User talk:Lugnuts/Archive 20
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Lugnuts. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | → | Archive 25 |
Last.fm
Sorry about the mistake in the edit summary, the discussion was started on September 14, not September 19. My mistake. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:23, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Please note that I have done a procedural close to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 September 9#Category:Mathematicians who committed suicide, and created a new discussion about the related category tree at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 October 3#Category:Suicides by occupation. Feel free to express your opinion there. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:47, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Venice Film Festival
Hi! I'm an italian user, sorry if my english is not good enough. the 1940, 1941 and 1942 Venice film festivals were disregarded because of the interference of fascism. if you look the posters of the 1940 festival and the 1947 festival you can see that are both marked as 8th. for example the 1962 festival was the 23rd edition (as confimerd by the official poster) and not the 27th like in the template. furthermore in 1969 the festival was not competitive but took place regularly. --Errix (talk) 10:03, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello
Please be civil. I strongly suggest you redact your message. It's fine if you disagree with him, but if you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all. Erik (talk | contribs) 11:19, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- It's a disrespectful comment, not to mention off-topic in that particular thread. If you have an issue with his comments, bring it up with him privately on his talk page, though any chance to provide constructive criticism is past. Like WP:DR says, focus on the content. Bring up an issue if it really is problematic. I think he has a point about being too standard, and Ktlynch thinks so too. Erik (talk | contribs) 14:15, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- I emailed him about it too since I've provided some Saw sources for him in recent correspondence. However, this kind of back-and-forth will intensify because the other editor wants to have the last word. Like I said, it's not the forum for focusing on the contributor instead of the content. It's one editor, so in discussions, a contrasting viewpoint will not be cancelling out all others. We've all been the minority viewpoint from time to time. Erik (talk | contribs) 16:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Erik, I would expect you to point out that he is lying. This is not a disagreement about content. Lugnuts is lying. --Ring Cinema (talk) 18:15, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- I emailed him about it too since I've provided some Saw sources for him in recent correspondence. However, this kind of back-and-forth will intensify because the other editor wants to have the last word. Like I said, it's not the forum for focusing on the contributor instead of the content. It's one editor, so in discussions, a contrasting viewpoint will not be cancelling out all others. We've all been the minority viewpoint from time to time. Erik (talk | contribs) 16:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- Look at RC's contributions and the majority are NOT in the article space. Looks like I'm right and RC is the liar. Lugnuts (talk) 18:28, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
- If you both want to duke this out, at least do it on one of the user talk pages. It's not going to move that parenthesis discussion forward. The rest of us don't need to see both of you going at each other and trying to have the last word. Erik (talk | contribs) 18:57, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
I would appreciate it that if you are going to nominate yourself as a candidate, you do so meaningfully. I understand that you don't see the point of coordinators (I broached that topic as I announced the election), but it's something I want to try improving. If you want to help, great. If you don't, then it's fine that you continue to make article edits. Believe me, I want to do more than discuss about parentheses. Erik (talk | contribs) 11:38, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- Lugnuts, per WP:CIVIL, we're all expected to participate in a respectful and considerate way. Comments like these are not conducive. Have you considered not participating at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film any longer? I think you're a great editor and hope you continue contributing to film-related articles. I'm sorry that you dislike so many of these discussions. Erik (talk | contribs) 11:33, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- I agree that some discussions can be limited, but your aforementioned comments have been hostile. It's possible to suggest in a cordial manner that something is not worth worrying about. The talk page ought to be a place where all editors can feel comfortable asking questions or making requests. In other words, we want it to be okay for stupid questions to be asked, but we should be able to respond and say, the answer's not that important, adding more information about that topic for readers is. We want to avoid a chilling effect on that talk page and should be able to offer advice in a non-brusque manner. I hope you'll consider that if you're going to frequent these discussions. Erik (talk | contribs) 12:17, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I am saying to humor them. People have different perceptions about the importance of certain edits. Would you be able to take off the edge off your response? It's an acceptable point to make in some discussions, but it really could come across better. Erik (talk | contribs) 12:28, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- I agree that some discussions can be limited, but your aforementioned comments have been hostile. It's possible to suggest in a cordial manner that something is not worth worrying about. The talk page ought to be a place where all editors can feel comfortable asking questions or making requests. In other words, we want it to be okay for stupid questions to be asked, but we should be able to respond and say, the answer's not that important, adding more information about that topic for readers is. We want to avoid a chilling effect on that talk page and should be able to offer advice in a non-brusque manner. I hope you'll consider that if you're going to frequent these discussions. Erik (talk | contribs) 12:17, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Question
Greetings. I apologize for bothering you, but I already tried in WP:Russia and user:Ezhiki told me they are not very active lately and probably would not be able to respond. Anyway, I wonder if there is any chance that the article about Mikheil Chiaureli's 1950 Stalinist personality cult film The Fall of Berlin (film) could ever be promoted to GA status? Do you know a user who would be interested in reviewing it? I have simply encountered a number of much less significant pictures which attained GA, and decided to give it a try. Many thanks. Bahavd Gita (talk) 15:56, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
October 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Banners. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Please refrain from making personal attacks. This goes even if you are not naming a specific person. Someone is responsible perhaps for what you are seeing. It is perfectly fine to call that person out on problems, but to insult him without him even having the chance to defend himself is improper. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 12:21, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
LOL, you're not Eammon Holmes are you? He recently said something similar to Jonathan Wilkes!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:44, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Technical Barnstar |
| For improving our coverage of "technical" sound editors on wikipedia. Costume designers next! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:25, 8 October 2011 (UTC) |
I 've begun stubbing German films from de wiki, I will resume soon enough. Ever heard of Montecito Inn?♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:39, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| There was a time when I reverted some edits made to Pearl Jam, especially genre changes. For as long as I can remember, whenever I check my watchlist, it's your name I see. Good jobs sir! HrZ (talk) 09:44, 10 October 2011 (UTC) |
No problem, they are one of my favourite bands too and the edits are hardly clogging up my watchlist. It just gives me one less vandalism revert to do. =P HrZ (talk) 13:14, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- Those are some awesome photos sir. Some great views you had! I'm pretty sure a few friends of mine were also at the ISS Dome show in Germany. =) HrZ (talk) 14:10, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Bob Minkler
Hi Lugnuts, I just wanted to let you know that I took a look at your recently created article Bob Minkler-- It's always nice to see users contributing to make Wikipedia better!Amy Z (talk) 03:24, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
LOL
Nice practical joke. Fooled me!
Matthew Thompson talk to me bro! 10:26, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- When you put the reply on my talk page & the message came up I was like BS. But I double checked and what do you know, legit! Matthew Thompson talk to me bro! 10:31, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
2011 WikiProject Film coordinator election
Voting for WikiProject Film's October 2011 project coordinator election has started. We are aiming to select five coordinators to serve for the next year; please take a moment from editing to vote here by October 29! Erik (talk | contribs) 12:03, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi
Hi there, thanks for saying that you'd support The Human Centipede (First Sequence) being on the Main Page this year for Halloween. I just thought I'd let you know that I've formally nominated it now, so if you could repeat your support on the nomination page it would be really helpful. The page is at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests. Thanks! cya Coolug (talk) 10:25, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Lugnuts/Archive 20! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Talkback
Message added 12:11, 27 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Mo ainm~Talk 12:11, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
It's great to disagree, but lose the snarky attitude. You should know better. Toddst1 (talk) 17:15, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
WP:FILM October 2011 Newsletter
The October 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk | contribs) 15:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- I expect to see you as a coordinator in the next elections. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 19:16, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Stubs
Yeah, I know. What one objector hasn't pointed out is that actually all the articles meet notability requirements and could be expanded reasonably fully. If notability is not an issue... Is it not our purpose to identify actually notable topics which have been excluded so far due to systematic bias and try to cover them? Unless anybody can point out grave errors and non notability to any of my stubs they should just really be quiet!! It is always those though who never do any work on wikipedia with articles who turn up to moan though. As if I'm not already doing enough on here... ♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:11, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
I can see the all articles must be high quality approach and really I'd rather every article on wikipedia was of GA quality. But unless the system and approach of the project dramatically changes and all stubs and poor articles are deleted/moved to the main space and only GA level content permitted in the encyclopedia then they do not have an argument against mass creation. They have a point about some of the unreferenced ones though, so I'll try to add a source/fact.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:27, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Stubs
You contributed to a recent discussion about an editor who was creating many stubs. The conclusion was that this was just a case of a prolific editor, with no violation of policy. There remains a question about whether very small stubs are useful, regardless of how they are created. You may want to contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Stub/Archive 15#Minimum size. Thanks, Aymatth2 (talk) 19:33, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- And speaking of stubs, are you making a point of removing the two spaces before the stub tag on some of my edits? I started recently adding this extra space before because Wikipedia:Stub#How_to_mark_an_article_as_a_stub instructs us to do so, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:15, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
WP:LEADCITE
"Because the lead will usually repeat information also in the body, editors should balance the desire to avoid redundant citations in the lead with the desire to aid readers in locating sources for challengeable material."
It's not controversial information, nor is it likely to be contested, that the cricketers got prison sentences. The citiation is already included in the article, so it is redundant. --FormerIP (talk) 13:28, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the fix
Hi Lugnuts, Thanks for the fix in Sachin Tendulkar Page.I don't why i was careless while editing it.Sorry for it. Abdul raja (talk) 14:27, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Afd
the list is not well sourced. most of its sources are tabloid like news articles, with only a few book sources, and most of the articles are in a foreign langauge- chinese. this list actually constitutes WP:SYNTHESIS and WP:ORIGINAL RESEARCH, by putting together unconnected incidents.
Imagine if I culled news articles regarding every time a burglary happened, and created an article called "list of Burglary incidents", and used those articles as references, while sprinkling in a few book sources about burglaries. My desire to delete the article has nothing to do with the type of content it represents (relating to sexual body parts)Bunser (talk) 01:52, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi
why? what is your problem? they are important persons of greek cinema bye Greco22 (talk) 20:16, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
I didnt know abt this...anyaway I didnt put it on every single article, only on the most importants Greco22 (talk) 20:19, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Deletion discussion
Hello, I noticed you commented on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Missoula, Montana. There is a related discussion on some of the buildings from that list at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Interstate Center (Missoula). Any insights and opinions you can offer would be appreciated. Thank you --JonRidinger (talk) 14:31, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
You got some 'splainin' to do
Hello, Lugnuts. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic WP:WQA#Incivility (curse words, swearing) by User:Lugnuts. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:09, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- 2nd time's the charm. Lugnuts (talk) 18:07, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Peer Review
Hello Lugnuts.
I would like to bring to your attention an urgently-needed in-depth peer review on the article Ra.One. The article is 99% over, with only awards season to go. The article is strongly being considered for a GAN, but before such a step it is necessary to ensure it meets all requirements. Please give us an unbiased, honest and thorough opinion on the article. That way, we can clear backlog and move ahead with the GAN.
Cheers! AnkitBhattTalk to me!!LifEnjoy 18:16, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- Umm yeah. That's why you were asked to do the review. A person unfamiliar with the film and article has to review it. You aren't reviewing the film, you are juts reviewing the ARTICLE, whether it's fair, informative, balanced, presentable etc. AnkitBhattTalk to me!!LifEnjoy 18:25, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- ...Okay, whatever. AnkitBhattTalk to me!!LifEnjoy 18:32, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but do you have some sort of an attitude problem? The way you speak to a stranger like me doesn't inspire any confidence or goodwill. I can guess reasons for your sour mood, but do not put it on me. I am not responsible for your loss anywhere. AnkitBhattTalk to me!!LifEnjoy 18:38, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, so this is spamming. Your dictionary differs greatly from mine. I won't be bothering a prick like you again. Come to think of it, now I get why you failed in your co-ordinator election. AnkitBhattTalk to me!!LifEnjoy 18:45, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Not a good idea
Not sure why you did this [[1]], but it's not a good idea -- Ankitbhatt is allowed to remove the notice. At this point it's best to let the admin community review the situation and not respond to any provocation from Ankitbhatt. Gerardw (talk) 15:02, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Is it me though or are the editors on here especially irritating today.... I thought it was just me who was thinking certain people are just being completely unreasonable today! Don't know what is up with people..♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:18, 13 November 2011 (UTC) And still the dickheadedness continues...♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:17, 15 November 2011 (UTC) Can't name them otherwise I'll be warned for personal attacks!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:22, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Darn.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:09, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Ha, that cat actually looks like somebody famous, can't think who it is though.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:39, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Lists of Russians
See Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 November 14#Template:Lists of Russians 198.102.153.2 (talk) 21:48, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
You have new messages
Hi Lugnuts - I stumbled upon your page the other day - don't remember why - and had a good laugh over your "Messages" banner. So I stole it and put it on my page. Today, this happened: [2].
I noticed the note on your page about not removing this thing, and I wonder if you have anything to share about this, or any advice on how to proceed. It's really a small matter, but I dislike people removing stuff - it seems unjustifiably - from my page.
Thanks for your time. Best wishes. --Seduisant (talk) 00:12, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Elections 2012 template
Morning Lugnuts
Thanks for your edit to some of the council pages, but the community decided (see http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Politics_of_the_United_Kingdom) that having so many red links so early doesn't do the project any good. The consensus seems to be "Wait until later in the process" Hope this makes sense doktorb wordsdeeds 09:25, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
dates
Hi Lug. Hope you've been well. Tx for all your great work. BTW -- just a note to day I reverted the date format on Kurt Epstein back to m/d/y. It was the first format used. And it is also one of the appropriate formats, as he lived part of his life in the US, so we are able to choose from the three formats. Unless a format is not appropriate, we are as I understand supposed to stick with the initial format chosen in the article. You can reply here if you like, but no reply needed. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 16:54, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. Understood. I spent more time than I should have recently looking at the applicable guidances, as I've been communicating with an editor who thinks it is good practice to use two divergent date formats in the same footnote. Sometimes ... Anyway, I know you do great work, and simply wanted to leave a longer explanation than in my edit summary revert. I understand your rationale as well, and had that been the first-chosen usage, would have deferred for the reasons you mention, which of course are quite valid ones as well. There must have been much edit warring over such issues between other editors, because the rule (now) has a "default to initial usage if arguably OK" clause. Btw, I imagine you will be busy soon w/greater focus on the upcoming Olympics. Quick random thought -- do you think that if someone has now qualified for the 2012 Olympics, that they are automatically notable for wp purposes, even though they have yet to compete? If that is clearly the case, I may create some more articles. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 20:12, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
ITN
Would you perhaps reconsider your opposition to this ITN? Beatniks aside, an incident abridging the role of the press in this way is something of front page material. — C M B J 08:01, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Very well. Thanks for getting back to me. — C M B J 08:21, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Good Humor |
| For deleting this article (ha ha :-) benzband (talk) 16:06, 24 November 2011 (UTC) |
List of hospitals in Benin
Thanks for letting me know. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:37, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
2011 Pension Strikes
The proposed merge with another article is pointing to the wrong vote. Thanks for the support. I could not believe an article had not been started about this. After all there is about 2 million involved - and I was not one of them! I definitely support the strike. It is crazy they make these small cuts to other areas when the bank executives were given 850 billion for "bailouts" (or is that really future bonuses?). The bank execs should pay this back ASAP. WhiteAct (talk) 20:50, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Film November 2011 Newsletter
The October 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk | contribs) 22:41, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Future film projects
Hi There. I think you recently created a number of new articles on potential future films (Arthur & Lancelot, Liberace, etc.) which are currently going through the AfD process as failing WP:NFILM. But I just wanted to flag up for you that a couple of editors have suggest blocking you because of these new articles which they (wrongly, I think) asserted were hoaxes - see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic, Magic (2013 film). I don't know you at all, but you seem to be an active member of the Wiki community, and I think blocks are only for extreme cases, so I just wanted to make you generally aware of those comments and allow you to participate in that conversation if you wanted to do so. --Legis (talk - contribs) 01:39, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
stub templates and botting
ref: this discussion. Can you explain what is so critical about the placement of stub templates that it requires a block? There isn't even much of a reason that we put them after the cats but before the interwikis except that it's a convention we've adopted. It has almost know effect on the display of the article (it does move the category to the beginning of the category list but, other than stubs, categories are in no particular order to begin with). The bot was doing nothing harmful that I could see. BTW, I would consider moving the stub templates back to be a trivial edit and therefore not even allowed.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 13:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, but that is just a WP:Guideline and is subject to common sense checking; moreover, the template appears in exactly the same place whether you place it before the categories or after, so the purpose stated in the Guideline (but not referenced in the MOS) is fulfilled. Additionally, bot was moving a minority of templates and it was tested, it was using the highly tested category.py module of pywikipediabot. That is not an untested bot. I believe Reedy meant that he didn't have time to debug the bot script himself - but he did post in #pywikipediabot before the block was in effect, which is how I became aware of the issue. So, my concern is that Reedy was acting in good faith and the bot was doing negligible if any harm, the issue could have been dealt with other ways. I should have posted to the ANI the moment I decided not to block, declining the block so we wouldn't have had so much drama. I believe you should have addressed the matter with the bot handler directly and not on ANI, but moreover, I think your approach to Reedy did not demonstrate AGF and was an over-reaction to a minor issue.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 13:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- I'm talking about comments like "Oh the drama indeed. Now go and fix it" was a bit rude, we don't generally order people around here. "Someone block this fool and quick" : 1 - the word "fool", 2- it was anything but urgent. And for lead up, your additions to the thread here go from "please ensure you don't move the stub tag from the foot of the page" (the bot never changed the placement of the template on the displayed page that I can see) to notice of an ANI thread in 11 minutes. You were dealing with a highly trusted dev who said he was going to try to fix it, if he screwed things up he was more than competent to fix them or get them fixed. This just wasn't worth this level of concern and ANI is drama by definition, it rarely helps in situations that aren't serious and often hurts as I believe it most certainly did here. --Doug.(talk • contribs) 13:58, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- OK, you're welcome to that opinion. BTW, I did not mean to imply that devs are free to be rude.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 15:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- I'm talking about comments like "Oh the drama indeed. Now go and fix it" was a bit rude, we don't generally order people around here. "Someone block this fool and quick" : 1 - the word "fool", 2- it was anything but urgent. And for lead up, your additions to the thread here go from "please ensure you don't move the stub tag from the foot of the page" (the bot never changed the placement of the template on the displayed page that I can see) to notice of an ANI thread in 11 minutes. You were dealing with a highly trusted dev who said he was going to try to fix it, if he screwed things up he was more than competent to fix them or get them fixed. This just wasn't worth this level of concern and ANI is drama by definition, it rarely helps in situations that aren't serious and often hurts as I believe it most certainly did here. --Doug.(talk • contribs) 13:58, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
December 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 December 17#Category:Burnt-out Wikipedians. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. ASCIIn2Bme (talk) 09:42, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Haha! Lugnuts (talk) 09:44, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Cricketers who have taken five wickets on Test debut
Thanks for completing the categorization of "Cricketers who have taken five wickets on Test debut". Well done! StAnselm (talk) 20:35, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- "India" - Category:Lists of Indian sportspeople had several lists that established a precedent. I've moved the page. StAnselm (talk) 08:49, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- List of Pakistan Test cricketers who have taken five wickets on debut (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Bryan Young and Bruce Murray
- List of West Indies Test cricketers who have taken five wickets on debut (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Kingston and Vijay Mehra
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Accolades for The Artist
Hi Lugnuts :) Yesterday I edited the table by putting for almost every award the exact date of ceremony but it has been been removed by a non-registered user. I thought it was better to do it my way because I saw it on List of accolades received by Up in the Air which is considered as a model by Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Film. Maybe the person thought it was not neccesary yet but I was thinking since the film will probably win more nominations and consequently have its own accolades page, it was ok to already put the precise dates and even if the section doesn't get its own page, wouldn't it be better to have the dates of ceremony? Either you put the whole date or you don't mention anything. Don't you agree? What do you think? --Sofffie7 (talk) 21:20, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
ps: the system I'm proposing is kind of used for War Horse (film) but there the dates don't have their own column so it looks messy
- Mєяяу Cняιѕтмαѕ тσ уσυ тσσ --Sofffie7 (talk) 12:36, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Tis the season
.jpg)
MarnetteD | Talk is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec11}} to your friends' talk pages.
Thanks for all your work here at WikiP - especially on film articles. Here is hoping that you have a superb 2012. MarnetteD | Talk 23:01, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
X.One SOS 14:13, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Seasons greetings
ϢereSpielChequers is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec11}} to your friends' talk pages.
Hi Lugnuts, thanks for all the work you've been doing on the death anomalies. ϢereSpielChequers 23:35, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Season's tidings!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:57, 25 December 2011 (UTC).
Crime victims by nationality
Please note that the subcategories of Category:Crime victims by nationality are up for renaming again. Given that you participated in the previous discussion, you may be interested in participating in this on, too. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:07, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Fencing at the 1992 Summer Olympics – Men's épée (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Robert Marx and Daniel Lang
- Fencing at the 1992 Summer Olympics – Men's foil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Dmitry Shevchenko
- Fencing at the 1992 Summer Olympics – Men's sabre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Antonio García
- Fencing at the 1992 Summer Olympics – Men's team foil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Dmitry Shevchenko
- Fencing at the 1992 Summer Olympics – Men's team sabre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Antonio García
- Fencing at the 1992 Summer Olympics – Men's team épée (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to César González
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 28 December 2011 (UTC)