User talk:Juno/Archive 2015

A question for you

See Talk:2014 Iranian-led intervention in Iraq#Requested move December 2014 -- PBS (talk) 12:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

I had not seen this yet. Thanks for the heads up, PBS. Juno (talk) 20:34, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Juno. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is Re: The Wikipedia Library.
Message added 00:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Nikkimaria (talk) 00:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Can you explain your objection to the history of racial discrimination on the Edina, Minnesota page?

Hi, Juno. I'm new to Wikipedia and so I hope I'm communicating in a way that will reach you. Can you explain your objection to the history of racial discrimination that you have repeatedly removed from the Edina, Minnesota page? These issues have been well-documented, and the story of the restrictive covenants in the Country Club neighborhood can be found on the city of Edina's own official web page. John from Minneapolis (talk) 21:41, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi John,

Thanks for reaching out. I was concerned (and with regard to much of the proposed wording, still am) that the text was not properly sourced. If you have any questions about proper sourcing, or how to correctly format the citations on any sources that you do come across (the city's website would be gold) please don't be a stranger. Juno (talk) 08:28, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello Juno, Just as a heads up. A the Minneapolis StarTribune has run an article referencing the "edit war" about the Edina, MN page. Keep up the good work, the edits made by the other editor were poorly sourced and it doesn't appear they even brought the edits up on the talk page.2601:2:4E00:C662:8097:ABBE:870D:A6F3 (talk) 06:12, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you User:2601:2:4E00:C662:8097:ABBE:870D:A6F3. I am also now concerned that this may constitute a Conflict of Interest with regard to Wikipedia policies. Juno (talk) 08:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Juno2007: Are you from Edina, by chance? Jonathunder (talk) 14:59, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

User:Jonathunder I'd rather not tell the internet exactly where I live, but I will say that am from the neighborhood. Juno (talk) 08:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

In any case, we are having an edit-a-thon at Southdale Library on March 1 from 2-5 p.m. and you are welcome to attend. Jonathunder (talk) 15:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Sadly I will be out of town on the 1st, but thank you so much for the invite. Hopefully I can make the next one! Juno (talk) 06:39, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

We'll be having an editing event at the Walker Art Center in Minneapolis the following week (March 8th). gobonobo ^{+ c} 12:42, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Link to the StarTribune article mentioned above. --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 19:31, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Juno. I'm co-editor-in-chief of the Signpost. I'm going to write about the Edina news story for next Wednesday's issue and I'd like to talk about the story with you. Thanks. Gamaliel (talk) 05:01, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Worldwide wave of action for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Worldwide wave of action is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worldwide wave of action (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thargor Orlando (talk) 13:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

JSTOR

Hello Juno,

You said that I was approved for JSTOR access, but I haven't as yet received any email correspondence. Is this normal? Cheers, --ceradon (talk • contribs) 20:07, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi Ceradon, at present the average turnaround time seems to be around 3 weeks so don't worry! But please keep checking that email and ping me back if you don't have anything by mid-March. Juno (talk) 08:18, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I have a question as well. I was approved for JSTOR access a while ago but when I go to the JSTOR page, I don't know the log in information. Do we need to access it through Wikipedia? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:11, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi Liz, to clarify: do have an approximate idea of how long ago it was and do you recall if you ever received an email from JSTOR itself? Juno (talk) 08:30, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Juno. I finally found my way back to your talk page! I know I've never received an email from JSTOR and I think I got the okay to use JSTOR in January 2015. That's when I came back to active duty on Wikipedia after being gone for a few months. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:07, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Liz, could you please check your spam folder through that time-period? You are correct in that you should have received an email. If you could please just check it see if that spam folder caught it before I run it up the chain I would appreciate it. Juno (talk) 19:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Juno, I empty my spam folder at least once a week so I don't even have message in there for early June, much less January or February. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi Juno. Thanks for approving my application for JSTOR access. I hate to be a bother, but I just wanted to make sure that everything is going through all right, because I haven't yet received an e-mail from anyone regarding access. I understand from reading above that it could a considerable length of time, so that is probably the reason, but I'd just like to be certain. Thanks very much for your time!-RHM22 (talk) 04:24, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Profile

Hey Juno, when you get a chance could you add a quick profile to WP:The Wikipedia Library/Coordinators? Thanks, Nikkimaria (talk) 06:31, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Nikkimaria, an honor! I will work on that later tonight. Juno (talk) 21:41, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Scott Walker presidential campaign, 2016

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Scott Walker presidential campaign, 2016. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Scott Walker (politician). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Scott Walker (politician) – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:53, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Hillary Rodham Clinton

You are invited to join WikiProject Hillary Clinton, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to American politician Hillary Clinton. You received this invitation because of your history editing articles related to her. The WikiProject Hillary Clinton group discussion is here. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of participants.

Thanks for your consideration, and please note that joining this project is in no way an endorsement of HRC or her political positions. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:04, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016

Harrias ^talk 21:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Melanie Maria Toney) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Melanie Maria Toney, Juno!

Wikipedia editor SparrowHK just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice job on the article

To reply, leave a comment on SparrowHK's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

2015 Garland terror attack listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2015 Garland terror attack. Since you had some involvement with the 2015 Garland terror attack redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - MrX 12:33, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

JSTOR access

Hi Juno,

I wish to have access to JSTOR.

For now, my interest is on an article titled "The picture postcard as historical evidence: veracruz 1914", to expand on the editing of the article in Spanish on https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocupaci%C3%B3n_estadounidense_de_Veracruz_de_1914.

What do I need to do?

Saludos desde Coyoacán, México. --Wkboonec (talk) 18:05, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi William, I believe that you meet the qualifications and would have a compelling case for sponsored access. I would encourage you to fill out an application here. Please let me know if you have any questions. Juno (talk) 19:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi Juno. I really appreciate you approving me for JSTOR. And thanks for your kudos on my folklore edits.

I hadn't even noticed this happened a month+ ago, being drawn into prolonged editing debates over Providence (religious movement). But now I have access, I'll go give JSTOR a spin. Thx again! -- Kiyoweap (talk) 07:40, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

As for the Wiki email for the registration, I understand there is a backlog delay for that (having read user:RHM22's message above, dated 04:24, 20 March 2015, above). So I'll wait. I've been picking up bot and wiki user messages by email so I don't believe I missed it.--Kiyoweap (talk) 07:49, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Melanie Maria Toney

The article Melanie Maria Toney has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:BLP1E and WP:NOTNEWS. Will we ever hear about this person again? Of course not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 04:44, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Keeping in mind WP:FAKEARTICLE (Userspace is not to be used for hosting pseudo-articles that can't survive in mainspace), what are you planning to do with this now that you've requested it be userfied? I know Rhododendrites (talk · contribs) also had some BLP-vio concerns. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:19, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Indeed it should not have been resurrected as a pretty clear WP:BLPCRIME issue. She's only notable for one thing, a crime, and has not been convicted of that crime. No objections to working on it offline and bringing it back if she's convicted (and if sources justify it). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:43, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

• This was userfied a month ago and hasn't been touched since. Juno, can you explain why this isn't just a WP:FAKEARTICLE that you intend to host indefinitely? –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:13, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Query about Jstor account

Hi Juno, I appear to have got sanctioned access to Jstor (in round 5, see https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:JSTOR/Round_5_target_list ) Looking forward to using this facility. Please let me know if I need to do something to initiate this process, or just wait. Thanks! fredericknoronha (talk) 23:27, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Juno/Melanie Maria Toney

User:Juno/Melanie Maria Toney, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Juno/Melanie Maria Toney and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Juno/Melanie Maria Toney during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:17, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For finally someone creating something about Syrian Train and Equip Program..! Great work! Buckshot06 (talk) 04:57, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

@User:Buckshot06, thanks! There have been so many interesting programs these last few years and they have not been well covered. I'm hoping to have the time to add a few more in the weeks to come! Juno (talk) 03:16, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Intelgate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intelligence community. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)