User talk:Leszek Jańczuk/Archive 3

DYK for Peter P. Dubrovsky

On January 4, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Peter P. Dubrovsky, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 536

On January 10, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 536, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar, and a suggestion

		The Original Barnstar
		For your excellent articles on Papyri, Minuscules, etc. Just great work! bender235 (talk) 12:58, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

If you're adding Ancient Greek words (or other languages) to articles, please include them with {{Lang}}, like I demonstrated here. This has several advantages, especially for automatic screen readers. --bender235 (talk) 12:58, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Transcription of Early Greek NT Manuscripts

Being informed by yours truly that you used Philip W. Comfort and David P. Barrett's The Text of the Earliest New Testament Greek Manuscripts to do a transcription of ${\mathfrak {P}}$⁵, are you planing on doing transcriptions for the rest of Early Papyri? If so, I'd be more than willing to give a hand if this is your intention :) (Stephen Walch (talk) 19:55, 12 January 2010 (UTC))

I can quite easily do some of the smaller ones that haven't been done quite quickly. But you're right - quite a daunting task being able to put the transcriptions into Wikipedia form (Stephen Walch (talk) 21:52, 12 January 2010 (UTC))

Qubbat ul-Khazna

Kubbet el Chazne (Arabic: قبة الخزنة Qubbat ul-Khazna) is an old structure [1]. It is translated into English as the "Dome of the Treasury" and is located inside the courtyard of the Umayyad Mosque. You may take a look at this structure here: [2]. DrMoslehi (talk) 20:48, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 541

On January 22, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 541, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Minuscule 545

Hello! Your submission of Minuscule 545 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cryptic C62 · Talk 06:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 543 (Gregory-Aland)

On January 27, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 543 (Gregory-Aland), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 06:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

question about your dyk hook

Hi, I have asked a question about your dyk hook here. I do not understand what it means. Could you help me out? Regards, —mattisse (Talk) 20:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

I have made a alt hook suggestion at the above location. What do you think? Regards, —mattisse (Talk) 21:31, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Your request

I went to edit the article, but I guess you are working on it. Would appreciate your not requesting a copy edit until you are out. LilHelpa (talk) 20:45, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 544

On January 30, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 544, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 545

On January 31, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 545, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Limits of the Five Patriarchates

Hello Leszek. I have reviewed your latest submission at DYK and there are some issues that may need addressing. Kindly Calmer Waters 09:16, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Limits of the Five Patriarchates

It would be very good if you could add the critical apparatus to the Greek Wikisource, where it is available to non-English readers.  Andreas  ^(T) 13:42, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of New Testament uncials/archive1

Can you reply to the comments on the FLC page so reviewers know what has and has not been completed? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 17:10, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Christ's Agony at Gethsemane

Hello! Your submission of Christ's Agony at Gethsemane at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! otherlleft 19:57, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 569 (Gregory-Aland)

On February 5, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 569 (Gregory-Aland), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Daniel Gotthilf Moldenhawer

On February 6, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Daniel Gotthilf Moldenhawer, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:01, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Your request

Had a quick look and have to run. Please check the introduction. Did you mean to say he worked on several palimsests' texts or one palimsest's text? -- LilHelpa (talk) 16:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

RE: DYK

In response to this conversation: I'm not quite sure I understand. How should I change the nomination? I have just changed my comment to report the number of characters, rather than words, by which the article was expanded. Is that what you mean? Alekjds ^talk 18:27, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

your dyk hook for A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament

Hi, your dyk hook for A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament is not a 5x expansion. Please see here for an explanation. It needs over 3000 more characters to qualify. Thanks, —mattisse (Talk) 20:28, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

re edit count for article

See my talk page. Regards, —mattisse (Talk) 02:16, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

(from my talk page) I have found that bot to be unreliable in picking up articles. So I would not depend on it if I were you. —mattisse (Talk) 02:32, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Christ's Agony at Gethsemane

On February 13, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Christ's Agony at Gethsemane, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 06:01, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

dyk hook problem

Hi, there is a problem with your dyk hook here. The hook in the article needs an inline citation after it. Thanks, —mattisse (Talk) 18:39, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Codex Carolinus

Hello Leszek, I have reviewed your recent submission at DYK... and have some questions regarding it before promotion. Thanks in advance. Kindly Calmer Waters 08:09, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Both nominations are well sourced; however, it appears just the hook facts are currently uncited for Codex Carolinus and Minuscule 614. If these facts can be cited, I see no reason for promotion to the main page. Thank you again for your diligence and outstanding article creations. Kindly Calmer Waters 17:35, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Kubbet el Chazne

I am not exactly sure what Kubbet el Chazne is? I am fairly certain that it is not the National Museum of Damascus, which is called Mathaf el WaTany bieldamasq.

I can tell you that the word Kubbet (قبة) which is better transliterized with a Q (Qubba[t]) is usually used to refer to the dome of building, particularly the Islamic architecture of mosques. So Qubbet el Chazne most likely refers to some mosque somewhere, or at least its dome. But I'm not sure what the name Chazne here refers to.

Hope that helps.

codectified (talk) 21:47, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Franz Anton Knittel

On February 18, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Franz Anton Knittel, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:17, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 614

On February 19, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 614, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:17, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Minuscule 629

Hello! Your submission of Minuscule 629 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Arctic Night 14:15, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Verlorene Siege

Hi Leszek, I've looked at your article on Verlorene Siege and would suggest that you give references to some of your claims: ie "Colonel-General von Rundstedt - brilliant exponent of grand tactics, a talented soldier who grasped the essentials of any problem in an instant." Is this Manstein's judgement or your own? Much of what you say doesn't make sense in English: "the German general staff had some concerns with Adolf Hitler. Hitler, despite the lack of education and preparation of military forces as a supervisor reached unprecedented success"; "End of the war looked from his property." Ericoides (talk) 07:55, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

"Colonel-General von Rundstedt - brilliant exponent of grand tactics, a talented soldier who grasped the essentials of any problem in an instant." Is this Manstein's judgement not mine?" I have no idea; you tell me. That is one of the problems of the article; the reader can't distinguish between quotes from Manstein and your own POV. Ericoides (talk) 10:31, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. I've put the quotation back into the article with quote marks; please would you use quote marks so that we can see which bits are being quoted and which bits are your own opinion. If you look at this diff you will see that the Manstein claim looked like your own.[3]. Was this a quote too: "He was a type of old-guard, man from a past." I can't believe it could be from an English translation as it is very badly written English and makes no sense. Was it your own translation from the German? It's all very confusing. Ericoides (talk) 10:45, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. The confusion in the article comes from your level of English. Eg what does this mean: "The global analysis, thin vision of " the moments of true » in battles, the consecutive description of optimum plans and not optimum actions — all this makes the book of Manstein as a handbook of strategy." It doesn't make sense. Ericoides (talk) 11:11, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Fulcran Vigouroux

On February 26, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fulcran Vigouroux, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 18:13, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 627

On March 2, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 627, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Ucucha 18:11, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 644

On March 3, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 644, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Calmer Waters 06:04, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 546

On March 3, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 546, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 19:06, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Verlorene Siege

On March 4, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Verlorene Siege, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—Ed (talk • majestic titan) 00:33, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Biblioteca comunale Luciano Benincasa

On March 4, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Biblioteca comunale Luciano Benincasa, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:04, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 629

On March 4, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 629, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:04, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations

Thanks and congrats for adding all the miniscule manuscript articles. it's a truly invaluable and absolutely historic service both to Wikipedia, the theological and biblical community, and to the knowledge base of humankind. i mean it! i'm a theology and biblical studies enthusiast. --Dpr (talk) 21:49, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Minuscule 642

I have left a question at Did you know about some wording in the hook for Minuscule 642. The article states that he brought the hooks over; however, the hook states that he purchased them but this is not yet in the article. I am sure he did both, but if you can add this to the article (as it is offline sourced), I can go ahead and approve it. I also left a note at the nomination, because I often show up at your submission with what seems like ....we'll I still need this or that :) Also disregard the English orientalist portion I discussed as I was mistaken. We'll take care, and keep up the good work :) Calmer Waters 08:03, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Andrew Birch

I'm trying to copy edit the article on Andrew Birch but I'm not sure what this sentence means: "The young Danish scholar left the church in the state capital quite a few friends who almost surely belonged to the circle of Roman Catholics, who busied himself with patriotic and archaeological studies." Moglbys to napisac tu (albo na moim talku) po Polsku?radek (talk) 08:52, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 642

On March 9, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 642, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lectionary 187

On March 11, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lectionary 187, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

25 DYK Creation/Expansion Medal

		The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
		Congratulations for reaching the milestone of 25 of your created articles appearing at Did you know. The variety of your contributions, including the articles on palaeography topics, are a great asset to the encyclopedia. Well done! Binksternet (talk) 15:46, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of British Library, Add. 14448

Hello! Your submission of British Library, Add. 14448 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Thelmadatter (talk) 23:56, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Codex Arundel

Hello! Your submission of Codex Arundel at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 07:30, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Andrew Birch

On March 16, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Andrew Birch, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:02, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for British Library, Add. 14448

On March 16, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article British Library, Add. 14448, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:04, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Arundel Codex, etc

Please pay more attention to your categories. Also "Arundel Codex" is often seen, & should be a redirect. MS are not "currently housed in" etc, they are just "in". This information should be in the lead, regardless of the infobox. "Additional" etc should be spelt out in text, and "MS" included. Thanks. Johnbod (talk) 10:56, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Codex Arundel

On March 18, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Codex Arundel, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Minuscule 658, Minuscule 659, Minuscule 661

Hello! Your submission of Minuscule 658, Minuscule 659, Minuscule 661 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Storye book (talk) 13:16, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Example

On March 26, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Example, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Mifter (talk) 08:40, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Minuscule 655

Hello! Your submission of Minuscule 655 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ThaddeusB (talk) 20:26, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Novum Instrumentum omne

Hi Leszek Jańczuk, can you clarify "In 1512 he had been in negotiation with Badius Ascensius of Paris to publish Vulgate of Jerome and a new edition of Adagia. It did happen, and Erasmus did not continue contacts with Badius.[1]". Thanks. Pyrotec (talk) 18:16, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

The main body of the article is OK, but the WP:Lead needs some expansion to summarise the main points in the article. I've slightly expanded the Lead; if you could finish it off, I will award GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 09:39, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Archangel Gospel

Hello! Your submission of Archangel Gospel at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Storye book (talk) 17:14, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Erasmus

I've just noticed that you have been editing the Novum Instrumentum article. This is fascinating, as I am a fan of Erasmus's Encomium Mories, and I have a personal (unproven) suspicion that he and Thomas More's daughter cooked up the letters of Heloise and Abelard between them. I believe that only Erasmus's great mind could have written the Abelard letters. I would be interested to know whether you have come across any other theories on the origin of the letters. But please don't do any research to answer this - I'm just interested to know what you think. Please reply on my talk page if you have any comment.--Storye book (talk) 17:22, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Countenance divine

I have opened an AfD for Countenance divine at WP:Articles for deletion/Countenance divine if you are interested. Tb (talk) 01:24, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Archangel Gospel

On April 12, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Archangel Gospel, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 16:42, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Kodeks Aleksandryjski na polskich Wikiźródłach

Cześć! Na polskich Wikiźródłach opracowujemy właśnie Encyklopedję kościelną z 1873 r. Tak się składa, że pierwszym hasłem w tej encyklopedii jest "A", czyli Kodeks Aleksandryjski. Niestety, mamy problem w jego przepisywaniu - mianowicie, tekst encyklopedii zawiera kilka liter greckich. Nikt w projekcie nie zna greki, litery są nieco niewyraźne, a na dodatek nie ma ich w alfabecie greckim (znaczy, że to jakaś starsza forma), i nie bardzo potrafimy je przepisać. Jeżeli chodzi o Kodeks Aleksandryjski i ogólnie manuskrypty, jesteś bez wątpienia najlepiej zorientowaną osobą na Wikipedii, i jeżeli tylko miałbyś chwilę czasu, bylibyśmy bardzo wdzięczni za udzielenie pomocy. Strona z hasłem znajduje się tutaj - s:pl:Strona:PL Nowodworski-Encyklopedia koscielna T.1 016.jpeg. Serdecznie pozdrawiam --Teukros (talk) 20:01, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dura Parchment 24

The article Dura Parchment 24 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Dura Parchment 24 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 01:30, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for National Library of Russia, Codex Syriac 1

On April 18, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article National Library of Russia, Codex Syriac 1, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:10, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament

Hi Leszek Jańczuk, I have left comments on Talk:A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament/GA1. Pyrotec (talk) 16:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

jakew

regarding the edit war i have with jakew

i posted an message on his talk page in which i explained why i made my edits and asked him to explain why eh keeps changing my work he has deleted it and replaced it with the following comment

Thank you. It's very thoughtful of you to let me know. Jakew (talk) 21:17, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

i posted a comment on jakew talk page explaining why i changed his edits and asked him why he changed mine he replied with this

Thank you. It's very thoughtful of you to let me know. Jakew (talk) 21:17, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

this response does not give any insight into why he keeps changing my work

i believe that he is maliciously changing my work

---

circumsison is a matter over which many people have strong fealings. in the past wars have been fought over it and many people still do it regardless of what the law may say. for this reason i suspect that jakew may be sabotaging my work because he has strong personal fealings about the matter

jakew has posted a lot of articles, however due to the extreame fealings some people have regarding circumsision is suspect that he may be chanlengeing my edits which mostly opose circumsision because h has stong fealings about it himself.--82.24.163.100 (talk) 22:42, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Otto Thott

Hello! Your submission of Otto Thott at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jujutacular ^T · C 21:30, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Euthalian Apparatus

On April 20, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Euthalian Apparatus, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Codex Marchalianus

On April 21, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Codex Marchalianus, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Differences between codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus

On April 23, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Differences between codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 671

On April 23, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minuscule 671, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 16:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Otto Thott

On April 23, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Otto Thott, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 16:04, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lectionary 216

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Samuel Thomas Bloomfield

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Samuel Thomas Bloomfield, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://chestofbooks.com/reference/American-Cyclopaedia-14/Samuel-Thomas-Bloomfield-Samuel-Whitbread.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:11, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

FYI, if the page that was tagged merely repeats verbatim the information from American Cyclopedia (which appears to be the case), you can stick with the original wording if you'd rather since anything pre 1923 is public domain. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:27, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Lectionary 220, Lectionary 223

Hello! Your submission of Lectionary 220, Lectionary 223 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

Sorry for bringing this up so late. Espresso Addict (talk) 08:52, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Minuscule 686

Glad to see another of your wonderful Minuscule articles, but with this one I'm wondering if we can get a more mainstream-accessible hook? I had no idea what "so called Jerusalem Colophon" meant, and neither Minuscule 686 nor Jerusalem Colophon were particularly enlightening. Can we get a hook that might be more readable to a casual main-page browser? If you add one, feel free to let me know on my talk page and I'll revisit the nomination. - DustFormsWords (talk) 07:46, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Lectionary 226

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Lectionary 226, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Lectionary 220. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:10, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Lectionary 227

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Lectionary 227, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Lectionary 220. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:39, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Oriental MS 424

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lectionary 220

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lectionary 223

The DYK project (nominate) 16:04, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 686

Thanks for this one, cheers Victuallers (talk) 08:02, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Codex Vaticanus

Hi, I thought I'd let you know that as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/May 2010, I've copyedited Codex Vaticanus. Please check my changes for accuracy as the article is fairly technical and I wouldn't want to have changed the meaning. I found this to be an absolutely fascinating article (particularly as yesterday I finished reading a book about William Tyndale who translated from Greek to English). Should you need any more help on this article, please don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 15:06, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 697

Thanks for this one Victuallers (talk) 00:03, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you very much for the Copyeditor's Barnstar. That was a nice surprise! I'm not completely done, but wanted to wait for a few days before I come back to it. At this point it only needs a little more polishing. It's really an informative article, and I enjoyed working on it. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 01:32, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

A barnstar

		The Christianity Barnstar
		I'm not sure if anyone's given you a barnstar yet for your series of articles on lectionaries and minuscules, but if not it's about time you had one. DustFormsWords (talk) 04:45, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lectionary 232

Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK problem

Hello! Your submission of Lectionary 226 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! LittleMountain5 00:09, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lectionary 228

The DYK project (nominate) 18:02, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Hunterian Collection

Hello! Your submission of Hunterian Collection at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

Interesting subject! I've heard of the Hunterian Collection (in the context of early books on anatomy) but never realised it included coins. However, I think you need to select a different hook, unless the "finest" is supported by an independent source. Espresso Addict (talk) 17:47, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your continued work on this. Espresso Addict (talk) 00:26, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lectionary 226

Thanks for the article Victuallers (talk) 06:02, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Nice work!

Just wanted to say awesome work on biblical manuscripts you have done so far! Omegastar (talk) 11:20, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 699

The DYK project (nominate) 12:01, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Minuscule 716

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Minuscule 716, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.reachinformation.com/define/Minuscule_716.aspx. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:30, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lectionary 239

Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 12:02, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lectionary 240

Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 12:03, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lectionary 241

The DYK project (nominate) 18:02, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Charles de Condren

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Hunterian Collection

The DYK project (nominate) 12:04, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal

		The 50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
		Congratulations are in order upon the occasion of your reaching the milestone of 50 articles which you created or expanded, submitted to "Did you know?" and appearing on the Main page! Your efforts have substantially improved the encyclopedia. Well done! Binksternet (talk) 18:56, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 714

BorgQueen (talk) 12:03, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 715

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Kaiser Wilhelm Society

I am sorry I reverted your edits. It was an accident. I was trying to revert the IP's edtits, when Huggle decided it was going to be clever and revert yours as well! Again, I am sorry. :) --Mithrandir^Again (Talk!) 23:07, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Wow, thanks for these speedy edits! Regards! See you around. --_Sulmues ^{Let's talk} 19:45, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, drop by if you need my help with any translation from Albanian. --_Sulmues ^{Let's talk} 21:04, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

		The Literary Barnstar
		I will be glad to award this barnstar for your work on the two Berat Codices work in particular (Codex_Beratinus and Beratinus 2), and in general on the hundreds of articles you have created on uncials, codices and old bibles. Actually this is kind of the wrong barnstar, because there should be a Leszek barnstar from now on. Please accept my personal recognition and admiration! Thank you! Sulmues Let's talk 17:46, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Codex Tischendorfianus III

Hello! Your submission of Codex Tischendorfianus III at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Rlevse • Talk • 01:29, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Pls archive a lot of this talk page ;-) — Rlevse • Talk • 01:30, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

seriously?

Philip Ojha (better known as "Father" Ojha), infamous Nepalese religious figure, founder of the Church of DotA, first apostle in the Book of Brian Peppers, coiner of the phrase "Do You Scream?" used in the popular film Batman Molests 2011. He is currently serving a life imprisonment in the Correctional Facility in Stockholm, Sweden following a sexual assault case. This is obvious vandalism.84.136.206.1 (talk) 20:11, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

• Indeed it is. Please take more care in reverting. –xeno^talk 22:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Borg in-Nadur

Thanks for adding that category to Borg in-Nadur apparitions. Do you know Biblical Greek ? ( I'm studying at the moment ). Alan347 (talk) 17:25, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Codex Tischendorfianus III

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:01, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Biblical Greek

Good morning Leszek Jańczuk, I'm continuing to study the Greek, what I'm doing is reading it out in Greek http://biblos.com/mark/1-3.htm, with the help of the interlinear translation. Hope this gets me to a new phase where I start understanding the Greek directly. For the recorded manuscripts, I can always refer to your User page. Thanks. Alan347 (talk) 08:14, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

You're editing at a rate of once every 3 minutes

Please stop blindly editing/reverting articles you've never read or contributed, as you did to anti-Americanism. Noloop (talk) 02:21, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Burki

Please read the secion on Burki before you undo. This piece is purly opinion which is in violation of Wiki Policy. Kindly undo the reveret. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2010khan (talk • contribs) 19:51, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Bibliothèque municipale de Besançon

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Nicolas Perrenot de Granvelle

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 03:56, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Codex Copticus Tischendorfianus I

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:02, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Oscar Eduardovich Lemm

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:03, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Codex Vaticanus and GA tag

Curious as to why you would preemptively place the GA tag on this article, [4], when it has not been passed as a GA? -- Cirt (talk) 08:49, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Okay, thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 08:50, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Fifty Bibles of Constantine

-- Cirt (talk) 18:03, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Small correction in the Codex Sinaiticus needed

Dear Leszek, Please take at look at the end of the second paragraph in the History of the Codex -> Scribes and corrector section. There's clearly some referencing typo, but I can't figure out what you had in mind. Many thanks for your superb work!!!--Opera Omnia (talk) 22:38, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

742

Why not have at the 742 article located at Minuscule 742 instead of Minuscule 742 (Gregory-Aland)? There doesn't seem the need for the disambiguation parenthetical "Gregory-Aland". We should probably have a consistent naming convention for manuscript articles, so I'm curious why you added the longer title for 742's article name? -Andrew c ^[talk] 00:07, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Consistency on P98

So in regards to your edit, does that mean that the recto text was written first and then the Revelation text was written on the same paper decades later? Or does it mean that the previous date mentioned in the opening of the article is wrong? I'm confused, and all I'm asking for is consistency. The opening says "late 2nd century", and then the paragraph about the recto says late first to early second. It just seems inconsistent. At the very least, if it is after all the case that the two sides were written at different times, then perhaps that should be made a little more clear in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.40.18.26 (talk) 21:25, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Scrolls were written on one side only. In sometimes also another side was written (opistographa) but with different text and scroll was rolled in different way. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 21:35, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Okay(sorry to keep pestering you), so if I am understanding you correctly, you are confirming that the recto & verso were written in two different decades, is that correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.40.18.26 (talk) 21:44, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Exactly. Thanks for your attention, because this text was not clear enough. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 21:50, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Codex Nanianus

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:03, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Ernst von Dobschütz

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:02, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Codex Glazier

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Family E

-- Cirt (talk) 06:02, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Eberhard Nestle

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Codex Vaticanus 2061

Hello! Your submission of Codex Vaticanus 2061 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! AngChenrui (talk) 13:16, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Codex Vaticanus 2061

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:03, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Codex Boreelianus

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:02, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks and appreciation

I appreciate the work you've put in for New Testament manuscripts. Stephen C. Carlson (talk) 13:13, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Friedrich Münter

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for University of Fulda

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Codex Cyprius

The DYK project (nominate) 18:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 759 (Gregory-Aland)

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Waverley House, Bristol

The article Waverley House, Bristol has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet the WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:56, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Edit Summaries

Hiya. Remember the good old days, when you commendably always supplied a wp:ES?

But now, whilst you do stacks of edits & get stacks of DYKs, you're setting a very bad example in ESs.

Shame - couldn't you try a bit harder? Trafford09 (talk) 18:16, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Codex Vaticanus

I have recently made an edit to this article which I think may have been a poor judgement on my part. The Codex Vaticanus was said to have 759 leaves, which I could not see the importance of. Is that number significant? Does the Bible have a set number of leaves (sections) that it should have? Is this a measure of its completeness? --Screwball23 talk 02:06, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

BnF categories

See Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_August_19#Category:Holdings_of_the_Biblioth.C3.A8que_nationale_de_France

DYK nomination of List of Hebrew Bible manuscripts

Hello! Your submission of List of Hebrew Bible manuscripts at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BabelStone (talk) 23:45, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Skokie, Illinois

I am completely baffled. What did you actually do in these two edits?[5][6] HuskyHuskie (talk) 01:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Could you take a moment to answer my question, please? HuskyHuskie (talk) 13:45, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Richard Waldron IV

Thanks for your fixes.RWIR (talk) 05:49, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lectionary 269

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for List of Hebrew Bible manuscripts

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:02, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Family 1739

Hello! Your submission of Family 1739 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 23:28, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Good edits on William Shockley article--thanks.

I see you have been improving the William Shockley article and reverting vandalism there besides. Keep up the good work. P.S. I'm very interested to see that you have done so many articles on papyri and uncials. I used to study textual criticism of the New Testament quite a bit, so it's great to see that that subject is well covered in Wikipedia. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 20:18, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Family 1739

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 113

The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Bernard de Montfaucon

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:02, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Nani

Znam Ciebie z plwiki, więc mogę napisać po polsku. Nie rozumiem dlaczego cofnąłeś dobrą edycję IPka w tym haśle. Usunął on ewidentny wandalizm dotyczący jego rzekomego transferu do Aston Villi, co oczywiście jest nieprawdą. PS. (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

WP:RS

[7] Please show me where this site has proven that it has a reputation for fact checking and accuracy. Active Banana ( ^bananaphone 20:33, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Codex Vaticanus

I left a comment on the talk page in regards to the language per the editor; hopefully that can be looked at and dealt with soon, since it's been at GA a while now. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 19:42, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Mark Zuckerberg

I stared and stared at the differences between the Zuckerberg article before you made your "minor" change and after, and I simply could not see what you did. What did you change, and is there a way for me to see it better because it shows SO much text in green, it's hard to figure out sometimes. Usually, if I look long enough, I finally see something in red, either on the right or on the left, but I couldn't with yours.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:08, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. The software should color the spaces red.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:31, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination for Lectionary 283 and Biblioteca Communale

Hello, your nomination of Lectionary 283 and Biblioteca Communale at DYK was reviewed and comments provided. --NortyNort (Holla) 12:24, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Nope, the nomination is good now. Thanks for the quick reply. --NortyNort (Holla) 12:46, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Revert my edit

Excuse me, but why did you just revert my edit. The 2010 Summer Live Music Fest is a festival with all sorts of acts. Alesha was not supporting Mcfly, she was simply performing at Sandown Park Racecourse alongside other acts like Mcfly and Tinchy Stryder. Furthermore, she states she doesn't work with Xenomania on her new album here: [8] 79.69.224.213 (talk) 23:20, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lectionary 283

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:04, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Biblioteca Communale (Siena)

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:04, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 782 (Gregory-Aland)

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:04, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

George Nathaniel Henry Peters

Hello Leszek. I know you are interested in theology and Biblical studies. This article (a 19th century American Lutheran) is nominated for deletion for the third time since June 2010. I'm not sure if you have any expertise exactly in this area, however, I believe that you could provide a more competent analysis than most of us commentators at AfD. Thanks for any opinion and my apologies if you are not interested. Best regards. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 07:30, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Ok, the AfD was speedy closed. Thanks. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 08:13, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

2009-10 NHL season

What is your reason for removing this edit? [9] Rusted AutoParts (talk 10:31, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

/* Rajesh khanna filmography */

We need your help in filling up the column of directors - which you can get from http://www.citwf.com/person241842.htm in the article rajesh khanna filmography in wikipedia.As you seen to be interested in working in wikipedia articles we would be gald if you contribute in filling up the DIRECTORS cloumn and in the NOTES column fill up the awards won and nominations won by khanna against a particular film.Shrik88music (talk) 14:39, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your contribution but sorry to say but lots of dates have been changed very unnessarily and many films with Khanna have been deleted too. I have put forward what needs to be changed and how similar it should be with the list i have pasted down and i hope u take in right spirit and make the changes happily.. .Total rajesh khanna films must be 3 added by you and 153 already mentioned. 1)In notes column add the follwing details for the following films needs to be mentioned.

• 1972 – Winner BFJA Awards, Best Actor for Anand
• 1973 – Winner BFJA Awards, Best Actor for Bawarchi
• 1974 – Winner BFJA Awards, Best Actor for Namak Haraam
• 1987 – Winner BFJA Awards, Best Actor for Amrit

and 1982 – Winner Lions Club, New Delhi– Best Actor Award for Dard 1994 – Winner Russian Film Festival, Ujvegistan- Best Actor for Khudai and

Won

• 1971 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Sachaa Jhutha
• 1972 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Anand
• 1975 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Avishkaar

Nominated

• 1970 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Aradhana
• 1970 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Ittefaq
• 1971 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Kati Patang
• 1973 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Dushman (1972)
• 1973 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Amar Prem
• 1974 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Daag: A Poem of Love
• 1975 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Prem Nagar
• 1980 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Amardeep
• 1981 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Thodisi Bewafaii
• 1982 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Dard
• 1984 – Filmfare Best Actor Award for Avtaar

2)thanks for adding khoon aur pani,Ram Tere Kitne Nam and 1987 Raj Kapoor Himself but Khoon aur paani i doubt as it did not hav e rajesh khanna. where from you got the data about this film having Khanna? but the following which are either missing from imbd or citwf were added me by me and are now missing......they are needed to be added back as they have been searched by me after watching those films and they are available in different sites and articles. ........... Sundara Satarkar (Marathi Movie -1981,Dushman Dost of 1981 Rekha and Reena Roy,Bayen Hath Ka Khel - Tina Munim of 1985,Hathyara (1977) - Special Appearance,Ayaash (1982) Rati Agnihotri - Special Appearance Shakti Samanta , and Dushman (1990) - Special Appearance Shakti Samanta... and the 1968 film reads Shrimanji in the film credits and not Srimanji

3)1972 filmfare awards was won by Rajesh Khanna - Anand as Anand Saigal and the film was released in 1971 and Premnagar was nominated in 1975 filmfare awards and was released in 1974. 4)do not delete anything only add things. please ensure that the order of film release is as follows which is right..... 5)Kati Patang was released in 1971 and got nominated in 1972 filmfare awards as Rajesh Khanna - Kati Patang as Kamal Sinha and similarly Dushman and Amar Prem were released in 1972 and got nominated in 1973 held filmfare function and Aavishkar was released in 1974 and Khanna won in 1975. 6)The Year of the film release is perfectly laid down below please ensure filmography is in following ORDER and the spelling of the film is as follows...The filography as edited by you should be now modified as follows

• Aakhri Khat(1966 film) Indrani Mukherjee
• Raaz (1967 film) (1967) Babita
• Baharon Ke Sapne (1967) Asha Parekh
• Aurat (1967 film) Nazima
• Shrimanji (1968 film)
• Aradhana (1969 film) (1969) Sharmila Tagore
• Ittefaq (film 1969) Nanda
• Doli (1969) Babita
• Bandhan (1969 film) Mumtaz
• Do Raaste (1970) Mumtaz
• Khamoshi (1970) Waheeda Rehman
• The Train (1970 film) Nanda
• Sachaa Jhutha (1970) Mumtaz
• Safar (film) (1970) Sharmila Tagore
• Kati Patang (1971) Asha Parekh
• Anand (1971)
• Aan Milo Sajna (1971) Asha Parekh
• Andaaz (1971) Hema Malini
• Maryada (1971) Mala Sinha
• Chhoti Bahu (1971) Sharmila Tagore
• Haathi Mere Saathi (1971) Tanuja
• Guddi (1971)
• Mehboob Ki Mehndi (1971) Leena Chandavarkar
• Badnaam Farishte (1971) Sharmila Tagore - Special Appearance
• Dushman (1972) Mumtaz
• Amar Prem (1972) Sharmila Tagore
• Apna Desh (1972) Mumtaz
• Dil Daulat Duniya (1972) Sadhana
• Bawarchi (1972) Jaya Bhaduri
• Joroo Ka Ghulam (1972) Nanda
• Mere Jeevan Saathi (1972 film)(1972) Tanuja
• Maalik (1972) Sharmila Tagore
• Shehzada (1972) Rakhee
• Anuraag (1973) Nutan
• Raja Rani (1973) Sharmila Tagore
• Daag: A Poem of Love (1973) Sharmila Tagore/Rakhee
• Namak Haraam (1973)Rekha
• Avishkaar (1974) Sharmila Tagore
• Humshakal (1974) Tanuja/ Moushumi Chatterjee
• Aap Ki Kasam (1974) Mumtaz
• Prem Nagar (1974) Hema Malini
• Ajnabee (1974 film) (1974) Zeenat Aman
• Roti (1974) Mumtaz
• Badhti Ka Naam Dadhi (1974)
• Prem Kahani (1975) Mumtaz
• Ginny Aur Johnny (1975) - Special Appearance
• Aakraman (1975) - Special Appearance
• Sawa Lakh Se Ek Ladaun (1976) Neetu Singh - Special Appearance
• Maha Chor (1976) Neetu Singh
• Bandalbaaz (1976) Sulakshana Pandit
• Mehbooba (1976) Hema Malini
• Tyaag (1977) Sharmila Tagore
• Karm (1977) Vidya Sinha/Shabana Azmi
• Chhaila Babu (1977) Zeenat Aman
• Chalta Purza (1977) Parveen Babi
• Anurodh (1977) Simple Kapadia
• Aashiq Hoon Baharon Ka (1977) Zeenat Aman
• Aaina (1977) Mumtaz - Special Appearance
• Tinku (1977) - Special Appearance
• Hathyara (1977) - Special Appearance
• Palkon Ki Chhaon Mein (1977) Hema Malini
• Chakravyuha (1978) Neetu Singh
• Bhola Bhala (1978) Rekha/Moushumi Chatterjee
• Naukri (1978) Zahira
• Til Til Dalekha (1979) Punjabi Hit Film
• Muqabla (1979) Rekha - Special Appearance
• Janata Havaldar (1979) Hema Malini /Yogeeta Bali
• Amar Deep (1979) Shabana Azmi
• Prem Bandhan (1979) Rekha/ Moushumi Chatterjee
• Phir Wohi Raat (1980) Kim
• Bandish (1980) Hema Malini
• Thodisi Bewafaii (1980) Shabana Azmi
• Red Rose (1980) Poonam Dhillon
• Aanchal (1980) Rekha/Rakhee
• Kudrat (1981) Hema Malini
• Sundara Satarkar (Marathi Movie -1981)
• Fiffty Fiffty (1981) Tina Munim
• Dhanwan (1981) Reena Roy
• Dard (1981) Hema Malini/Poonam Dhillon
• Naseeb (1981) Sharmila Tagore - Guest Artist
• Dushman Dost (1981) Rekha/Reena Roy
• Jaanwar (1982) Zeenat Aman
• Dil-E-Nadan (1982) Jaya Prada
• Ashanti (1982) Shabana Azmi/Zeenat Aman/Parveen Babi
• Suraag (1982) Tina Munim /Asha Sachdev- Special Appearance
• Rajput (1982) Hema Malini
• Dharam Kanta (1982) Reena Roy
• Ayaash (1982) Rati Agnihotri - Special Appearance
• Nishaan (1983) Poonam Dhillon
• Avtaar (1983) Shabana Azmi
• Souten (1983) Padmini Kolhapuri/Tina Munim
• Agar Tum Na Hote (1983) Rekha
• Disco Dancer (1983)
• Paapi Pet Ka Sawaal Hai (1984) Jaya Prada/Tina Munim
• Maqsad (1984) Sridevi
• Dharam Aur Kanoon (1984) Asha Parekh/ Jaya Prada
• Awaaz (1984) Jaya Prada
• Aaj Ka M.L.A. Ram Avtar (1984) Shabana Azmi
• Asha Jyoti (1984) Rekha/Reena Roy
• Naya Kadam (1984) Jaya Prada/Sridevi /Padmini Kolhapuri
• Zamana (1985) Poonam Dhilon
• Oonche Log (1985) Salma Agha
• Naya Bakra (1985) Reena Roy - Special Appearance
• Masterji (1985) Sridevi
• Insaaf Main Karoonga (1985) Tina Munim/Padmini Kolhapure
• Durga (1985) Hema Malini
• Aakhir Kyon? (1985) Smita Patil
• Bewafai (1985) Tina Munim/Padmini Kolhapuri /Meenakshi Seshadri
• Hum Dono (1985) Hema Malini/Reena Roy
• Alag Alag (1985) Tina Munim
• Babu (1985) Hema Malini/RatiAgnihotri
• Bayen Haath Ka Khel (1985) Tina Munim
• Awara Baap (1985) Meenakshi Seshadri/Madhuri Dixit
• Shatru (1986) Shabana Sadique
• Mohabbat Ki Kasam (1986) Jaya Prada
• Angaarey (1986) Smita Patil
• Ghar Pariwar (1986) Moushumi Chatterjee
• Amrit (1986) Smita Patil
• Adhikar (1986) Tina Munim/Zarina Wahab
• Nasihat (1986) Shabana Azmi
• Anokha Rishta (1986) Smita Patil
• Sitapur Ki Geeta (1987) Hema Malini
• Nazrana (1987) Sridevi/Smita Patil
• Awam (film) (1987) Poonam Dhillon
• Goraa (1987) Sulakshana Pandit
• Woh Phir Aayegi (1988) Farha
• Vijay (1988) Hema Malini
• Main Tera Dushman (1989) Jaya Prada - Guest Artist
• Mamta ki Chhaon Mein (1989) Leena Chandavarkar - Special Appearance
• Ghar Ka Chiraag (1989) Deepika/Neelam
• Paap Ka Ant (1989) Hema Malini - Special Appearance
• Swarg (1990) Madhavi
• Dushman (1990) - Special Appearance
• Rupaye Dus Karod (1991) Amrita Singh
• Begunah (1991) Farha
• Jai Shiv Shankar(1992)
• Khudai (1994) Deepika
• Kis Kaam Ke Yeh Rishte (1995)
• Sautela Bhai (1996) Moushumi Chatterjee
• Aa Ab Laut Chalen (1999) Moushumi Chatterjee
• Pyaar Zindagi Hai (2001)
• Kyaa Dil Ne Kahaa (2002)
• Classic Dance of Love (2005) - Special Appearance
• Jana: Let's fall in love (2006) Zeenat Aman - Special Appearance
• Om Shanti Om (2007)
• Jaanleva (2008) Rati Agnihotri
• Wafa: A deadly love story (2008) Laila Khan
• Kash Mere Hote (2009)
• Do Dilon Ke Khel Mein (2010)
• Phir Tum Mil Gaye (unreleased)
• Hello Kaun Hai (unreleased) Rati Agnihotri/Sara khan
• Door Door Sat Samandar Paar (unreleased)
• Police Ke Peechhe Police(unreleased)

Shrik88music (talk) 20:31, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Minuscule 482

Hello! Your submission of Minuscule 482 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Adabow (talk · contribs) 01:01, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010

In a recent edit to the page Miami Vice (film), you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Srobak (talk) 13:36, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination for Tivoli Friheden

Hello! Your submission of Tivoli Friheden at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:23, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 788 (Gregory-Aland)

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:03, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK

Hi Leszek, I don't understand the point of your remark below my DYK submission for Eccles. Regards, Ericoides 08:14, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Thanks. Ericoides 09:53, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 482

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:05, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Tivoli Friheden

Hello! Your submission of Tivoli Friheden at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Demiurge1000 (talk) 18:16, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Happy Leszek Jańczuk's Day!

Leszek Jańczuk has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, so I've officially declared today as Leszek Jańczuk's Day! For being a great person and awesome Wikipedian, enjoy being the star of the day, Leszek Jańczuk! Signed, Neutralhomer A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, click here. Have a Great Day...Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:25, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Judgment of God listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Judgment of God. Since you had some involvement with the Judgment of God redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 18:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Judgment of God for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Judgment of God, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judgment of God until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 18:59, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Temptation of Barbizon

Hello! Your submission of The Temptation of Barbizon at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:36, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Adams River

Hi Leszek, just wanted to tell you I expanded the Adams River in order to meet DYK criteria. Do you mind confirming its eligibility status? (Bit worried as the 5 days rule is almost up!) Thanks, The Interior(Talk) 20:08, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks leszek, The Interior(Talk) 04:20, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK for The Temptation of Barbizon

The DYK project (nominate) 18:02, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Minor edits

I noticed you are making a large number of minor edits with only the explanation "minor". When I view the diff for, as an example, Tropical year, I am unable to tell what was changed. Would you please explain the reason and benefit of these changes? Jc3s5h (talk) 18:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Codex Floriacensis

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:05, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Query

Hi, was wondering if you could do a DYK review. The hook is at Template_talk:Did_you_know#For_November_3. There are no remaining actionable opposes:

1. The page has been expanded over 5x.
2. Every single sentence in the article is sourced.
3. The hook is sourced to two online refs.
4. After discussion at WT:DYK and at T:TDYK, the hook was moved to wait to be displayed on November 3, 2010, the day after the election, so as to address complaints about having it go up before the election.

• Just would appreciate having the hook reviewed and confirmed as to the above points, so it does not have to continue sitting there, unapproved and unreviewed.

Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 04:51, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Did you get a chance to take a look? ;) -- Cirt (talk) 22:51, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

La Bande à papa

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of La Bande à papa, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://filmsdefrance.com/FDF_La_Bande_a_papa_rev.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:33, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Fall of Agadir

Hi, I notice you're approving hooks even though the article has unformatted references. You may want to read Wikipedia:Did you know/Additional rules; in this case, Rule D3 applies. Best, Yoninah (talk) 21:59, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Alf (barque)

I've reverted your edit because the date is the Danish spelling of the word "February" per the source - click on linked webpage and you'll see what I mean. Mjroots (talk) 06:57, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

P.S Time to do some archiving?

Talk:Codex Cyprius/GA1

I've reviewed the article and left notes on the talk page. I've put the nomination on hold for seven days to allow the issues to be addressed. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, here, or on the article talk page with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:15, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Le Diable et les Dix Commandements

Hello! Your submission of Le Diable et les Dix Commandements at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PM800 (talk) 04:45, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Candide ou l'optimisme au XXe siècle

Hello! Your submission of Candide ou l'optimisme au XXe siècle at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 18:54, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Codex Boreelianus

Hi Leszek Jańczuk, I am happy to wait until Wednesday/Thursday until you have your sources. It now mostly done, but I will just keep the review On Hold. Pyrotec (talk) 12:52, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Peter Frederik Suhm

Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

ru:Письмо (письменность)

Это ставится в категориях, в Письменности уже есть. М? (отвечать здесь) -- Abc82 (talk) 17:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

List of EastEnders characters

Hi, just thought I'd let you know that you reverted an IP's "test edits" but actually they were fixing a broken reference and table. AnemoneProjectors 18:06, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Papyrus 6

Hello! Your submission of Papyrus 6 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! - Tim1965 (talk) 01:03, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Your help is appreciate

Hi, can you please assist on a article issue Mario Kleff? I need some help there as it is nominate for deletion. Many thanks! Mario Kleff worked on/with Book of Kells, and thought a man with your reputation can tell more what's wrong. SaksitVongaram (talk) 20:52, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Uspenski Gospels

Hello! Your submission of Uspenski Gospels at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! The Interior(Talk) 22:57, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Alexander Sergeyevich Stroganov

Hello! Your submission of Alexander Sergeyevich Stroganov at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PM800 (talk) 00:11, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Joseph Dodson

Hi, you've reviewed Joseph Dodson and commented "looks good". Should your comment show the tick () – {{subst:DYKtick}}? Schwede66 03:39, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Uspenski Gospels

The DYK project (nominate) 06:02, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Papyrus 6

The DYK project (nominate) 18:01, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Alexander Sergeyevich Stroganov

Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lectionary 183

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lectionary 296

Materialscientist (talk) 06:06, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lectionary 1599

Materialscientist (talk) 06:06, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Sergei Olegovich Kuznetsov

Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK

Hi Leszek, I changed the hook for your DYK nomination, because I think it said "brought" (to bring, take somewhere) where "bought" (to buy, get) was meant, please check and change the articles if correct, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:09, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Can't verify the hook for l297/298. You input is needed at T:TDYK. Merry Christmas. Materialscientist (talk) 07:42, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Resolved nicely, our hooks match well in prep1, Bible and Bach, your favourite composer, merry Christmas, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:19, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lectionary 297

Season's Greetings! --The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lectionary 298

Season's Greetings! --The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lectionary 303

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Minuscule 801 (Gregory-Aland)

Orlady (talk) 08:04, 28 December 2010 (UTC)