Jump to content

User talk:Kicks of seven

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Kicks of seven! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! EggRoll97 (talk) 04:39, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reference

[edit]

Can some give first reference of spotify artist page link? Kicks of seven (talk) 08:37, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:43, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Kicks of seven! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:43, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Patient Zero. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Rose Tico—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Patient Zerotalk 05:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Toadette (Let's discuss together!) 07:09, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Check my sandbox please

[edit]

Please check my sand box its ready. Kicks of seven (talk) 10:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check my sandbox.

[edit]

Please take a look on my sandbox. Kicks of seven (talk) 02:32, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By your command -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged accordingly. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:32, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check my draft

[edit]

Please check my draft from my sandbox. Kicks of seven (talk) 06:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check my sand box right now. And Allow me to publish my draft.

[edit]

Please check my draft and allow me to publish it. My draft is ready by all the ways. So please check. Kicks of seven (talk) 23:32, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Umarjaum (March 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 06:41, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Umarjaum (March 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:38, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Umarjaum (March 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Still zero evidence of notability (and no, adding a link to Wikidata does nothing in this respect), despite multiple declines. On this basis I can only assume that better sources are not available and that the subject is therefore not notable enough to warrant inclusion. To avoid further reviewer time being expended on this draft, I am now rejecting rather than merely declining this.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:44, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iffi jutt (April 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please check my draft:umarjaum

[edit]

I have citation added my draft:umarjaum . please check my draft. Your regards! Kicks of seven (talk) 10:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaum Umar (April 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 11:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaum Umar (April 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaum Umar (April 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:13, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Jaum Umar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KylieTastic (talk) 18:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kicks of seven. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but a page you created  Draft:Jaum Umar has been deleted as meeting one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see WP:CORP for subjects that are groups or companies or organizations. Please see WP:ANYBIO for subjects who are people. Please see Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

Also, encyclopedia articles must be neutral in tone and not use language that promotes or advocates for a subject, or tries to cast the subject in a favorable light. Please see Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid here and here. Sometimes creators of promotional/advocational content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has been trained to write such content, or if one has spent some time writing such content, one may simply be blind to non-neutral phrases or styles.

Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. A common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. It applies to any topic, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc.

CV's/resumé's are by their nature promotional. Writing about oneself or any connected subject is discouraged as the connection can make objectivity difficult. Information on avoiding advocational content and common pitfalls is here and here, however be aware that these are not exhaustive.

New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk, and on IRC chat. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined.

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:31, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Kicks of seven/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Draft:Jaum Umar. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Marjaavaan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. KylieTastic (talk) 17:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already past final warning -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaum (April 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gobonobo was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
gobonobo + c 09:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Armaan bedil (April 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gobonobo was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
gobonobo + c 09:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How many minimum independent citations are needed to be included on Wikipedia

[edit]

Hiw many minimum citations are needed to be included on Wikipedia Kicks of seven (talk) 09:43, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaum (April 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 09:44, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaum (April 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 10:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaum (April 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:59, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaum (April 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Despite multiple previous declines there is zero evidence of notability, therefore I can only conclude that better sources are not forthcoming, and that the subject is not notable enough to justify inclusion at this time. To avoid further reviewer time being expended on this draft, I am now rejecting rather than merely declining this.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:54, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]