User talk:Karinsoika

Welcome!

Hello, Karinsoika, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 08:45, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Schotter (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robert Schotter.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t) Josve05a (c) 21:02, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Schotter (May 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robert Schotter.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--Demiurge1000 (talk) 07:34, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Karinsoika, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Robert Schotter (June 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Robert Schotter.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:36, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Robert Schotter (June 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robert Schotter.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 08:45, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Robert Schotter (June 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robert Schotter.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 10:14, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question about Draft:Robert Schotter

Hello, Karinsoika! I'm Ritchie333. I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about Draft:Robert Schotter. You can read the reply at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#12:10:51, 16 June 2014 review of submission by Karinsoika. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:22, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Robert Schotter concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Robert Schotter, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robert Schotter

Hello, Karinsoika. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Robert Schotter".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Robert Schotter}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Robert Schotter concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Robert Schotter, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:42, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robert Schotter

Hello, Karinsoika. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Robert Schotter".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —MRD2014 alt (MRD2014's legitimate alternative account / talk) 13:31, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robert Schotter

Hello, Karinsoika. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Robert Schotter".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:20, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Robert Schotter concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Robert Schotter, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Robert Schotter concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Robert Schotter, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robert Schotter

Hello, Karinsoika. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Robert Schotter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 08:37, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per WP:CSD#G11 as spam. – Athaenara ✉ 09:08, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, Karinsoika. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 09:08, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

– Athaenara ✉ 09:08, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Karinsoika (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Karinsoika (talk) 10:01, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Thanks for admitting your conflict of interest. Now that you know you won't be unblocked to write about your husband, please take a moment to consider if there's anything else you want to write about instead. Anything for which you have no conflict of interest. If so, please tell us what you'll write about instead and convince us you understand and will stop violating WP:COI and WP:PROMO. Yamla (talk) 10:31, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi, ‪Athaenara‬, thanks for caring about Wikipedia. Regarding my block: I think the block is in fact not necessary; I just tried to publish an English version of my husband's German Wikipedia article (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Schotter) Many of the people who are working with him or research him (Robert Schotter in der Internet Movie Database (https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3323585/)) do not read German. It was a try to make Wikipedia better. What was weird is that I was approached by some editors who tried to sell me publication (publicate the english article for a fee). This is nothing I want to support. Maybe rather block these?

You failed to mention the Karin Ulrike Soika article you wrote about yourself. – Athaenara ✉ 11:16, 7 June 2019

Hello Athaenara, Somehow you seem to be on a crusade. May it be of benefit. Regards, Karin (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karinsoika (talk • contribs) 11:24, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Karinsoika: If you read the policies and guidelines linked in the {{uw-coi}} notice I posted above, it would not be mysterious to you. – Athaenara ✉ 11:35, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Athaenara: If you read you checked the history of the Karinsoika page you would note it was much older than {{uw-coi}}. The Karin Soika page was created 2007.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Karinsoika (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I am reconsidering your criticizing promotion - actually I do not see that. Athaenara even deleted my own article (Karin Ulrike Soika) for that reason. Looks like a cruzade, somehow (Athaenara blocked the Karin Soika page created 2007 referring to the Hello, Karinsoika. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you: *avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors; * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template); * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE); *avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM); *do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies. In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID). Editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. guidelines published much later.). The wording was not promotional, just stating facts. In fact I AM an international artist, in fact my husband IS an award winning director. Weird. And the good news? We will continue being what we are in real life. With or without wiki.riteme.site :) Karinsoika (talk) 11:45, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This doesn't seem to be an unblock request. 331dot (talk) 14:01, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Karinsoika (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I would like to edit/update https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wabi-sabi

There is an improper citation

According to Leonard Koren, wabi-sabi can be described as "the most conspicuous and characteristic feature of traditional Japanese beauty and it occupies roughly the same position in the Japanese pantheon of aesthetic values as do the Greek ideals of beauty and perfection in the far West."

The Citation omits words, wrong punctuation; I do have the original book at hand and would like to update the article.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. As with the previous request, this doesn't seem to be an unblock appeal. We all understand you want to be unblocked. You really need to read WP:Guide to appealing blocks first. In your appeal, you need to be clear about your understanding of the reason for your block, what you will refrain from doing once unblocked, and what you intend to do. I can offer one bit of advice: a condition for unblocking, in an administrator's eyes, would likely include an agreement that you will not edit any article subject with which you have a conflict of interest. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:11, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello Anachronist, thank you for your administrator's advice. In what form would you like to receive the agreement regarding the articles bearing a conflict of interest? Here? An email ? (→ where to?) Registered letter (→ what address?) A cease-and-desist letter? (→ How?) Karinsoika (talk) 17:33, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All we need from you is a simple statement that you will refrain from making edits related to your conflict of interest. You should also tell what subjects you will edit about instead. 331dot (talk) 17:45, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Karinsoika, please, just one unblock request at a time. I have removed the appeal template from around your previous comment. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:12, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Karinsoika (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello 331dot, thank you for your information. If you scroll up just a little bit you'd see what I want to do (I posted that yesterday). But I can state it again. I would like to edit/update https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wabi-sabi

There is an improper citation

According to Leonard Koren, wabi-sabi can be described as "the most conspicuous and characteristic feature of traditional Japanese beauty and it occupies roughly the same position in the Japanese pantheon of aesthetic values as do the Greek ideals of beauty and perfection in the far West."

The Citation omits words, wrong punctuation; I do have the original book at hand and would like to update the article.

Decline reason:

This is basically the same as your previous unblock request. Please read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks and follow the instructions. In particular, you were asked to make "a simple statement that you will refrain from making edits related to your conflict of interest". You have declined to do that in this unblock request; is that because you are refusing to abide by our policies? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:00, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Karinsoika (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I would like to edit/update https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wabi-sabi

There is an improper citation

According to Leonard Koren, wabi-sabi can be described as "the most conspicuous and characteristic feature of traditional Japanese beauty and it occupies roughly the same position in the Japanese pantheon of aesthetic values as do the Greek ideals of beauty and perfection in the far West."

The Citation omits words, wrong punctuation, words within the citation which are not there in the original text; I do have the original book at hand and would like to update the article.

Regarding to this very long user talk: Referring to the above: I will refrain from making edits related to the conflict of interest, thus the above mentioned Draft:Robert Schotter and the Karin Ulrike Soika article. Both have been deleted in the process (the issue is open since 2014) which makes this statement a bit... obsolete... in my eyes. Anyway, it boils down to the same: I will not edit these articles.

@Anachronist, NinjaRobotPirate; Like that? Something else?

Fact is - my reason why I would like to be unbocked: I would like to make the wabi-sabi article better by correcting a definite mistake (wrong citation). Service to the comunity etc. If I remain blocked, I cannot do that, the mistake remains until hopefully someone else notes it and corrects it. Fine with me. I think you can get the book in any library... you guys could also correct it. :)

PS: To make this story short and waste less energy and time: maybe one of you guys could make the correction in the above mentioned article (I cannot due to block). Here is the proper citation:

″Wabi-Sabi is the most conspicuous and characteristic feature of what we think of traditional Japanese beauty. It occupies roughly the same position in the Japanese pantheon of aesthetic values as do the Greek ideals of beauty and perfection in the West.″ Page 21

Here again a link to the article: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wabi-sabi

Accept reason:

You are unblocked subject to these conditions: (1) you shall not edit articles with which you have a conflict of interest; (2) you shall not create articles in main space about subjects with which you have a conflict of interest; (3) if you create a draft article about a subject with which you have a conflict of interest, you shall submit it for review and refrain from moving the draft to main space; (4) if you want to make any substantive changes to an article in main space with which you have a conflict of interest, you shall propose your change on the talk page rather than making the change yourself. Violating these conditions will result in immediate re-blocking, with little likelihood of a successful appeal. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:21, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Athaenara: I'm OK with the appeal above, if you are. Clearly a new editor trying to learn the ropes here. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:59, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Anachronist: I haven't high expectations, but will not object either. – Athaenara ✉ 04:51, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]