Talk:A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 09:31, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 09:31, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Initial comments
[edit]I've done a couple of detailed readings of this article and have corrected what I suspect were typos and grammatical errors. Please undo any that I've incorrectly changed.
The WP:Lead contains the statement "It was used by Gregory and von Soden for further work." but there is no mention of this in the body of the article. Assumming that this was an important use, I would have expected some mention and application of this in the body of the article - possibly in Reception. Pyrotec (talk) 16:27, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Overall summary
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Congratulations on the quality of the article. I'm awarding GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 17:30, 18 April 2010 (UTC)