Jump to content

User talk:JuJube/Old Archives 2007

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing the coolest guy on the Intarweb.

Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page and give them ==A Descriptive Header==. If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia and frequently asked questions.


What you had done with pastlife was vandalism

[edit]

If 'past life' search cannot get the real info about past life because your whim, let people get it by pastlife at least.

If you edit it again, I will be forced report it as vandalism.

Rekhaa Kale 19:46, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have you passed your comment after reading? Certainly NOT!!!

[edit]

I would be obliged if you take the pain to read the text before commenting.

In fact the page that was opening on typing past life was out of context.

I Do respect the research in the page.

But I wish you could differentiate between a vandalism and a scholarly article.

Please take the pain to read the article before deletion.

Remember I am NOT INTRUDING YOUR PRIVATE SPACE. I am JUST PUTTING THE RIGHT INFORMATION IN RIGHT PLACE as an authority in this matter.

This matter is from a book under publication taken with the due permission of the author. The name of the author is not disclosed as you will say it is advertising!

Rekhaa Kale 19:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

STUB TAG: Suz Andreasen

[edit]

Hi - Please let me know what this Stub Tag is and why it has been put on the post. I removed it by accident - I apologize for that but now, please let me know why it is on there. This is not a Fashion bio - you should be listing it I should think in relation to Design. Thanks, Archie Archiemartin 01:40, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Bold text[reply]

Sorry for removing the redirection

[edit]

I am really sorry for removing the redirection, but I did not know what to do to put the stuff of REAL significance about Past life in he right place.

When people type past life in search box, they do not want to know only about reincarnation. They need scientific information about past life.

This information was missing there.

Also, the title of past life was missing.

So I did this. Please don't delete things without reading carefully.

Your links are properly kept at right places.

I am saying this as a first hand expert on Past life memory, vision and regression. The info in the article is totally scientific. If you allow it to be, You will have volumes of valuable info on this page.

Rekhaa Kale 19:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that

[edit]

Didn't really know it was vandalism. I'll knock it off.74.38.30.178


Cleveland Browns-Pittsburgh Steelers Rivalry

[edit]

Dude, why did you delete my article? I have no problem with you, cheer up, it's the New Year, don't take out your problems on me. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by French Bodybuilder (talkcontribs) 21:33, 1 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]


Get well soon!

[edit]

I see your'e taking a break because of illness. :( I hope you get well soon, I enjoy some of the work youv'e contributed! Especially with the Lilith article. I'm terribly sorry for sometimes coming off "mean". I apologize. Anyways, I am very worried, please keep in touch. Xuchilbara 04:29, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


It was perfect solution (about popculture), IDk if youv'e checked her paganwiki.org article yet.[1] i contributed alot to it, and you'll probaly find it more informative & in depth (w/ no popculture refrences!) than the current wiki article here. (I've been trying to update the one here as best as i can with the new info & scholarship given.)

I'm glad to hear you'll be ok... I think you have my YIM if you want to talk anytime.

Xuchilbara 04:42, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: "Can an admin close this... ?"

[edit]

I've found that petitioning on WP:AN with a polite explanation of the situation usually works in getting admin attention to an AfD.

(Additionally, it's amazing the lengths some people will go to keep their articles/pet subjects/POV kept into the eneyclopedia.) NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 04:55, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Future Naruto

[edit]

I'm not trying to vandalize anyhting. I feel that this is an inmportant subject here. You say improve the article, how? I know that it gave me instructions, but its all jiberish to me. Just give a list of everything that is wrong with it and I'll fix it. It would also be nice if you told me how to fix it. Please dont delete this article --Count Mall 06:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Responded directly on Countmall's talk page. --Dennisthe2 00:59, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bra Size

[edit]

Danny,

I will call a spade a spade. I'm not looking to offend anyone, but I think that casual or reckless approaches to AfD are potentially harmful to WP in general. I know that without a deletion process we would be buried in crap, but the process can go too far to stifle creativity. I'm not sure what the soulution is, but sometimes a good swift kick in the balls will gain someones attention.

However, if I have offended you I am sorry as I think that you are a good and well meaning editor.

Sincerely,

Kevin

--Kevin Murray 23:30, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries on the bra thing. It is a silly article to which I am ambivilent. My main gripe was the cavalier or moralistic attitude of the nomination and deletion comments. Thanks for your response. --Kevin Murray 23:37, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Frequents

[edit]

Oh, thanks for letting me know on that. It's just, I've never heard of frequent being used as a verb. Thanks again! --Tohru Honda13Sign here! 01:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

[edit]
Thank you for your excellent work against one or more twits (and on behalf of my long-suffering user page). User:Jkelly gave me this very handy twit-whacking stick; I think it's time to pass it on to you. -- Hoary 07:00, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but, the user continually refuses to clarify what and why things are being changed. It is a hallmark of vandalism by ip users. I was trying to help this user begin to consider joining the wikiculture. Thanks for the feedback. --Kukini 02:17, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The user reverted again...earned a 31 hour block. Hopefully he/she will begin to pay attention to feedback from other users when editing. --Kukini 06:52, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like you made a good choice. When I look at those edits, I realize that this likely needs more oversight than I can provide. --Kukini 02:36, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:SpeedResearch

[edit]

Hi, i guess you flagged me for speedy delete for 'SpeedResearch'. I'm simply trying to add to the list of browsers on http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/List_of_web_browsers .. Speedresearch is a valid specialty browser and that's where i'm trying to add it.. why can I not add this browser where there are other similar browsers that also link to their 'official websites' ?

Kuch123 11:02, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Contested? prods

[edit]

Sorry about reverting to a {prod} on "The Expendable One". It was late, and I wasn't paying close enough attention to the templates I was replacing. This anonymous editor[2] was blatantly vandalizing by removing templates, and the first few, [3] [4] [5] [6], weren't {prod}s. At that point, I was just interested in reverting. You are correct though, and I'll change any other replaced prods with AfDs. Thanks. --Onorem 12:32, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

mcgil art

[edit]

Danny, I am sorta new at this. It was okay for me to re-post the entry because I changed it to what it was, no? I dont see why it is contested for deltetion again, it is no differnt then this listing: mcmun orMcMUN isn't that blatant advertising for a group too? I don't think either are.--Cheetahcool 23:19, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't think it is fair to characterize this as a "content dispute". There can't be a dispute if only one side is doing any talking. The anon is simply unilaterally changing the article to the way he wants it, adding many pictures that are unnecessary, despite me repeatedly trying to tell him that such changes should be discussed on the talk page first. There's no point in taking any other measures since this user is simply not responding to my attempts to discuss the issue with him; he should be blocked. Danny Lilithborne 02:45, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Either way I feel it is more complicated than WP:AIV is meant to deal with. You can request some discussion at WP:ANI, but i am inclined just to protect the article and force discussion. ViridaeTalk 02:47, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly...this is my leaning as well. --Kukini 02:52, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Millennium Mamodo

[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, JuJube! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 23:57, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan David (Musician) on deletion review

[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Ryan David (Musician). Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. You deleted my page. I am referenced on Wikipedia at the following page:

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Cryogenic_%28Band%29

If I cannot have my own page, then please remove my name from that page. If I am not reputable enough to have my own page, then I am not reputable enough to be on that page. Thank you.

SF characters

[edit]

Hi Danny! I'm also the user who tried to add heights to these Street Fighter-characters and you reverted my edits. Well, please can you make an excrement? Can you restore the heights and weights of these Street Fighter characters again? I won't vandalize them any more and I'll stop with my editwars, promise. Sergeant Gerzi 07:43, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What a pitty. Mike Bison is my favourite fighter in Street Fighter and I'd like to add his height and weight but this is not available, as you said. Well, ok then... Sergeant Gerzi 08:24, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'll stop to add heights and weights to fictional characters then but what if someone else would add heights and weights to these Street Fighter-characters? Would you blame me again or would you try to get more evidences about that matter? I'm asking because I'm a little bit nervous that someone else would add the heights and weights to these characters and you would blame me again. Sergeant Gerzi 08:28, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


List of films with similar themes and release dates AfD

[edit]

Hi, you've expressed an opinion in the deletion discussion of this article. I've recently suggested a compromise in hopes of improving the article while keeping both sides happy, and would appreciate if you could revisit the issue. Thanks. --Wafulz 18:24, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the speedy db-bio tag on that page. I think the person has made an assertion of notability there, so IMO it isn't subject to SD. Perhaps prod would be a better option? -- cmhTC 04:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Boucher article deletion

[edit]

I was only attempting to Contest the deletion of the page. Because my argument was to be placed on the talk page of my article, i had to recreate it for others to see. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mike239 (talkcontribs) 06:25, 10 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

And Chaos Died AfD

[edit]

Metamagician3000 and I have reworked the article on Joanna Russ's book And Chaos Died. It's not a great article, but I think it's much better than what had gone before (on the AfD, 23skidoo has changed his vote to keep). While it could certainly be expanded, it maintains an encyclopedic tone, establishes an amount of notability and includes external hyperlinks. Thoughts?

Best wishes, Anville 18:24, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of your reversion of vandalism

[edit]

Hello, I've reverted this. Take a look at this.

Certainly, this IP's other edits are a pile of crap, though. You'd every reason to be suspicious. -- Hoary 08:57, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conduct unbecoming

[edit]

Declaring someone to be wrong because he is (speculatively) a sockpuppet is an argumentum ad hominem. Please refrain from such personal attacks and instead offer evidence (any little shred will do to get a discussion started). 129.171.233.24 20:59, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Ban Vandals, Please

[edit]

I have noted that at 06:15, 13 JAN 2007, an anonymous a****** added "poo" to the caption of the main Sacha Baron Cohen photo. I have removed the word from the caption. What is the procedure for banning such vandals?Relgif

Yeah, I got tired of dealing with it, left a message with Quarl and bid the matter adieu. Clogging up the edit summary wasn't helping so I figured a higher authority would have to handle it. Thanks for stepping in. GassyGuy 04:19, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Somari

[edit]

Just in case you didn't already see this - Somari is an illegal Hong Kong video game meant to be placed for sale, not a "fan game." WhisperToMe 05:15, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:IILIIDIUK.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:IILIIDIUK.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Stop saying that I vandalize the page. I'm serious. This page shows that the number of English speakers as the mother tongue is about 354 million. This means that English will be the 3rd place next to Chinese and Hindi. Also, the total number of English speakers is 1.3 billion to 1.8 billion. This means that it is going to be 1st.--219.125.6.244 07:42, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

I disagree with you twice. First off, I disagree with what happened. The article should have been tagged with a speedy delete template as you did, NOT directly deleted immediately after being created. Heck, at the spped it got deleted, the user could have still been working on it!

So instead, I placed a notice on the original users talk page to please provide notability references, went to the deleting admin and explained my actions - and then you come along and give me a talking-to...

Loosen up people. Not every noob must have his articles deleted half an hour after he created them. Give them a blimmin' chance to provide notability. MadMaxDog 11:19, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Responded on my page. My, this talking to and fro would really benefit from a different system... MadMaxDog 11:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What would give you the idea that I am User:67.80.238.244? RYANonWIKIPEDIA

I see you did some research on me. But it's not me. Sorry. RYANonWIKIPEDIA

Re: BonniePrinceCharlie

[edit]

I cannot say why Nlu did that. Maybe the user name was similar (with spaces, no uppercase, etc) and he mistook them (reporting one but not this one). It appears to be a misunderstanding somewhere. If he continues vandalizing, report him back and we will block him. -- ReyBrujo 02:23, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Old Future

[edit]

Why was my article "Old Future" removed? I was not done with it. Actually, I was far from done.

Beatlehippie 14:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC)Beatlehippie[reply]

[edit]

A user Jonny2x4 has been trying to merge the article with the List of Final Fight characters article. He ran a discussion on the merging before the first attempt, and only two people offered input in that regard (myself and one other fellow) and both were opposing. Yet he's gone ahead with the motion twice now, citing fancruft. Not trying to make a huge deal about this, but the way I understand it that page should be mainly for one shot characters or those of very low importance, and as it stands it's a cluttered mess, and the character deserves her own article given the characters significance and number of appearances (one playable, one intended to be playable). Basically coming to you to see what your take on the matter is given SF-related articles are mainly your domain. Thanks for your time.--Kung Fu Man 07:12, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What's the meaning of this?

[edit]

You told me to provide a reference to the information I posted, well I did so, and now you're saying that I didn't. What in the hell is this? I'm going to repost the information one more time, with the same reference that I posted the last time, and if you tell me that I didn't provide a reference point this time, I'm taking this up with the administrators.74.61.179.180 09:13, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is bullshit; the reference I linked to gave no evidence of the character's involvement? It says very clearly what his involvement is in the episode. What more do you want, an entire transcript of the episode? This is outrageous. Ban me if you want, but my facts are just that: FACTS. And if you don't agree, then let's take this to the administrators, because I'm getting really tired of you deleting my edits without cause. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.61.179.180 (talkcontribs)

Response to Weight/Height bit

[edit]

I was wondering why that was removed from all the articles...well, I'll keep an eye out for him and see if he bothers to meddle with what I've added as is before adding anything else (all data is from what I can gather from official sources and the measurements in tiamat's guide). At the very least some cause for good news in all this is that if it does get out of hand, simply modifying the template would nix it until he's gone. Speaking of SF, there's a minor kink with [bit of an article here], namely the fact that a proposed merge is being done to merge those characters into the SF1 page, but nobody seems to have discussed what to do with Q's bit there as a result. Anyway, thanks for your time and all that good ol jazz--Kung Fu Man 23:35, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that

[edit]

I just changed your speedy delete tag here, and it was because I thought I had got my spam tag in first and was changing it... Wasn't trying to overrule you! Leebo86 01:30, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't Realize

[edit]

Hi. I didn't realize that I should not be removing the tag, when I contested the instant removal of the page. Sorry about that. Skip.

Re: Turco-Persian article

[edit]

May I ask why you have removed the deletion notice, few hours after installing it by Wikipedia administrator? You should give sometime so the Wikipedians to contribute and convey their opinions, whether the article should be deleted or otherwise. I have reverted your removal, and please to not remove it until the deadline imposed by Wikipedia policy for deletion Surena 07:14, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You obviously have a bias or are plain bored

[edit]

I have screenshots of some of your latest actions over the past few days. I had removed a external link to a website for asylum-et and changed it to an internal link that whent to an article on wiki after I read the policy and what is viewed as advertising. I then noticed you changed it back to an external link to the website but omitted the .com although it still linked to the site. I just checked back and now you leave a comment that it is spam and removed it altogether. I am contacting the wiki admins tomorrow. The Asylum Entertainment bit you removed is no more advertising than the Asylum_Records or any of the others that apear on that page. Some even with external links. This has been and is still an organization of many bands and people from various parts of the USA. The page that was created internally on wiki was a reflection of the various companies and organizations that have followed suit in using the very same name that the original asylum entertainment has used since 1992 and I might add has a current valid trademark on. Also I might add that in one of your responses to me you mention that you keep removing things I have posted due to the fact that they are not well known.. Uhm well maybe not to you but rest asured there are more people in this world than you and just because you do not know someone or something does not mean it does not exist. Try a google search for instance. As well you may notice I have edited one of the guidlines to editing on wiki. You are so worried about the content here? Why is it that the guidlines told me that it is suggested to just poop. What is that all about? I kindly removed that and it now only reflects to just be bold... The bit I refer to is located here http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Be_bold_in_updating_pages&diff=101245716&oldid=101243481 So on that note thanks for wasting everyone's time here and best wishes.

3RR

[edit]
Warning
Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Turkeyphant 06:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Tiamat's Guide

[edit]

Still a little confused as to how it's not reliable. Street Fighter Alpha 1 doesn't happen, yes...but the latter bits about Alpha all are worked into the game somehow and mention of when he's conjecturing on what might have happened is mentioned, but when he states something factual that isn't conjecture it's pretty clear...regardless, for that Honda bit he cited that one mook. Could that be cited?--Kung Fu Man 02:45, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't blame my act!

[edit]

I recognized your comment on Kung Fu Man! The reason why the height and weight of several characters have been removed is because it is too difficult to verify. Think of your own words. I've already told you that I'll stop to edit the heights and weights of several characters if you would restore these heights again! For Future, if other users would vandalize or add these heights and weights again, don't blame me! Sergeant Gerzi 09:22, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be happy if you would mention my current username and not my old one because my old username is not available any more and I wasn't kidding by creating a new account. Sergeant Gerzi 09:34, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria Woodhull Documentary

[edit]

Hello JuJube, Please do NOT remove the documentary addition to Victoria Woodhull biography. This documentary is the first and only documentary about the first woman who ran for US President. And, interviews with feminist icon, Gloria Steinem and esteemed professors and not to mention actress Kate Capshaw, this documentary was also reviewed in the esteem American Journal of History. It's been broadcast via PBS for several years including Canadian broadcasts. This isn't a home video project but an award winning documentary that today, continues to be distributed to universities and colleges internationally. Paying close attentiont to Wiki guidelines, it appears that I have acted accordingly. I am also seeking suggestions from administors. thank you, Vweston3554 14:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey JuJube!

[edit]

Hey JuJube! Yes, as a producer and director of a historical documentary with esteemed reviews from American Journal of History, which also includes indepth interviews from feminist icon Gloria Steinem. You are failing to see that the documentary is about VICTORIA WOODHULL not me. Victoria Woodhull And as other authors have posted their books, it's equally important to include the only documentary which has been broadcast in the US and Canada and currently distributed to universities should be included. This is a significant and well respected documentary about the first female presidential candidate.

If you have specific suggestions on how YOU believe this Documentary portion should be presented, let me know. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vweston3554 (talkcontribs) 00:06, 26 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

REPLY

[edit]

I'm replying to your comment posted "if you're offended by my comment, I'll remove it". Making statements like this is a reflection of your character and true spirit. If I am going to commit to improving pages on Wikipedia, I will act in a professional manner and offer intelligent critques to issues rather than tacky comments that add nothing to improve an issue. Vweston3554 00:34, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mudslinging?

[edit]

Hey JuJube! I did reply to your message, and if YOU feel that comment was funny and intended to be a reflection of your true spirit, so let it be. I am not humored by it and unless a photo is truly out of focus, one might suggest uploading a different one. I don't believe the founders of this forum intended its users, editors, contributors to be offensive.

So, yes, go ahead and remove the comment. My apologies to you if I said anything that offended you. Vweston3554 00:46, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


ChibiChibi/Sailor Cosmos

[edit]

In case you didn't see, I've responded to your comments at Talk:ChibiChibi. I'd love to hear back from you on the subject so that we can move forward in some way. :) A lot of the rewriting in the test article is actually irrelevant to the merge, but expands the current ChibiChibi stuff a lot. So I'm itchy to see whether or not the merge is happening and get some kind of update made. Thanks for your time! --Masamage 05:14, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Subliminal Music entry

[edit]

Hi JuJube, I got your message and will ask my webmaster to add ""I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." to the two related pages on the Ultimate Healer external website. As he usually gets changes made within 48 hours, I ask that you not delete the submission for this time period. Will this work for you? Thanks, Kyrah —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kyrah8 (talkcontribs) 02:08, 30 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Ok now I am confused. On my talk page you said you didn't know if adding this phrase would be sufficient, but that is the suggestion you made. And now you say I will have to prove the article is not an advertisement. It seems to me to be a definition; that's the way it was intended. As a hypnotherapist, I would think it offers a more informed description than one submitted by a layperson.

That said, what part of it do you feel is an advertisement? I have edited it to remove any statements that may be construed as such. Thanks Rev. Kyrah F. Malan, CHT, CEH 02:37, 30 January 2007 (UTC)Kyrah[reply]

Sailormoon

[edit]


thanks for the heads up... I was trying to revert it back to the old article but I was having server problems...

Hadouken! Page

[edit]

You deleted my page on the band Hadouken! when it should not have been, the band are quite popular and have been covered in various publications such as the NME and the Guardian newspaper and are one of the largest bands in the grindie and new rave scenes, so why was it deleted? Could you please revert it as I believe that it does have signifigance, I've made band and music related pages before. Acertainromance 20:57, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for completely ignoring me--Acertainromance 13:44, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I also agree it should be created, it is a real band so I don't see reason for deleting it. --Rebirth 22:50, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scientology as precedent

[edit]

On Talk:Kadism you wrote:

I'm starting to think Wikipedia needs a "WP:SCIENTOLOGY" page stating "Just because Scientology is a stupid religion doesn't make your less stupid religion notable".

Maybe related to WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS, one of my favorite WP: shortcut names. DMacks 06:52, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Cyr

[edit]

Duly Noted 66.97.206.129 10:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Biting the newbies

[edit]

Hey, please try to be more civil and not bite the newb like you did here. The user's suggestion seemed to be in good faith- he/she just seems unfamiliar with the ways of Wikipedia. --Wafulz 16:06, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


i have wrote what i think but it feels like the page will be deleted what ever i write. like its final./matrix17

yeah i see your point in one way. but on the other hand in 4 week theese people will be something other will read about. because melodifestivalen makes the singers in it very popular./matrix17

just because i dont agree with you on certain matters./ matrix17

Thanks for contributing to the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamela Fischer. I expanded the Pamela Fischer article, and you might want to take a second look at it. --Eastmain 03:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I need your help

[edit]

User:Part-Deux and others have accused me of sockpuppetry, when in fact it's false. They believe that I'm using the name of User:Fil-co. I do not even know, how the heelll is User:Fil-Com. User:Fil-Co is also trying to get me into trouble, by acting like me..At the moment, I'm un-able to log on to my account because, I'm currently blocked for incivility due to my heated dispute with User:Howard the Duck.. about the Spanish language in the Phlippines. So I'll be using the unanomious user for the moment. Please help me, I need your help from this accusations.Saludos!-- User:Ramirez72

Reply::Look, I don't know who is User:Fil Co, alright!!! Some-one out there is Impersenating me and is trying to sabotage me and damage my reputation.. alright!!! Why wouldn't you ever believe me???.. For the second time, who the f-king hell is User:Fil-com-- User:Ramirez72

  • Bro!! I' am unanamouus at the moment because, I'm blocked.. I can't log in..so I'm realying on using the unamous user. I need your help!!! Someone out there is trying to sabotage me due to my heated arguements about The Spanish Language, I don't know who User:Fil Co is??. All I know is someone is impersanating me, and is trying to get me into alot of trouble..Please help!!I don't know who that User: Is... Please help!! thanks!!User:Ramirez72

Your Dan stuff

[edit]

**Well, as long as we are arguing, Dan is seldom the worst character in games he's in, but has never been higher than mid tier (Alpha 1). His main strength is his Gale Kick (and in Puzzle Fighter's case, high-damage drops). JuJube 18:13, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And that's not an opinion based on POV? My point with the previous edit was that how it was written made him sound useless, when obviously that isn't the case. It needs simple rewording to inform users that he is only intended to be crap, and he can actually be a hard-to-defeat character. Mr.bonus 17:12, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an Edit war according to the reverts you have made on English language. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. - RJASE1 02:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, sorry for the misunderstanding...thanks for reporting him, I was about to. - RJASE1 02:12, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new combined deletion debate. ~ trialsanderrors 20:11, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Accent Core pics

[edit]

Yeah, no problem. I've been wanting to make those pages look better for awhile now. --SeizureDog 12:15, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable Content

[edit]

Well, I think the t-shirt marketing thing is pretty notable, byut, hey, I ain`t gonna get all upset about it. Just glad to see that there`s someone out there who holds strong opinions on something I care about. Even if it is just a comic. Have a good one. 70.52.75.181 05:13, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, and thanks for committing to being WP:COOL. At this point the appropriate people are aware of the situation and it is being monitored.--Isotope23 15:55, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think not

[edit]

continued from Koko —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.61.26.34 (talk) 22:20, 7 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Formatting

[edit]

I'm going to send this message to Geg and Benten, too. I have no experience in Wikipieda's table formats, so I'd like to suggest to those who may that we clean up the original Yugioh pages with the minor characters to resembled the GX page, which is clean, concise, and organized, whereas the original series pages...aren't. What do you think? Drake Clawfang 01:20, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

???

[edit]

I'm wording how do you make those box thingys that say stuff like this user's Favorite color is light blue --User:Kappabo 101 03:44, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! And sorry if the edit summary sounded rude at all. I've seen a lot of edits on various pages where people just randomly change romaji around, so it's a little frustrating sometimes. ^^; Nique talk 22:42, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish language

[edit]

Hello, I saw that you put a {{POV}} tag on the Spanish language article. Could you please comment on the Spanish language talk page to address why you added the tag and why you feel the article fails WP:NPOV. Thank you.--Jersey Devil 04:54, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I want to remove it because unless the anonymous user's address their issues with the article in the talk page then there is no way we can know if their complaint that the article fails WP:NPOV is legitimate. Would you agree with me removing the tag (at least for now, so long as no other future complaints are made)?--Jersey Devil 04:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I removed it. Thank you for being so helpful in this matter.--Jersey Devil 05:05, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Edit summary on Gaara

[edit]

Caveman see word "no" both sentences. Caveman not believe double negative. ~SnapperTo 03:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Touche

[edit]

Touche JuJube! Sorry that a troll came by your way. Allow them to stomp along with their silly wooden club ;).¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 19:45, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ashuron.PNG)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ashuron.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 21:20, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Riinwise.PNG)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Riinwise.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 21:20, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:GGI ABA.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:GGI ABA.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 02:52, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category sort keys

[edit]

I have come across a couple of articles where you have recently manually added sort keys to all the categories (e.g. here). While this is generally commendable, please note that this is not necessary when the {{DEFAULTSORT}} magic word has been used. The magic word method is preferable, because it reduces the amount of typing and makes typos less likely. --Stemonitis 13:13, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eugenius (band)

[edit]

The City 02:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)Hi, you have put a deletion policy on the "Eugenius (band)" page, if you'd look at the page as far as I can see there is nothing wrong with the page and I'd ask you to remove the deletion policy ASAP.The City 02:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Yugi's Age

[edit]

I didn't put false information, Yugi is NOT 11. He is around the Freshman age for a Japanese student which is 15-16 years. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shisui2006 (talkcontribs) 02:27, 19 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Yugi's Age cont.

[edit]

You put a source for yours before you edit too. Where did you get the idea that he was 11? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shisui2006 (talkcontribs) 02:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Yugi's age cont.2

[edit]

That's the first time I've ever seen it, if it isn't yours find out who did it and get on them. Everytime I have checked Yugi's age it has been in the range of 15-17 years. Stating that he is 11 is extremely inaccurate. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shisui2006 (talkcontribs) 02:36, 19 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

"the late"

[edit]

I usually do a google search and type "site:wiki.riteme.site "the late...." and then put a name in the quotes after that. Sometimes I'll put in a common first name, or for those who have recently died, just put a full name. Booshakla 19:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On MSH article

[edit]

Sorry about that. I added it because, last time I played, I thought I could do that just by slamming the opponent down with a normal combo. I played the game again afterwards and saw that is not really the case. Sorry again. 201.8.138.54 23:10, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Japanese manga and anime characters

[edit]

Is there a reason why you're removing Category:Japanese manga and anime characters from articles or are you just removing it for the hell of it? It's kind of hard to tell from your edit summaries. // DecaimientoPoético 01:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

just did it thanksMatteo747

Broken edit summaries

[edit]

Hi. You might want to the edit summaries on some of your recent reversions. Something seems to be broken. It might be related to the 'popups' tool you're using. Thanks – Qxz 08:30, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As a thought, I almost wished this page was vandalized more, because every time I ask for it to be protected, I'm told there's not enough activity to justify it. Damn Yugioh Abridged...I've never seen it and I still hate it. Drake Clawfang 20:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thatnks for the talk page revert. That stuff was hilarious. --Chris Griswold () 17:44, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your userbox on process

[edit]

Hi, I've copied your userbox saying "This user believes process is important on Wikipedia" to one of my own user subpages, as it more or less summarises my own viewpoint - hope you don't mind! Walton monarchist89 16:40, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Tatsumaki Shenpuu Kyaku thing

[edit]

I don't know why you changed it,since Tatsumaki "Shepuukyaku" is incorrect Or, I did forgot to mention that the user used a wrong name for the article.It's truly Tatsumaki Shenpuu Kyaku.Master Bigode 00:41, 25 February 2007 (UTC)Master Bigode[reply]

Blanking

[edit]

This edit constitutes as blanking sections or links of an article. Just don't it then. I had already reverted the vandalism before you had to blank me. Power level (Dragon Ball) 23:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zatch Bell Characters

[edit]

I sort of want to keep the King Festival Mamono together since they are the only ones to get this far. The whole situation is confusing as is, particularly with some Mamono that weren't sent back by the end of the anime and now with the whole situation with the current King Festival. If we eliminate Mamono one by one, then somehow the only one left at the top at the end is the winner...maybe we could have something where we have the Mamono who lose in the "King Festival Round", thus leaving their final rank, but separate from all the other eliminated Mamono since they lasted longer than the first ninety. (then again, we still need to figure out how to separate certain differences in sendbacks between the anime and manga, particularly with everything from Riou on) -StrangerAtaru 03:52, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles as sources

[edit]

Hi, I think you misunderstood my statement. I have clarified it at the AfD. I did not mean that the articles themselves function as sources, but rather that the sources are located in the articles. -- Black Falcon 07:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prenatal Discrimination

[edit]

The prenatal discrimination was supposed to be a stub not something in the "just shy of nonsense" category. I'll try to identify it as such to avoid any further confusion. Thanks.

Pax jfraatz

Re:Human Luna

[edit]

...Really?

...Ewwwww. --Masamage 01:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Drew Nutter

[edit]

i put this in its discussion page because im a weirdo and i take comfort in the fact that you understand my motives

not was i was looking for, but your right, i take that as "it harms the reputation of wikipedia as a true encyclopedia about serious topics"... and the point you failed to note "it is a very offensive article and harms those such as african americans and jews"

i would also like to say that i am not racist or anti-semitic, i am just not afraid of political incorrectness and appearing hateful while i am not.

i apologize for bothering you with my annoying, stubborn hunger for mind control

Babarism

[edit]

Hello there, I noticed that back in October 2006, User:Danny Lilithborne which redirects to your page (are you him?) was discussing my violation of WP:POINT in defending of the Babarism article. I'm afraid you misunderstood my intentions in discussing it, possibly due to the wording of the article. The author of the religion presents it somewhat jokingly, but the article itself is not a joke, it's a serious analysis of the religion, it's origins and comparisons to other elephant-based religions, and of the event that occured at the widely-known Burning Man event. I'm sorry that you took my rebuttals to those who were voting to delete the article to be harassment. It was merely my attempt to defend the article and explain its merits, not be a nuisance or a dictator. Tyciol 21:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh joy a barnstar :)

[edit]

Hehe, puts a smile on my face. Which is nice, considering I've been rather bitter from working fast food all day. I notice that you say that you hate "SNK fanboys" :P I'm rather unfond of their games myself, but I got stuck with a couple of their games so I've played them some. Out of all the KOF characters, May Lee was just the one bright spot of originality, so I felt like fixing up her article to be a GA. Plus, there's not much information on her, so it was easy to find it all and thus be "complete". But Guilty Gear and Street Fighter are certainly better series than any of SNK's.

So anyways, I'm planning on going around and bringing a few more fighter character articles up to GA status, probably with a Guilty Gear next but I'm not quite sure which to go with. Right now I'm trying to round up sources to cite, but it's been a bit slow going. I was happy that I was finally able to find a source for Sol about the Queen references, though I'm rather doubting I'll be able to pull it off for any other character. One thing I'd really like to be able to cite is fighter characters' "tiers", or how well they do in tournaments, but I can't find shit to use there. Some of SNK's games are supposed to have online leader boards and yearly tournaments, but I can't figure out how the hell to access them. For instance, there are some links here, but they die every time I click them.

But whatever. Are there any character articles you'd like try to push for GA? FA are too damn hard (as evident of E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (Atari 2600) getting denied 3 times), so I like to try and make GAs.--SeizureDog 10:11, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, Ryu is probably one of those few fighters that stands a chance at FA. The problem is that the more famous the character is, the more sources there will be to have to find. And not really to the point where you have more sources than you need either, since most of the stuff you'll find is in-universe stuff, when the things you really need are the character design information and other technical details. So basically, it just means that it takes longer before you can say that you've researched everything. Also means more story arcs to cover without being crufty :P Have you tried contacting this Tiamat fellow and seeing if he could help? And just for the record, I happen to have the mook that came with KOF '94 Re-Bout. 'Course you don't care, but just sayin'.--SeizureDog 10:31, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I see. I'm really not much help for translating, especially if I can't copy and paste it (looking up unknown kanji can take forever). Like with the Sol article, I downloaded a couple of things that might look like they would have some information, happened to notice "Mister Badguy" in katakana, and spent about 30 mins figuring out exactly what he said. Just for the hell of it, I'll show you what took so long to translate.

-What was the first album you listened to?
-I can't remember. I started liking music because of Queen, which continues to be my lifetime favorite. That's why I choose this naming (the vocalist to Queen, the late Freddie Mercury's nickname was "Mister Badguy"). So Sol's real name is Freddie (laughs).

Sad, but rewarding. I can usually get the jist of something by reading it, but in order to cite it I have to make sure to translate the whole thing so I don't happen to miss that one word that gives it an entirely opposite meaning (for instance, I could have just sourced it saying that Sol was named after the album Mr. Bad Guy and not Freddie's nickname if I didn't read it right).--SeizureDog 10:42, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, normally not for something that simple, though you might need to source that they actually are fireballs if you wanted to use that exact statement.--SeizureDog 10:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Griffith page

[edit]

I've modified the page to be in line with policies. Is it acceptable now? thanks. .--FishoFish 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Rush note

[edit]

From AN/I, plese read: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Rush_tours. thanks ThuranX 22:38, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have been fighting this anon vandal for several weeks now. Using several different IP addresses, he has been adding false information to lots of voice actors' articles. Corvus cornix 00:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But it was a re-edit of hoax (or unproven) information added by that vandal a couple of times. Corvus cornix 00:17, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

[edit]

Your voice is needed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of diss songs (2nd nomination). TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 00:41, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

T. Hawk

[edit]

Hi, I'm just wondering why you think the height info is too difficult to verify on T. Hawk's page. Surely there is no one even close to 7'7. I saw that Hugo was listed as 7'2 and he is the only other character I thought could have been as tall. Mr.bonus 12:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chibi Chibi

[edit]

Im sorry, i didn't post nonsense on chibi chibi. that was an actualy fact that explained part of the story line. what i think is nonsense is how much time you spend sending messages to other people about how they post things you dont like on wikipedia. are you angry someone posted those things before you or what. the 97 people you corrected added important things and you are out of line by telling us that we are posting nonsense. i dont care if your bipolar, stop re-edditing what we posted corectly then sending us messages about how we were wrong and you took the liberty to basically imply that we are stupid. and why should we coward down to you as if you are the high and might overlord of what gets edited on wikipeda. what i posted was true, not nonsense. we arent spamming, if someone knows tony hawks height, then they do. that isint hard to verify. it seeems you just like to correct people on things that werent incorrect to begin with.

speedies

[edit]

Thanks for catching the spam. You could further help by putting the corresponding warn templates on the authors talkpage. Agathoclea 08:11, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Informal mediation

[edit]

Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-12-21_Street_Fighter_character_articles has been reopened by request. Please join in the discussion so we can finalize a compromise acceptable to all parties. Vassyana 22:28, 19 March 2007(UTC)

Orochimaru

[edit]

You stay out of this and stop for the love god quit getting rid of my Orochimaru image! --Naruto134 00:00, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Deletion of PGSM fair-use images

[edit]

Those images were deleted as part of clearing out the Category:Replaceable fair use images as of 28 February 2007 backlog. They were nominated by 60.53.2.95 (talk · contribs), and the majority were later contested by Masamage (talk · contribs). Use of these images violated WP:FUC, and since the articles included multiple copyrighted images of the same character without an appropriate rationale, also violated CSD:I6. It appears that the uploaders were not notified by 60.53.2.95, although other users did notice the tags, and attempted to contest the various deletions. You're correct in pointing out that a technicality prescribed in CSD:I7 mandates that the uploader be given 48 hours notification, and I can temporarily undelete them to notify the uploader, if you'd like. A temporary undeletion, however, will not change the fact that these images are not allowed by Wikipedia policy, nor will it earn these photos anything other than a 48 hour reprieve. I am sorry for not being careful in checking the nomination of these images. It's a mistake I do not mean to make again, and I thank you for bringing it to my attention. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 05:04, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hassleberry/David Wills dispute

[edit]

Jujube, Please discuss this with Benten before making any alterations to the Tyranno Hassleberry page. I'll leave Benten to revert it. Here is the original letter that has been sent to 4 people now:

Makemi, Thanks for getting back to me (and unblocking me). I'm relatively new to contributing to Wikipedia and the procedures around here are baffling to say the least. To answer your question...YES... this IS David Wills the voice actor. My ID and e-mail address is "ghostysshow" because, aside from my voice acting career, I also host a show on Sirius Satellite Radio on channel#32 Sirius Disorder and a Saturday night show on WFDU fm out of Teaneck, NJ under the on-air name of "Ghosty"...hence "Ghosty's Show"...get it? Here's what happened over the weekend. While trapped at the radio station as a result of the snowstorm, I began browsing around online. While I was aware of various forums and websites related to another TV show I work on, Viva Pinata, I decided to see if there was anything about Yu-Gi-Oh GX. Well, yes indeed there was, but on all of the aforementioned sites and forums I was not credited with playing Hassleberry. Now I'm not really one for self-promotion (especially true when GX is heading into season 3 and I've never bothered to look and see what's out there). Research into how and why this incorrect information has spread all over the internet led me to Wikipedia. I logged in and made the correct changes where applicable. Of course, my corrections were undone and the false information has once again reappeared. While not getting credit for the role of Hassleberry on Wikipedia will probably not be injurious to my career in the long run, I do take a certain amount of pride in my work and at the very least would appreciate having the correct information listed on both the Hassleberry and Yu-Gi-Oh GX pages. As a disc jockey, I've often used Wikipedia for show prep purposes but now after having been the subject of bad information, I'll refrain from taking Wikpedia's word as "gospel" (something I'm sure the other sites, forums and fan pages made the mistake of doing too). I don't know what else you need from me (and is this OTRS?) but I hope I've made it clear who I am (although I'd hardly call myself "notable". LOL If you have any questions feel free to contact me either via e-mail or phone which I can also give you.

- David Wills Ghostysshow 22:45, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

triceratops

[edit]

What I saw was a blank of the article, so I instantly reverted. Sorry 'bout that. Circeus 17:05, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

deleted page: 360 Architecture

[edit]

The page I created was speedy deleted due to a user believing it was advertorial in nature. I took out any phrases that could be considered as such and then reposted. Could you please tell me why the re-posted page was deleted? I can't see any different between the most recent page and a page of any other architecture firm (Ellerbe Becket, HOK, NBBJ)? Also, I would strongly agrue that this information is legitimate for an encyclopedia since the company is the architect for some of the largest sporting venues (Oakland Athletics' New Ballpark and NFL Jets and Giants New Stadium) and corporate offices (Fortune 500 H&R Block Headquarters, Lockton Companies Headquarters, etc.).

Sdkucera 18:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Deak

[edit]
  • I accidentally deleted the Wikipedia notices. Sorry - and I won't do it again!

lenabean54 18:21, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

[edit]

Regarding your edit, [7], please remain WP:Civil. Lukas19 06:32, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AFD categorization

[edit]

I noticed you had a problem setting an AFD category. See my fix for how to do it in the future. —dgiestc 03:12, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]