User talk:MatthewDalhousie

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jemma B King has been accepted

Jemma B King, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:20, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Pigsonthewing ! MatthewDalhousie (talk) 03:47, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Systematic page

Hi mate For more info on Systematic you can drop one of their comms guys a line - he's on Twitter as securitysplat. He's a useful dude. Methna7 (talk) 12:24, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Methna7 - and thanks for the kind suggestion. Will probably maintain a healthy buffer between self and subject. Appreciate the thought. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 00:58, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alliance for Responsible Citizenship

I also thank you for creating this article. Unfortunately I don't have much time right now. When I'll be less stressed, I'll create translations of the article in German, Spanish and maybe Portuguese, if they do not yet exist.

Best wishes

Tuncker

Portuguese? This will be a first for me!MatthewDalhousie (talk) 06:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alliance for Responsible Citizenship, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Anderson and Paul Marshall. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know that you're a Bot, not a Person, but all the same, thank you for making that fix up. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 01:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pacific Equity Partners - article amendments

Dear User:MatthewDalhousie, LizziePEP from the Pacific Equity Partners Wiki article here. I left a comment responding to your helpful advice a little while ago. I have mocked up some proposed changes in my sandbox (link can be found at the comment!). It would be great if you had some time to provide feedback. Much appreciated, and I hope you enjoy the holiday period. Cheers, Lizzie PEP (talk) 05:11, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image on Danny Kruger

Hello there. I noticed you'd documented the 'ARC Forum' conference and used images placed by the conference in public domain. You captioned one upload 'Danny Kruger in conversation with John Howard, former Prime Minister of Australia, at the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship in October 2023.' What are you basing the caption on, please? It looks to me like Iain Duncan Smith, not John Howard, and the date of the image according to Flickr is actually August 2021. --Cedders^tk 07:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It could have been the wrong date set on the camera, but the other photos in the stream are all consistent with the date of the conference. My question is about verifiability. There's also a lot of sourced work on ARC at https://www.desmog.com/alliance-for-responsible-citizenship-arc/ in case it helps. --Cedders^tk 07:56, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The caption is corroborated by a non-free image caption [1] and a Guardian story. [2] However, I don't do much image work myself and wonder what sources you used. --Cedders^tk 08:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there @Cedders. Yes, I noticed that the date on the Metadata is out of whack too. Some setting problem with their camera? But given that 2023 was the organisation's first conference, the date generated by the camera is clearly wrong. Yet the reliable sources indicate it was, indeed, Danny Kruger who interviewed John Howard at the Alliance for Responsible Citizenship, which is mentioned by the Straits Times for example. As to the date the report from SMH correspondent indicates the interview between Kruger and Howard was 31 October 2023. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 08:23, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply and the Straits Times link. I mistook the identity of one of the subjects (that particular profile looked very similar to another UK Conservative MP) and then the date made me suspect the image on Flickr had been edited. I've never seen guidelines on verifiability of images. --Cedders^tk 09:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder what would happen if I asked them to correct their image details? Wouldn't hurt. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 09:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome MatthewDalhousie! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:52, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

You know what, I will!

start again

the categories in Steve Baird were so weird, I removed all of them (they have nothing to do with steve baird) - please make an effort to allocate relevant categories, thanks... JarrahTree 13:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks for noticing that @JarrahTree. Must have been vestige from something else. My apologies. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 14:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

very very weird, always better to start anew than lift from elsewhere, it can be dangerous to do that - if you accidentally leave things like that, it reduces your credibility very quickly... JarrahTree 14:03, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sound advice. Honestly I don't feel that confident to start with a blank sheet, but perhaps I should be brave and just do that anyway. Again, apologies for the trouble and thanks for fixing. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 14:07, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

apologies are pointless, correcting it yourself is more likely to get it right - you simply lifted his sisters cats, (Julia) (very funny from this point of view) and I havent fixed it at all, the best advice is to reverse engineer a male compatriot's and adjust - for instance I wouldnt try Dan_Bourchier is a crap set of cats, whereas his brother's is very average Mike_Baird JarrahTree 14:19, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, that's the first time I've ever added categories to any article. Had never actually spotted those three horizontal lines before. Added 11 categories. Thanks for alerting me to this. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 02:37, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

I saw your comment at Talk:Noël Coward about an infobox. Just a heads up, the topic of infoboxes on certain featured article biography articles can be highly contentious. The editors who have spent significant time editing those articles are sometimes very passionately opposed (as you can see from the discussion) to adding infoboxes. If you decide to move forward with a RFC make sure to separate the survey into yes/no/discussion otherwise the arguing back and forth will discourage comment. Thanks! Nemov (talk) 15:36, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Nemov! Thanks for stopping by. When it comes to Wikipedia, I'm a lover, not a fighter. Not my style to move to RFC. I like interacting with people and seeing what can be done. But I did feel it was okay to share my view of how the article could be improved. Happy to leave it at that. Appreciate the note! MatthewDalhousie (talk) 01:26, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, probably wise. You're welcome! Happy editing! Nemov (talk) 02:46, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Miriam Cates

A citation is necessary for "After a friend asked her to stand" which you added at the beginning of Member of Parliament. Mcljlm (talk) 16:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Appreciate the improvements you have made to the article too. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 21:34, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it comes from that article in The New Statesman, which is in the footnote at the end of that first sentence in the subsection you mentioned. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 21:37, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where in the article is a friend mentioned? Mcljlm (talk) 01:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Correction, it comes from the "Women with Balls" podcast, at approximately 7 minutes and 50 seconds. Citation updated accordingly. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 11:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award

		Citation Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to MatthewDalhousie for collecting 1 point during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's FEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – – DreamRimmer (talk) 17:24, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello MatthewDalhousie and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
The project Academy has lots of useful information about editing and writing military history articles. One very useful introductory course to get you started is Writing a good stub.
Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 10:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the welcome @Pickersgill-Cunliffe! And thank you for the incredible amount of Navy material you have contributed!

MatthewDalhousie (talk) 03:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Pageau

Pageau is one of the few public figures I love. I have yet to see a single negative character flaw in the man. His work is valuable and important. I may meet him in August 2024. I hope we can continue to collaborate on his Wiki page. Tfdavisatsnetnet (talk) 02:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He seems to have many fans. And wiki welcomes anyone who can contribute to a given subject, if they have a genuine interest, but can keep within the parameters of an encyclopaedic tone, with plenty of reliable sources. Happy to keep working on the page too. I've done a bit of a purge of some of the fawning language, and removed stuff that was using non-reliable articles as sources. (Am about to removed goodreads.com as a source right now!) So I think it's in much better shape that it was last year. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 02:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was turned off by the 'peacock language' in the earlier versions of the page. Thanks for addressing that. Tfdavisatsnetnet (talk) 10:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on HOK (firm)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page HOK (firm), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know you're a bot, but because I like being polite, be aware that I took note, and I believe I fixed the bare URL problem. Thanks! MatthewDalhousie (talk) 08:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:HOK (firm)

I have reverted your edit on Talk:HOK (firm) as inline citations are not required for projects that have their own articles with HOK mentioned. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:31, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HOK (firm), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Office of the Chief Medical Examiner.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo for the Australian charity The Leprosy Mission Australia.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo for the Australian charity The Leprosy Mission Australia.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:13, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, there were two versions of this logo uploaded, and, ultimately of course only one used, so naturally I accept the deletion of the unused version. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 03:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited J. D. Vance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:28, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Collaboration on a topic

Hi Matthew, thanks for getting in touch. One idea I had for collaborating is to work on improving some articles related to C. S. Lewis? His main article looks pretty thorough to me, but perhaps one of the articles on one of his books or characters would be a good candidate? Sir awesomness (talk) 06:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would love to help with that. There are separate wiki pages about 18 of the books by C. S. Lewis; most of which are pretty good. The one that, I feel, could be better is The Abolition of Man - given how often it is used in contemporary discussions about the decline of Western culture. Perhaps the article could have a new section "In contemporary thought" or something like that. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 07:55, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Thanks Matthew, I'll see what research I can find on contemporary thought related to the book and go from there. Sir awesomness (talk) 02:09, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice one. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 02:37, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick White

Hello there

I have edited and slightly reworded some content you recently added on Patrick White and religion. I have added a section on White's Religious and Political views to cover the issue more adequately. I moved the comments by Greg Clarke to the Themes and Style section where it seems to fit better and added some counter views.

Happy to discuss here or on the article Talk page.

Cheers Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 03:33, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! Was just leaving you a note on your page.

You've made a superb addition @Aemilius Adolphin.

Really enjoyed it. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 03:35, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you approve! By the way, I think Marr is very good on White's commitment to the Anglican church in the 1950s, it's influence on his writing and his gradual disillusionment with organised Christianity. I don't see what else Greg Clark wanted Marr to say in a biography for general readers. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 03:40, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think Brian Kiernan (who is just excellent, isn't he) who gets it right here; there is "a division among critics" as to White's religiosity. So, good to have WP:BALANCE. Again. Thanks again for what you've added. Especially the "cursing a God I had convinced myself didn’t exist" quote. Superb. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 04:31, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Imane Khelif

Hi, in this edit [3] you said "A letter from the IBA was sent to Khelif advising him of the same". Him seems to refer to Khelif, but Khelif is a woman and I'm fairly sure has not indicated a preference for any other pronouns so you should use her and definitely not him. The only case where this would be acceptable on en.wikipedia would be if for some reason a direct quote was needed but I see no indication this is a quote, nor do I see why it would be needed here. Actually I can't see in the Sky News source where it says Khelif was advised of the result of the first test, only the second although only some pages of the primary source as shown. Also even she Sky News source itself uses her and other such pronouns anyway. Nil Einne (talk) 02:02, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I quite see your point. The section you've quoted did come from that Sky News page at the time, but it seems to have changed. I suppose that can happen. Since it isn't quoting the page any longer, I will ensure that my note reflects the language. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 02:55, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Tim Efkarpidis

Hello, MatthewDalhousie,

Thank you for creating Tim Efkarpidis.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I couldn't find a single significant piece on this person in a quality national source. He doesn't even appear that often in the mainsteam Australian media in passing that often (and nothing outside of Australia). The "NewActon Precinct" could be notable (as it does get some coverage as a topic), but I can't see that Tim Efkarpidis is getting coverage as a standalone person of note? thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Aszx5000 (talk) 17:43, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Aszx5000, thanks for this note. I've worked through your concerns on a fresh talk page section here.

MatthewDalhousie (talk) 06:59, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Erasmus Sydney per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The Little Platoon. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 18:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppets are online identities used for disguised activity by the operator. I have not participated in that.

I have stopped using certain accounts at point, for very good reasons - and informed admins of doing so - and moved on to use other accounts. I notice one of the editors who has made the accusation also uses another account. But that person won't be disciplined by admins.

I will not be appealing the block because I know some of those involved in the initial accusation are nefarious in intent, well connected to influential editors and admins, and so are extremely powerful.

There is is no hope for any editor who has done the right thing, at least by the instructions we're giving, but who has powerful enemies.

None. There is no hope for those who have made mistakes and wanted to set things right. I have never seen that supported by the system. I have never seen anyone take the brave step of being honest about their activity, then see that editor go on to be welcomed back into a healthy pattern of editing. Sad but there you have it.

I entirely respect @The Wordsmith for the decision made. I know none of this is personal for you. I deeply respect the work you do as an editor and an admin. You are an incredible contributor. So my best to you.

Happy trails everybody.

MatthewDalhousie (talk) 01:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for coordinators is now open!

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors September Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors September Newsletter

Hello and welcome to the September newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.

Election news: Project coordinators play an important role in our WikiProject. Following the mid-year Election of Coordinators, we welcomed Mox Eden to the coordinator team. Dhtwiki remains as Lead Coordinator, and Miniapolis and Wracking returned as assistant coordinators. If you'd like to help out behind the scenes, please consider taking part in our December election – watchlist our ombox for updates. Information about the role of coordinators can be found here.

Blitz: 13 of the 24 editors who signed up for the June 2024 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 169,404 words comprising 41 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

Drive: 38 of the 59 editors who signed up for the July 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 482,133 words comprising 293 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

Blitz: 10 of the 15 editors who signed up for the August 2024 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 71,294 words comprising 31 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

Drive: Sign up here to earn barnstars in our month-long, in-progress September Backlog Elimination Drive.

Progress report: As of 05:14, 11 September 2024 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 233 requests since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 2,824 articles.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we do without you! Cheers from Baffle gab1978 and your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Mox Eden and Wracking.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Message sent by Baffle gab1978 (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors December 2024 Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors December 2024 Newsletter

Hello, and welcome to the December newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since September. If you no longer want this newsletter, you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. If you'd like to be notified of upcoming drives and blitzes, and other GOCE activities, the best method is to add our announcements box to your watchlist.

Election news: The Guild's coordinators play an important role in the WikiProject, making sure ~~nearly~~ everything runs smoothly and on time. Editors in good standing (unblocked and without sanctions) are invited to nominate themselves or another editor to be a Guild coordinator (with their permission, of course) until 23:59 on 15 December (UTC). The voting phase begins at 00:01 on 16 December and runs until 23:59 on 31 December. Questions may be asked of candidates at any stage in the process. Elected coordinators will serve a six-month term from 1 January through 30 June.

Drive: In our September Backlog Elimination Drive, 67 editors signed up, 39 completed at least one copy edit, and between them they edited 682,696 words comprising 507 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

Blitz: The October Copy Editing Blitz saw 16 editors sign-up, 15 of whom completed at least one copy edit. They edited 76,776 words comprising 35 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

Drive: In our November Backlog Elimination Drive, 432,320 words in 151 articles were copy edited. Of the 54 users who signed up, 33 copy edited at least one article. Barnstars awarded are posted here.

Blitz: The December Blitz will begin at 00:00 on 15 December (UTC) and will end on 21 December at 23:59. Sign up here. Barnstars awarded will be posted here.

Progress report: As of 22:12, 7 December 2024 (UTC), GOCE copy editors have completed 333 requests since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 2,401 articles.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Mox Eden and Wracking.

To stop receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Message sent by Baffle_gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:49, 7 December 2024 (UTC).[reply]