Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bobby Cohn was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Wikipedia is really only concerned with what reliable and independent sources have to say about the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Telelaudo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Maosone!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bobby Cohn (talk) 19:58, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CNMall41 Thanks for your feedback, CNMall41. Initially, I included sources that provided more in-depth coverage, including those discussing the company before its merger. However, another editor advised against using those because it used the acquired company. The company is notable in the medical field, so many of the sources are specialized and not from general media. I’m unsure what qualifies as in-depth coverage since discussing awards and company achievements was previously flagged as promotional. I don’t think I can find other sources beyond those I’ve already mentioned. Do you think this article could be published as a stub so other fellows could help improve it? I appreciate a lot your help. Maosone (talk) 15:02, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the ping. Size of the page does not matter so having a stub would not make sense. It would first need to qualify under notability guideline. Unfortunately, I do not believe it would be notable if the in-depth coverage about this specific company does not exist. --CNMall41 (talk) 15:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tavantius was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Telelaudo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
