This is an archive of past discussions about User:Kailash29792. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
I was trying to do a move for you but I received an error message and something strange happened during the move you requested which caused multiple moves. I'm hoping you can check this page and tell me whether it is the content you wanted at the right location. Thank you. LizRead!Talk!18:42, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
For thupakki movie edit by managineers
No one is paying me for the edits.
I dont even know her personally but only as an entertainment personal.
I m again right in my edit, you can verify yourself.
Hi Kailash29792, hope that you're well. I was wondering if you'd be able to participate in a Signpost interview in your capacity as a contributor to WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers? I am enthusiastic about these interviews because they help remind other Wikipedians about the passionate and diverse group of volunteers that edit Wikipedia, and into the many discussions and editors that inhabit our space, nooks and crannies. If you had time to even answer a few questions here (User:Tom (LT)/sandbox/WikiProject actors and filmmakers interview draft) I'd be very grateful :). Tom (LT) (talk) 22:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Kailash29792. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:11th Cinema Express Awards, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Yes, I did. I don't know what to say, I don't think there is a need to reassess it. It is already perfect for a GA, and I think it will be better if you nominate it to FA. I will start read the article now. Please wait. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 11:07, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Because I ended up mangling the article severely in the quest to attain FAC (there were four unsuccessful FACs), I want to know if it is still GA-worthy. The FAC process has proven too straining, and 2019-2020 was a rather traumatic period. That's why I decided to stop going too high, and be satisfied with GA itself. Kailash29792(talk)11:13, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
You have the book Hema Malini: Beyond the Dream Girl, don't you? Does it contains information about Baghban or, at least, can you send me its "Introduction" chapter? —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 12:03, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
This will add a "Books to Sfn" link to the portlet on the right side, when you are in Visual Editor's source mode editing. This will convert one book per click along with named references and set Sfn to all of them, I recommend saving it so tracking the edits would be easy. This will try to search for a "Bibliography" sub-section level-3 under "References" level-2 section and will create if not. This doesn't support quotes yet, but only the basic cite book with first{n} last{n} params or author{n} params or editor{n} params in that order. Many other params exist in cite book, I just don't know which one need to be in Sfn. This would convert most of the normal cite books and complicated cite books need to be handled manually. I'd recommend trying out in the sandbox first and see if that suits your needs. Let me know if you find anything that needs to be improved and/or bug fixed :) — DaxServer (talk) 13:49, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
I've updated it to allow for checking level-2 Bibliography sections under References, so the Mayabazar edit would now be adding the book to the existing level-2 one instead of creating a new Bibliography level-3 section. — DaxServer (talk) 06:57, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. LizRead!Talk!21:55, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Kailash29792,
This was not a draft article but just a blank page containing an external link so it was deleted as a test edit. If you would like the page restored any way, you can request this at WP:REFUND. LizRead!Talk!21:57, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
The new image you uploaded is too large per WP:NFCC#3b. If you think it should still replace the original image, you need to start a discussion at WP:FFD instead of the file being deleted by being orphaned. Also, one a deleted orphaned template is removed from a file, the seven day starts over and you would need to change the date to 12 November instead of simply reverting its deletion. Aspects (talk) 12:47, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Show me 1 example of LINKROT in the article Jai Bhim (film). I bet there are Zero. In the past 40 days since the page has been created, you have done it 15 times already. How do you justify this behavior. Those edits are totally unnecessary and spams the page history and watchlist. Please consider doing it once a quarter or a year. If you are scared that the link will be dead within a month, then that link should probably not be added in the first place.I have no concerns if you archive the links 15 times a day, as long as you do not edit the page to add the unnecessary archive links of live URLs. If the archive URLs exist at the archives a bot can add the link to the page in future whenever needed. So you are doing no good by editing the page to add links, unless the intention is to increase edit counts. Since you have 2,600 edits just by IABot, this appears to me as a spammy way to inflate edit count. You should reconsider. --Venkat TL (talk) 12:24, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hako9 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please read WP:SUSTAINED and WP:BLP1E. Subject must have significant coverage in reliable sources that isn't related to his recent burst of coverage. I don't see that here. All significant coverage is related to that one event.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aryan Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aryan Khan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Kailash29792!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - hako9 (talk) 15:41, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Kuselan.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Kuselan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Kailash29792. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is Suspected sock. Message added 09:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
I appreciate you reverting my wrong edit, now that I've seen other GA and GA Indian film articles, however I don't appreciate you accusing me of prejudice against Indians. I have no prejudice and does not hold that belief, and I don't see how my edit, despite being wrong, shows it. I am sorry if it comes off as such, but I'd suggest that you WP:AGF next time before assuming a motive. Happy editing nevertheless! GeraldWL06:46, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
I was guilty conscious the second after I edited it, and I apologise for not retracting my comments sooner since mobile editing is hard and I have limited/zero PC access on Sundays. Kailash29792(talk)06:59, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
I agree with you, but I am not able to do it on my own. We can put a template to inform the users that it lacks info and they can help to expand it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gggiann (talk • contribs) 10:58, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
I just tested and it's working fine for me. It only appears in Visual Editor's Source editing mode. Here's a screenshot. Does it not show up for you like this? — DaxServer (talk) 11:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Yeah, turns out I had disabled VE's source editing mode. My bad. It should be able to work in general source mode too, or at least VE's normal editing mode. Kailash29792(talk)11:33, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
How did you disable and re-enable the VE's source editing mode? I've looked at settings but couldn't figure out which one :/
The script works on Regex. At the moment, I wasn't able to extract proper wiki text in VE's visual/normal editing mode. That's why I limited it to source mode.
Hello User:Kailash29792 and thanks for cleaning up the article Shafqat Amanat Ali. I appreciate your time. If you have any suggestions for bringing this article up to B-class or GA-class, I'd be grateful. I've been working on it and will be requesting an assessment soon. I might ask for a peer review too, but was wondering if you had any specific input or feedback. Thanks again. Priyanka2330 (talk) 15:58, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Sankar
Hello User:Kailash29792 I know you are good at adding articles. I need a small help could you add a separate article for Vettaiyadu Vilayadu(soundtrack). Vettaiyadu Vilayadu is the 2006 Tamil film of the same name.
Was this Bhojpuri film ever released? The songs are on Youtube (under the tile Gangotri Ganga- 2). The film is listed here and not here. If it released it should be added to Amitabh Bachan's filmography. If it is not released, it should be listed as unreleased on Bhumika Chawla's page. DareshMohan (talk) 09:56, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi mate you removed my edits to this page. The primary named protagonist in the movie is the female star. It is only rightful that the female cast are listed ahead of the male cast.
Hi Kailash kher could you expand the article of the page Etharkkum Thunindhavan (soundtrack) by adding in more information as I don’t know what all to add.
Thanks for uploading File:Thiruchitrambalam poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sadanand Menon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Etharkkum Thunindhavan (soundtrack) instead.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.
If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.
This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Etharkkum Thunindhavan (soundtrack), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Kailash29792!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 08:24, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Kailash29792. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:11th Cinema Express Awards, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
Template:YYYY thriller films category header has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 02:24, 26 January 2022 (UTC)