User talk:Lquilter/Archive 019
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Lquilter. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Cfd
(Parts of) various category schemes that you created long ago are at cfd (today and yesterday in particular). Oculi (talk) 11:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Category:Immigration-related organizations has been nominated for discussion
Category:Immigration-related organizations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PanchoS (talk) 22:11, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Art+Feminism Wikipedia Edit-a-thon
Dear Lquilter,
We are writing to let you know about the 3rd annual Art+Feminism Wikipedia Edit-a-thon, taking place over the weekend of March 4-6, 2016. Librarians were key catalysts in making this event happen, which is why we are reaching out to you, to see if you would be interested in organizing an event at Simmons. Thanks to a generous grant from the Wikimedia Foundation, there will be funding available to help satellite events pay for childcare and refreshments. If you would like to learn more, you can reach us at: info@art.plusfeminism.org. We look forward to hearing from you!
All best wishes,
@Siankevans, Failedprojects, and Theredproject:
Vkguf Rachel Takserman-Krozer
Hi Lquilter, I am relatively new contributor to Wikipedia. I have writte a bio of Rachel Takserman-Krozer, which has now been rejected a couple of times. Can you give a quick advise on what to change. This might help me further. Maybe I put too much material and/or wrong sources.
Many thanks Vkguf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vkguf (talk • contribs) 13:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Category:Anti-neo-Nazi organizations has been nominated for discussion
Category:Anti-neo-Nazi organizations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PanchoS (talk) 17:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
There's a merger proposal rgdg LeBaron group/Ch1stborn
...Here: Talk:Church_of_the_Firstborn_of_the_Fulness_of_Times#Merger_proposal.--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 17:40, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
April Fools? Nope! Welcome to the Women Scientists worldwide online edit-a-thon during Year of Science
Join us! | |
---|---|
Women Scientists - worldwide online edit-a-thon -
|
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
Category:Medical and health organizations by medical condition has been nominated for discussion
Category:Medical and health organizations by medical condition, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 18:03, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Category:Medical and health organizations by medical specialty has been nominated for discussion
Category:Medical and health organizations by medical specialty, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 18:03, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Pride 2016
As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?
- Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work here
- Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons
- Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)
Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.
This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:18, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Category:Organizations by structure has been nominated for discussion
Category:Organizations by structure, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Category:Aspects of organizations has been nominated for discussion
Category:Aspects of organizations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:41, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Category:Fictional journalists and mass media people has been nominated for splitting
Category:Fictional journalists and mass media people has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:27, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Lquilter! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC) |
Unreferenced articles February 2024 backlog drive
WikiProject Unreferenced articles | February 2024 Backlog Drive | |
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact.
| |
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Category:Bookstores by year of establishment has been nominated for merging
Category:Bookstores by year of establishment has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 01:04, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
Happy adminship anniversary! Hi Lquilter! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:33, 30 January 2024 (UTC) |
Category:Copyright attorneys has been nominated for merging
Category:Copyright attorneys has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Category:Trademark attorneys has been nominated for merging
Category:Trademark attorneys has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
WikiProject Anarchism checking in
Hey there! I noticed you're on the WikiProject Anarchism members list, but you don't appear to have edited in this subject area for some time. Just in case you're still interested, here's a little update:
- In the past couple years, we have brought four articles to Featured status, including the ones on Nestor Makhno, La Salute è in voi, The May Pamphlet and "The Day Before the Revolution". We're likely to get even more to this status in the near future, so stay tuned to the front page for some of our best articles on the platform.
- A number of our most vital articles have been reviewed and achieved Good Article status, including ones on Gaetano Bresci, Camilo Cienfuegos, Joseph Déjacque, Luigi Galleani, Paul Goodman, and the Kronstadt rebellion. As these "vital articles" are generally considered among the most important on the platform, we aim to get as many as possible to GA and FA status over the coming years.
- We recently hit the first milestone for our stub-expansion project, getting the number of stubs down to under 1/5th of our total articles. This means that the vast majority of our articles are now relatively substantial, as we expand and add greater detail to the articles that lack sufficient information. We hope to narrow this number down even further, so more articles have the information they deserve.
- We just started a cleanup drive, in which we are aiming to resolve the problematic parts of our articles, from finding citations for unsourced sections to fixing up formatting errors. In doing this, we intend to make sure our articles provide the best possible reading experience, without unsourced claims or ugly tags littering the page.
If you want to get more involved in the project, please feel free! We always need an extra pair of hands to help out with our ever-growing project. If you want to help out with one of the above efforts, go right ahead. If you want to keep more up to date with the project's activities, consider adding our noticeboard to your watchlist or adding your name to our mailing list. On the other hand, if you think you're time with the project is over, then consider removing your name from the members list, but we do hope you're still interested in our wee project.
All the best to you, whatever your future plans are. Regards, -- Grnrchst (talk) 10:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Category:Works about mountaineering has been nominated for merging
Category:Works about mountaineering has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Aszx5000 (talk) 19:54, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 August 16 § Veterans' rights activists
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 August 16 § Veterans' rights activists on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mclay1 (talk) 11:20, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Category:Education scandals and controversies has been nominated for deletion
Category:Education scandals and controversies has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 18:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
GDMG page
I work for [[GoDigital Media Group]], a digital rights management company. I disclosed a COI and requested a corrected/updated list of subsidiaries a few weeks ago and haven't gotten a response. I saw that you have an interest in digital rights management and was hoping you might be willing to take a look. You can find my edit request '''[https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:GoDigital_Media_Group# here]'''.
Let me know if you are willing to take a look. Matthewjmt (talk) 20:49, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Category:Computer science award winners has been nominated for discussion
Category:Computer science award winners has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shardul.chiplunkar (talk) 14:38, 4 October 2024 (UTC)