User talk:Mandeep Rumana

Welcome!

Hello, Mandeep Rumana, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Schazjmd (talk) 14:59, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rhea Sharma in tu sooraj main saanjh piyaaji.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rhea Sharma in tu sooraj main saanjh piyaaji.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:33, 5 August 2019 (UTC) Verbcatcher (talk) 15:33, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rhea Sharma in tu sooraj main saanjh piyaaji.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Rhea Sharma in tu sooraj main saanjh piyaaji.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 16:13, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sanjivani2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sanjivani2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image licensing

Hi, there are several problems with some of the files that you have uploaded.

The {{Non-free Crown copyright}} tag should only be used where the copyright is owned by the British Government.
Non-free files require a valid non-free use rationale.
Non-free images should be low resolution. 0.1 megapixels is used an a rule of thumb, see WP:Image resolution.

Please resolve these issues or I will nominate these images for deletion. Thanks, Verbcatcher (talk) 19:02, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Mandeep Rumana, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Ishq Subhan Allah have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

You are welcome. Kindly keep in mind the concepts of self-redirect (when the link you click redirects back to the article) and disambiguation pages.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:08, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Star Utsav.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Star Utsav.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Star Utsav.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Star Utsav.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raaz Mahal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gul Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:24, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Yehh Jadu Hai Jinn Ka !.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Yehh Jadu Hai Jinn Ka !.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 10:00, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sanjivani (2019 TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:36, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Nazar StarPlus.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Nazar StarPlus.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:17, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Meri Hanikarak Biwi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:22, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Yehh Jadu Hai Jinn Ka!, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Begoon 00:41, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Yehh Jadu Hai Jinn Ka!. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Begoon 05:08, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yehh Jadu Hai Jinn Ka!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gul Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Jag Janani Maa Vaishno Devi.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Jag Janani Maa Vaishno Devi.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 13:00, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:IshqSubhanAllah.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IshqSubhanAllah.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:44, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Malformed quotes

Hi there, re: this edit, if you are going to present quotations, then you need to follow proper quotation formatting. For instance "The show has grabbed the attention of the audiences with the plot" does not appear in the reference provided. Refactoring quotations is not allowed. There are some commonly accepted workarounds, but you will have to learn them on your own. See MOS:QUOTE. Either totally rewrite the information with unique words, or present the quotations properly, please. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:57, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You Mandeep Rumana (talk) 03:07, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You Mandeep Rumana (talk) 10:35, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT COPY

"DO NOT COPY" is a basic concept in academia. The content you added here at Yehh Jadu Hai Jinn Ka! was copied from here. This is unacceptable. Copying is intellectually dishonest and lazy, and constitutes intellectual theft. Plagiarism and copyright violations will not be tolerated at Wikipedia. If you can't write in your own words in proper English, then you should not be editing prose. Also, you shouldn't be here to promote anything, which is what it looks like you're doing by obsessing over a show's TRP ratings. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:25, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Re: this and your previous submission(s), you do not get to unilaterally declare that a website is a reliable source. That's a matter for the community to discuss if there is a difference of opinion. And when your changes are reverted, your recourse is to open a discussion on the article's talk page and seek consensus for the change you want to make. Televisionpost.com is not a mainstream source that everybody knows, like India Today or Hindustan Times or that sort of prominence. That doesn't mean that the information is not correct, but you still need to find a better source. And since you already have a history of making edits that seem promotional in nature, you need to start thinking about ways to submit content that doesn't sound like you're trying to sell the series. And since we're now talking about this, you need to quickly familiarise yourself with our conflict of interest guidelines and WP:PAID our community policy on paid edits. If you are being paid to edit, you must declare that along with who your client is, who is paying you, as well as any other relevant relationship. Failure to do so can result in your account being terminated, and any changes that you make could be removed. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:05, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Again you tried to add this source Here despite the fact that the reason of removal of the source was explained to you here as well as in the edit summaries. Please note that some sources are not considered reliable by the community, Please check WP:ICTFSOURCES to know which sources are considered as reliable and which are not. --Sid95Q (talk) 05:23, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are some Wikipedia Pages like Namah in which TelevisionPost.com is considered as a reliable source . Mandeep Rumana (talk) 06:05, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just because it is present on another article does not make it reliable. It is quite possible that the user who added that ref was not aware about the community guidelines and it was not noticed by someone who was aware about it. WP:OTHERSTUFF exists on Wikipedia but that does not allow other users to use same stuff everywhere as Wikipedia works on Guidelines and Community consensus. Sid95Q (talk) 10:05, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

English proficiency

Edits like this, where your vague writing makes it sound like Divya Drishti is in the top 20 of all television shows watched worldwide, are problematic. If you don't have a strong comprehension of English, you need to find other ways to contribute. Additionally, content like this where you gush about how "exceptionally well" the series is performing on the weekend is not proper encyclopedic tone, and isn't even supported by the reference. The reference does say that the series does better on the weekend than most Indian fiction series do, but that's not the same thing as "exceptionally well". If you continue to add problematic prose like this, I will have no choice but to interrupt your editing privileges. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:05, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did in this edit at Bhakharwadi (TV series), which introduced content copied from here. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:37, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Here you added content you lifted directly from here. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:43, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reply.First of all let me tell you that i am not a paid editor.I am accepting that i have done some mistakes while editing (copyright voilations) the pages unintentially.But i had not made any another wikipedia account.After getting blocked,i lost my phone through which i used to do edits.Someone had created an another wikipedia account on my phone.Hence my IP address was used by Mandeep8.But later i found my phone and i realised that someone had created another wikipedia account in my phone and there are multiple blocks against my account.I have very much contributed for wikipedia and i would like to continue it .I assure you that in further i will not repeat my mistakes while contributing.Please unblock my account. Mandeep Rumana (talk) 10:09, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On Blocking of my wikipedia account

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Mandeep Rumana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by " Mandeep8 ". The reason given for Mandeep8's block is: " Sock puppetry : Mandeep Rumana".

Blocking administrator: JJMC89 (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Ah ha ha ha, no. Come on, now. Obvious sockpuppetry is obvious. Furthermore, this account is directly blocked, indefinitely for copyright violations. Yamla (talk) 12:41, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly,i know the meaning of "Copyright voilations" very well. Copyright infringement pertains to the violation of someone's intellectual property (IP).In future, to avoid copyright voilations,i will not put any website's data in any pages.I will check my information before adding in the pages. I will read and research before using an IP that is not mine.I will check my words before using it.Secondly,when someone has your phone then he might have your details like your name,email etc.Please try to understand that i am not trying to mislead you.I haven't made any another account.You are looking at the mistakes that i have done but can't you look at the contributions that i have done for wikipedia.I want a last chance.Please unblock my account Mandeep Rumana (talk) 03:37, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please give me a last chance and unblock my account.i will not repeat my mistakes. Mandeep Rumana (talk) 02:09, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On blocking of my wikipedia account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mandeep Rumana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account has been blocked since 11 January 2020 due to copyright voilation. There is no any expiry date of this block.Please set a expiry date of this block so that my account gets unblocked. Mandeep Rumana (talk) 13:26, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's not how this works. To be unblocked, you need to explain what it is you did wrong, what steps you will take to avoid doing it again, and what constructive edits you will make. As copyright violations can potentially put Wikipedia in legal jeopardy, there can't be an end date on the block. It will be removed when you do as I have asked. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 13:30, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You must also address the sockpuppetry issue. Please read WP:GAB to learn how to craft an acceptable unblock request. 331dot (talk) 13:32, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mandeep, you'd best be cautious if you choose to open another unblock request, as administrators tend to get tired of multiple problematic requests. Abusing this system will quickly result in your talk page access being revoked. The two main issues you must ruminate on are 1) copyright violations -- what constitutes a copyright violation, why are copyright violations problematic? There are no fewer than eight copyright notices on your page, which suggests that either you have no capacity to understand what a copyright violation is, or that you don't care. How do you ignore eight copyright notices? And 2) you must explain why you think that you have the right to evade a block by opening another account.

Oh, and I have to ask, are you a paid editor? If you are being paid, per WP:PAID you must disclose this fact, as well as the name of the company that pays you, who your client/clients is/are, and any other relevant information. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:01, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On Blocking of my account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mandeep Rumana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you for the reply.First of all let me tell you that i am not a paid editor.I am accepting that i have done some mistakes (copyright voilations) while editing the pages unintentially.Every time i have improved my editing.Last time,while editing Divya Drishti page,I had added some information with a source that accidently resembles with the data given in website.Hence my account was blocked .But i had not made any another wikipedia account.After getting blocked,i lost my phone through which i used to do edits.Someone had created an another wikipedia account on my phone.Hence my IP address was used by Mandeep8.But later i found my phone and i realised that someone had created another wikipedia account in my phone and there are multiple blocks against my account.I have very much contributed for wikipedia and i would like to continue it .I assure you that in further i will not repeat my mistakes while contributing.I will check my information before editing and i will not put any data that voilates copyright. I request that please unblock my account. Mandeep Rumana (talk) 13:15, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per Cyphoidbomb, this is not plausible. MER-C 10:20, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Again, you haven't demonstrated that you understand what a copyright is or indicated how you'd avoid violating copyrights in the future. And your suggestion that you added copyrighted content by accident is ludicrous. How do you steal content by accident? Additionally, your argument that some mysterious person created an account on your phone, which coincidentally had the same name as yours, is completely unbelievable. The community doesn't care for lies. If you're not going to be honest with other members of the community, you should find some other hobby. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:52, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To any reviewing admin, somehow the editor responded to the copyright query up above. And Mandeep, to your repeated assertion that someone in possession of your phone created a sockpuppet account in your name, sorry, but, that's just so implausible as to be ridiculous, and that's why someone many years ago wrote WP:LITTLEBROTHER. Why would a random person who happened to have possession of your phone create a phony account in your name at Wikipedia so they could continue the same editing you were engaged in? That defies any sort of logic. Anybody who steals or "borrows" a phone is likely just to be interested in getting free calls or free internet or accessing porn or committing scams or anything other than editing Wikipedia in the same areas you are interested in. This defense is absolutely ludicrous. Stop lying. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:23, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:THREESTRIKES

Since you were again found to be violating your block by using the account DeepSingh5, per WP:THREESTRIKES, you are de facto banned from the community. Any edit you make may be reverted by any editor without regard for whether it was helpful or not. Any articles you create may be deleted, and hours of work you spend will be wasted by the single click of a button. I'll also note that even despite your claim to know what a copyright is, you still can't consistently present quotes as quotes or write summaries in your own words. Problem! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:30, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bhakharwadi.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bhakharwadi.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Yehh Jadu Hai Jinn Ka !.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yehh Jadu Hai Jinn Ka !.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jag Janani Maa Vaishno Devi.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jag Janani Maa Vaishno Devi.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jag Janani Maa Vaishno Devi.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jag Janani Maa Vaishno Devi.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jag Janani Maa Vaishno Devi.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jag Janani Maa Vaishno Devi.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Yeh Hai Chahatein.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yeh Hai Chahatein.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nimki Vidhayak.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nimki Vidhayak.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Yeh Hai Chahatein.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yeh Hai Chahatein.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:12, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Namah.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Namah.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:05, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]