Jump to content

User talk:MaranoFan/Archive 13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15→Archive 20

Promotion of Made You Look (Meghan Trainor song)

Congratulations, MaranoFan! The article you nominated, Made You Look (Meghan Trainor song), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:05, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Another job very well done! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 12:26, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Thank you! Your insightful comments at the PR greatly helped.--NØ 13:28, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-retired

Hello again. Congrats on your latest FAC promotion. Apologies if this comes across as intrusive, but I have noticed that you have put the semi-retired template on your talk page, and I just wanted to reach out to make sure everything was okay. Aoba47 (talk) 21:42, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for checking, Aoba47! Everything is fine on the real life/health front. I'm just having a knee-jerk reaction to my new nomination not doing as well as the last one. It is also difficult to cope with watching five music FACs nominated at the same time when I had gatekept this as a somewhat unique achievement in my head over the past few years. Anyways, hopefully I'll regain inspiration and this will just be a phase. I guess I am starting to understand what HĐ felt when they decided to quit, lol.--NØ 03:02, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for the response. I am glad that you are doing well. I can completely understand that, and it is a fair response. It is possible in some sense that your past music FACs have inspired other editors or helped to ope the door to make them more acceptable in that space. Just to put a more positive spin on it. I do think the FAC space has changed over the years, but I am not exactly sure how to explain it.
On a somewhat related tangent, I always get disappointed and discouraged whenever I see editors put down work on entertainment-based articles because at the end of the day, Wikipedia is a volunteer service and we should respect what other editors are interested in and the time and energy they put into the site. To me, it is such a weird thing to be outraged about since Wikipedia is such a large place that no one is being forced to look at topics they do not enjoy.
Anyways, I hope you do get inspired again in the future, but if not, you have done a lot of work on here that you should be proud of. Breaks can be very important to figure this out and sometimes, it is necessary to walk away and let things go (but not saying you have to). I have been less inspired lately as well, but for me, it is more so trying to put more focus on off-Wiki activities. I do miss HĐ, and I hope that he is happy and proud of the work still being done on the Swift articles. Aoba47 (talk) 15:27, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Honestly, it's really great to even be able to share this with someone. This is something I have been feeling for a while. Thanks for hearing me out and not being judgemental. I believe you have retired a few times as well after frustrations at FAC so I really appreciate you sharing your perspectives on this. Obviously, I can't ask other people to stop submitting FACs so I am just going to have to deal with it. I think another weird thing is how editors who are clearly influenced by me would rather ignore my FAC nominations and pretend I don't exist. I remember when I was starting out, I always made it a point to acknowledge you and HĐ as my influences, lol. Anyways, this rant is starting to sound like a Nicki Minaj tweet so I'll stop now. Hope you are having a great weekend!--NØ 06:35, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
You are all good. I think it is important to share these kinds of things, and it is much than keeping them bottled up. I probably have annoyed a lot people by going back and forth with retirement over the years. I appreciated that you have listed me as an influence in the past, and it was very humbling since it was and still is difficult to see such impact on this kind of platform. HĐ was a very solid editor who I believe still impacts a lot of editors on here through their work.
I can understand your feelings regarding this, and although I am sure your work has influenced other as well, I can understand feeling a certain way if it is not brought forward to you directly. I hope you are having a great weekend as well! I am still trying to balance out my schedule and time management. I know I have been saying that on here for years so here's hoping it finally connects (with work on my part of course). I have passed your FAC source review by the way. I thought it would help you a lot to get that done early in the nomination process, but I will likely take an extended break from reviews so apologies in advance for not getting to any future nominations if you choose to do more. Aoba47 (talk) 18:10, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Takin' It Back

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Takin' It Back you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 19:24, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Takin' It Back

The article Takin' It Back you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Takin' It Back and Talk:Takin' It Back/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Takin' It Back

The article Takin' It Back you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Takin' It Back for comments about the article, and Talk:Takin' It Back/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:01, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next_issue/Next_featured_content

So, writing this up at the moment, and I need to ask one thing about Made You Look: It premiered in... Candy Crush Saga? Is that a thing that happens now? Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.2% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 22:39, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Hey Adam, love the poem, lol. The music video for this song did premiere on Candy Crush Saga. I initially found it odd too but whatever strategy they used for this song clearly worked, so I'm not mad in retrospect.--NØ 07:07, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Fair enough. Not something I've ever heard about anyone else doing. Might have to mention that - get a photo of Trainor and mention that in the caption. That's a hell of a DYK hook. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.2% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 17:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Oh My God (Adele song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Oh My God (Adele song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:41, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

"lips are movin"

MaranoFan, i had a question regarding this article and the associated blurb. the statement that the music video for this song is "the first [music video] created entirely by social media influencers" appears to be a rather bold claim that i admittedly find hard to believe. for example, i would assume that the self-made music videos by laina that predate "lips are movin" would be considered earlier music videos created entirely by a social media influencer. i noticed that the cited billboard source hedges the statement by reporting that trainor's video is "billed as the first-ever music video to be created entirely by social influencers".

i presume that, if the claim is actually true, a very specific definition of "music video" is being used. furthermore, since philip andelman is singled out in the blurb as the music video's director, and the wikipedia article on him appears to mention nothing that would lead me to believe that he could be credibly called a social media influencer, the claim would also appear to need to use a very specific definition of "created" that would not include directors amongst the creators of a music video. in addition, wikipedia's own definition of "music video" appears to be rather inclusive, so i think that if we are going to be presenting this claim in wikivoice, we should be qualifying the statement appropriately, and i admittedly do not know what qualifications would be necessary.

instead, would you be amenable to simply replacing "the first created entirely by social media influencers" with "said to be the first created entirely by social media influencers" or something similar? dying (talk) 14:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

April songs
my story today

Thank you today for the article, "about Meghan Trainor's second single "Lips Are Movin", which she wrote within eight minutes. Almost every critic that reviewed it compared this song to Trainor's debut single, and its release made Trainor the fifth female artist in Billboard Hot 100 history to follow her debut number-one single directly with a second top-five. Additionally, it is noteworthy as the first-ever music video made entirely by social media influencers."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the message, Gerda Arendt! I really appreciate your constant encouragement given how overcompetitive this space can feel sometimes.--NØ 11:34, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Thank you, and now congrats for the next FA! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:38, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
I loved to see Marian Anderson and her story of protest against discrimination by singing on Easter Sunday 9 April 1939 on the Main page yesterday. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:23, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
My story today, Messiah (Handel), was my first dip into the FA ocean, thanks to great colleagues. - a few pics added, one day missing --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:14, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Today is the 80th birthday of John Eliot Gardiner. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:18, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Million Awards

The Quarter Million Award
For your contributions to bring Deja Vu (Olivia Rodrigo song) (estimated annual readership: 288,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 04:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
The Quarter Million Award
For your contributions to bring Made You Look (Meghan Trainor song) (estimated annual readership: 270,000) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 04:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Oh My God (Adele song)

The article Oh My God (Adele song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Oh My God (Adele song) and Talk:Oh My God (Adele song)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:03, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Well done on such a quick pass, however I wish there was more reviewers around not only to take on everyone else's articles but mine too since I've got like five in the queue at the minute! --K. Peake 12:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Oh My God (Adele song)

The article Oh My God (Adele song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Oh My God (Adele song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Oh My God (Adele song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 13:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Promotion of Me Too (Meghan Trainor song)

Congratulations, MaranoFan! The article you nominated, Me Too (Meghan Trainor song), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

New "I Drink Wine" coverage

Hello again. I am sure you are already aware of this, but Adele has performed "I Drink Wine" on James Corden's Carpool Karaoke, and there has been some renewed coverage on it. An IP user has added some information to the article with this edit, although they did not add any additional coverage to support this in the article. I just wanted to raise this to your attention if you were not already aware of it. Hope you are having a solid start to your week! Aoba47 (talk) 05:10, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Hey Aoba47, it's great to hear from you again! For some reason I was out of the loop on this so I really appreciate you bringing this to my attention. I have added a brief mention to the article since that section already looked quite big to me. Hope your week is going great as well!--NØ 21:30, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
I am glad that I could help! To be honest, this just happened so it is not like you were really out of the loop long. I noticed it on a pop music subreddit, and I think it would be best to let you know. Your edits look appropriate to me. Thank you for the kind words! Aoba47 (talk) 23:59, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 May newsletter

The second round of the 2023 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to have scored 60 points to advance into round 3. Our top five scorers in round 2 all included a featured article among their submissions and each scored over 500 points. They were:

Other notable performances were put in by Sammi Brie, Thebiguglyalien, MyCatIsAChonk, Chicago PCN02WPS, and London AirshipJungleman29.

So far contestants have achieved thirteen featured articles between them, one being a joint effort, and forty-nine good articles. The judges are pleased with the thorough reviews that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Takin' It Back

On 4 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Takin' It Back, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an earlier title going viral on TikTok prompted Meghan Trainor to take it back to doo-wop, which made them look again? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Takin' It Back. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Takin' It Back), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 12:02, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mother (Meghan Trainor song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mother (Meghan Trainor song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 06:33, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mother (Meghan Trainor song)

The article Mother (Meghan Trainor song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mother (Meghan Trainor song) and Talk:Mother (Meghan Trainor song)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:02, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Wishing MaranoFan a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee!   interstatefive  00:10, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Thank you! Unfortunately, not many irl people remembered it this year. I really appreciate the message.--NØ 04:26, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mother (Meghan Trainor song)

The article Mother (Meghan Trainor song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mother (Meghan Trainor song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Mother (Meghan Trainor song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:42, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Meghan Trainor

Hello again! Sorry for the super random message, but for whatever reason while I was reviewing Takin' It Back, I was reminded of "With You" and how much that I enjoyed it. It is interesting to look back on the brief moment that Trainor had more dance-oriented music.

I know in the past I said "Like I'm Gonna Lose You" was my favorite Trainor song, but in retrospect, I think my favorite is really "Wave". The lyrics just really connected with me, the production was fun and different for her, and I still think it is a shame it never really took off. I fully get why Trainor returned to her doo-wop sound, and while it is not for me, I also fully get why she focused her career more on TikTok, but I wish she had experimented more with electronic music.

Your FAC also reminded me of Trainor's song from Songland and that show in general. That show has seemingly been forgotten by everyone, which is a shame since a show highlighting songwriters was such a great idea on paper. Just thought it was interesting how many random memories a FAC could bring back lol. I just felt like sharing that with you. Aoba47 (talk) 18:15, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Hey, Aoba47! Honestly, I think the music Trainor was releasing during the Treat Myself and album delay era was some of her best. The song from Songland was called "Hurt Me", and that was one of my favorites too. I often think about how "Let You Be Right" predicted the disco revival that happened earlier this decade. It is a shame the commercial underperformance probably scared her away from doing that sound again. I haven't even tried to think about bringing Treat Myself to FAC because of how much that article depends on less reputed sources, lol.--NØ 21:28, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
I could see your point about "Let You Be Right". It has a great production that I think would have been better appreciated if done with a different artist. I've seen a lot of people say that Trainor does the same song over and over again, and I think this era does show her versatility. "Nice to Meet Ya" was another example of her doing something slightly different and The Love Train has a solid mixture of styles.
I understand your concerns with sourcing with the FAC process, and I have been there before. Even with sources I know are considered high-quality, it is a concern in the back of my mind. I hope this is okay to ask, but do you have any articles in mind for future FACs? I've seen your work on "Mother", and I was curious if that would be in the FAC pipeline? Aoba47 (talk) 22:24, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
I think it's tough to predict my future with regard to FAs. Unfortunately, the whole FA process gives me a negative vibe nowadays. I feel a little too overexposed there, like Taylor Swift in her Reputation era or something, lol. I feel like some people want me to disappear from there like Swift disappeared from the public eye back then. I may start writing about UFOs or something to escape the politics of contributing to music FAs altogether. But it is very tempting to complete these featured/good topic series once you get started!--NØ 23:09, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
I would encourage you to pursue whatever would make you the most comfortable and happy. I know that is really cliché and obvious, but you should put yourself first. I always find breaks helpful. I am not the best at taking them, particularly on Wikipedia, but in the long run, it is sometimes best to pull back for a bit. Not saying you have to do that. More so just saying that it is understandable and valid. Aoba47 (talk) 23:41, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Takin' It Back/archive1

I have struck the words about inferring "moaning" to be a personal attack on me as this is not stated explicitly. Will you do the same for your lie about my purported "wish to withdraw from the review process" and aspersions on Gog's talk page about how I am somehow in a Four Award rivalry with you? Heartfox (talk) 18:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Dear Heartfox
You can remove the comment altogether, since no one has replied to it. The "My Man" peer review has nothing to do with the Takin' It Back FAC, and if you had an issue with my comments on the former you should have brought it directly to my talk page. The "struck" comment, as it currently is, is still off-topically taken out of context and seems to have been placed there to convince prospective reviewers that reviewing my nomination is somehow not worth their time.
Moving fully addressed reviews (which you explicitly stated) to the talk page of a nomination is normal practice which even coords have done on plenty of nominations before. They have already stated it will be taken into account pre-closing. Anyways, being competitive about Four Awards is not necessarily a negative thing, so I disagree that needs to be struck. Seems to be a random thing you have picked out to serve as a counterbalance to your actual aspersions on my nomination. Anyways, it seems clear nothing productive is going to come from us engaging on this further (given the continued use of passive aggressive words: "your lie", "aspersions"). This discussion has consumed me for the past two days and has been the source of a lot of negativity. I am devastated to say this, as a self-professed Lamb, but I think it would be most productive if we stay away from each other's FACs in the future. I have been hard at work on this article since June(!) last year, and you have uttered absolutely nothing positive about it since commencing your review. The fact that you are repeatedly indicating all of your comments have been addressed, but refusing to support, and trying to restore inflammatory comments on the review page blatantly indicates malicious intent. Given the constant bad faith assumptions, I have neither the strength nor energy to engage in this further. Let's do this voluntarily so I don't have to seek administrative intervention (which I absolutely will if the disruption continues). I do not wish to hear from you again. Regards.--NØ 20:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Four Award

Four Award
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Made You Look (Meghan Trainor song). — Bilorv (talk) 22:48, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Thank you!--NØ 08:50, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Neptune FAC

I'm a little confused by your edit summary there. Did you mean to remove your comment? ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:18, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

One-account restriction lifted

Per this close at WP:AN, your one-account restriction has been lifted. starship.paint (exalt) 13:22, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Talking to Yourself

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Talking to Yourself you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Unlimitedlead -- Unlimitedlead (talk) 00:22, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Talking to Yourself

The article Talking to Yourself you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Talking to Yourself for comments about the article, and Talk:Talking to Yourself/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Unlimitedlead -- Unlimitedlead (talk) 12:22, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello again. Apologies for leaving a random message on your talk page. I was wondering if you could do a media review for my current FAC? I completely understand if you would prefer not to do so. You've already gone above and beyond with the image and prose reviews, but I still wanted to reach out and ask anyone. I am very grateful for all of the comments and help that I have received so quickly. I did not expect to get so much, and it has only been active for a few days. I hope you are doing well. Aoba47 (talk) 23:36, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Hey Aoba! My comment that there are no licensing issues and there are succint captions included an assessment of the audio sample as well. I'll make sure to pop back in and clarify this should the coords have doubts about it. Hope you are having a great start to your week :) NØ 07:05, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Adele One Night Only

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Adele One Night Only you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pseud 14 -- Pseud 14 (talk) 14:41, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Adele One Night Only

The article Adele One Night Only you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Adele One Night Only for comments about the article, and Talk:Adele One Night Only/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pseud 14 -- Pseud 14 (talk) 18:02, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Promotion of Takin' It Back

Congratulations, MaranoFan! The article you nominated, Takin' It Back, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Congrats on this! Was about to get back to the FAC but noticed it was promoted. Keep up the great work, Ippantekina (talk) 03:10, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MaranoFan/Archive_13&oldid=1160765535"