Welcome to Wikipedia. I am your Wikipedia Campus Ambassador,Dumpling. If you have any questions, feel free to post on my discussion page or send me a quick e-mail. I'm usually always online. It'll be fun working with you.
This is how you link articles in Wikipedia using double square brackets: [[Antarctic Peninsula]] giving this result: Antarctic Peninsula. For a heading use the ==Heading== and use the triple quote for making something bold, but not at the same time as the heading markup. For an ordered list use # on the beginning of a line. The lines will be numbered. To get a new line put two enters in so that a blank line separates the paragraphs. Or you can use <br/> to break a line into two, but this is not the preferred way.
Thanks for uploading File:Meeting of the Indian and Southern Oceans, Cape Leeuwin AU.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mlpearc Public (Talk) 23:21, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again Logan, I see that you have worked out how to use images, but had a lot of trouble with getting everything right! For your file: File:Indian Southern Oceans Meet.jpg you should state some more information, to say what this is a picture of. I suspect it is you, but others that come across the picture may have no idea of that. The Information template is the thing to uses for that, you would have had a chance to fill in a form when you uploaded it. THe important thing to know is the source, how did the photo get taken and how did you get to own the copyright, so that you can grant a license to the world with the CC license.
Drawing diagrams is a lot of work, it can take 4 hours or more for one image. Since you are doing some research there is an important policy to read Wikipedia:No original research. This means that you should not announce your discoveries first on Wikipedia, but that Wikipedia should contain material that is published elsewhere. I am not suggesting that you will get into difficulty but you should know about it before hand. You will be in a strong position to know the published literature on the topic and will be able to select the best references. Will you create a new article on the geology of the Antarctic Peninsula or just add to the Antarctic Peninsula page? The name Antarctic Peninsula’s subduction zone tectonics sounds to be a narrow topic for Wikipedia, so I would suggest a broader term for the actual article name. I am not suggesting that you change your research, I am thinking about how it should fit into Wikipedia. It does not mean that you have to write about the parts you are not interested in, just leave that to someone else! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:29, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, some comments on File:Antarctic Peninsula Cross Section.jpg. I am pleased to see that you followed up on the suggestion to have this. For the appearance in the thumbnail image I suggest that you make the text in the image at least twice as large so that it is legible. There is a red ellipse in a white circle and a whiote ellipse in a red circle, but there is no explanation of what they mean. If there was trench rollback happening I would have expected remnants of subducting oceanic crust further to the right, but it is not in the diagram. The grey lump north east of Bransfield rift is probably an Island with a name which could be included. How fast is the rift expanding? There is a yellow hook under the Antarctic Plate label, does that mean anything? B would be clearer than A'. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:55, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:53, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Logan, Geology of the Antarctic Peninsula has now been promoted to the Template:Did you know/Preparation area 3 from where it will go into a queue and then spend 8 hours linked from the main page. You will be the second last one of your class to get an article on Did You Know. (Unless those that missed out write a new article). 09:04, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
What was in the original verbiage was complete conjecture. Should not be allowed as modern Archaelogy has started to have differing understanding of history. Look it up. Lgkirst (talk) 19:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia shout NOT be a consensus machine, it should allow differing opinion and get entirely away from having slam pieces against people who have a differing professional and scientifically backed thesis. Lgkirst (talk) 19:05, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I get an orange notice because of "vandalism"? Even though science has started to more consistently back his research, I am vandalizing by editing out slander? Lgkirst (talk) 19:06, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edits to User talk:Lgkirst could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 19:17, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
or 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:53, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Graham Hancock, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 19:02, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Your recent edits to User talk:Lgkirst could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 19:17, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
