Jump to content

User talk:Kristinak98

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Planforge (October 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DreamRimmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
-- ๐™ณ๐š›๐šŽ๐šŠ๐š–๐š๐š’๐š–๐š–๐šŽ๐š› ๐š๐š’๐šœ๐šŒ๐šž๐šœ๐šœ 15:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Kristinak98! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- ๐™ณ๐š›๐šŽ๐šŠ๐š–๐š๐š’๐š–๐š–๐šŽ๐š› ๐š๐š’๐šœ๐šŒ๐šž๐šœ๐šœ 15:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Planforge has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Planforge. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:41, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Planforge (November 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:23, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Planforge (November 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was: ย The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Drmies (talk) 15:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If there are no reliable, independent, secondary sources for an award, it's probably not an award worth noting. Drmies (talk) 17:09, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing, I deleted the given award due to inappropriate sources! Kristinak98 (talk) 08:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Planforge (November 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:35, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Planforge (November 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was: ย The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 14:12, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Planforge (November 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kilaseell was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
โ€“ Kilaseell - Message me! - 15:58, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Kilaseell! Thanks for your quick review! Can you please help me by informing me, which article sources are not valid or if/where I have to add additional ones for the article to be accepted? I read through the guidelines and checked related articles to the topic to make it right, now I don't really know what else to change/where there still are mistakes. Thank you! Kristinak98 (talk) 11:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Kristinak98! I declined the submission as you relied a lot on Gartner. You need a lot of independent sources with significant coverage on the subject. The sources also have to be reliable. My suggestion is that you find, for example, news articles about the subject and add them. Good luck to you and have a great day! โ€“ Kilaseell - Message me! - 11:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your answer, I will! Have a nice day! Kristinak98 (talk) 11:49, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Planforge

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Kristinak98. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Planforge, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]