User talk:Mcpotbelly
Mcpotbelly, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]Hi Mcpotbelly! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
FJC
[edit]I don't see it in your list of references, so I'll offer Bee's FJC bio, and search results page. Good luck. Dru of Id (talk) 21:54, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
- The FJC website has two errors. I could not find evidence that F. A. Bee represented Chinese immigrants in 1855. He did hire Chinese miners to dig for gold. I could not find evidence that President Lincoln appointed Bee as a Provost Marshal.
- MC Potbelly 00:52, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
September 2013
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Frederick Bee. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BlackberrySorbet 09:03, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- What are the issues? MC Potbelly 13:28, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
- It reads like a random list of names, dates and places.
- The huge blocks of text lifted direct from the sources rather than being rewritten/summarised.
- The poor image captions.
- The irrelevant and unexplained "family tree" consisting of just a name and a date of birth on each line.
- The very poor standard of writing.
- BlackberrySorbet 18:07, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Ways to improve Frederick Bee
[edit]Hi, I'm Matty.007. Mcpotbelly, thanks for creating Frederick Bee!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. May need some work on prose, but I will remove the other tag
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Matty.007 13:53, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Signature
[edit]It looks as if you have been trying to use a signature in your messages on talk pages & discussion pages, but you haven't included a link to either your user page or your user talk page. Please read WP:Signature. If you have been trying to customise your signature, it is possible that you have erroneously ticked the box that says "Treat the above as wiki markup". - David Biddulph (talk) 14:09, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 14:59, 7 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I also replied at the Teahouse question Matty.007 14:59, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Editor's Barnstar | |
Well done in fixing the issues I laid out on my page, I hope you stick around! Thanks, Matty.007 15:02, 8 September 2013 (UTC) |
Talkback
[edit]Message added 17:11, 8 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Matty.007 17:11, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:45, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:41, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Mcpotbelly, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! - I see that you didn't get a welcome link when you first arrived, so there are probably a few things that you haven't read yet. - David Biddulph (talk) 12:55, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Your user page
[edit]Your user page User:Mcpotbelly is redirecting to the Frederick Bee page? Theroadislong (talk) 14:00, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- If you look at the user page history you will see why. The article draft was originally placed there, & then moved to the AFC & then to the article. A redirect was automatically left when the draft was moved. Sensibly the user page might reasonably be changed from a redirect to just a link, if the user still wants it there. - David Biddulph (talk) 14:54, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
- I see now thank you...I've removed the redirect to avoid confusion. Theroadislong (talk) 15:04, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Lead section of Frederick Bee article
[edit]Please could you respond to my message on Talk:Frederick Bee than you. Theroadislong (talk) 17:34, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Mcpotbelly. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
November 2017
[edit]Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Hoodlum. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:
- Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
- Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
- Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
- Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
- Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
- Do not insert external links or references
Thank you. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:08, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Hoodlum(word)
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Hoodlum(word) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.frederickbee.com/hoodlum.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 14:57, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Hoodlum(history)
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Hoodlum(history). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Hoodlum. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Hoodlum. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 03:15, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Mcpotbelly. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Mcpotbelly. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)