User talk:KuduIO/Archives/2011/08
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:KuduIO. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please be more careful with Huggle
this edit reintroduced vandalism. In that case, one IP was trying to undo the damage a different IP had done. See the diff between your fix and my reversion to an earlier rev. Huggle may not do this automagically, but it's certainly appropriate to drop back and edit the article by hand when you see something like this. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 00:15, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- Duly noted, thanks. — Waterfox ~talk~ 17:01, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 00:43, 1 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I finished the test on my talk page. Nathan2055talk 00:43, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 01 August 2011
- In the news: Consensus of Wikipedia authors questioned about Shakespeare authorship; 10 biggest edit wars on Wikipedia; brief news
- Research interview: The Huggle Experiment: interview with the research team
- WikiProject report: Little Project, Big Heart — WikiProject Croatia
- Featured content: Featured pictures is back in town
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision submitted for one case
- Technology report: Developers descend on Haifa; wikitech-l discussions; brief news
Proposed deletion of Geo Da Silva
Hi! This is just to let you know that I've de-prodded Geo Da Silva, as it had previously been the subject of a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'll Do You like a Truck, where the outcome was redirect. If you would like to nominate the article for deletion at WP:AfD, I'll probably support you. Maethordaer (talk) 11:57, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Waterfox
...Does this mean you're a Vaporeon? :D Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 16:46, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
IP test
Here's an IP quiz. You may choose to complete it or not. Just post the info for 76.11.11.253, 89.89.4.4, and 1.1.1.111.
IP Quiz
Thank you for applying to Abuse Response. As part of the application process, please look up the information for the following 3 IP addresses, and provide the Owner, Location, Abuse Contact Name, Abuse Contact Email, and Abuse Contact Phone in the table below.
| IP Address | 76.11.11.253 |
|---|---|
| Country of Origin | Canada |
| Owner/Lessee | EastLink |
| Abuse Contact Name | ARIN Abuse Support |
| Abuse Contact Email | arin-abuse@eastlink.ca |
| Abuse Contact Phone | +1-902-453-2800 (Office) |
| Abuse Contact Mailing Address | 6080 Young Street
Suite 700 Halifax, NS, Canada B3K 5M3 |
| Answer Grade | Correct |
- This is my IP adress. For the customer info, its wrong.
| IP Address | 89.89.4.4 |
|---|---|
| Country of Origin | France |
| Owner/Lessee | Bouygues Telecom |
| Abuse Contact Name | Bouygues Telecom |
| Abuse Contact Email | abuse_box@bouyguestelecom.fr |
| Abuse Contact Phone | (Not found) |
| Abuse Contact Mailing Address | 13-15 avenue du Marechal Juin
92366 Meudon-la-Foret cedex France |
| Answer Grade | Correct |
- Random.
| IP Address | 1.1.1.111 |
|---|---|
| Country of Origin | Australia |
| Owner/Lessee | Asia Pacific Network Information Centre |
| Abuse Contact Name | George Michaelson |
| Abuse Contact Email | ggm@apnic.net |
| Abuse Contact Phone | +61-7-3858-3100 |
| Abuse Contact Mailing Address | PO Box 2131
Milton, QLD 4064 Australia |
| Answer Grade | Correct |
- Random, well, the info from WHOIS is here but I am thinking that APNIC is not the owner, but well done! ~~Ebe123~~ talkContribs 20:02, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
Once you have answered, an abuse response staff member will grade the answers. Thanks again for applying! ~~Ebe123~~ talkContribs 10:43, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
I hope you like the quiz. ~~Ebe123~~ talkContribs 10:43, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 August 2011
- News and notes: Wikimania a success; board letter controversial; and evidence showing bitten newbies don't stay
- In the news: Israeli news focuses on Wikimania; worldwide coverage of contributor decline and gender gap; brief news
- WikiProject report: Shooting the breeze with WikiProject Firearms
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Manipulation of BLPs case opened; one case comes to a close
- Technology report: Wikimania technology roundup; brief news
There are problems with your dyk nomination. Joe Chill (talk) 01:38, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
The article Charybdis (IRCd) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Does not seem notable
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:49, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:43, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Charybdis (IRCd) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charybdis (IRCd) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charybdis (IRCd) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Joe Chill (talk) 12:36, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 21:06, 10 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
—KuyaBriBriTalk 21:06, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Notification of discussion
Hello, I forgot to notify you that I have initiated a discussion at WT:UAA regarding an issue that you are involved in. —KuyaBriBriTalk 04:14, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Reply to your message
Thanks for that message you left it is kind of encouraging. I was hoping to find someone I could ask for help on if I ever got into some difficulties. So thanks for that, and should I need some guidance, I'll know where to turn! ~Red Rover (Talk to me!) contribs 07:12, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 August 2011
- Women and Wikipedia: New Research, WikiChix
- WikiProject report: The Oregonians
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case opened, two more still in progress
- Technology report: Forks, upload slowness and mobile redirection
Talkback
Message added 13:33, 17 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 13:33, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Autoblock finder
http://toolserver.org/~nakon/autoblockfinder.php. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:31, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
August 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your comments, which you added in discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UnrealIRCd (3rd nomination). Please note that, on Wikipedia, consensus is determined by discussion, not voting, and it is the quality of arguments that counts, not the number of people supporting a position. Consider reading about the deletion policy for a brief overview of the deletion process and how we decide what to keep and what to delete. We hope you decide to stay and contribute even more. Thank you! Beeblebrox (talk) 16:51, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Renovation
You requested for your page to be renovated? Reply to me (at my talk page) and we can get this show on the road! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Levonscott (talk • contribs) 11:07, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Admin help
{{adminhelp}}
See my archive box at the top. The newer archives have leading zeros in the month numbers. Could someone please move the older ones to the new format while suppressing the creation of redirects? I'll make sure the links are updated. — Kudu ~I/O~ 13:26, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- I could move them and mark for speedy deletion. ~~Ebe123~~ talkContribs 19:41, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Suppressing the creation of redirects seems like a neater solution. — Kudu ~I/O~ 19:43, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Well, any way you get the redirects suppressed and the archives moved. On a side note, your first and 7 (2011 b)th archive actually needs an sysop for the move, since history merge is needed. ~~Ebe123~~ talkContribs 19:45, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- That's right, it requires deleting the page with the new title format to make way for the move, and then restoring the other revisions. It'll be easier if an admin does it all. — Kudu ~I/O~ 19:50, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Done. Exempt for the 2 that cannot. Others did more. ~~Ebe123~~ talkContribs 19:51, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- That's right, it requires deleting the page with the new title format to make way for the move, and then restoring the other revisions. It'll be easier if an admin does it all. — Kudu ~I/O~ 19:50, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Well, any way you get the redirects suppressed and the archives moved. On a side note, your first and 7 (2011 b)th archive actually needs an sysop for the move, since history merge is needed. ~~Ebe123~~ talkContribs 19:45, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Suppressing the creation of redirects seems like a neater solution. — Kudu ~I/O~ 19:43, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Done. Histories of two remaining archives have been merged. Favonian (talk) 22:03, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Please merge User talk:KuduIO/Archives/2010/8 with User talk:KuduIO/Archives/2010/08. — Kudu ~I/O~ 22:24, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- There's no history left in the former page—it has already been merged. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:54, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Also, please merge User talk:KuduIO/Trash/Talkpage old (whatever that is) with this page, and I will re-add the improperly archived content for it to be archived by the bot. — Kudu ~I/O~ 22:27, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Already with another request?! Its fine. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
Contribs 22:31, 22 August 2011 (UTC)- I've merged the history of that page with this one. To see the content so that you can re-add it, look at this revision. -- Atama頭 19:41, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Already with another request?! Its fine. ~~Ebe123~~ (+) talk
The Signpost: 22 August 2011
- News and notes: Girl Geeks edit while they dine, candidates needed for forthcoming steward elections, image referendum opens
- WikiProject report: Images in Motion – WikiProject Animation
- Featured content: JJ Harrison on avian photography
- Arbitration report: After eleven moves, name for islands now under arbitration
- Technology report: Engineering report, sprint, and more testers needed
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:31, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Charybdis (IRCd)
Message added 20:27, 23 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
- I'va zapped the other one that you tagged G6 - don't know how there managed to be two copies, but the userfied one at User:KuduIO/Charybdis (IRCd) has all the history, so all is well. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:27, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for your assistance with my "help me" request regarding a questionable link. Dbiel (Talk) 03:57, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
St.Lawrence Junction Station
Re the AfC for this, I've raised the issue at WT:UKT. It's always worth giving a WikiProject a shout as members may be able to address issues raised. Mjroots (talk) 19:05, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Common Dead
Hi, please, please, please do next time a real cleanup after/before accepting such a bad page like Common Dead. Check the revisions before and after my cleanup! A few named references and some replacements of google-redirects wasn't that hard. I will nominate that page also for deletion since I really doubt that this music group is notable. At least the links that the submitter provided are not either independent or good for proving that this group is notable. mabdul 15:10, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
"Appears non-notable"
With all do respect, you're very out of the scene to be talking about what's "non-notable". The citation is there and can be explored to counter your claims, which should have been done before your unwarranted rejection took place. Press and interviews aren't dolled out by the sources provided for some kid's garage band down the street. I've seen this guy open for some larger acts, and this article is overdue. Additionally, there already is an article for this subject in other languages on Wikipedia. So you judge too quickly. Know your metal, friend. 96.22.223.106 (talk) 18:51, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Article accepted. — Kudu ~I/O~ 19:47, 24 August 2011 (UTC)- I'm glad you reconsidered and approved, sir. It's nice to see moderators such as yourself willing to make the extra effort in re-investigating certain matters. Be well. 96.22.223.106 (talk) 20:02, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
- Just for the record, I'm not a moderator or at any special position, as far as Articles for Creation is concerned. On the other hand, if you want to, we'd greatly appreciate you helping with such matters - there's a place for everybody. If you're interested, just create an account and then shoot me a message. — Kudu ~I/O~ 20:05, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. I really should start an account but my IP address is always changing, which is frustrating because I don't get any "real" credit for a lot of the arts and music/band pages I've helped start up over the months. Do you know if an account must be tied to a specific IP address to stay valid? 96.22.223.106 (talk) 13:31, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- No, it doesn't have to be. That's the advantage of having a named account. :) — Kudu ~I/O~ 14:05, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. I really should start an account but my IP address is always changing, which is frustrating because I don't get any "real" credit for a lot of the arts and music/band pages I've helped start up over the months. Do you know if an account must be tied to a specific IP address to stay valid? 96.22.223.106 (talk) 13:31, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Just for the record, I'm not a moderator or at any special position, as far as Articles for Creation is concerned. On the other hand, if you want to, we'd greatly appreciate you helping with such matters - there's a place for everybody. If you're interested, just create an account and then shoot me a message. — Kudu ~I/O~ 20:05, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Rollback?
I've decided to start reverting vandalism more, do you think enough time has passed to request rollback again? --Nathan2055talk - review 17:52, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
- I was going to reply aye, but it looks like you have it already! Congrats! — Kudu ~I/O~ 14:09, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 August 2011
- News and notes: Abuse filter on all Wikimedia sites; Foundation's report for July; editor survey results
- Recent research: Article promotion by collaboration; deleted revisions; Wikipedia's use of open access; readers unimpressed by FAs; swine flu anxiety
- Opinion essay: How an attempt to answer one question turned into a quagmire
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Tennis
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four existing cases
- Technology report: The bugosphere, new mobile site and MediaWiki 1.18 close in on deployment
Mentorship of User:Thisthat2011
Per the relevant ANI discussion, a topic ban has been enacted on this editor - see User_talk:Thisthat2011#Topic_ban. A number of editors including yourself offered to mentor the user during their topic ban, hence this notice. I have informed all these editors and will place a list of those willing to mentor on the user's talkpage. Thanks, Black Kite (t) (c) 23:54, 31 August 2011 (UTC)