User talk:Major97

This is Major97's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Woohoo Storytime (December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by WaddlesJP13 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Woohoo Storytime and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waddles 🗩 🖉 20:38, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Major97! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Waddles 🗩 🖉 20:38, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. I'm still disappointed. But I can just try again some time later. I just wanted to spread some information quickly. That's why we have the Internet. How's your day? Major97 (talk) 16:50, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe me and you could both work together to create the article! Working together is important! Major97 (talk) 16:53, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bible Summary (December 19)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:04, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bible Summary

A tag has been placed on Draft:Bible Summary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Previously deleted. Against what Wikipedia is meant for.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:06, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh!!!! I just want people to know the entire story of the Bible! The amazing story of the Creation of the universe! The first couple who ever lived, a man who survived a mega-flood! A man who led his people out of Egypt and gave them rules! The story of a great shepherd who became a poet, then a great king! A man who knew everything and resurrected from the dead! What more can you ask for! It's like God's Survival Book For His Followers! Major97 (talk) 13:08, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Major97, I understand your frustration, but we have an article on the Bible already with more in-depth coverage of the topic and a standardized encyclopedic format. We don't accept drafts into the mainspace if they already cover something that has an article, even if it's written or formatted differently. I recommended seeing Help:Your first article before further submitting any drafts. Waddles 🗩 🖉 19:00, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks. I'm glad that I didn't have to make that article now. I also edited out a bad word in the already existing article about the bible. Major97 (talk) 19:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for you understanding. On another note, please do not remove words or content that you deem inappropriate, as Wikipedia is not censored and content of this matter is allowed as long as it provides relevant context. Waddles 🗩 🖉 19:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But Wikipedia is 10+! We don't want the kids to see bad words! Major97 (talk) 20:00, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Im sorry, Ok? Major97 (talk) 20:04, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries—many new users do misunderstand this rule. I should note that Wikipedia has no official age rating and will have articles and content that people may deem inappropriate for younger readers. According to its official policies regarding censorship, Wikipedia may contain content that some readers consider objectionable or offensive‍—‌even exceedingly so. Attempting to ensure that articles and images will be acceptable to all readers, or will adhere to general social or religious norms, is incompatible with the purposes of an encyclopedia. This means that, for the sake of educational purposes, 'inappropriate' content can be allowed. Waddles 🗩 🖉 20:07, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Its bad if you use it the rude way but not the educational way. Major97 (talk) 20:09, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is correct and I appreciate your understanding. If you ever need any more assistance, feel free to let me know when you do at my talk page or at the Teahouse. Waddles 🗩 🖉 20:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warren Blackie (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Warren Blackie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 20:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UUUUGGGGGGGHHHHH!!!!!! I WANT FAME AND YOU KEEP RUINING IT!!!! WHY????? please just stop doing this!!! I want my time to shine! sorry about that. I understand why you deleted my draft. The subject is just... mysterious...He wont even do a face reveal on his youtube channel. I just think he's pretty cool. Major97 (talk) 20:07, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Major97, your draft was not deleted and can see be edited and viewed at Draft:Warren Blackie. It was declined by another reviewer due to the issues highlighted in the gray boxes within the above message. If these issues are fixed by you or another person who edits the draft, it can again be resubmitted for review. I will however say that sometimes drafts are outright rejected when a topic is unfit for Wikipedia, such as if it does not meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines. Waddles 🗩 🖉 20:19, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you have a merry christmas! Major97 (talk) 20:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Based on what you say here and the fact that there's zero indication of notability, the draft has been rejected. This means you don't need to waste your own time editing a draft that would never be accepted anyway. --bonadea contributions talk 20:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I Already understand. What do you want for Christmas? its coming soon! Major97 (talk) 20:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to A Trip to the Moon, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 20:14, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Thanks. Major97 (talk) 20:30, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'LL NEVER BE A WIKIPEDIA EDITOR!!!! NOOOOOOOO!!!!! Major97 (talk) 20:32, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I WONT HAVE A JOB! I WONT HAVE A WIFE! I WILL LOSE ALL MY FRIENDS!!!!! IM ACTUALLY CRYING!!! Major97 (talk) 20:34, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Ice King, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 10:57, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And again with the original research. Your edits to Ice King are not supported by any of the sources supporting the rest of the content. Please stop adding unsourced claims. --bonadea contributions talk 11:03, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]