User talk:Little Mountain 5/Archive 12

Archive 12
(April 2010 – August 2010)

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Little Mountain 5. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18

Four award

Thanks for your nomination at the WP:FOUR award. In order to keep the queue relatively short we ask that nominators review other nominees and make awards if appropriate.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:50, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Cool, I wasn't aware that anyone could review nominations. Reviewed two. Sincerely, Little Mountain 5 14:41, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Re:Four Award

Thanks! — Hun ter Ka hn 15:40, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Re: Four_Award

Thank you, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 16:41, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome, both of you! Little Mountain 5 00:02, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Four Award

		Four Award
		Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work all through on Big Butte Creek.

Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:26, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! Little Mountain 5 23:55, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Fishkill Creek DYK

Stub? Which article did you mean? Daniel Case (talk) 18:18, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Fishkill Creek is currently assessed as a stub, and stubs are not accepted at DYK. However, the article is most definitely not a stub anymore, so simply reassessing it to c or b class (probably b) will make it eligible. Sincerely, Little Mountain 5 18:27, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

I didn't know we were going by what it says on the talk page ... I thought that "stub" was strictly a question of whether the template was on the page or not.

I can easily move it up to start-class, but having done so much work on it as I have I do not feel comfortable making any further increases. So, I'll have to ask someone else, further delaying this.

Where and how did this rule get created that the assessment on the talk page is controlling? I do not remember ever going by it when I reviewed DYKs more actively. It defies sense, and you'd do well to ignore it. Daniel Case (talk) 18:42, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

I saw the discussion at T:TDYK and followed it here. I agree with Little Mountain 5; an article that has been correctly assessed as a stub (whether by article-page template/category or talk-page assessment) should not be used in DYK ("There is a reasonable expectation that an article which is to appear on the front page, even a short one, should appear to be complete and not some sort of work in progress."); however, it's quite common for an article to have a stub-class assessment that predates the 5x expansion for DYK, and in that case it's not a problem to reclassify to start-class, which is sufficient for DYK, and then request a reassessment from the appropriate WikiProject(s). On the other hand, if I came across an article like this (obviously no longer a stub) when reviewing DYK hooks, I'd just fix it myself and approve the hook. cmadler (talk) 18:54, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

First of all, I apologize if I came across a bit rude. The article certainly doesn't have to be c or b class, it was just a suggestion; start is fine, and yes, it would have probably been better if I just fixed it myself in the first place. I've verified it, and it should be on the main page within the week. Sincerely, Little Mountain 5 19:18, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

...and it has already made its way into queue 4, so it will be featured on the main page tomorrow. (Thanks Hassocks5489!) Little Mountain 5 21:47, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar and photos

Thanks much for the barnstar and kind words. I got really lucky on my Rogue photo trip. We had three days of clear skies or skies with just enough clouds to be interesting, and I was able to get photos from Grants Pass to within 10 miles or so of Crater Lake. The people at Union Creek Resort said they hadn't had such good weather since last fall. I compiled a list of photo ops in my little black book before I made the trip; it included some National Register of Historic Places buildings in Gold Hill and elsewhere along the way, and I haven't uploaded those yet. I took something like 400 photos, and I'm slowly working my way through the pile, picking out the best ones in each group. I hope you noticed that I added your photo of Mount McLoughlin to the "Watershed" section of the Rogue article. I first saw it when I was reviewing Big Butte Creek and just after I had added mention of the mountain as the highest point in the Rogue watershed. I'm not quite sure yet which photos will end up in the comprehensive version of the article, so if you have any you think might be appropriate, please upload them to the Commons in the Rogue River, Oregon, category. Any suggestions about how to improve the article would be welcome as well. After I fiddle with a few more photos, I think it'll be almost ready to go to PR. Finetooth (talk) 18:24, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, we finally got some nice weather! :) But now it's raining, again. Oh well, I guess we need it down here. You've done some extraordinary work on the Rogue River article... looks like an FA to me! At this rate, we may have a featured topic in a few years—Tributaries of the Rogue River. :P I'll dig around and see if I have any more images for the Commons category, I probably do. Hopefully if I have time I'll be able to take a more detailed look at the article tonight or tomorrow. Again, great job! Sincerely, Little Mountain 5 14:44, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

I made a few minor edits, and the only thing I found is that all the images need alt text before you take it to FAC. Little Mountain 5 00:51, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

I also added a few old Avenue of the Giant Boulders pictures to the Rogue River category on Commons. Little Mountain 5 02:57, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for posting the images, the edits, and your note about alt text. I've been putting off the latter until the images were pretty much settled into place. I think maybe they are now. Finetooth (talk) 03:02, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

It Takes a Rim Village - Oregon COTW

Greetings WikiProject Oregon member, time for the next edition of the Collaboration of the Week. Thanks to those who assisted in improving a few articles over the last month. For May Day edition of the COTW (in Wikipedia time its May already), we have by request Rim Village Historic District and the Oregon Museum of Science and Industry (AKA OMSI). Rim Village just needs some refinement to get to GA, while OMSI needs a lot of work in general. As always, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Adios (on May 5th that is). Aboutmovies (talk) 04:49, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Imperial Triple Crown

Why, thank you. :) Little Mountain 5 14:22, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

	<font=3> Thanks again for your images, kind words, and encouragement. Rogue River (Oregon) made featured article today! Finetooth (talk) 17:26, 22 May 2010 (UTC) _><>°^° 11:31, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Your note to me this morning was my first inkling that the article had been promoted. Finetooth (talk) 17:26, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

I was just skimming over the FAC comments to see how it was going... and there was a little closing note at the bottom! Congrats again! Little Mountain 5 22:36, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Chetco River

Hi, just want you to know that it passed as GA. Congratulations! Best wishes, Xtzou (Talk) 17:58, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Congrats from me too. Finetooth (talk) 19:50, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, both of you! Little Mountain 5 14:15, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Smile!

Hello Little Mountain 5, Thesevenseas has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Set Sail For The Seven Seas 357° 30' 45" NET 23:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 17:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Arizona Beach

Thanks for checking it! Dincher (talk) 00:29, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

No problem. :) Little Mountain 5 00:31, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations

Congrats on the FA star for Chetco River. You are on a roll. Finetooth (talk) 04:27, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

It's been a while since I've TPS'd this page. Three FAs and two GAs? Way to go, LM. Way to go. :-) Also, those maps are pretty sweet. On a somewhat-related-but-not-really thought: if you ever consider running for adminship, I would nominate you. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 17:40, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

@ both of you: Thanks!

@ Ed: Make that four FAs and one GA. :) I've definitely been thinking about an RfA lately, but I can't see myself doing one anytime soon (maybe this fall at the earliest...) Thanks for the offer! Sincerely, Little Mountain 5 20:36, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Congrats from me too - Chetco (tribe) made DYK, hope to see the river on the Main Page before long. I would also support if you had an RfA. Take care, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 04:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Whenever you decide to run, feel free to ping me and I'll nom you; even if you find a better nominator, I'll still be 100% in the support section. :-) —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 06:52, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

@ Ruhrfisch: Thanks, and congrats to you for the DYK (you'll probably make DYKSTATS, being the lead hook and everything :) ).

@ Ed: Thanks again, I may have to take you up on that sometime. Cheers, Little Mountain 5 16:00, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Elk Creek photo

Just noticed it a minute ago. You solved a problem I couldn't solve in April when I walked through the woods to the edge of the no-trespassing zone west of the dam. I took photos, but they were too boring to use. The one you took from the air really shows what it looks like. Finetooth (talk) 22:25, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I had an awesome opportunity to ride in my friend's new airplane this morning; I got a bunch of great shots. Glad I could help! Cheers, Little Mountain 5 22:31, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Happy Little Mountain 5's Day!

User:Little Mountain 5 has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as Little Mountain 5's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Little Mountain 5!

Peace,
Rlevse
00:04, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:04, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

I'm honored! Thanks, that means a lot. :) Sincerely, Little Mountain 5 03:47, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Whoa, a huge congratulations! Hope you have a great LM5 day. :) —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 05:15, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, I am. :) Little Mountain 5 22:20, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Yay, a big day for a little mountain! Congrats. Crap, late as usual. —La Pianista ^{♫ ♪} 04:03, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

It certainly was! Thanks to you too. A fittingly late reply. :P Little Mountain 5 23:00, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Roxy Ann Peak Wikipedia Page Trail Edits

I added specific information to the Roxy Ann Peak page recently, mainly because when I first hiked it I missed the tower road that reached the top of the mountain because it was an offshoot that I missed. You recently removed it. I called the parks dept today, and they said the road that leads to the peak is part of the park. It is closed off to vehicles, but not to people as you can simply walk around or over the gate. There is no sign that says it is closed to hikers. And there are signs that direct you to viewpoints along tower road. This area contains some of the best views of the area, so I wanted to include it on the page. Additionally, the elevation profile and map that I link to are GPS-derived, and are completely accurate, as is the nearby weather information, photos and directions to the site.

I would like to add these back to the wiki page to assist others who want to hike this peak. I hope it meets credibility requirements. Is this okay with you? Thanks for your time...if you need to respond my user id is Nsk3179.

75.139.199.123 (talk) 20:07, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

I re-added a sentence about Tower Road; I was unaware that it was open to the public (thanks!). You can add more or tweak what's already there if you like, it's fine with me. I'm hesitant to add julieshad.com as a source simply because it's someone's (your?) personal page, but the information does seem to be accurate, so I put it in the external links section. What do you think? Sincerely, Little Mountain 5 14:39, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, that sounds good to me. The main reason I put the link on there is because google maps won't show up as an image on the wiki page. Let me know if you know how to add this. I'll likely add the profile image so people can get a good idea of the relative steepness of the various parts of the trail, along with the total hike distance. Also, I may add another view to the images. Just curious...why would the site go under "external links" vs. "websites"? Thanks for the help, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.139.199.123 (talk) 15:49, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Adding pictures via links from external pages is disabled on Wikipedia for several reasons, see here. Any images you upload to Wikipedia (or better yet, Commons) have to be "free for commercial use and alteration"; in other words, it either has to be your picture that you created, or it has to specifically say that it is free to use. So if you created the profile image, you own the copyright and can upload it, but if not, it isn't suitable for Wikipedia. Please see our image use policy for more information.

The reason I put julieshad.com under 'external links' instead of 'websites' is because 'websites' is a subsection of 'references', and it is not currently used as a reference. Hope that clarifies some things. Thanks, Little Mountain 5 16:16, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikiproject Rivers!

Welcome! I am glad for your participation. Feel free to read the page and ask me if you have any questions. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 16:37, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, I've actually written quite a few river articles already, I just never joined. Sincerely, Little Mountain 5 17:02, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Nice articles, in contrast to my sl op py li tt le ar ti cl es. (haha). --Chemicalinterest (talk) 10:58, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Hey, at least they're articles! They just need a few citations and they'll be nice little articles. :) Good work! Thanks, Little Mountain 5 18:58, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for the kind words. Oregon streams are getting their fair share of attention. We must be fond of water. Finetooth (talk) 03:06, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

You're very welcome. You're only one article away from a 'Rivers in Portland' featured topic! (And yes, I'm very fond of water. :) ) Congrats again, Little Mountain 5 14:30, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

top ten cities image

I like this graph (File:Largest US cities graph.png) but it's hard to see the differences between the smaller cities. A log plot would solve the problem nicely.--Louiedog (talk) 03:53, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

I changed it to logarithmic scale; it looks a bit clearer now. What do you think? Thanks, Little Mountain 5 14:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Much better though the color code is still daunting. Can you put the labels right on chart, next to the relevant line?--Louiedog (talk) 16:02, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure how to, other than manually. Do you know of a way? (I only have Excel 2003.) Little Mountain 5 18:24, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Moved them manually; I'm not sure that makes it look much clearer. Thoughts? Little Mountain 5 23:50, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Much better. Also, Salem is in Massachusetts not Rhode Island. You might also want to circle the cluster of cities that suddenly shows up between 1850 and 1900 and leave a note along the lines of "Sun Belt cities", since their similarity is nicely shown here.--Louiedog (talk) 17:35, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Whoops, I knew that... :P I also labeled the Sun Belt and the Rust Belt. Thanks for your suggestions, Little Mountain 5 18:07, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Portland Parks Photo Blitz!

	<font=3> Want something to do this weekend? I propose a WikiProject Oregon weekend photo blitz! Let's try to fill up the List of parks in Portland, Oregon as much as possible by getting out and taking our own pictures or finding ones online that can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. The pictures uploaded will not only benefit the aforementioned list, but they will be used for future articles about specific parks and will fill up the Parks in Portland category over at Commons. Get your cameras ready! --Another Believer _(Talk) 20:58, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunately I will not be able to; I don't live anywhere near Portland. :( Good luck, Little Mountain 5 21:03, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Rogue updates

Thanks for your timely updates to the Gold Ray Dam saga. I had noticed the lawsuit filing but missed the judge's decision, and I was completely unaware of the beaver dam incident. The news stories were fun to read. I hope the fish and the beaver come through this OK. Finetooth (talk) 16:07, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

No problem; feel free to tweak it if you want. The Rogue is officially free-flowing from the ocean to Lost Creek Lake now! (I wonder when they're going to take that out... :P ) Sounds like the beaver was fine (aside from losing its home), but some fish weren't so lucky. Interesting that they left the old log dam there when they built the new one. Cheers, Little Mountain 5 16:48, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

!@()%&

Please don't edit other's comments without their permission. Wikipedia is not not censored and these are very minor oaths in the first instance. –xeno^talk 18:05, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

My apologies; I'm not exactly sure how that happened... :/ Odd. Sincerely, Little Mountain 5 18:17, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Some kind of locally installed browser-helper maybe ? –xeno^talk 18:18, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Might be, I'll take a look. (Never did that before...) Little Mountain 5 18:21, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

@#!*% @#!*% @#!*% @#!*% . Edit this page from wherever you voted on that RfA and see =) –xeno^talk 18:22, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Oh, that's just great. *sigh* I'll try to figure it out. (Sorry again) Little Mountain 5 18:25, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

@#!*% , I'm good. =] –xeno^talk 18:26, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

South Fork John Day

Bless you. That's it. I looked and looked, but for some reason could not find an RS for the basin size. The federal agriculture department lumps the South Fork and the upper main stem together, and I was loathe to estimate what fraction belonged to the South Fork. As for the Illinois, I sourced the 60 miles to the John Shewey fishing book. I think the fishing books (Shewey and Sheehan) are OK as reliable sources, but I doubt that the precise length matters much in the context of a fishing guide. Better would be a government number, if I could find one. Thanks a bunch for solving one of the remaining knotty problems with this list. Any suggestions about how to improve the list would be welcome. It's not quite done yet, but I won't have any trouble finishing the source elevation column or the "Remarks" column. All of the sources for the list will come in handy for anyone working on the individual stream articles, I think, since many contain data about things other than length and basin size. Finetooth (talk) 23:55, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for looking, and thanks for your offer to help. FL is my goal; I want to try one because I've never done one. I review them fairly often, and I think the experience of actually doing one will make me a better reviewer. I agree that the list needs images, and it should be fun picking out some good ones. I'm open to any suggestions. Also, I'd like to include a map showing the four major mountain ranges (Coast Range, Cascades, Blues, and Klamath–Siskiyous) and at least some of the bigger rivers. I haven't figured out how to show the mountain ranges; all of my maps so far represent only two dimensions. Would you be interested in trying your hand at a three-dimensional one like the ones you did for the Chetco and the Rogue? It could be placed near the top of the article, as usual, or it might be an oversized map placed at the bottom like the one in Ricketts Glen State Park. One other thing, I'm not absolutely sure I've identified every creek in the state that's at least 40 miles long. There are some pretty long ones in the dry eastern part of the state. Silver Creek in Harney County might be 40 or more, but I haven't found an RS yet one way or another. It took me a long time to notice that Cow Creek was more than 40. Finetooth (talk) 16:40, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

I sent a note to Kmusser this afternoon asking him if he knew of a way to check a central source for Silver Creek and maybe any others over 40 miles. I found a USDA source for the Silver Creek watershed too at [1] which confirms the one you found. (The 1.1 million acres converts to 1,720 square miles, just about the same as the 1,700.) Alas, the USDA documents don't ever seem to include individual stream lengths; rather, they give the sum of all the stream lengths in the watershed. If you can make the map, that would be swell; time is not a problem. I can focus on the other stuff and not get into a sweat about the map. Finetooth (talk) 23:43, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

I'll add the new ones you and Pfly found to the bottom of the list and look for the missing data. The source documents you found are really helpful. Finetooth (talk) 16:18, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

The Wikipedia Birthday Committee wishes you a very happy birthday! Enjoy your special day.

--Sweet xx ^Talk 07:31, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Wishing you all the best on your birthday! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee.

Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 12:37, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Aw, thanks guys. :) Little Mountain 5 14:19, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Hungry? Here's a little snack for you on your birthday, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day, Little Mountain 5!

Hehe, I just had to :-) --The Wing Dude, Musical Extraordinaire (talk) 14:58, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Wow, three! Thank you! :D Little Mountain 5 15:07, 24 August 2010 (UTC)