User talk:Lubegapius

This is Lubegapius's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Lubegapius/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Lubegapius/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:50, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lubegapius! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 13:50, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Legacypac was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Legacypac (talk) 21:06, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning WikiGap Challenge 2019

Hi, my name is Mia Jacobsson and I am working att Wikimedia Sverige. We have seen that you have signed up for the competition WikiGap Challenge and now I only wanted to remind you that you have to register your contributions on your own, if you have done some.

Have a nice weekend!Mia Jacobsson (WMSE) (talk) 12:29, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lubegapius/sandbox

Hello, Lubegapius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:Lubegapius/sandbox.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:36, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiGap Challenge

Hi! I noticed that you took part in WikiGap Challenge last year. I just wanted to inform you that we are running the Challenge this year too, to improve the representation of women on Wikipedia! For WikiGap Challenge 2020, the first prize is to go to Geneva and visit UN Human Rights. Writing one of the bonus points articles, about women active in human rights, yields double points in the competition. I hope you join this year too! Best, Eric Luth (WMSE) (talk) 10:28, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you though unfortunately my schedules are too tight for this but Thank you for the initiative! Lubegapius (talk) 14:03, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]