User talk:Lionel Messi Lover

Welcome!

Hello, Chennai Super Kings Lover!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:05, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

The reference provided by you is unreliable since it quotes an opinion by a politician (without providing any details) and does not mention the number 174 anywhere. Moreover it clearly states that government was formed with support of 169 MLAs, as provided in the article. Also there is a clearly written note in Maharashtra Legislative Assembly which asks not to make changes to party totals without making corresponding edits to the section "Members of Legislative Assembly" (which you are not adhering to). Also note that party colors are based on community wide consensus and should not be changed without reaching a consensus on the same. Dhruv edits (talk) 21:25, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Maharashtra Legislative Council, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 09:05, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2026 Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council election

Hello Chennai Super Kings Lover,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, 2026 Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council election, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at 2021 Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council election. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:02, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 12:49, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Can you explain why you made this edit? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 22:00, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

As I couldn't find Tipu Sultan in the source Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 05:39, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Warning

Hello. This came to my attention here. When someone asserts that a source you're using does not state what you're claiming it does, what you then need to do, what is your WP:BURDEN, is to prove that it does — on the talk page, post an excerpt of the proof. So, an objection of that nature concerning your reliance on a source for Shiromani Akali Dal (Amritsar) (which apparently has no abbreviation) as "far right" (diff), that requires the proof I speak of above (pertinent excepts).

The argument could also be made that this one single source, even if it does say that, is not enough to substantiate that ("far right") claim (I have no idea). But one thing at a time. The point, though, is that failure to follow BURDEN while continuing to edit war is likely to result in sanctions under the WP:ARBIND sanctions regime (see thread above this one for details). Thank you. El_C 12:38, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

@El C This appears to be a failure to communicate. @Chennai Super Kings Lover Please check and reply on Talk:Shiromani Akali Dal (Amritsar). Join the discussion. Venkat TL (talk) 14:56, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of 2027 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2027 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2027 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of 2026 Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council election for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2026 Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2026 Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

(t · c) buidhe 23:46, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Thank you for contributing to the article Maharashtra Legislative Assembly. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 06:33, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi Chennai Super Kings Lover! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Maharashtra Legislative Assembly several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 06:36, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 07:26, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Dhruv edits (talk) 20:34, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Next Punjab Legislative Assembly election moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Next Punjab Legislative Assembly election, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 05:39, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Next Punjab Legislative Assembly election moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Next Punjab Legislative Assembly election, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude talk 05:44, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Next Punjab Legislative Assembly election for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Next Punjab Legislative Assembly election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Punjab Legislative Assembly election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 06:14, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Reference

Please see WP:REFVISUAL and follow. Venkat TL (talk) 07:44, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rashtriya Janata Dal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Left Front. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mahagathbandhan (Bihar), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Left Front.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Next Rajasthan Legislative Assembly election has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Dhruv edits (talk) 14:25, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jana Sena Party. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 14:33, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 15th Rajasthan Assembly, you may be blocked from editing. Venkat TL (talk) 10:34, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Infobox in election articles

Adding leaders on infobox of election pages is case specific, not hard and fast rule. CM candidate or the face of party in that state is added based on consensus at that time, which should not be changed after the election. For elections that are further away, state president is added until a CM candidate is announced or there is a prominent face of the party for that election. For 2022 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election, Priyanka Gandhi was the face of the party in the state, and was added to the infobox for the same reason. Do not undertake edit warring. Dhruv edits (talk) 00:19, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Do not revert back to your preferred version on 2022 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election until a consensus has been achieved for the same. Continued disruptive editing and edit warring may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 00:29, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

But You Said that State President is leader in infobox Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 12:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover Like I have said above, it's case specific, there is no fixed rule. For elections that are more than 2-3 months away, we don't know definitely who CM candidate/ party face will be (except incumbent CM), that's why state Presidents are added. When CM candidate is announced, state president will be replaced by that candidate. Dhruv edits (talk) 20:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Edit Summary

Hi, can you please repharse your edit summary, Special:Diff/1114832748. It currently appears that you are trolling me.

Just saying

"There is no "Other" bench in the Assembly. There are Treasury (Government) benches and everyone else is in Opposition bench. "

or

"There is no "Other" bench in the Assembly."

is sufficient, and gives the idea to the page readers. Please see WP:EDITSUMMARY for more guidelines on how to write edit summary. Venkat TL (talk) 17:36, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Ok,Sir Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 05:44, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Sorry,Sir I'm had mentioned your name as people respect you as senior editor and will not revert back the edits Thank You 🙂 Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 15:48, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

LoL, no I am not senior, If you ever need help from senior editors you should post on WT:POI. I also post there regularly. Venkat TL (talk) 15:59, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Important

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Akshaypatill (talk) 11:29, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

AFD

Hi, if you are interested, please join the discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindu mythological and devotional cinema. 2409:4073:4D81:8F4:78AC:BD2E:F197:F02E (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Assam Legislative Assembly. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 16:36, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Gana Suraksha Party. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:45, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully on the page Bharat Rashtra Samithi, but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. It is clear that you ignored my reason for reverting your edit. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 16:15, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Gana Suraksha Party moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gana Suraksha Party, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MaxnaCarta (talk) 08:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

BJP and NPF Lok Sabha tally

Hi. There has been an update in Lok Sabha seats. Due to stay order by SC, Outer Manipur Lok Sabha constituency will stay with NPF. New tally is 302 Lok sabha seats for BJP and 1 for NPF. I have made the correction at Lok Sabha and List of members of the 17th Lok Sabha. Please make this change on all other pages that have BJP and NPF Lok Sabha seats. Add this reference only in the edit summary, no need to add this in the articles. Dhruv edits (talk) 17:07, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank You for your investigation! Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 18:10, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry

Hi. Is Diamond Leveler (talk · contribs) your second account? If so, you need to read WP:SOCK and determine if it is a valid alternate account WP:SOCKLEGIT and also declare it on your userpage. If it is created for malicious reasons, it is not allowed. Please respond to this query — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:56, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't knew the WP:SOCK policy and I will it as soon as possible Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 12:21, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi Chennai Super Kings, please retain this message here until you have actioned it. What do you mean by I will it as soon as possible? You will what? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:17, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

• Seems there is yet another account Settings gujrti (talk · contribs). Are you ever going to disclose your alternate accounts? — DaxServer (t · m · c) 12:24, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

  Sorry for the inconveniences as I mistakenly logged in with that account while logging in at Wikimedia Commons

  I will soon disclose that account

  ThanK You Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 13:32, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Map of legislative assembly goverments

Please do not change the map of legislative assembly goverments. [1] should be the map used everywhere and the same should be updated when there is change in government. This map contains proper summary and explanation. Dhruv edits (talk) 07:23, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Copyright violations

@Chennai Super Kings Lover: Please stop adding images as you did multiple times. The images you uploaded disregard copyright. Wretchskull (talk) 13:28, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Lok Sabha

@Chennai Super Kings Lover As Lok Sabha election is national level election, hence important national alliances should be added to infobox of Lok Sabha elections in various states. That is why, I added BJP (NDA), INC (UPA) and CPIM (Left Front) in infobox of Bihar and Kerala in different order despite NDA and Left Front not scoring good in previous elections of Kerala and Bihar respectively. IUML is part of UPA, so I think we should not add it in infobox, we should add one party from each alliance now. RLJP and LJP (RV) were not present in last election in Bihar, one party LJP was present. So we should remove them from Bihar infobox as it will be wrong to mention their last election seats. XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover As it is lok sabha election, we should add national leaders as you did in Bihar by adding Narendra Modi to BJP. XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:23, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Bro, But in Indian elections at Wikipedia Infobox the parties are added on the basis of vote % or seats in last election

Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 08:57, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Tripura election

@Chennai Super Kings Lover The citation given by Firdos asharf does not say that INC is major party. XYZ 250706 (talk) 13:21, 1 January 2023 (UTC) Chennai super King lover stop spreading the idea one political group you does not know the ground reality of Tripura Congress is now become a major party in Tripura you can see the last 2019 election result both lok sabha seat Congress was on 2nd position — Preceding unsigned comment added by Firdos ashraf (talk • contribs) 13:57, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at 2023 Tripura Legislative Assembly election. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 14:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lionel Messi Lover (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

User: Firdos ashraf has continuously vandalising page 2023 Tripura Legislative Assembly election by unsourced and Unexplained edits after several warning see [2] [3] Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 14:28, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The edits involved are not vandalism. 331dot (talk) 18:50, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130854049

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130861641

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130883350

More sources of vandalism by User: Firdos ashraf Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 14:30, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Reverting obvious vandalism—edits that any well-intentioned user would agree constitute vandalism

Is an exception for three revert rule as per rule number 4 Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 14:51, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

My edit war is exception

1. Reverting obvious vandalism—edits that any well-intentioned user would agree constitute vandalism, such as page blanking and adding offensive language.

User: Firdos ashraf has continuously vandalising page 2023 Tripura Legislative Assembly election by unsourced and Unexplained edits after several warning see [4] [5] Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 15:20, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130883350%EF%BF%BC

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1130861641

More Vandalism reference Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 15:21, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rajya Sabha. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

I'm sorry for the inconveniences but the [[User:SharadSHRD7]] was continuously vandalising page by making new rules and I told him to stop the edit war but he kept reverting my sourced edits Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 11:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

@SharadSHRD7 has again started edit war even though I have sourced I revert it few times but he reverted it again.

So, I request to block this user to avoid such disturbance

Thank You , @User: Chennai Super Kings Lover Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 15:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

2024 Lok Sabha

As articles of next Indian general elections in many states are being formed in Wikipedia, I am adding those parties in next Indian general election page. The party which will not be part of any alliance will be removed or be added to others section at the advent of election or confirmation of not being in alliance. XYZ 250706 (talk) 15:41, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

New sock returned

https://sigma.toolforge.org/editorinteract.py?users=Prof+Shinde&users=Politics+of+Maharashtra&users=Crompton+editz&startdate=&enddate=&ns=&server=enwiki Shadow4dark (talk) 17:50, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Tripura election

@Chennai Super Kings Lover I added the link of official facebook page of CPIM Tripura to cite a statement : In 2022, many party workers of BJP, IPFT and TIPRA joined CPIM. But an editor removed them. Link of reliable facebook page has already been added in 2022 Gujarat election. Can I add the statement again? What do you think? XYZ 250706 (talk) 16:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 08:08, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

SharadSHRD7 (talk) 16:11, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

United Progressive Alliance

Ready to help against the biased edits made by user SharadSHRD7. I think he is probably aligned with AIADMK.

2024 Lok Sabha

I think adding regional alliances in 2024 Lok Sabha election will give wrong estimation. Such date many regional parties are adding with NDA on national level and Jharkhand Mukti Morcha are in UPA on national level where JDU and RJD and others are not part of UPA at national level. There can be numerous regional alliances, if we start to add all alliances, the list will be too long. User SharadSHRD was trying to push up AITC first adding federal front (which was a proposed alliance in 2019 but could not materialize) and then adding AITC to infobox. He is imposing his edits over others and if anyone is against him, he is complaining against that user to the administrators. Actually no party in India is part of any alliance in all the states where it has presence. For example, NPP contested against BJP in Arunachal Pradesh. SO we should as Left Front in alliances section. There are many important parties which are not being added in this list. So we should add the parties and alliances like this :

Parties and alliances

Political alliances

Main articles: National Democratic Alliance, United Progressive Alliance, and Alliances formed by left-wing parties in the states of India

With the exception of 2014, no single party has won the majority of seats in the Lok Sabha since 1984, and therefore, forming alliances is the norm in Indian elections.

There were three main national pre-poll alliances. They are the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) headed by the BJP, the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) headed by the INC, Left Democratic Front of Communist-leaning parties. Given the volatile nature of coalition politics in India, alliances may change during and after the election.

The INC did not form alliances in states where it is in direct contest with the BJP. These states include Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Rajasthan, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, and Chhattisgarh. Parties of UPA contest election being part of UDF, SPA, MGB (Bihar), MVA.

In 23rd Party Congress of Communist Party of India (Marxist) at Kannur in the state of Kerala, the final draft of the party's political resolution was prepared and it gave thrust on increasing the independent strength of CPI(M) and on empowering the Left parties as an third alternative without being part of Congress alliance nationally. CPIM general secretary Sitaram Yechury and the delegates of the party congress gave final seal for the formation of Left Democratic Front in national level to unseat BJP from the central government. On 11 January 2023, Sitaram Yechury announced their intension to form Left Democratic Front in a press meeting in Tripura.

Political parties

More than __ (value) parties contested in these elections. Most of them were small with regional appeal. The main parties are the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Indian National Congress (INC).— Preceding unsigned comment added by XYZ 250706 (talk • contribs)

@XYZ 250706:: There won't be numerous alliances because minor parties (without national/state party status) and state parties which don't win any seat in past election/don't have any seat in current Lok Sabha, will not be added. If you want to discuss about this topic, please comment in the talk page of specific article to pave way for more users to engage in your discussion. Thank you. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 15:11, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

2024 Lok Sabha

@Chennai Super Kings Lover Please do something to stop User:SharadSHRD's imposing edits over others. XYZ 250706 (talk) 13:46, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

User SharadSHRD is continuosly adding regional alliances. I said that we can add the name of regional alliances like SPA, MGB (Bihar), MVA, UDF under UPA. But he is adding them continuously. User: AS Sayyad also reverted his edits. XYZ 250706 (talk) 13:58, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

I also added introduction to parties and alliances section of Next Indian General election but he deleted it. XYZ 250706 (talk) 13:59, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Can you say are there citation sufficient for adding Left Democratic Front in that page? XYZ 250706 (talk) 14:00, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Yes, from my pov it is sufficient as per [[WP: Reliable]] Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 14:03, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

So pls revert his edits on that page and restore last good version by me. XYZ 250706 (talk) 14:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

I think (https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Next_Indian_general_election&oldid=1134753941) this edit contains information which will meet opinions of all editors. XYZ 250706 (talk) 14:08, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

I added LDF he reverted that. XYZ 250706 (talk) 14:09, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

@XYZ 250706 (talk · contribs)

The section of Parties and Alliance is currently blanked due to dispute,So I can't revert it back Chennai Super Kings Lover(talk) @XYZ 250706, "Tell me how can I help you!"Chennai Super Kings Lover(talk)

Notice

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. SharadSHRD7 (talk) 14:46, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently been editing India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;

follow editorial and behavioural best practice;

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— DaxServer (t · m · c) 11:57, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Left alliance

@Chennai Super Kings Lover User Sharad SHRD7 is again started disruptions and he is trying to delete an article written by me : Alliances formed by left-wing parties in the states of India. Wikipedia reviewer Onel 2569 (I forgot the exact name) previously said me to add more citations to the page and I added that and then he said nothing against that page. Please say your opinion in that page. XYZ 250706 (talk) 12:11, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover I request you to join the AfD discussion about the article named "Alliances formed by left-wing parties in the states of India". Thank you. XYZ 250706 (talk) 04:16, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Alliances

@Chennai Super Kings Lover I came to know that NCP contested against INC in Katihar Lok Sabha constituency, Lakshadweep Lok Sabha constituency, Outer Manipur Lok Sabha constituency in 2019 and UP election in 2022. On the other hand, Shiv Sena contested against INC in 2021 Dadra and Nagar Haveli Lok Sabha constituency bye election and 2022 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election. MNF, NDPP, NPP, NPF contested against BJP in some seats in 2019. I doubt they can be called national level member of UPA and NDA. What do your think? XYZ 250706 (talk) 16:23, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Besides, NCP and Shiv Sena contested against UPA in 2022 Goa election also. XYZ 250706 (talk) 16:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

JMM contested against INC in Bihar and WB in 2019. XYZ 250706 (talk) 16:32, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

In constituency level, allies contest against each other some times, but what matters is the state or national level election where they mostly contest with alliance,Hope your confusion is over, Thank You Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

Signature

There is something wrong with your signature. Please fix that immediately — DaxServer (t · m · c) 09:49, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

TIPRA

@User:Chennai Super Kings Lover According to ECI website of candidate affidavit, the name is Tipra Motha Party. Please fix the template with TMP (Tipra Motha Party). XYZ 250706 (talk) 14:13, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

The template : Party name with color XYZ 250706 14:14, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

@XYZ 250706:DoneChennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

UP

@Chennai Super Kings Lover This citation says that CPIM general secretary has announced that his party will ally with SP in UP. It is not speculation. And if you say about the name of the alliance, the name is derived from . XYZ 250706 (talk) 14:26, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

But CPIM is not major party in Uttar Pradesh, Therefore The Alliance name, I couldn't found in the article, hence, Alliance should be renamed as SP+Left Front Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

Yes CPIM is not major party in UP. But Left and Democratic Front is not only of CPIM, many sources are saying this (name is not confirmed) is the alliance of left, secular and Democratic parties to isolate and defeat the BJP. DP is also left wing and Democratic Party as per ideology. XYZ 250706 (talk) 10:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover XYZ 250706 (talk) 10:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Infobox

@Chennai Super Kings Lover I request you to join the discussion Using Template:Infobox legislative election until the announcement of election results and to give your neutral opinion. XYZ 250706 (talk) 02:52, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

State assembly pages

Hi. Your edit on Mizoram Legislative Assembly is seems to be incorrect as ZPM still has 6 seats. See here. Try not to use assembly pages as reference since they are rarely updated. Dhruv edits (talk) 05:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

@Chennai Super Kings Lover I request you to join the discussions Talk:Balasahebanchi Shiv Sena#Shiv Sena and Template:Infobox legislative election and put your valuable neutral opinion. XYZ 250706 (talk) 03:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Please put your valuable neutral opinion in Template:Infobox legislative election. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:20, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Maharastra Legislative Council

Your recent edits to the page aforementioned have dragged my concerns regarding the numbers you put on the page, those numbers basically exceed the total number of seats in that house. Kindly refer to the page: http://mls.org.in/PDF2023/BUDGET/member-list-council.pdf. This is the latest version of the list of members published by the Maharastra Legislative Council for the ongoing budget session. Hope you have better time reading that file by scrolling down to the last page. Regards. Wiki Master World (talk) 16:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

See @Wiki Master World, In the page of Mizoram Legislative Assembly, when I added party seats on their official website point of view,refer[6] , @User: Dhruv edits, senior Wikipedia editor reverted it [7] stating that though Official website refer it as update or 2023 latest, it is not true, because as you know government works are too slow in India, this pdf which you are referring was same before latest mlc election, the number of parties are increased as MVA won 3 seats and BJP won 1. Hope your doubt is clear. Thank You! Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

But the numbers you put still don't add up to 78, what sorcery is this? Wiki Master World (talk) 18:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

See @Wiki Master World,This is because a large number of seats in Maharashtra Legislative Council are vacant because of 2022 Maharashtra political crisis, soon after 1-2 years the seats will be filled up by coming MLC elections, Thank You! Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

UPA

@Chennai Super Kings Lover this citation directly or indirectly says that UPA was the alliance led by Congress with the help of like-minded parties from 2004 to 2014 and Congress wants to rejuvenate the UPA model for 2024 election. Should we keep UPA as existing alliance or not? Besides, regional parties having alliance or seat-sharing with congress in the state does not mean that they are part of UPA. Please give your valuable opinion. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:35, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Although it is an opinion, Mamata Banerjee also said that UPA does not exist now. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:38, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

@XYZ 250706, This source clearly states that soon after Mamata Banerjee said , some opposition parties part of UPA organised meeting to strength UPA, Mamata Banerjee said so because of bad performance of UPA in recent elections, refer:United Progressive Alliance#Timeline of the UPA and other regional alliances formed by the Congress Party , The source you provided says that Congress want to re model UPA form of governance in 2004, 2009. Thank You! Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

SP

@Chennai Super Kings Lover Can you please form an article of the alliance led by Samajwadi Party in UP elections? XYZ 250706 (talk) 16:04, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Sorry @XYZ 250706, currently my exam is coming and I'm currently

SEMI-RETIRED

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

Soon In Last week of March, I will research on the topic and make an article.

Thank You, Sorry for inconvenience! Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover Ok, no problem. Are you also a school student? XYZ 250706 (talk) 16:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover I have created an article Gathbandhan (Uttar Pradesh) for using now. You can update, edit and improve article after the completion of your exams. Thank you. XYZ 250706 (talk) 09:33, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

@XYZ 250706, Done✅,Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

@XYZ 250706 No, I am currently doing my bachelor's on Political Sciences and History of Modern India. Thank You!

Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

MVA

@Chennai Super Kings Lover One of your source says that Pawar has said MVA should fight together. 'Should' does not mean 'will'. The other source does not say about Maharashtra election. XYZ 250706 (talk) 11:52, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

@XYZ 250706::But This source:https://theprint.in/india/we-accept-their-leadership-says-sharad-pawar-on-kharges-remark-that-cong-led-alliance-will-come-to-power/1390284/ says that Sharad Pawar will accept Congress leadership , so it is common senses that if they will contest together in India ,they will contest under UPA in Maharashtra too. Thanking You Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

LA

@Chennai Super Kings Lover West Bengal Legislative Assembly, Rajasthan Legislative Assembly etc contain others section. XYZ 250706 (talk) 12:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

@User:XYZ 250706, These may be done by some IPs and will be corrected due to confusion but I mentioned statement of Senior Editor User: Venkat TL here [8] stating that few months back there are government and opposition branch in a Legislature. Thank You Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

2024

@Chennai Super Kings Lover What should we do with infobox legislative election in 2024 Lok Sabha election article? XYZ 250706 (talk) 16:35, 2 March 2023 (UTC) @XYZ 250706, Regarding the 2024 article , we should complain to administrator as the User: Number 57 is admin and he have more rights than us! Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover Then please try. XYZ 250706 (talk) 08:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Regarding vandalism in the Bihar Legislative Assembly Page

Hi, I just noticed a person with the following IP Address: 59.153.2.57, has been vandalizing the page mentioned in the above subject. He added BJP as the ruling party of Bihar, which isn't true. I reversed the IP edits with appropriate reasons. Additionally, I checked this guy's edit history both on the page and on the IP account, he has a long history of vandalizing pages, especially this one. It is my humble request that you monitor this page for a few days, he might do it again, I am not that active on this platform. Thank you Lord Elzai (talk) 17:41, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

I will monitor it for few days, ThanK You.!

[[User: Chennai Super Kings Lover|<b style="color: Green;">Chennai Super Kings Lover</b>]] ([[User talk: Chennai Super Kings Lover|talk]]) Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 05:50, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Signature - second request

Hi. I've notified you earlier on 27 January 2023 that there's something wrong with your signature and asked to you to rectify it. You are not dating your comments [9]. You must add date/timestamp on talk pages. Please read Wikipedia:Signatures for help regarding custom signatures among others — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:08, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

2024

@Chennai Super Kings Lover National parties in India have some extra advantage over other parties. They can user their particular symbol all over India and the government provides land or a building for the National parties to erect their party headquarters. I think national parties in India can be regarded as major parties for Lok Sabha election. Besides if you look at the national parties, all parties (Except NPP) have national significance. Shouldn't we add them in the infobox for 2024 Lok Sabha election? XYZ 250706 (talk) 05:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

BSP

@Chennai Super Kings Lover As of now there is no political position of Bahujan Samaj Party in Wikipedia. Can you please give any source of information regarding its political position as in List of political parties in India it is only national party having no written political position. XYZ 250706 (talk) 15:51, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

@XYZ 250706, I couldn't find any source about BSP's political position, but in Wikipedia Bahujan Samaj Party#Views there it is said that BSP believes in Social Transformation which is characteristics of Left Wing, So I should say that we should put it in Left Wing or Centre-Left position. Kindly share your views. Thank You! Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

ECI rule

@Chennai Super Kings Lover Is there any rule of ECI that a major party for election should have more than 5% votes? You wrote in your edit in 2023 Nagaland Legislative Assembly election : But as per eci rules for major party 5% vote percentage is needed and RPI(A) won above it https://results.eci.gov.in/ResultAcGenMar2023/partywiseresult-S17.htm?st=S17. [N.B.: You wrote RPI(A) instead of LJP(RV) by mistake] Can you give source for it? XYZ 250706 (talk) 11:16, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

@XYZ 250706! User:Dhruv edits few months back told me that 5% vote share party is added as if all parties winning seat would be added then the Infobox would be too long, RPI (A) won 3%+ vote share 2023 Nagaland Legislative Assembly election#Results, so I had not added them in Infobox. Thank You! Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

Images

@Chennai Super Kings Lover Hi, your recent additions [10] are maybe not required; for I belief that images representational and popular to the particular state should be inserted, which also has some significance with historical background. Both Ajan peer dargarh and Sukapha khestra are not specifically notable to be held in frontispiece, also the image quality and adjustments are not right. ComparingQuantities (talk) 16:49, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Vandalism Alert on Maharashtra Legislative Assembly Page

Hi, an account named Shaan Sengupta has been vandalizing pages of various legislative assemblies like Bihar and Maharashtra..he is placing the whole NCP under the NDA , which isn't the case. Kindly look into the matter.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lord Elzai (talk • contribs) 11:51, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Next Indian general election in Uttar Pradesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Azam Khan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

2024 election

@Chennai Super Kings Lover The opposition alliance has not yet taken the full shape. Some members may go out. CPIM leaders (both national and state level) and Congress leaders (West Bengal and Northeast units) have discarded alliance with TMC. [11][12][13][14]. Some Congress leaders have also given threat to their high command that they will leave the party if alliance with TMC is formed in WB. Besides LDF and UDF alliance is not possible in Kerala. One cannot deny that many a member of this new alliance INDIA will contest against each other in many constituencies in different states. So I think we should not add INDIA alliance in Next Indian general election now and it should be added after confirmation of seat sharing formula and keep the alliance article as draft for now. XYZ 250706 (talk) 17:15, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

As INDIA has announced to contest 2024 Polls together.So we should not remove it now if in near future some parties may leave it will updated accordingly.

Thank You✨ Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 17:20, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover And the Bengal - Kerala - Northeast issue? XYZ 250706 (talk) 17:23, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Besides Congress Lok Sabha leader and WB state president Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury also discarded alliance with TMC. XYZ 250706 (talk) 17:26, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

@XYZ 250706, On this issue, we have to wait for the committee formed to survey the seat sharing finalised in the next meeting in Mumbai, to give the report on if the alliance will contest in all parts of India or will contest state wise! Though Adhir Ranjan Choudhary refused alliance with TMC before meeting but now Congress President, Mr Mallikarjun Kharge has said that all members of INDIA will contest together, and these statements are contradictory, so we have to wait till the next meeting in Mumbai for clearity.

Thank You✨

@Chennai Super Kings Lover

Legislative Assembly

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

@Chennai Super Kings Lover Many editors are adding INDIA members together in various state assemblies. But it is wrong. For example, they have added INC and CPIM together in Rajasthan Legislative Assembly in the government. But CPI(M) is in opposition in Rajasthan Assembly. Please do something. XYZ 250706 (talk) 12:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

CPI(M)is not in opposition in Rajasthan, it is supporting the government.Refer:[15]

Thank You ✨ Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 15:27, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover That comment was done when BJP was trying to topple Gehlot government in 2020. Besides Amra Ram has said that there would be no alliance with Congress in Legislative assembly polls though there can be alliance in Lok sabha polls. https://www.siasat.com/rajasthan-polls-third-front-parties-to-contest-against-bjp-congress-2625248/ Besides in an interview to ABP news, he severely criticised Congress government. XYZ 250706 (talk) 16:53, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover Sitaram Yechury's statement was based on a situation when there could be a floor test for Gehlot government. That does not mean they are in government. Besides in Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, TMC and INC are being added together. But they have not formed alliance in assembly. XYZ 250706 (talk) 16:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover Can you please mention an editor who is quite active in Wikipedia and makes election maps? XYZ 250706 (talk) 17:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover Which alliance of WB and Kerala should be considered to be affiliated to INDIA (Sanjukta Morcha or TMC+/LDF or UDF) as Adhir Chowdhury yesterday said that Congress will fight TMC in Bengal and LDF in Kerala.https://www.sangbadpratidin.in/india/congress-to-fight-against-tmc-in-bengal-despite-having-an-alliance/ XYZ 250706 (talk) 17:13, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

We should add Sanjukta Morcha and LDF till further clarification.

Thank You✨ Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 06:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Sorry to say but I don't know an active user to make political maps.

Thank You ✨ Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 06:13, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

I think now CPIM has only 1 MLA in Rajasthan as the other MLA was suspended for supporting Congress.Reference:https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/cpim-suspends-mla-in-rajasthan-for-indiscipline/article31892467.ece/amp/

Thank You ✨ Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 06:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

The MLA (Balwan Poonia) was suspended from CPIM for one year. After completion of suspension was in the party and attended Legislative Assembly meetings and raised voice against government. XYZ 250706 (talk) 07:41, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

July 2023

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

Please see gere the CM has clearly said that they are a part of NDA but do not support BJP's Ideology. They dont support BJP ideology but they are in alliance. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 04:10, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

But CM has said that he is allied with NDA in centre but still he did not said about state, So You can use MNF in NDA in political alliance map but should be removed from Mizoram Legislative Assembly as MNF allied with NDA as He had said about state in 2018 , that he does not need NDA to form government in state.Refer:https://thewire.in/politics/i-wont-need-the-bjp-to-form-government-in-mizoram-zoramthanga

Also BJP Mizoram Leader Have mentioned MNF as true partner of NDA in Centre. Refer:https://nenow.in/north-east-news/mizoram/mnf-true-partner-of-bjp-led-nda-government-says-bjp-mizoram-in-charge-mmhonlumo-kikon.html

quote=BJP national spokesperson and state in-charge of Mizoram, Mmhonlumo Kikon has said the ruling Mizo National Front (MNF) is the true partner of the BJP led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government at the centre.

Thank You✨ Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 05:38, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover

As I said that the politics of the country has changed a lot from 2020s. The sources which you are quoting are from 3-5 years back. Even if you understand basic English you will understand the difference between won't and don't. The wire article is before the counting even started. He said he won't need BJP's support means he was sure about that he will have enough MLAs of his own after counting that he can make govt on his own.

Coming to my source. Its his most recent quote. A statement from 3 years ago cant overrule what he said recently. He said that MNF is a part of NDA. He also was at NDA meeting in Delhi. He didn't said anything like that he is the partner only at centre and not at state.

And I saw that you reverted my edit while the discussion was going on. This is called edit war. Don't do that again since it is against the rules. I have removed your edits and made the corrections. If you still have any questions please discuss before re-reverting. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 07:15, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Just to let you know @Chennai Super Kings Lover

Both the new agencies that you quoted are not considered reliable sources on Wikipedia. Please read the rules before engaging in an edit war with me or anyone else ever again. 07:23, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

MNF is not part of NDA in state, that's why it was not added with BJP, You said while putting MNF with BJP in assembly that it now allied with BJP.In your source, CM said he is part of NDA, but this source clearly states that MNF is not allied with NDA in the state.Being in NDA meeting doesn't mean he is with NDA in both state and centre, for example: TMC is part of INDIA,but is not allied with Congress in state.

This is the case here. Read the Although the MNF is a member of BJP led North East Democratic Alliance (NEDA) and an ally of the NDA at the Centre, the party does not have any tie-up with the BJP in the state. PTI COR RG carefully, it is mentioned MNF is not allied with NDA in state. Chennai Super Kings Lover^Talk(talk) 07:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Brother this source is again of January. And I am telling you again. Compare the political situation of the country in Jan Vs July. You will get your answer. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 11:03, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

But Bro, since in January, MNF was not allied with BJP in the state, now also CM of Mizoram had not said that MNF is allied with BJP in the assembly, thought part of NDA in Centre. MNF is very critical political party it had also alliance with INC in MCDs and also suspended an MLA for toppling Cong-MNF Government. Thank You ✨ Chennai Super Kings Lover^Talk

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mizo National Front, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Right-wing nationalism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Better source request for File:National People's Party (India) logo.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:National People's Party (India) logo.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 10:52, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, I couldn't find a better source.

Thank You! Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 11:57, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Pay attention

@Chennai Super Kings Lover I told you not to use ref tags in talk pages. When providing a link use the method I have used in that guy's talk page. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 08:07, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Ways to improve Next Indian general election in Mizoram

Hello, Chennai Super Kings Lover,

Thank you for creating Next Indian general election in Mizoram.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi! Thanks for creating this article. It's good on the whole, but could use a little bit more prose and references from additional sources. It seems that sources could be used related to INC and MNF. Have a great day!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|TartarTorte}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TartarTorte 13:18, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

BVA

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hi, @Chennai Super Kings Lover I wanted to discuss with you about BVA. After finding several more articles about this, I came to know that they aren't unallied. So, if we'll discuss about this and come to a conclusion, It would be beneficial for these important government pages. Thank you Maha Sainik (talk) 11:56, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Kindly cite some reliable articles about BVA part of NDA Government in Maharashtra, Except Floor Test one. (As Floor Test, No confidence motion doesn't confirm alliance, like BJD supported NDA in recent No Confidence Motion, and Also Rajasthan CPIM supported Congress Government in crisis but currently unallied).

Thank You✨

Chennai Super Kings Lover^Talk Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 13:15, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Exactly, in the same way I wanted to draw your attention towards the point that, MNS is not in the NDA alliance , Still we count their MLA in maharashtra government as their MLA had voted for CM Shinde in trust vote. At the time of MVA, This MLA of MNS was UNALLIED. But, in Rajyasabha election (10th June 2022) & in the Vidhanparishad election (20th June 2022) This MLA of MNS voted for BJP candidate and they came closer to Shinde and Fadnavis. They did not officially enter to NDA ever. In the same case 3 MLAs of BVA voted for BJP candidate for Rajyasabha & Vidhanparishad election & then voted for CM Shinde in the trust vote [16]https://www.freepressjournal.in/mumbai/maharashtra-vasai-mla-hitendra-thakur-likely-to-get-ministerial-berth . Hitendra Thakur never remained unallied, He always enjoys the power with the Govt. He had extended his support to BJP & Fadnavis just after 2019 elections when it was clear that BJP is coming into power again. Then, MVA formed and again Hitendra Thakur extended his support to Uddhav Thackeray & MVA. And again when new government formed under the leadership of CM Shinde, BVA voted for the government in the trust vote. Sanjay Raut told the media that BVA didn't voted for MVA in Rajyasabha & Vidhanparishad elections even if they are in the government So to give a tight reply to him, Hitendra thakur then said that our MLAs aren't tied to anyone's door(which is your reference). Maha Sainik (talk) 13:36, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

As the reference seems correct. You can add it in Maharashtra Legislative Assembly

Thank You✨

. Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 13:46, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the confirmation @Chennai Super Kings Lover I think we should add these 3 BVA MLAs in government only and not in the NDA. What do you guys say ? @Chennai Super Kings Lover . I suggest updated Government no. is 205 and updated NDA no. is 201(Excluding BVA & MNS) Maha Sainik (talk) 13:55, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

@Shaan Sengupta Maha Sainik (talk) 13:56, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

@Maha Sainik, this is second time I am telling you this. And third time in total you are being told. One ping, each user, each comment is sufficient. Please try to make this your habit. And also adhere to advise by Lourdes to change your name.

Now coming to the discussion above I agree on your point of MNS. But for BVA please do that only after citing a reference (if its not there). Shaan Sengupta^Talk 04:46, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Chennai Super Kings Lover

Isn't support to BJP in govt means part of NDA? Shaan Sengupta^Talk 06:09, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

I think it isn't as AIMIM supported RJD-JDU government in Bihar Legislative Assembly. They were not added in alliance, since last few months the page it is removed by unknown editor, Will should re-edit with reliabe source!

Thank You🤍✨

Happy Independence Day🧡🤍💚 Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 06:19, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

AIMIM is not a part of govt or alliance in Bihar. It neither suoports Nitish Govt. But here case is different. Kadu supports BJP-Shinde govt. In the reference he just said that he made a mistake. He never announced alliance breakup. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 06:21, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

No, AIMIM supported RJD-JDU Government. Just like Kadu's party supported BJP.

Source:https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/bihar-165-mlas-to-support-nitish-kumar-led-grand-alliance-government-in-floor-test/articleshow/93738865.cms

Thank You 🤍✨ Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 06:24, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Those MIM MLAs left party to join RJD Shaan Sengupta^Talk 06:26, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

But the reference mentions about One Current AIMIM MLA. Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 06:28, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

His quote in article is "BJP should have discussed it with all constituents of alliance". Which means he is the part of alliance. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 06:25, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

But this constituents of alliance may say about Shinde Sena, as Kadu has strong relationship with them, and he went to Guwahati during the crisis with them.

I think we should find a clear reference which says it is part of NDA to avoid confusion.

Thank You 🧡🤍💚 Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 06:32, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Shinde Sena itself is a part of NDA. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 06:34, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

That's what I am saying, Kadu mentioned about constituents of alliance(Shinde Sena,JSS,etc). Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 06:39, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover @Shaan Sengupta Bachhu Kadu & his PJP is a part of NDA alliance as PM Modi called him for the NDA Meeting on 18th July and he was present. Total 38 parties were there. [17]https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-politics/38-parties-nda-8848786/ Maha Sainik (talk) 06:43, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank You for citing the source...

Will update it. Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 06:56, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover Government has 205 MLAs : NDA(201)+BVA(03)+MNS(01). You've updated 201 infront of the government also Maha Sainik (talk) 07:15, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Cite Grand National Assembly of Turkey or Nagaland Legislative Assembly as supply and Confidence number not added in government. Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 07:17, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

@Chennai Super Kings Lover I think these 205 MLAs are clearly in the support of the government so should be added in the Government. We've added Unallied MLAs in the opposition but factually Unallied means they aren't actually opposing the Government nor they are supporting. Same way, 205 MLAs are clearly present within the Government so the no. of Govt should be [205] Maha Sainik (talk) 07:49, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Ok☑️ Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 07:54, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Regarding my template

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

"Template:User Hindu" is a template not an article. It clearly stated that the user is. The one who agrees will keep it and the one who doesn't won't. Everyone has different thoughts. Templates userboxes are made to show own thoughts. You can too make your own template according to what you think. Don't alter my template. That is not for imposing something. It clearly says The user is follower of Hinduism and Hindutva both. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 17:07, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

But this Template:User Hindu was not created by you, it was created by an editor in 2016, and this template is used by all Hindu Wikipedians, by personalising it and aligning it with Hindutva will create the Hindus using this template to create a new one which only says about Hinduism not Hindutva, So If you want to use Hindutva, I suggest you to create a separate template like Template:User Hindu1 etc.

And don't alter the template created in 2016 for Hinduism to be aligned with Hindutva.

Thank You! Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 00:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

The template that I created was a redirect to UBX/hindu template. Please read template history. You will get it. I removed the redirect and created the template. The template was transformed into a redirect in December 2016 only. First get your knowledge correct. Then debate. You will understand it very well. And please donot make changes until we solve this. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 01:15, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

@Shaan Sengupta Dear fellow editor,

The potential promotion of "Hindutva" through the userbox you created/edited:

1. Explicit Promotion: The userbox states, "This user is a Sanatani Hindu and an ardent follower of Hindutva." By including "Hindutva" alongside one's religious affiliation, it explicitly promotes the ideology and associates the user with it.
2. Symbolic Alignment: The userbox implies a connection between the user's identity and Hindutva. This alignment can be interpreted as endorsing the ideology's principles and beliefs.
3. Endorsement of Ideology: Declaring oneself as an "ardent follower of Hindutva" goes beyond expressing personal beliefs. It can be seen as actively endorsing and supporting the ideology.
4. Creating a Perception: Users who openly identify with Hindutva could be perceived by others as advocates for the ideology. This perception might extend beyond the user's intention to express their beliefs.
5. Conflict with Neutrality: Wikipedia aims to provide neutral information and avoid promoting specific viewpoints. Including a userbox that explicitly associates with an ideological movement like Hindutva could conflict with this neutrality.
6. Avoiding Potential Controversy: "Hindutva" is a divisive and contested term that carries political implications. As a user-generated content platform, Wikipedia must be cautious about content that might spark controversy or promote advocacy.

In conclusion, while userboxes are meant for personal expression, openly identifying with Hindutva in a Wikipedia context might inadvertently promote or advocate for a political ideology. (Reference: WP:UBCR)

AMNR0011 (talk) 17:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Let's continue this discussion at Template talk:User Hindu#Userbox content. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 01:21, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Indian Ancestry

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hello, Indian Ancestry is defined as per Ancient Indian architecture. Indo-Islamic came into existence no earlier than 1100s. Before that Indian Architecture was in existence. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 12:52, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Indian rock-cut architecture also an example of Indian Ancestry. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 12:58, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, but I could find in Wikipedia that says that Indian Ancestry is defined as per Ancient Indian architecture. And there is no valid reason for remove Taj Mahal Image as it was added before you edited. Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 13:20, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Just added before doesn't mean it's correct. Since you understood that you belive that Indian Ancestry is defined by Ancient Indian Architecture. Please look at that page. It is costly said that it ranges from Prehistoric period to Early Middle Ages (550–1200 CE). Arrival of Islam in Indian subcontinent is 1193 which is centuries late compared to Bronze or Early Middle Ages. This things very well defines what is Indian Ancestry. Islamic or European Invaders who came from outside can't be termed as Ancestors. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 13:47, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Something which comes outside India is not always bad, even ideals of democracy, fraternity etc came from Outside, Taj Mahal was made by Mughals but now it is Indian Property and UNESCO World Heritage Site, And Indian Ancestry Identity is not need to be taken so far by times, Template:User Indian template is used by Indian and NRI who went abroad after 1940s, no need to go to 600 CE building for this template. Thank You! Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk)

Its not about what is good or bad. Anyways Islamic invaders did not bad than good for India. I can agree on one thing. You can take any image that's built by Indian rulers/people. But anything built by an invader whether good or bad can't be a part of Indian Ancestry. Indian Ancestry is of Indian people. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 01:31, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

As, I'm from Assam, So I am adding Ahom Kingdom's Kareng Ghar, Done☑️ Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 02:19, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

I have no issue in it at all. But that isn't even visible in userbox. So I am re-adding that rock temple image. And giving argument that you are from assam so you will add that isn't good. I too am from Bihar but I added what truly defines Indian Architecture. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 02:44, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

You miss understood me, I'm telling that North East India has good tourism potential but is ignored as it is too away from Mainland India and Patwon ki Haveli architecture and it's gold colour is best for infobox. Chennai Super Kings Lover (talk) 03:02, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Yes I agree on that. But all of India is mainland. NE isn't away it is a part of mainland. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 03:08, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Regarding WikiProject Indian Politics

Hi please don't modify Wikiprojects template userboxes as you did at Template:User Indian politics They are made as per a standard.

Why are you changing my templates

Why are you changing my templates. I made Template:User Akhand Bharat you changed its content and moved it to Template:User Hindu Akhand Bharat. How is it that. It just mentions user want Akhand Bharat. Nowhere it is mentioned as Hindu Akhand Bharat. Why did you change it on your own without discussing. You want to depict something the way you want. It didn't exist. I created it. You create one for yourself. Don't change what I have made for me. You can make other as Template:User Akhand Bharat 1 or whatever name you want. Secondly, Template:User Hindu was a redirect to other template. I made it. People are using it. Noone has made any objection yet. Only you are the one to make it. I removed Hindutva after I agreed to your point. But everything wont to be done according to how you want. Sanatan is the other name of Hinduism. Reformists are not part of Sanatana. Donot change my templates without discussing and notifying. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 09:37, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

The flag you are using it is mentioned that it's of so called Hindu Rashtra Akhand Bharat.

Cite:https://www.reddit.com/r/vexillology/comments/rkj1tv/flag_of_hindu_rashtra_akhand_bharat/

That's why I named it Hindu Akhand Bharat, If you truly use Only Akhand Bharat, you should use Indian Flag instead.

And secondly I was confused about Sanantan and Hinduism.

Thank You✨ Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 11:41, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

We can't add India Flag. It is the property of our nation. Akhand Bharat is not a reality yet on ground. So better to use the imaginary flag. And regarding Hindu template thats why I told you. Please discuss before making changes in future. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 13:40, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Donot remove saffron colour from Akhand Bharat template. I have removed the flag. Amd donot change the subject. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 16:36, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

"SP+" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect SP+ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 10 § SP+ until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 03:07, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

IShowSpeed edit

Hey, I saw that you reverted the edit (https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=IShowSpeed&oldid=1181429401) on IShowSpeed that I made regarding Watkins meeting Daler Mehndi on his visit to India. I was confused on why you said that it was a sock puppet edit, because I do not have any other accounts. This is my only Wikipedia account. Reev132 (talk) 17:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, there was other sock account which I thought had made this edit.

I have reinstated your edits.

And sorry for inconvenience.

Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 02:14, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Sock investigation

@Lionel Messi Lover you initially declared your alternative accounts but from what I can see in the current version only Template:User alternative account is there which doesn't reveals the alternative accounts. I would suggest you put {{User alternative account name|Diamond Leveler|(other accounts names)}} on userpage of this account and {{User alternative account|Lionel Messi Lover}} on userpage of Diamond Leveler and all other accounts. This is all within the rules and what you are required to do. I also see that you created a userpage for Abhisruti qho has been inactive for more than a year. Is that also your account? If yes, then please declare that too and all others that you have. Because if there is another report filed on you and a checkuser checks it with his tools its gonna unearth some possible sleepers too which will land you in problem. ShaanSengupta^Talk 12:39, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

I have mentioned User: Diamond Leveler in my user page, User:Settings gujrti is commons account so no need to mention it as it has zero edit. User: Abhisruti is not my account, it's my friend's account and since last year she in far away town, So as not used by me since a year, I can't say it my account, so I decide to leave the account as it as it's. Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 13:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Lionel Messi Lover your userpage is deleted. Did you request for it? Or the admin did it because of some violation? ShaanSengupta^Talk 05:47, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

I didn't know, I have to ask the admin about it. Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 05:58, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

@Lionel Messi Lover I see u have made your userpage once again. As per the conclusion at the sock investigation, I would advise you to add {{User alternative account name|Diamond Leveler}} on your userpage which will appear as —

This user has an alternative account named Diamond Leveler.

It will let other users know that you have (for now) a legit sock account. ShaanSengupta^Talk 16:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

^Done√ Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 01:27, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

We agreed on it.

Hi @Lionel Messi Lover, I remember we agreed on not using Indo - Islamic architecture in Indian ancestry template of Template:User Indian at your own talk page here. You yourself added Patwon ki Haveli then Hawa Mahal which I never objected. Then what made you decide to unilaterally change it and readd Taj Mahal. I would repeat myself. Taj Mahal is Indo-Islamic architecture and not Indian Ancestry. If you want it on your userpage, please make Template:Indo-Islamic or anything like that. Taj Mahal can't be accepted as Indian ancestry. ShaanSengupta^Talk 18:10, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Taj Mahal can be accepted as Indian Ancestry as it is a great symbol of Indian Medival Era architecture. Isreali PM Netanyahu, Canadian PM Justin Trudeau, even former US president Donald Trump visited specifically Taj Mahal, so this is a global Symbol of India internationally and every Indian should be proud of it and it is now owned by our government, regardless who made it. Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 02:09, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

@Lionel Messi Lover First of all you should not have reverted the status quo. Just because someone visited doesn't mean it can be accepted as Indian ancestry. Yes it is in India, it is owned by Indian government. But these are totally different from Indian ancestry. Indo-Islamic is not Indian ancestry. Indian architecture is Indian ancestry. I am removing it untill this is resolved. You only added Hawa Mahal. Do we need to discuss this after every few months? We need to add something that is traditional Indian architecture with no foreign influence. Mughal architecture is influenced by Arab architecture. ShaanSengupta^Talk 05:22, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

There is nothing foreign influence, Taj Mahal is considered the finest example of Mughal architecture, a style that combines elements from Persian, Indian, and Islamic architectural styles cite: https://www.tajmahal.gov.in/overview.aspx which means it's an amulgum of Indo-Persian architecture, and as The peoples of India and Iran, two ancient neighbouring civilisations, have enjoyed close historical links through the ages, had a common homeland and share a common linguistic and racial past. cite:https://www.indianembassytehran.gov.in/eoithr_pages/MTc,

which means Indo-Persian architecture is not foreign and as they had a common homeland in the past. Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 09:56, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

@Lionel Messi Lover That's my point. Mughal architecture is a combination of Indian, Persian, Turkish and others. This is said in your given source only. Having links doesn't mean it is same. Your source itself says that Taj is different from pre-Islamic architecture that was there in India. It combines other architecture in its completion. Which means it is not solely purely Indian in nature. Hence can't be termed as Indian Ancestry. ShaanSengupta^Talk 11:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bangladesh genocide. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nomian (talk) 04:00, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Thought I may have misunderstood the targets of genocide but killing of 1,111 intellectuals in Dacca University a case of Anti-intellectualism, and why was that removed?, They were one of the targets of the genocide, So I am adding it back.

Thank you! Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 13:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

You have to verify your claim by citing a reliable source or it will be considered an original research and will be removed. This time you have cited another Wikipedia article which is not a reliable source, neither it verifies your claim. Nomian (talk) 05:55, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Since you have accepted that you have a misunderstanding about the topic, it is better to first discuss your proposed edit on the talk page and reach a consensus before adding them to the article. There were many killings but all of them do not fall under the definition of genocide which has a very specific meaning in International Law. The source you added is a news article which is not reliable enough to cite in an article about a historical topic. We mostly rely on academic sources in these cases. Before you dig into cherry-picking another source, I would suggest you again to first discuss your edits on the talk page since all your edits so far have been quite problematic and have disrupted the article. Nomian (talk) 19:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Bangladesh genocide, you may be blocked from editing. Nomian (talk) 08:14, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Nomian (talk) 05:40, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Andrew Tate

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Regarding numerous edits on Andrew Tate page: [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23]

Please familarise yourself with WP:LEAD as well as MOS:FIRST as previously referenced in history edit comments, and avoid linking to WP:DISAMB pages when adding wikilinks. If there is more up to date information about Tate's boxing career, please add it to the correction section, so the lead can then be updated. Please refrain from adding information to the lead section prior to adding it to the body, and avoid WP:UNDUE content in the lead section as well as the first sentence. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 03:25, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Re: RfC

Someone (including you or me) could post on Wikipedia:Closure requests right now to request that the RfC be closed. There is no fixed conclusion date for an RfC, but RfCs are typically left open for between 7 and 30 days. In this case, because we both think there is active harm in propagating this misinformation, it might be wise to ask sooner.

Is there any reason that you enclosed your question in quotes? Malerisch (talk) 12:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank You! Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 13:14, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Can you kindly post on Wikipedia:Closure requests right now to request that the RfC be closed? Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 13:20, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

I added a request, but I can't guarantee that someone will close it immediately. Some closure requests have been left unresolved there for a week or more. Malerisch (talk) 13:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Thank You for your help! Your edits are appreciated. Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 14:48, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024

Hello, I'm Someone who's wrong on the internet. I noticed that you recently removed content from Islam in Assam without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 01:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

I think you miss understood my edit. I move the human right issues (Discrimination of Bengali Muslims) in the last part of the page like Islam in the Netherlands. Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 01:49, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shruti Haasan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Israel–Hamas war, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaza.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Godhra train accident

Hello. This is a message to inform you that one of your recent contributions to the Godhra train tragedy does not appear to be beneficial and has been reversed. Sheikbaba36524 (talk) 03:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Please see

@Number 57 Can we use Infobox legislative election instead of Infobox election লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 16:03, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

You're admin. So, no body can betray you লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 16:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

@লাল সেলাম কমরেড: My status as an admin is not relevant here, but I started a discussion about it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Indian politics#Endless edit warring on general election infoboxes if you would like to give your view there. Cheers, Number 57 17:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LJP Ram Vilas.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LJP Ram Vilas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jharkhand Mukti Morcha Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jharkhand Mukti Morcha Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Contentious topics reminder

You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Kautilya3 (talk) 09:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Narendra Modi

I have reverted your edits on the hindutva section- what you added has no relation to hindutva. Please add the section in his general election campaigns (after 2014 and 2019; no one has added 2024 yet). And then add that there. Pharaoh496 (talk) 14:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

There is a relations between Hindutva and anti-muslim hate. Hindutva pop artists defend their music as neither xenophobic nor Islamophobic, arguing it promotes truth. Popular Hindutva pop artists like Laxmi Dubey and Prem Krishnavanshi mainstream the xenophobic values of the genre. So, my edits are correct with reliable source as per WP: Reliable. If you have any problem with my edits , discuss it in Talk:Narendra Modi.

Thank You!

Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 16:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

I am not in favour of removing it mate, but there have to be more appropriate ways to actually add this. In the section "premiership campaigns", we should add one for 2024 and include this there. This in hindutva makes negative sense Pharaoh496 (talk) 08:29, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:UBX/Comparisons between Israel and Nazi Germany

User:UBX/Comparisons between Israel and Nazi Germany, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UBX/Comparisons between Israel and Nazi Germany and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:UBX/Comparisons between Israel and Nazi Germany during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:13, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Next Manipur Legislative Assembly election for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Next Manipur Legislative Assembly election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Manipur Legislative Assembly election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Soni (talk) 13:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited May Calamawy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Egyptian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hinduism in Assam, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Assamese and Marwari.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

Hello, I'm R0paire-wiki. I noticed that you recently removed content from Asom Sonmilito Morcha without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. R0paire-wiki (talk) 19:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

as the Indian National Congress left the alliance, cite:https://news.abplive.com/blog/opinion-congress-gaurav-gogoi-is-responsible-for-collapse-of-opposition-unity-in-assam-northeast-notes-1727033

I made the changes. Lionel Messi Lover (talk) 20:06, 26 October 2024 (UTC)