User talk:Maliner/Archive 1

Rollback granted

Hi Maliner. After reviewing your request, I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2023-06-18. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @HJ Mitchell, Hope you are doing well. You told me to see you so that you will reevaluate my rollbacks. You are kindly requested to have a look. Maliner (talk) 16:08, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 21:39, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

‌Thanks Ingenuity!!! Maliner (talk) 20:38, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You're doing an awesome job in reverting vandalism... Keep going! Volten001 ^☎ 07:44, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Volten001. Maliner (talk) 07:44, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem.... See you around and happy editing! Volten001 ^☎ 07:47, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Study invitation for anti-vandalism patrollers

Hi @Maliner, thanks for reverting vandalism! I wonder if you are interested in our ongoing study for anti-vandalism patrollers. The study aims to evaluate AI models that power recent change filters, Huggle, SWViewer, and many other anti-vandalism tools. Your feedback can be really helpful! If you're interested, please check out our recruitment page for more information. Thank you for your consideration! Tzusheng (talk) 00:51, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tzusheng: Thanks will let you know if interested. Maliner (talk) 20:51, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol \| October 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IPBE

Sorry to say, your email hit as I was in airport 1, then by airport 2 and 3 it had all slipped my mind. Looking this morning, I’ve added tge IPBE flag for a year. Courcelles (talk) 11:40, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Courcelles. I was discouraged when 331dot declined it. Thanks for your consideration. I am unblock now. Maliner (talk) 11:43, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t be too discouraged, you did things right. You just happened to pick the CU who was traveling yesterday! Courcelles (talk) 11:45, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Advocatur Seeger, Frick & Partner

Hi - Just letting you know I have put Draft:Advocatur Seeger, Frick & Partner onto review as I have added independent sources and removed more ambiguous reference material, as per your recommendation on my own talk page. Would be great if this could be put through. Thanks - TheBritinator (talk) 22:15, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@TheBritinator Reviewed. Maliner (talk) 15:42, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Carmelo Pipitone

hi, why the page was cancelled? I just translated from the italian one. Kimbamy (talk) 18:09, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Kimbamy I have mentioned the reason in my move summary. We need WP:SIRS. Maliner (talk) 14:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. since I am not an expert what if i do again a draft and I put a tag WP:SIRS so that sombody can check if it can be a page ? thank you in advance Kimbamy (talk) 15:22, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Kimbamy Nope. This is not the way. You need to add WP:SIRS. It means you need to add sources which are independent, reliable and secondary which discussed the subject in detail (See WP:Sigcov). And submit the daft for review. Maliner (talk) 15:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, very clear. Have a nice evening. 93.35.147.158 (talk) 15:47, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome. Have a nice evening too, dear IP editor. Maliner (talk) 15:57, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kimbamy, it is not a good idea to edit without logging in. Please try to avoid doing so in the future.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:04, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. Sometimes I miss doing it. I'll try to avoid it. Thanks. Kimbamy (talk) 16:17, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November Articles for creation backlog drive

Hello Maliner:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1700 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023 NPP backlog drive - Streak award

		Worm Gear Award
		This award is given to Maliner for collecting more than 7 points per week in the October 2023 NPP backlog drive. Thank you so much for your continuous contributions to the drive! - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 01:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Illusion Flame getting award from future admin is really an honor for me. Eagerly waiting for your RFA to support you. Maliner (talk) 07:35, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023 NPP backlog drive – Points award

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		This award is given to Maliner for collecting more than 100 points during the October 2023 NPP backlog drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to the drive! Hey man im josh (talk) 01:51, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Hey man im josh getting barnstar from an admin is really an honor for me. Maliner (talk) 07:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Pauper Press

Why was the Peter Pauper Press page removed? Savagecrybaby (talk) 20:39, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Savagecrybaby I think I have already explained it in my move summary and on your talk that why was your older version of draft was not suitable for mainspace. Anyways, your draft was reviewed by another experienced reviewer Rich Smith who has provided much better explaination while declining it. Maliner (talk) 16:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gewan Island

suggest me the changes required to publish Gewan Island page

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Gewan_Island

Thank you 212.70.109.52 (talk) 09:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear IP. Please back up your article with reliable, independent and secondary sources discussing the subject in detail. Maliner (talk) 16:09, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol \| January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources q's

Hi there, thank you for such a speedy review of the Draft:Valery Fradkov I was trying to submit. I’ve read the articles about the sources and still not sure what should I add for this article to be submitted. Like, for example, will it help to include the medical websites where Dr Fradkov is listed as a practicing therapist? I didn’t think so. What about professional interviews with him? Like this - htt ps://link.chtbl.com/greenpillvalery or this - https://link.chtbl.com/greenpillvalery

SmartLis (talk) 17:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@SmartLis: You might want to read WP:RS. No interviews do not count for notability as they are considered to be as WP:Primary Source. We need independent, secondary and reliable sources having in-depth coverage of your subject. You might also want to read WP: referencing for beginners. Hope this helps. Maliner (talk) 17:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Got it thanks. I followed this {{cite journal}}: Empty citation (help) for magazines, academic journals, and papers - and added at least 10 links but I don’t see them now in the draft.

Like these: 1) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270542918_Effect_of_Surface_and_Grain-Boundary_Diffusion_on_Interconnect_Reliability?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InByb2ZpbGUiLCJwYWdlIjoicHJvZmlsZSJ9fQ

2) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/294777803_AUTOMATED_ANALYSIS_OF_CELLULAR_STRUCTURES

Still not good? SmartLis (talk) 17:41, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SmartLis. Ah, it seems Bbb23 has nominated it for quick deletion. You need to cut down on the promotional tone from there if you want to improve it. Maliner (talk) 17:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I saw that. Honestly, no idea why Im still here ) I tried to publish a first page. Learn and grow. Wikipedia is BIG. And I mean REALLY BIG. so many people, so many companies, so many everything. I met a person worth being mentioned/remembered , or so I thought. no promotions here. sorry to bother. I get it. you guys are doing a fantastic job. I just tried to be a part of this amazing community in my ‘spare’ time. again, sorry for wasting your time. thanks for the guidance. SmartLis (talk) 18:10, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in AfC November 2023 Backlog Drive

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	Thank you for your participation in the Articles for Creation's November 2023 Backlog Drive! You made a total of 51 reviews, for a total of 51 points. – robertsky (talk) 06:51, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: reissued to include 15 deleted reviews which were not included in the participation log as indicated at User:Maliner/AfC_log, which bumped the score from 36 to 51, assuming at least 1 point was accorded to each deleted review as I am unable to look at the deleted drafts to ascertain if additional points were to be given. – robertsky (talk) 09:07, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays!

– robertsky (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

– robertsky (talk) 06:51, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Robertsky. You may wish to see this discussion I had with Ingenuity earlier. Maliner (talk) 08:38, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

updated. – robertsky (talk) 09:07, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Robertsky Thanks. Maliner (talk) 09:08, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Robertsky: Happy holidays 🎉🎉🎉 to you too. Maliner (talk) 09:09, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

REMAP-CAP speedy deletion

Thank you for the quick review of the article REMAP-CAP trial. After looking at similar Wikipedia sources (such as the PANORAMIC trial) and reading some of your previous responses to people, I think I only used primary sources and need to add news articles as secondary sources. Could I please have the draft undeleted so I have the opportunity to implement these changes as well as any others that need to be implemented. CrazyRedOctopus (talk) 15:33, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CrazyRedOctopus: Since it is deleted under G11, It can't be refunded per WP:Requests for undeletion. Next time you write a draft, please try to write in a neutral tone instead of promoting one to prevent it from being deleted again. Maliner (talk) 16:43, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adopt me

Kindly adopt me and teach me. — Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) 21:32, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@QuadriOnMobile: Sure. I will shortly ping you on the adoption school page. Maliner (talk) 03:59, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Maliner kindly reply me — Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) 06:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@QuadriOnMobile: I will be back to you in an hour or two. Please be patient. I'm a bit busy off-Wiki. 😞 Maliner (talk) 07:28, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Draft:AI Hispano

Hi Maliner -- I'd actually seen this one, but it doesn't seem quite glaringly promotional enough for me to delete in draftspace, particularly as the creator is not trying to submit it at present. As it's not an area I know anything about, I'd left the tag in place so that someone more expert could look into it. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 08:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response @Espresso Addict. Actually, this was the version which I have tagged for speedy deletion. It appears they have made some amendments to it after my tagging. Maliner (talk) 08:29, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RMT

Hi, thank you for your contributions. I note your recent removal of several entries at WP:RMT [1]. If a technical request is contested, a requested move must be opened; removing the threads without discussion, as you did here, is improper. 162 etc. (talk) 19:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@162 etc.: You said that if a technical request is contested, a requested move must be opened; removing the threads without discussion, as you did here, is improper. Unless I am missing something, it is completely optional for a requester to open a requested move for a controversial move, and the RM noticeboard discussion is not an infinite host for those debates; instead, it should go to the article's talk page. As far as I know, those requests that I have archived were stale and were unanswered on the noticeboard for more than 24 hours. Maliner (talk) 00:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:RMT: "If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move." 162 etc. (talk) 17:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@162 etc.: And creating an RMT is not the duty of the page mover. The RM noticeboard is not the correct place to open an RMT. It should go on the article's talk page. Maliner (talk) 17:30, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contested requests get discussed. Please do not remove the request before opening a discussion. Thank you for your continued contributions to the encyclopedia. 162 etc. (talk) 17:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@162 etc.: This is literally pompous. Maliner (talk) 17:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And stale requests are removed. Also, it is not compulsory that every contested request have its own RMT. Maliner (talk) 17:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Robertsky: I literally learned a new thing today. Maliner (talk) 17:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Maliner you might have cleared the entries too soon though. And even if it is not the responsibility of non-requestor to open the discuss, it is a courtesy and typical for pagemovers to open it if the discussion is leading somewhere, i.e. the responses aren't a total shutdown. Personally I leave entries for up to 3 days in case there are editors who wants to open the discussion. I would also sometimes revisit these entries as well. – robertsky (talk) 02:44, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

El on a bender

Hey, what the fuck? It's not my fault the story's nonsensical, I didn't translate it! You wanna tell me you deleted my article while you're at it? Be more polite next time. https://imgur.com/uDuq0Ji is your proof. Temerarius (talk) 03:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think you volunteered to do copyediting on my draft until it's up to snuff. What do you think, can you show me how it's done? Temerarius (talk) 03:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Temerarius (talk) 03:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Temerarius,

Your article isn't deleted, it's simply moved to Draft space which is what happens with articles that don't have sufficient sourcing. It isn't a slight, it's a way of saving your article so it isn't tagged for speedy deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:39, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ OP did you complain to the admins that I called you out? LMAO Liz, OP said deletion for hoax. That's a presumption of bad faith. Don't get me bogged down in petty discussions. Help me find art and papers for articles or leave me alone. Temerarius (talk) 03:51, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Temerarius, there is no need for one to complain to admins if this page is already on their Watchlist for one reason or another. (mine is because I had given out a barnstars here) – robertsky (talk) 04:47, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Liz, let me put it this way. I post about controversial topics, and if I don't show that I have a spine, I'll be in trouble. Do you understand what I mean by that? Conservatives try to clean up after me to make the truth more traditional. I got little patience for poorly written apologetic scholarship. You can see how little patience I got. Temerarius (talk) 04:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

for email Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are most welcome, Jimfbleak the great. Maliner (talk) 14:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]