User talk:Kennethmacalpine

July 2024[edit]

Please stop introducing links to disambiguation pages as you have done here, here, here and I dare say on many other places. Your edit here not only introduced a disambiguation link, but also completely changed the name of one of the authors of a reference. DuncanHill (talk) 10:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DuncanHill. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cadwallon ap Cadfan have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. You claimed to "fix refs" but in fact introduced a number of incorrect changes in the text DuncanHill (talk) 10:35, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion concerning your edits[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.DuncanHill (talk) 10:51, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Fixed refs and citations"[edit]

Re: this edit - please could you explain what you mean by "fixed"? You don't seem to have fixed anything, but you have made other changes throughout the article. DuncanHill (talk) 06:56, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Repaired Kennethmacalpine (talk) 07:00, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But how? In what way? They were working before. What do you think needed to be repaired? DuncanHill (talk) 07:06, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They are still working. Kennethmacalpine (talk) 07:13, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to answer the question? What do you mean by "fixed"? You haven't fixed them, you haven't repaired them, what do you think you have done? DuncanHill (talk) 07:16, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a troll? Kennethmacalpine (talk) 07:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have repeatedly made bad edits, you now repeatedly make edits with misleading edit summaries, and refuse to explain what you mean. DuncanHill (talk) 07:20, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See my work in View history. Kennethmacalpine (talk) 07:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have been looking at your edits, that is why I asked. DuncanHill (talk) 07:27, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are a troll. Kennethmacalpine (talk) 07:28, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kennethmacalpine Are you going to withdraw this accusation? If not expect to be blocked. Doug Weller talk 13:27, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw. Kennethmacalpine (talk) 20:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DuncanHill No response to your question and see below. Doug Weller talk 09:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Avoid unconstructive edits[edit]

@Kennethmacalpine Really? Why would you be changing CE to AD? CE is currently regarded as a neutral term and you should not be adding that anymore, as you did here. You even added this < inside the sentence before although in the same edit above. Country pages are very sensitive and you shouldn't be adding unconstructive or testing edits like that. Again, avoid your false edit summaries. What has "review" (as an edit summary) to do with unconstructive changes? Tumbuka Arch (talk) 08:49, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to know also. Your edit summaries could be called deceptive and in some cases hide a major change in era style. Doug Weller talk 09:47, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]