User talk:LosAngelesWriter

Welcome!

Hello, LosAngelesWriter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:52, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sean Zarinegar Travels America

Hello, LosAngelesWriter, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Sean Zarinegar Travels America, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing! Veryhuman (talk) 18:59, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sean Zarinegar Travels America

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sean Zarinegar Travels America requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 16:15, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nadrich and Cohen - Personal Injury Lawyers

I have moved this article to your userspace so that you can work on it. It's located at User:LosAngelesWriter/Nadrich and Cohen - Personal Injury Lawyers. Please be sure to indicate in the article how the subject meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. (See WP:N and WP:CORP.) ... discospinster _talk 02:43, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What did you think about the deletion notice you received?

Hi LosAngelesWriter,

In November you received a message about either "Nomination for deletion" or "Proposed deletion" of an article you created. I'd like to ask you a few quick questions:

Was the message helpful? Were the instructions clear and easy to follow?
If not, how do you think the message could be improved?
What do you think about the deletion process in general? Do you understand how to contest a deletion?

You can feel free to answer on my talk page or send me your response by email (mpinchukwikimedia.org). (I won't quote you or link your answers to your username if you don't feel comfortable with that.) Your feedback is incredibly useful for improving the content of deletion notifications, so please take a minute to think about and answer these questions. Thank you! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 21:07, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maryana's

Hi! I've seen your message on her talk, I know it's sometimes pain to do anything on wikipedia, because all the hostile people we have here. If you want, let me know and I help you to get your article live. Petrb (talk) 09:36, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:LosAngelesWriter/Nadrich and Cohen - Personal Injury Lawyers

A tag has been placed on User:LosAngelesWriter/Nadrich and Cohen - Personal Injury Lawyers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cahk (talk) 07:43, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Media Path Podcast

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Media Path Podcast, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TipsyElephant (talk) 17:28, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shelley Herman moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Shelley Herman. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and it doesn’t speak for itself. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 05:29, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That article 16 legitimate sources, which exceeds most Wikipedia pages and matches Shelley Herman husband's page https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Randall_Carver.

There is nothing promotional about the tone. It simply states the facts, which have been backed up by the 16 links. No product or service is being sold. LosAngelesWriter (talk) 00:10, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Shelley Herman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shelley Herman. Thanks! Spinster300 (talk) 20:54, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That article 16 legitimate sources, which exceeds most Wikipedia pages and matches Shelley Herman husband's page https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Randall_Carver.T

here is nothing promotional about the tone. It simply states the facts, which have been backed up by the 16 links. No product or service is being sold. LosAngelesWriter (talk) 00:10, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shelley Herman (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shelley Herman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 08:35, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LosAngelesWriter! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spinster300 (talk) 08:35, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shelley Herman has been accepted

Shelley Herman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spinster300 (talk) 19:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help! LosAngelesWriter (talk) 19:46, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]