User talk:Madhusmitabishoi

Welcome!

Hello, Madhusmitabishoi! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 06:40, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Proposed deletion of Rupa Khurana

The article Rupa Khurana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actress who satisfies neither WP:NACTOR nor WP:GNG and cited to sources that mention her in passing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 06:26, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rupa Khurana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rupa Khurana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rupa Khurana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Citterz (talk) 10:03, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjana Ganesan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sanjana Ganesan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 12:05, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sanjana Ganesan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sanjana Ganesan. Thanks! Hatchens (talk) 12:07, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjana Ganesan (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hatchens were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft is being submitted without any substantial changes. Hence, rejecting. -

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sanjana Ganesan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sanjana Ganesan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hatchens (talk) 14:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Madhusmitabishoi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hatchens (talk) 14:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjana Ganesan (March 16)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Hatchens were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Hatchens (talk) 04:17, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Kashmir Premier League. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:57, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages

Disambiguation pages, such as Kashmir Premier League are only used to list links to existing pages with that, or very similar, titles. They are not the place to add information about the subject in general. - Arjayay (talk) 15:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Atika Farooqui for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atika Farooqui is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atika Farooqui until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Eatcha 09:08, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trivial

Hi. Please stop adding facts on "second-highest", as it is trivial. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 16:39, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kashmir Premier League (Pakistan) (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Kashmir Premier League (Pakistan) instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kashmir Premier League (Pakistan) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kashmir Premier League (Pakistan), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:24, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Elnaaz Norouzi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Elnaaz Norouzi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elnaaz Norouzi. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --- Possibly (talk) 07:56, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ek Mini Katha

Hello, Madhusmitabishoi,

Thank you for creating Ek Mini Katha.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

It is unclear if principal photography has started

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|NoonIcarus}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

NoonIcarus (talk) 22:29, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ek Mini Katha

The article Ek Mini Katha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable future film, fails WP:NFF. Should be deleted or moved to draftspace until release.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, I'm Run n Fly. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Rohit Sardana have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 11:22, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Rohit Sardana, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 11:24, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Run n Fly: : Wikipedia is NOT a promotional medium to just ignore critical aspects of an individual. We cant just mention lovey-dovey things for that person. If there are sufficient third-party reliable sources showing that person's other side, it has to be there on that article page. It is well known that Rohit Sardana was part of the Laptop media, favouring the ruling party at the Centre and giving controversial statements/tweets on minority community.--Madhusmitabishoi (talk) 17:04, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Rohit Sardana, you may be blocked from editing. Run n Fly (talk) 17:41, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

30 April 2021

I think you want to start edit war on page Rohit Sardana. Your edits have been reverted. Thank you. Your edits are against the neutrality of Wikipedia. Nitesh003 (talk) 17:41, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Nitesh003. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nitesh003 (talk) 17:45, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hello, I'm Nitesh003. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Nitesh003 (talk) 15:52, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your Vandalism on page Rohit Sardana was reverted. Nitesh003 (talk) 15:53, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rohit Sardana. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nitesh003 (talk) 17:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please stop adding Godi media link for now and engage in yourself at WP:WAR. The article Godi media is currently listed for WP:AFD. Run n Fly (talk) 17:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Madhusmitabishoi, I am also notifying Nitesh003 to stop edits that is leading to WP:WAR. Thank you Run n Fly (talk) 17:32, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding citations

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Changthangi does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. If you want to add a citation to existing text, you need to explain why it is needed. You also need to make sure you add a WP:Full citation. Kautilya3 (talk) 22:30, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You were warned before not to add meaningless sources, please stop Muhandes (talk) 22:05, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Zoji La, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 10:38, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

TonyBallioni (talk) 18:12, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Whore of Wall Street for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Whore of Wall Street is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Whore of Wall Street until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 18:50, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Atika Farooqui

Hello, Madhusmitabishoi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Atika Farooqui, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Atika Farooqui

Hello, Madhusmitabishoi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Atika Farooqui".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:05, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sanjana Ganesan

Hello, Madhusmitabishoi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sanjana Ganesan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sanjana Ganesan

Hello, Madhusmitabishoi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sanjana Ganesan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:09, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Chinese Census

Template:Infobox Chinese Census has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]