Jump to content

User talk:Michael.j.schwartz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Ave Fenix Pictures, from its old location at User:Michael.j.schwartz/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 07:56, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Michael.j.schwartz. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Draft:Ave Fenix Pictures, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GABgab 00:12, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ave Fenix Pictures

[edit]

Hi, Michael, I was having a look at the draft of Ave Fenix Pictures you submitted. The article looks good, and I am ready to move it to the main Wikipedia articlespace for you, but I did not see any declaration anywhere of your financial conflict of interest in writing the piece. I read in one of your edits that you are an employee of this org. That means you have a financial COI, and need to declare it either on your userpage, on the article's talk page, or in an edit summary. Have you done any of these things yet? (If so, where?) Please leave a message for me below and I will be back to read it. I can offer you assistance with your declaration as well, if you need it. Thank you! Hart of ten (talk) 04:51, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, excuse me, I was traveling and I had not seen the comments, I found how to make the statement in my Talk Page, it is done, anyway I want to clarify that I am an employee of the company but I did not receive any money for the page. I'm glad that the page has been approved, thank you very much!--Michael.j.schwartz (talk) 05:16, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ave Fenix Pictures has been accepted

[edit]
Ave Fenix Pictures, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CNMall41 (talk) 19:26, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arise from Darkness has been accepted

[edit]
Arise from Darkness, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:19, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: La Raza filmmaking has been accepted

[edit]
La Raza filmmaking, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:01, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Black Ruby has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Black Ruby. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 02:40, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Black Ruby has been accepted

[edit]
Black Ruby, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

AmericanAir88(talk) 12:47, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ave Fenix Pictures for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ave Fenix Pictures is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ave Fenix Pictures until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 13:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arise from Darkness for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arise from Darkness is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arise from Darkness until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 13:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Black Ruby for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Black Ruby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Ruby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 13:57, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of La Raza filmmaking for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article La Raza filmmaking is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Raza filmmaking until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 13:58, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

[edit]
Information icon

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Michael.j.schwartz, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Michael.j.schwartz|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Praxidicae (talk) 14:43, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae: Hello, sorry, but I do not understand. Since 2017, when I entered Wikipedia, I have declared my connection as part of the studio. I am not a paid editor, I am part of the company. You can see it here : https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Michael.j.schwartz#Ave_Fenix_Pictures and here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Michael.j.schwartz
Here, on my first contact, I introduced myself by commenting that the studio hired an editor, believing that was the best option because we did not understand the platform, but we had no idea that the editor worked without following the rules. Once learning and abiding, I stated that I cannot edit my own articles: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:There%27sNoTime/Archive_13, ("Ave Fenix ​Pictures" section)
I think the type of connection that I have with the company is clear, I can send supporting documentation if Wikipedia requests it.--Michael.j.schwartz (talk) 05:01, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arise from Darkness has been accepted

[edit]
Arise from Darkness, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:38, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Black Ruby (August 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 01:03, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Michael.j.schwartz! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (barksniff) 01:03, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]