Jump to content

User talk:Matthewedwards/Archives/2008/03

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

I've responded to your comments. I didn't quite carry out the changes you recommended, but they still give the same result (rather than changing the text colour, I changed the table row colour so they are now all white). Also, the episodes don't have titles. ISD (talk) 09:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded to your comments. Please strike out the items that have been resolved. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 05:27, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done again. Gary King (talk) 22:58, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded to your concerns at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of recessions in the United States. Please close items that have been resolved. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 03:08, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The March 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash (talk) 06:05, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am nominating List of wealthiest foundations as an WP:FLC at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of wealthiest foundations. If you have time, please look over the article and post any comments that you may have. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 00:19, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Responded. Gary King (talk) 15:38, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Responded. Gary King (talk) 15:55, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Matthew, I've attended the points you raised after reviewing the List of UEFA Cup winning managers. Perhaps you could have another look at it when you get the chance? All the best, The Rambling Man (talk) 15:21, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks to your support, List of autonomous areas by country is now a Featured List! This is my first FL, and I hope to have many more in the future. Thanks for supporting the nomination! Gary King (talk) 18:03, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a peer review of Facebook

[edit]

I have requested a peer review of Facebook at Wikipedia:Peer review/Facebook/archive2. If you have time, please add your comments. I wish to nominate this as a Featured Article one day. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 18:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have responded to your concerns at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of wealthiest foundations. Please respond back. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 22:41, 7 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Matthewedwards. You have new messages at Gary King's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You have requested on the above page that we link to all the instruments and school names more than once. Linking more than once is not necessary at all, partially because it looks untidy. The linking of the instruments is also not necessary, per WP:CONTEXT. Qst (talk) 12:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at FLC -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 04:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OTH DVD

[edit]

Sorry, I re created the page as I was unsure how the info being on the season pages would effect them getting to FL/FA status. I would personally rather just lose the info instead of it being on the season pages. Russell [ Talk ] 13:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Meerkat Manor meerkats

[edit]

Hi. I just wanted to check and see if you had a chance to revisit the list and if you had any additional comments for the FLC? Collectonian (talk) 05:21, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have revisited, and I have no other comments. I'm going through the FLC page now, adding more comments, supports etc to the nominations and I am getting there. While we're on the subject, Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Degrassi: The Next Generation (season 3) is dragging on a bit, and any comments there that you could give, I would appreciate. I know you edit some Degrassi pages, but this one you haven't so I don't think a conflict of interest would be an issue. Thanks in advance (if you do review). -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 05:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks and I'll give it a look. :) Collectonian (talk) 05:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Auckland This is an invitation to WikiProject Auckland, a WikiProject which aims to develop and expand Wikipedia's articles on Auckland. Please feel free to join us.

Taifarious1 09:52, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scottish footy champions FLC

[edit]

Hi Matthew

As all your comments appear to be addressed, would you now be prepared to support the article's promotion.........? ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As a personal rule I don't usually support/oppose based solely on the fact that my comments have been addressed. I usually wait for others to review just in case I missed anything, and see how and if their comments are addressed. I promise I will make a decision closer to the end of the 10 day period, though. -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 06:57, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[[List of UEFA Cup Winners' Cup winning managers]

Matthew, I've responded to your comments here, if you get the time, could you have a look at the article again please? Cheers! The Rambling Man (talk) 08:19, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your input is needed on your concern of moving the page. Qst (talk) 17:02, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input? Would you be ok if I added your comment in to a [show] box to tidy up the page, as all have been addressed? Qst (talk) 17:11, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have one templated in my userspace, I'll add it now. -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 17:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I need more Support votes for Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of tallest buildings in Toronto so if you have time, could you take a look over it and include your support or opposition? Thanks! Gary King (talk) 06:56, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look over it, but please be aware that this sounds like canvassing, and you might get in trouble for it. -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 04:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Matthew, I've added some comments at the FLC, it's a nice list (spelling bees, how weird are they for us Brits to understand the appeal!)... let me know when you're done with them. All the best. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:13, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know! At home we just used to do 15 question written spelling tests once a week in English. Here they home school kids so they can focus on the spelling. I have to say though, I watched the final for the first time last year, and it was incredibly nailbiting! I just felt sorry for the kids who came in 4th, 3rd and 2nd.. I just imagined them getting home and their parents telling them they were such failures and slapping them around the house! Especially when they lost to this kid: http://dcist.com/2007/06/06/spelling_bee_wi.php -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 20:07, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Degrassi:TNG GA

[edit]

Your welcome with regards to the review. The "reasonably well written" is part of the template I use when reviewing GANs, and in this case does not give the quality of the article justice. I don't think you'll have a problem with regards to that at FAC. Also, you'll be pleased to know that I am passing the article, and will be doing the appropriate work to promote the article on the talk page shortly. Regards, -MBK004 23:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou. Would you suggest a Peer review before a FA nom? -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 23:33, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It certainly wouldn't hurt, but it is up to you. Personally, I believe this article is ready for FAC as-is, but as I've said, it's your choice. -MBK004 00:04, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks! -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 00:07, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

[edit]

That's alright, I knew you were commenting in good faith. Though I don't comment much at FLC, I put Gary through his paces at PR. :) Best, PeterSymonds | talk 20:14, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know! I saw that! He asked me to as well, but I know nothing about social networking sites and such, and after your review, couldn't find anything else to comment on! -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 20:15, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From Gary King

[edit]
Hello, Matthewedwards. You have new messages at Gary King's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Yep, I'm busy, busy, busy... Gary King (talk) 20:26, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your help and constructive criticism. It's improved the list. The JPStalk to me 22:44, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regions of Peru

[edit]

Hello, a while ago you commented on Regions of Peru at WP:FLC. I think your concerns have been addressed since then. Could you check back on the article to see if it fits the featured list criteria. Thanks in advance. --Victor12 (talk) 02:52, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I gave it a conditional support, and that condition was met. As far as I'm concerned, nothing needs changing on my part, although I will strike the word "conditional" if you want? -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 02:58, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. Could you strike "conditional" so please? That way other editors can see that you are satisfied with the changes made. --Victor12 (talk) 03:29, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 03:33, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. --Victor12 (talk) 10:57, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PR and FLCs

[edit]

Sure, I'd be happy to. I'll get onto them tomorrow. PeterSymonds | talk 22:20, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 22:26, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No probs, I thought you'd want me to be thorough. Feel free to ignore any comments you don't agree with. Let me know when the copyediting's been done and I'll take another look, but great work so far! :) PeterSymonds | talk 19:12, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Did you get a chance to look at the two FLC to comment there, too? -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 19:15, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, am going through them now. I can only comment on prose and references, though, because I'm unfamiliar with all the technical requirements of tables and so on for lists. This is the main reason why I write so few comments on the FLC pages, because there's more table than text! I'll give it my best shot though. PeterSymonds | talk 19:17, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, I believe all of the critiques of this page have been resolved. Thanks, PGPirate 13:07, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Ida Makes a Movie
Stacie Mistysyn
John Ioannou
Riley Pathfinder
Siluck Saysanasy
DIY Network
The Kids of Degrassi Street
Triumph Motor Company
Alva Myrdal
Jake Epstein
Melissa DiMarco
Linlyn Lue
Dan Woods
Kitsap Sun
Evansville Courier & Press
Zoe Newman
Cathy Keenan
Maria Vacratsis
Linda Schuyler
Cleanup
Daniel Morrison
I'm a Slave 4 U
Father Figure
Merge
Spellbound (documentary)
List of songs featured on South Park
Hydrolastic
Add Sources
Sputnik crisis
Georgy Malenkov
Erich Honecker
Wikify
William Bent
List of All Grown Up! episodes
Xfire
Expand
Arms race
Alex Steele
Rocky Mountain News

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:30, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of public universities in North Carolina

[edit]

Hello, thank you for the comments to this article. I have a few specific questions, that I would like to ask.

You wrote: "As does Image:Www.uncfsu.jpg, Image:NCCU seal.gif, Image:Uncwlogo.gif, Image:WCU Seal.gif, and Image:Athletic ram color full.jpg. Some of them don't have any rationale and will find themselves deleted eventually."
I added Non-free/fair use image rationale for List of public universities in North Carolina to each one. Does this satisfy everything?
You wrote:"The free images should be moved over to the Commons"
So I should transfer all of the other photos to Commons, than transfer them back?
You wrote:"With the number of non-free images in use, it fails to meet the third criteria, and the remaining images, while looking nice, are so small that they're not worth including anyway."
Should I just delete the photo column? If the column does get deleted, would this help change your opinion on FL worthiness?

That is everything for right now. Photos are not my strong suit on Wikipedia, so I am still trying to learn everything about them. Please respond either on the FLC page, or on my talkpage. Thanks, PGPirate 00:31, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I am going to yank the photo column, with the hopes that it can be replaced, once fixed. Can the UNC System seal stay? Thanks, PGPirate 00:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the heads up. I didn't realize that a nominator should not do that. I used to use the checkmark, but didnt know about the {{done}} template, which is much easier. PGPirate 12:36, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FLC

[edit]

Can I ask you to reply here? Thanks, - Milk's Favorite Cookie 21:24, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied - can you also keep the page on watch? Thanks, - Milk's Favorite Cookie 21:29, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Any page I edit is automatically added to my watch list (and in the case of reviews, that page also) -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 21:30, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Do you have any further comments? Also, can you take a look at the other FLC (List of Super Bowl champions?) Thanks, - Milk's Favorite Cookie 21:34, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I finished all that was asked for List of Super Bowl champions Thanks, - Milk's Favorite Cookie 19:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I don't think I missed anything. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 21:53, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Are there any other comments? Thanks, - Milk's Favorite Cookie 22:20, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think so. However, I won't be supporting or opposing just yet as I usually wait until closer to the end of the 10 day listing period, and see if other reviewers find things that I miss or whatnot, and how/if they are addressed, fixed etc. -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 22:23, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done - Milk's Favorite Cookie 13:24, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Degrassi PR

[edit]

Hey Matthew, I've revisited the article and you've dealt with my concerns. I guess it's WP:FAC now? Let me know if I can be of further assistance. All the best The Rambling Man (talk) 11:26, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! That's the next step. Collectonian suggested taking it to League of Copyeditors, but they have a backlog all the way to Jan 07! -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 19:00, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I can help with a copyedit, but it will probably take me a week at the least. If you still want me to run over it, remind me again on Saturday the 28th. Cheers. – Scartol • Tok 19:43, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

USRD Newsletter - Issue 3

[edit]
The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, Issue 3 • 22 March 2008About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – It's all here.О бот (тц) 21:33, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

[edit]

{{Talkback}} {{Talkback}}

does this work?

[edit]

or not?

Reply

[edit]

Those FLCs are being left open until they have four support votes because nobody has opposed them yet. -- Scorpion0422 21:08, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

test

[edit]

-- αŁʰƏЩ @ 01:24, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Test 2 -- αŁʰƏЩ @ 01:24, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Test 3

Test 4 -- αŁʰƏЩ @ 01:24, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Test 5

Your sig

[edit]

Dunno about "very disruptive", but it is somewhat confusing, to say the least. --Dweller (talk) 08:47, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I resolved the reference issue here, and all the other issues from you, and The Rambling Man. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 16:50, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

[edit]

The GimmeBot handles some tasks, such as adding the closure box and updating the article history, you just have to wait for Gimmetrow to come online and run it (he's usually on in the evening, so it'll likely be done within a few hours). As for the mathematics list, I saw there was some movement but I figured there were quite a few large issues, but I'll reopen it since it hasn't yet been officially closed. -- Scorpion0422 19:51, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't realise Gimmebot adds the closure box. I thought it was down you or CrzyCheetah, and the bot updates the article and talk page. -- Matthew 19:53, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

I hope you don't mind but I edited User:Matthewedwards/Top bar because the icons were huge (they were their normal size - 500 x 500 or something?) Gary King (talk) 16:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my gosh! I just looked at the previous diff, and that's hilarious! I don't know why it did that all of a sudden. They looked fine before I added the two latest ones and I did nothing different. Oh well, thanks for fixing. I wonder why width=15px is different from width=15 though. -- αŁʰƏЩ @ 19:01, 25 March, 2008

I'm nominating List of billionaires (2008) for WP:FLC at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of billionaires (2008). Please leave comments if you have time. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 17:46, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All done Gary King (talk) 21:41, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm also nominating Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of billionaires (2006) in tandem. Gary King (talk) 21:57, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lead of twelve Imams

[edit]

Hi, we are discussing to rewrite the lead. Can you please write your idea about the last proposal. Thanks.--Seyyed(t-c) 07:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, both your issues have been addressed. Feel free to archive them/modify them as you wish. Qst (talk) 10:54, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anything remaining with the current commentary that would prevent you from supporting? Cheers, Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 01:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated List of acquisitions made by Google as an WP:FLC at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of acquisitions made by Google and if you have time, please leave any comments that you might have. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 00:44, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded to your comments. Please respond. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 04:45, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
done Gary King (talk) 16:14, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please respond back? The candidate needs more comments before it can pass. Gary King (talk) 18:08, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I replied :-) « Gonzo fan2007 (talkcontribs) 19:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! :-) « Gonzo fan2007 (talkcontribs) 20:39, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I have made all the changes you suggested that I can. Could you please take a look and see if there is anything else that needs to be fixed.--Kumioko (talk) 22:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I read your last comment. Can't you understand, there should be a problem and we must solve. Please explain what's the problem and why can't you understand.--Seyyed(t-c) 05:22, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orlando Magic draft history

[edit]

Hello, it's been a week since I replied to your comments at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Orlando Magic draft history, could you take a second look whenever you have time? Thanks.--Crzycheetah 05:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

D:TNG Review

[edit]

I've finished my copyedit, and left some comments on the peer review page. Hope they're useful! I also like your David Brent userbox, by the way. My wife and I are watching it again – what a tremendous show that is. Cheers. – Scartol • Tok 01:34, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I can't believe you scrolled through all my userboxes! -- αŁʰƏЩ @ 02:56, 27 March, 2008
The box for the notes is fine. I was just curious. The other changes you made look fine. Cheers. – Scartol • Tok 12:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Lost (season 3)#Merger proposal Gary King (talk) 00:49, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please have a look at the list now? I tried my level best to meet all the recommendations. It would be really nice if you kindly review the list once again and place your opinion (support/oppose). I am looking forward to receive further comments from you at its nomination page. Cheers! -- Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 10:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Responded. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 18:08, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken care of everything here. Thanks, - Milks Favorite Cookie 21:05, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. - Milks Favorite Cookie 21:14, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]