Wikipedia:Civility. sign your messages too! don't say unrealted things. don't pm me here.i said in your talk page. Do not marginalize the discussion.Do not take my time either.--Miha2020 (talk) 14:36, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

You've gotten personal. First, you refer to iplstats.com. When I explain to them that the audience numbers there are only estimates, they don't go into it anymore. Then you refer to the capacity of the stadium, I explain to you with information from sources that the stadium is overcrowded at times. You don't go into that anymore either, although you initially referred to the capacity. You are also not interested in my explanation that the number of viewers in the game report by Varzesh3 was not updated. You then do not read the later article by varzesh3 carefully and say that the number of viewers is not mentioned in the article. Although it is mentioned that there were OVER 80 thousand in the stadium. And you do not accept the statements of the ANA News Agency stadium reporter who was live at the stadium without any justification. In summary, you simply don't read one source carefully and simply don't accept another with the correct viewership. User90fan (talk) 14:47, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Honestly, I don't want to argue with you. But given the sources, we should put in 85,000 first. If the official game report is still uploaded to iranleague.ir, we can correct it if there is a discrepancy. Regards. User90fan (talk) 14:49, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

your first sentence (You've gotten personal) is Wikipedia:No personal attacks. i can complain in Wp:AN and it can causes you to WP:BLOCK. first Apologize to me then delete your message in [1] Maybe I stopped complaining about you. i didn't change your 85000 and anapress ref but one sentence in one page(varzesh3) not shows exact number (it says more than 80000 but you insist on 85000! it can be 83000 or 88000!). Miha2020 (talk) 15:00, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

I don't insist on 85,000. I refer to a source, to the statement of a stadium reporter who, unlike the others, gave an exact number. And in my opinion, this coincides with the information from various media, which write that more than 80,000 were in the stadium. Unfortunately, yoou do not go into the source in your argument. The number 85,000 isn't mine, it's what a stadium reporter said.

I never wanted to attack you personally either, and please write to me where it happened. The fact that I wrote you contradicted yourself (if you mean this sentence) was not meant as a personal attack. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Best regards User90fan (talk) 16:07, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia rules

Hi, Kind of funny when you try to tell me the rules. you just broke the law now! no I didn't, maybe you should count again. I'm fully aware of 3RR. of course I will ask for a 3rd opinion. not now. when I have time for that which is a lengthy process. Sports2021 (talk) 00:00, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

hi. you can't edit articles by your own decision (it doesn't say in any wikipedia guidelines about that!). please be polite in my talk page and don't joke with me..history of Kianoush Rostami showw that you broke wp:3RR and i can complain you in wp:AN but i will chance to you to accept your own wrong edits. table for results of Olympian weightlifter must be like current version of above articles like many pages: Lasha Talakhadze , Ruslan Albegov, Lü Xiaojun , Fares El-Bakh and etc to show exact results of Weights lifted by the athlete..If you want to change the procedure please use Wp:CON. Miha2020 (talk) 00:12, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

I've checked the history of the page, only 2 edits have been reverted by Sports2021 in the past 24 hours. WP:3RR is 3 reverts not two. One more revert by either of you on Kianoush Rostami will result in a violation of 3RR, as you both have reverted twice on the page in the past 24 hours. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 17:49, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Learn how to count first and also learn the rules properly before threatening someone. Sports2021 (talk) 18:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

an account with 2 years old and in extended confirmed user group? is it your sock? that's fun. don't write anything in my talk page from now until ever user:Sports2021 Miha2020 (talk) 20:09, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

(user rafaelhp), first be polite in my talk page according to (WP:CIV and say hello. then who asked you for counting?? you seem your eyes have problems. 3 times: 12:41, 15:03 and 22:26 on 19 july (Despite two users disagreed with his wrong edit). Miha2020 (talk) 20:02, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Nobody asked me to count, but I noticed you falsely accused an editor of violating WP:3RR, threatened to go "complain" at AN unless you got an apology and had the other editor "accept that their edits are wrong". There are only two reverts from the editor, the 12:41 is not a revert, it's a standard edit. I also suggest you read up on WP:CIV yourself. Have a good one. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 20:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

it's not related to you which edit are right or wrong. see pages i said above (part: major results). i hope you are not blind. your all of speaks here is attack. read WP:NPA. I will ignore this time. what is have a good one means?? don't reply anymore. Miha2020 (talk) 20:37, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

"Have a good one" means have a good day. Also please stop falsely accusing editors of being sockpuppets without evidence; WP:Casting aspersions. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 20:42, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

ok. good night. Miha2020 (talk) 20:47, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Wrong edit

Why are you constantly returning information on the Iran Football Championship Cup page; That too without any explanation or reason! While the information is taken from the original version of this article in Persian language. Mahan Matin (talk) 19:01, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

read your talk page. We have nothing to do with the Persian article here Miha2020 (talk) 19:05, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

@Miha2020:This is an example of Wikipedia:NPOV dispute.

Kroos

Please see here for the discussion. If you disagree, do not re-add the honour, instead open a new discussion. Kante4 (talk) 14:15, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

i said my cm in summary of edit. all sites show he won 5 times super cup here and real madrid site! Miha2020 (talk) 14:19, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

The overall consensus here on wiki is pretty clear with that discussion and you just can't make it your way. This needs a new discussion. Andf after being reverted by more than one editor, WP:BRD should have taken place. Will take it to the footy project to get more input. Kante4 (talk) 14:23, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

we can't change honours of players by wiki's discussion! the german wiki (native) says 5 too: here. above Consensus is wrong! Miha2020 (talk) 14:27, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Then take your concern to the discussion where i pinged you. What other wikis do does not matter. Kante4 (talk) 14:31, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

ok. thanks. Miha2020 (talk) 14:32, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Dragan Skočić article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 18:46, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

@GiantSnowman hi. you can search first. here is ref : 1. are all of your 500000 edits have ref? of course not! all paragraphs don't need ref, if yes every article has 500 refs on References part! you are creator of above article but not WP:OWN. Miha2020 (talk) 01:22, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

5 users and ip do same edits like me but you send me this warn.why? can i ask you what are sources of these edits 2 and 3?--Miha2020 (talk) 02:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gerd Müller Trophy

Template:Gerd Müller Trophy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:09, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Miha2020. Thank you for your work on Amir Hossein Firouzpour. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

@SunDawn hello Sundown. thanks. I don't know what is your exact meaning for this note and this. would you please explain them more? Best regard. Miha2020 (talk) 02:00, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Aria Barzegar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aria Barzegar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aria Barzegar (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:01, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Draft:2022 World Taekwondo Championships

I've moved the article into draft space, it wasn't good enough for main space. It needs to be improved. Regards. Govvy (talk) 12:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

@Govvy hello. we use WP:DRAFTIFY For articles that have acute problems. it has started today (current event) and has minimum standard for being in main space. it is like other pages : Category:Scheduled sports events or (2022 World Weightlifting Championships). it will improve soon. please move it to mainspace for avoid reworking (new page creation). it was reviewed before too. Regards. Miha2020 (talk) 02:03, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Just click the button finished draft, Govvy (talk) 11:11, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

@Govvy  Done but i mean someone accept it soon. i want to create weight events (details) Miha2020 (talk) 12:54, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2022 World Taekwondo Championships has been accepted

2022 World Taekwondo Championships, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:31, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022

I was shocked. that's terrible mistake. I am not online for a few days (I am in travel) and I will say my words soon.--Miha2020 (talk) 17:56, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

I was really busy in my real life. i'll say about SPI and explain about my edits and then ask for unblock soon.--Miha2020 (talk) 10:59, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

hello. 2 months passed from this bad event for me. I apologize in advance that my speaks will be long (in few parts). first i want to say that is terrible mistake. i am not this person and i know the policy about Sockpuppetry. i saw that page (SPI), user:MarioGom words are funny. i was editing in wiki with ipies before and in tokyo 2020 (my name 2020 comes from this), I started to edit with an account. i only have this user. about edits summaries: i read and see many users activities (history of pages) and learned from them, many users can have same things i can point...i am active in iranian's football pages and sports like wrestling weightlifting and...similar pages (compare 2 users) don't show anything, many people edits on their interests. (i can say users edits like me: Shahin, Simeon, Sports2021, Lugnuts and etc). about timeline of my edits: i am active in wiki when i have some free times. forexample you can compare: 1 and 2, Many commonalities but they are not same person! don't know where this issue about me comes from but i am sure that's not true. i can send my passport pic to CheckUsers or ARB Com. At a glance, i saw similar mistake about mojtaba2361 (first he connect to ArmanAfifeh and then it was corrected). for me this has happended again. i read that case.

about my block in fa wiki, i had an argument with an admin for tagging in one page (CSD) and that admin In collaboration with another admin closed my account, my request is open there but unfortunately on that wiki admins are not active too much and they don't check requests like that. It had nothing to do with the topic Sockpuppetry at all. i am in iran and ipies here are dynamic (checkusers know about this problem in iran). my conduct (under any account or IP address) is not connected in any way with the block (this can happen if a block is aimed at resolving a separate situation and i am unintentionally blocked as a result because i used the same IP range). clerk said it can be possible but be notice that tools can make mistake. Even if the inspection is certain, mistakes could still happen. so An admin's personal impression of my edits cannot be accurate. human beings can always make mistakes, he can't only block me on evidence (because user:Vanamonde pointed SPI on summary of my block but the checkuser didn't approve it in certain). Vanamonde linked me to ArmanAfifehi and then PeymanNR and then Mojtaba2361! please see this pages: User talk:Mohammad.m.1628, User talk:Acv1006, User talk:Arminedite, User talk:Marouf.ashena (i reported them for multyaccounts, how can i be Sockpuppet like them?).Miha2020 (talk) 15:02, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Miha2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

hello again. please first read above (to admin). I've read and know wikipedia's policies. I am not vandal .I am good user (see my 6000 edits). i am here to improve wikipedia. i redirected 470 pages see here. i have created olympian persons: An San, Melvin Twellaar, Stef Broenink, Parviz Nasibov, Tadeusz Michalik in many sports for many countries. important pages for world cup 2022 like :2022 FIFA World Cup seeding and 2022 FIFA World Cup officials. events like: 2022 Beach Soccer Intercontinental Cup, 2022 World Taekwondo Championships, 2022 Asian Weightlifting Championships and most viewed page like Gerd Müller Trophy. i am active in many sports. please have WP:AGF and help me especially now that i am a little fluent in editing. best regards. Miha2020 (talk) 23:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are blocked for violating WP:SOCK but don't address this in your unblock request. You need to specifically address the findings at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mojtaba2361/Archive. Yamla (talk) 12:30, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yamla did you see passage above my request? i explained completely about link you addressed. (about my edits, timeline, my FAwiki block). what answer do you want to know? user:MarioGom said something that is not true. user:vanamonde made wrong and his Personal impressions can't be exact. more than 400 pages as admin blocker said ! i pointed (above) that tools make mistake and humans can too. i know what is WP:SOCK and i am sure that i am not Sockpuppet. how can he (Vanamonde) prove i am him (Mojtaba2361) 100%? Behavioural evidence is guess and It cannot be proven definitively but As I said, I am ready to send the my info to the Checkusers (to you).best regards.Miha2020 (talk) 13:09, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

You are free to make a new request. A different administrator will review it. --Yamla (talk) 15:48, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Yamla i didn't understand why you declined my request. Did you check carefully? what is your reason for decline? did you see my above explanation? if you didn't check carefully let other admins done it and don't close the request. thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miha2020 (talk • contribs)

WP:GAB explains how to write an unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 15:31, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Yamla Why do you give an irrelevant answer? I know how to apply, but first I need to know your reason for rejecting my application. i don't understand you.--Miha2020 (talk) 15:35, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

I already gave a reason for rejecting your unblock request. You are expected to explain why you should be unblocked in your unblock request. You didn't. --Yamla (talk) 15:36, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

@Yamla see above! no reason for your job! i said i am not him (that person). how can i prove it? i suggested the way but you didn't answer it. why you don't have wp:AGF? i'm not vandalism you can see my contributions. i'm here to help wikipedia. Miha2020 (talk) 15:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Make a new unblock request. Another admin will review it. I will not respond further. --Yamla (talk) 15:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

@Yamla You do not answer more because you do not have a convincing answer. You shouldn't have checked this request in the first place when you can't check it properly. An admin blocked me due to behavioral evidence (of course wrong) and suspended me for 4 months unnecessarily, and this is not acceptable for the system. Who is responsible for this misconception? Miha2020 (talk) 15:55, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Miha2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello. 7 months passed from this block that was not by confirm of spi or clerk. it was for Behavioural evidence! i tried to proof that i am not that user but no one helped me for resolvation. user:Yamla not read my above messages and not checked my request carefully. i am not vandalism (see my 6700 edits) and i have only this account. please read all of my speaks here. i know the policies and i didn't open account in last 7 months. this shows that i am good user and want to be here in correct way. please have wp:AFN and help me. Best regards. Miha2020 (talk) 19:08, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I think the evidence presented at the SPI is quite convincing, and your denial does not convince me that the conclusion there was wrong. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 19:47, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.