User talk:Marchjuly/Archives/2015/September
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Marchjuly. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
2023;Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022;Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021;Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020;Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019;Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018;Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017;Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016:Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015:Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014:Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013:Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Disambiguation link notification for September 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jose Roy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Filipino and Public Service Commission. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello Marchjuly, thanks for using the mop on WP:NFCR :). But you have to put the "archive top" element immediately below the section header, so that the section header itself is not part of the blue box (and we really should have some kind of tool for that function). I'd fix it, but I don't want to edit conflict you, in case you are still working on the page. GermanJoe (talk) 01:23, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. I kinda had the feeling I was doing something wrong. I'll go back and clean things up. - Marchjuly (talk) 01:24, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- No biggie. If you don't mind a second quick tip - when closing "keep" cases please double-check the images for remaining Template:non-free review templates and remove them (I am almost sure, that there is no bot to remove them later). I have checked all and removed a few from the current "keep" cases. Thanks for helping out with this task (I'll need to be less lazy myself and clean up some too). GermanJoe (talk) 10:38, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the advice GermanJoe. Actually, I was waiting until the threads were archived so that I could save a step by converting the "non-free review" to "{{non-free reviewed}}", but removing the templates right a way is no problem for me. - Marchjuly (talk) 12:28, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
- No biggie. If you don't mind a second quick tip - when closing "keep" cases please double-check the images for remaining Template:non-free review templates and remove them (I am almost sure, that there is no bot to remove them later). I have checked all and removed a few from the current "keep" cases. Thanks for helping out with this task (I'll need to be less lazy myself and clean up some too). GermanJoe (talk) 10:38, 28 September 2015 (UTC)