User talk:Mark at RAEng

Looking to collaborate on engineering-focused projects, feel free to message me.Mark at RAEng (talk) 11:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: National Engineering Day (October 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Primary sources do not establish notability per WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National Engineering Day and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mark at RAEng! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mark at RAEng. Thank you for your work on John Lazar (engineer). Bastun, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi Mark, nice work on your new article. It would benefit from being added to appropriate categories and Wikiprojects - at minimum, the Biogrpahy wikiproject.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:36, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Harish Bhaskaran

Hello, Mark at RAEng,

Thank you for creating Harish Bhaskaran.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

No significant indication cation of notability, plus far too much peacock. Please rewrite and resubmit.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ldm1954 (talk) 08:13, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Harish Bhaskaran moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Harish Bhaskaran. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because as a Wikipedia in residence you should know better, both the peacock and lack of notability validation.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 08:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:National Engineering Day

Hello, Mark at RAEng. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:National Engineering Day, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:National Engineering Day

Hello, Mark at RAEng. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "National Engineering Day".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Mark at RAEng. Thank you for your work on Suzanne Farid. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for starting this page for a UCL professor of Engineering. I've linked it to Wikidata, somethings that's often worth doing when you're starting new pages. It would also be helpful to intengrate it into Wikipedia by linking it from other pages. One way of doing this is to link Farid's page as part of the articles of hers that are cited on other pages; there's an optional element in the template:cite journal for doing this.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 12:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Mark at RAEng. Thank you for your work on Sean Gong. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

He may be notable. However, he is marked as FREng without a source, and no other peer awards are given, just business ones. Please add to better price notability and ping me when you have so I can check.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 11:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joshua Macabuag

The article Joshua Macabuag has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:NACADEMIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Moriwen (talk) 23:32, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm Edwardx. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Edwardx (talk) 09:53, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Edwardx (talk) 09:56, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Pratima Rangarajan, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Mark at RAEng, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mark at RAEng|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:38, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Mark at RAEng. Thank you for your work on Hussam Jouhara. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please addcitations

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 11:33, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pratima Rangarajan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Pratima Rangarajan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:37, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hussam Jouhara moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hussam Jouhara. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:40, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Roni Savage moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Roni Savage. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 09:24, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Mark at RAEng. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 09:26, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harish Bhaskaran (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilsebatti was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harish Bhaskaran and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thilsebatti (talk) 05:48, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harish Bhaskaran (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilsebatti was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harish Bhaskaran and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thilsebatti (talk) 05:48, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]