User talk:Sush150
Poster sizes
[edit]There is no problem with the size of posters exceeding 100KB. Just their resolution shouldn't be too large. Please read WP:IMAGERES. In fact, posters even as low as 220px are acceptable, read this for more info. --Kailash29792 (talk) 05:18, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Template:Infobox film instructions
[edit]Hi there, re: this and this, the |music=
parameter of the film infobox was designed for score composer, i.e. the person who wrote the incidental background music. The introduction of incidental songs into this parameter is a secondary usage, and per the current template instructions should probably not even be included. The instructions read: Insert the name(s) of the composer(s) of the original music score. They are usually credited with "Music by". Composers credited for "additional music" and songwriters should not be included.
So your repeated submission of this incorrect formatting, particularly with the justification "Generally Music composers are primary then score composer", is incorrect. If you want this to change, you will need to seek out a new consensus. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:07, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Ok but, music composers add first then add score composer this format was followed by many film articles. So I will be doing same. Sush150 (talk)
- If you do the same without first establishing a special consensus, like, say, at WT:ICTF or Template talk:Infobox film, it will not be consistent with the purpose of the parameter, and you could be subject to having your editing privileges interrupted. Just because some articles are shaped by people who don't bother to learn what the rest of the film community wants, doesn't mean that you are at liberty to do so. I'm not sure why this is confusing to you or why it is a point of contention. You might have a stronger argument if we were talking about a film that is decidedly a musical like The King and I, but we are not. The interstitial music in Indian films don't always have relevance to the plot, so they are often incidental, rather than essential. But that is something you can argue about if/when you open that consensus discussion. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:23, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
YouTube and Apple
[edit]Hey! I just wanted to follow up with you about using iTunes as a reference and linking to YouTube. The first is addressed by WP:NOTRSMUSIC: "Online retailers such as iTunes and Amazon.com should also be avoided." The second is discussed at WP:YOUTUBE. In my interpretation of that guildeline, the YouTube links in questions as external links should not be used per WP:ELNO #4 (Links mainly intended to promote a website) and #5 (Individual web pages that primarily exist to sell products or services...). I can see how these might be interpreted differently, so I've begun a conversation at WT:FILM to attempt to get more views. BOVINEBOY2008 22:49, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Keep up the good work. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:28, 7 October 2020 (UTC) |
- @Fylindfotberserk:Thank you for consideration. Sush150 (talk) 09:22, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- Welcome. This is for your contribution to film and TV related articles. You deserve it
. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:26, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- Welcome. This is for your contribution to film and TV related articles. You deserve it
- Regarding this, WP:ELMIN allows one social site handle if verified and if there is no official website present. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:01, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Love you editings! Thank you for helping me in my created articles! You're one of the best Wikipedian! Thanks. | Orbit Wharf 16:09, 17 October 2021 (UTC) |
@Orbit Wharf: Thank you for consideration. Sush150 (talk) 18:45, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Barnstar from a sock user? You have been a lucky one. Twinkle1990 (talk) 16:53, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
For your consistent work on Bollywood films over so many years! Your work is appreciated. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 20:13, 14 July 2022 (UTC) |
@Krimuk2.0:Thanks a lot 🙏 Sush150 (talk) 16:15, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
chhaava hindi movie
[edit]I noticed that you recently changed the link on Chhaava that I had added. I’d like to kindly point out that my original link contains accurate and reliable information, which is relevant to the context of the article.
The current edit seems to replace a correct and informative source with something less appropriate. I kindly request you to restore the original link or share your reasoning for the change. If needed, I’d be happy to provide further evidence supporting the validity of my link. AyyanaliGavandi (talk) 13:20, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- As per this [1] you added source is not reliable. Sush150 (talk) 17:44, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Baaghi 4 film poster.jpg
[edit]data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe62e/fe62edd0f4861935d801737da60d8a8cb820a74e" alt="⚠"
Thanks for uploading File:Baaghi 4 film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:03, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 12
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shubman Gill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ahmadabad.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
February 2025
[edit] You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mere Husband Ki Biwi. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. CNMall41 (talk) 18:24, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
What is your connect to User:संदीपमीना? You both have edit warred the same edits on this page. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:26, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- i don't think I am doing any kind of mistake here. According to WP:ICTFSOURCES all sources like NDTV, India Today, The Times of India, The Indian Express and Bollywood Hungama are reliable sources. But you are still revert all edits. There are many film articles these sources are used but you have problems with only this article. Sush150 (talk) 04:11, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Mere Husband Ki Biwi film poster.jpg
[edit]data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe62e/fe62edd0f4861935d801737da60d8a8cb820a74e" alt="⚠"
Thanks for uploading File:Mere Husband Ki Biwi film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
February 2025 (2)
[edit]Hello and thank you for your contributions on the article Chhaava. A separate article about the film Soundtrack Draft:Chhaava (soundtrack) has been created and you are welcome to expand and make it prepared for the Main space on Wikipedia. Thanks Sackiii (talk) 13:09, 19 February 2025 (UTC)