User talk:Kolya Muratov

Siege of the Kraków Castle moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Siege of the Kraków Castle, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 09:53, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Kraków Castle has been accepted

Siege of Kraków Castle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Lipniszki moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Lipniszki. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jamiebuba (talk) 07:40, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Rymnik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mustafa Pasha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yefim Chaplits, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Warsaw.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Bosnian uprising (1831–1832)

added a link pointing to Ibrahim Pasha

Ensign of the Russian Navy

added a link pointing to St. Andrew's Cross

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Wilhelm Derfelden

added links pointing to Galatz and Ibrahim Pasha

Bosnian uprising (1831–1832)

added a link pointing to Ibrahim Pasha

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thank you for all the military history of imperial Russia articles. I can see they are filling in a major gap in our historical coverage! Keep up the good work. jengod (talk) 21:10, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Reval

Hi, I noticed you've been adding most of the content to the article on the Battle of Reval. I noticed the article uses some rather dated sources for the casualties on the Swedish side. You may wish to update them using these from the Swedish Maritime Museum. They give the Swedish losses as 51 dead, around 80 wounded and 250 captured (and eight dead and 27 wounded on the Russian side). Probably it is more reliable than a German journal from the 19th century. Regards, Yakikaki (talk) 21:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Do you only want to replace the dead/wounded? What about prisoners? So many sources give higher figures. I hope you realise that your figures may be incomplete. (Anyway, I have added this data.) Kolya Muratov (talk) 21:54, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for adding it. It is odd that the sources give such different numbers, but some of them are quite old and maybe inaccurate. Anyway, it is good that this is reflected in the article, I think. Kind regards, Yakikaki (talk) 18:52, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wilhelm Derfelden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ibrahim Pasha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Orlov (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nikolay Orlov.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:09, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Lipniszki

Hello, Kolya Muratov. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Lipniszki, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrey Shishkin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ratnik.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Kolya Muratov. Thank you for your work on Nikolay Vereshchagin. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pisa. View of the Baptisterium and the Cathedral

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pisa. View of the Baptisterium and the Cathedral requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://rusmuseumvrm.ru/data/collections/painting/19_20/zh_7973/index.php?lang=en. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 13:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sledging on the Neva

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sledging on the Neva requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://my.tretyakov.ru/app/masterpiece/10928. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 13:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note - Translating copyrighted works is a copyright violation. If you were relying on the terms of use for the site thinking Wikipedia is non-commercial, you need to be aware that Wikipedia's licensing requires that material also be allowable for commercial use. -- Whpq (talk) 16:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that was my mistake. Kolya Muratov (talk) 12:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Kolya Muratov! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's elegibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The only remaining article that may have infringed copyright due to my effect was Battle of Rymnik - I decided to shorten the text and rephrase it. The confusion is that I had no qualms about Longworth's book being non-public (totally available at archive.org). The other texts that I transferred(-lated) (they're all Russian) are either too old, from the Russian Empire, to which era I mostly contribute lil by lil, or from GRE. Kolya Muratov (talk) 17:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Need help

Hi! I need a little help with my latest draft. Please see how you can remove the red mark in the sources, I just don't understand how to do it. I will also be very grateful if you help with the design and add sources. Thank you in advance. Dushnilkin (talk) 14:11, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]