User talk:Jim1138/Archive 62

Archive 55

←

Archive 60

Archive 61

Archive 62

Edits to scene subculture

My edits are not disruptive. They are restoring vandalism by Binksternet and Static N. These users removed the whole section on Latin America without good reason even though it was reliably sourced, and cut out everything about the subculture's decline. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.9.224.228 (talk) 01:06, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Replying on editor's talk page. Jim1138 (talk) 01:08, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

solitary confinement of women

What’s the problem with the edit I made to this article? The article is supposed to discuss solitary confinement of women. The content I removed was unrelated to the article’s premise. —107.77.234.139 (talk) 01:42, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

You removed the section discussing transgender women. Discuss its removal on talk:solitary confinement of women per wp:BRD Jim1138 (talk) 01:44, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Solitary confinement of women, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

strange edit

Hi, i just got a message saying you didnt approve my edit on some page, although ive never edited a page before (dont even know how to). This isnt a shared computer so i dont know how this would be possible. just very confused. 103.101.171.157 (talk) 22:05, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Jim reverted your edit because you added material that is not verifiable. All content in Wikipedia should be supported by secondary, reliable sources. Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me • my contributions) 00:18, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

@Abelmoschus Esculentus: Thank you for the response. The edit was made in 2015, so I suspect the IP address has changes. I left a note and link to that effect on the the editor's page. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 00:23, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

oh thank you, was just confused! 103.101.171.157 (talk) 00:59, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Lady Cilento Children's Hospital

The hospital is called Lady Cilento Children's Hospital not Queensland Children's Hospital. All references to the name change are incorrect. The name change is being disputed and there is considerable misinformation that has been presented to the public - this will soon be rectified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.217.167.5 (talk) 05:41, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Ian McKinley

Hi Jim1138,

I've tried to specify the italian brand that make the Goggles for Ian that is the only one with the Global Law Trial that can make the Rugby Goggles...

Sorry man, what it's wrong?

Luca — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luca Ruggio Ruggeri (talk • contribs) 08:31, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

BYREDO

HI Jim;

I am working for BYREDO and we are trying to update our wikipédia page to have a good descprition ad history as the one already online is not true. Could you please let me doing the change ?

When I start doing it i am blocked by you ....

Thak you in advance for your help ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by BYREDO France (talk • contribs) 10:46, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

@BYREDO France: I am undoing your edits per wp:NOTPROMOTION and other policies. Please read your talk page. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 10:48, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Editing Rich the Kid's Wikipedia page.

I made the changes to Rich the Kid's wikipedia page as I had tried to before, but this time I did it with citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xxxtentacionskimasktheslumpgod (talk • contribs) 01:13, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Xxxtentacionskimasktheslumpgod - Are these references from reliable sources? They seem to be alleging things and one appears to be only a primary source. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:16, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Yes, they are from reliable sources. The things that happened that I was updating on Wikipedia on Rich The Kid's page were all well known facts and there is even videos of people recording when the events on the sources when they happened. I suggest you visit the sites I used as sources and watch these videos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xxxtentacionskimasktheslumpgod (talk • contribs) 11:34, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Jim1138, what are your thoughts regarding the references used? I'm personally not fully convinced that they're reliable and hence in compliance with what's required to add content like this to a BLP. I've removed the content pending discussion; feel free to restore it if you disagree, Jim1138... ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:16, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

@Oshwah:, not too reliable and seems somewhat like a conclusion made from the videos. OR? A stunt by the subject? I'd like to see a real RS post a story before this is posted. Off to bed for me 05:20 in the morning. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 12:19, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

I agree. Goodnight, Jim1138! We'll speak again soon! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:22, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

The things that happened were very well known facts that I updated and if you are willing to remove what I updated, you may as well remove the whole entry I helped update. Would it be okay if you don't remove it this time, or if you feel like you need to because you think none of what I wrote down happened, remove the entire section on the Wikipedia page I helped update. Also, Complex was one of the sites that had different articles already used in the section before I helped update it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xxxtentacionskimasktheslumpgod (talk • contribs) 13:21, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Xxxtentacionskimasktheslumpgod - The reason that the edit was removed had nothing personally to do with you as an editor. It was removed because both Jimm1138 and I question whether or not the sources you cited meet Wikipedia's guideline here to be considered reliable. Because this article is biography of a living person, content that's contentious or potentially negative in nature must be supported by sources that meet Wikipedia's guideline and are considered reliable. I left you a notice on your user talk page regarding edit warring; please take note of this, as edit warring is not allowed. Your recent revert to the article adding back the content you wrote was also removed by another editor who also questions the content and if it even belongs in the article in the first place. Instead of reverting the article again, please start a discussion on the article's talk page here. Continuing to revert the article in a back-and-fourth fashion as you've been doing will result in being blocked from editing, especially now that you've been notified and warned on your user talk page about edit warring and 3RR. Please know that I'm trying to help you by explaining the relevant policies and guidelines so that you'll learn and become more experienced with Wikipedia; I obviously don't want to see you get blocked over content like this. I hope that you're here to edit many articles, subjects, and topics, and that you want to learn and gain more experience here. Please let myself or Jim1138 know here if you have any questions and one of us will be happy to answer them. Thank you for understanding and for doing your part to avoid causing disruption to the article :-). Best regards - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:32, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I am informing you that I am wondering why you editors keep removing the facts that I keep updating and you say it is because "the sources I am using are not reliable" - there are other things in the same section (Feud with Lil Uzi Vert) that also came from the same website I used, which was Complex. I am wondering why if the sources I used were not reliable, why the other ones from Complex were allowed to be in the article. I feel if you have to remove what I updated, you might as well remove the entire entry on Rich the Kid's Wikipedia page called "Feud with Lil Uzi Vert". I don't mean to sound mean, but I feel like I am not allowed to update anything on Wikipedia when everyone else is. By this I mean what everyone else has already contributed to the section "Feud with Lil Uzi Vert" on Rich The Kid's Wikipedia page was allowed and my content was not - - some of their sources came from the same website as my sources. The resources used from Complex on Rich The Kid's Wikipedia page (not by me, by previous editors) include https://www.complex.com/music/2018/04/rich-the-kid-has-more-to-say-about-lil-uzi-vert and https://www.complex.com/music/2018/03/rich-the-kid-doesnt-think-lil-uzi-vert-will-respond-to-dead-friends and the events I described were the most important parts of what happened between Lil Uzi Vert and Rich The Kid and if you do not think that is necessary to include in an encyclopedia, then you may as well delete the whole section "Feud with Lil Uzi Vert" on Rich the Kid's Wikipedia page. Because like I said, what I was trying to add to the article was the most important part of the feud by far, far more important than https://www.complex.com/music/2018/04/rich-the-kid-has-more-to-say-about-lil-uzi-vert and https://www.complex.com/music/2018/03/rich-the-kid-doesnt-think-lil-uzi-vert-will-respond-to-dead-friends — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xxxtentacionskimasktheslumpgod (talk • contribs) 17:58, 18 October 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xxxtentacionskimasktheslumpgod (talk • contribs)

Recreational Drug Use

Hello Jim1138. I would just like to say that I want to thank you for letting me know what you thought on what i did on the page "Recreational Drug Use" Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.36.75.140 (talk) 10:10, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

regarding errors

hi jim mate, I would like to say I am sorry and I wont do it again ]many thanks jim davies — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.83.51.26 (talk) 10:42, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

ty

thnx fr correcting me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.83.78.236 (talk) 13:44, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

My edits

I only mean to make good edits. I know I am making good edits. So what do you think I am doing wrong? 81.106.30.36 (talk) 08:31, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

When you reverted me on List of Japanese films of 2010 with this edit your edit summary was "It was produced by Dentsu which is a Japanese company". But, you added "Canada". WTF? Most of your edits were done without an wp:edit summary and you did not add nor mention a source. BTW: IMDB is wp:selfpublished and is not the best source. Jim1138 (talk) 08:36, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

I corrected that to saying "It was produced by Scott Pilgrim productions which was set up to produce this film which is a Canadian company" 81.106.30.36 (talk) 08:51, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

My edit on Awdal and other Somaliland articles

@Jim1138:Hi JIm i want to know why i was blocked for editing Awdal and other Somaliland pages? All the pages I edited replaced "Somaliland" with Somalia since they are all de facto Somaliland places and controlled and governed by Somaliland NOT Somalia. Plus people that are reverted in back are doing the exact same think which is reverting my edits and the Mustafa0 guy left threats on my talk after threating to undo all my edits which i believe arent his posts. If anything this should considered as edit war and admins should make the right edits and protect the pages instead of blocking me and others that don't agree. Thanks (Samirstown (talk) 07:42, 20 October 2018 (UTC)).

@Samirstown: I didn't block you, only admins can do that and I am not an admin. I undid your edit as you removed sourced content without sufficient reason. You need to discuss that on talk:Awdal. See wp:BRD Your edit summary accused me of "spreading hate against the Republic of Somaliland". That is a wp:personal attack. Many people get blocked for making such attacks. I believe that was mentioned on your talk page denying your unblock request. I think you will find most registered editors on Wikipedia have little interest in adding unsourced bad publicity about Somaliland. It's a good way to get oneself blocked. Jim1138 (talk) 07:54, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

@Samirstown: Also, you should read the wp:welcome page, wp:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle, wp:five pillars. I think most pertinent: wp:civility Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:07, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Alrighty jim I will look further into that

Thanks (Samirstown (talk) 09:02, 20 October 2018 (UTC)).

Creationism

Hi! There is a new discussion about the inclussion of the word "evolution" in the lead sentence on talk:Creationism. Please join in on the discussion. Best, James343e (talk) 21:30, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:North Quincy High School NQRaiders Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:North Quincy High School NQRaiders Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Bengali population is increasing

The Bengali population you updated is completely absurd. You haven't considered a major part of the population. I myself a Bengali and I have been involved in these researches over time. Let me give you the exact estimate : INDIA : West Bengal : 86 million Assam : 11.5 million Jharkand : 9.9 million Tripura : 2.5 million Rest of India : 20-25 million ( considering illegal Bangladeshis ) BANGLADESH has an actual population of 200 million and about 10 million Bangladeshis are staying abroad. Furthermore the Rohingyas are Bengali too. They speak the Chittagong dialect of Bangladesh. Pakistan has a registered Bengali population of approx 3 million All this estimates total round off to ~ 350 million Bengali people worldwide. This estimates are very well mentioned in Joshua as well as few other groups. Thank you Please do consider Subhajit db97 (talk) 09:09, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Editing Template of Abdul Jalil (Politician)

Hi, I made the changes after directly speaking with Mr. Abdul Jalil's family members. Already the Bangla Wiki page of Mr Abdul Jalil (Politician) confirms the changes and updated information published. https://bn.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/আব্দুল_জলিল Another source http://rootsbd.com/bangladesh/bangladesh-party-leaders-their-sons-and-daughters/3/ Hamu026 (talk) 14:21, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Ayda Field citation deletion

Hi Jim1138, could you explain why you removed the BBC citation of Ayda Field's date of birth? It says: "Ayda Field was born on the 17 May 1979 in Los Angeles". Thanks... --IamNotU (talk) 14:45, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

@IamNotU: Thanks for spotting that. I had searched for her birthday but didn't see it. I restored the reference. I undid my, yours, and the anon's edits. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 18:48, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Ok, thanks! --IamNotU (talk) 19:30, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

I really don't like you

I really don't like you.

Hatleryman (talk) 10:48, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

You must be intelligent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:248:8300:19a0:38f6:4fb7:f66f:261e (talk) 1:09, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Cyproterone acetate

Hi Jim. Yes, you are right, I do not know how to edit Wikipedia. I just wanted to remove words like "transgender woman", "trangender" and similar words from the article. Because they offend the gender identity of women who have changed their sex.

Sorry for my English — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lidia9000 (talk • contribs) 11:18, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Rolfing

Jim1138, The editing that I did to the rolfing page was to remove the outright slanderous information there. It is clear that the content was added by those that have no firsthand knowledge of the subject, so the negative and baseless information should be considered vandalism.

First of all, rolfing is not fringe or alternative medicine. It is not a system that is designed to treat or diagnose illness. Anyone who has read Dr. Rolf's book can see this clearly. To call it fringe or conspiracy medicine is vandalism.

Second, "the principals of rolfing contradict medical knowledge" is outright false. Which principal is in question? The fact that human beings have to relate to gravity? The fact that structure affects function? Such a general and baseless statement is vandalism.

Last, editing a page so that it contains only negative and useless information (such as "there is no good evidence Rolfing is an effective treatment for any health condition") is vandalism. Rolfing is not design to treat any kind of health condition. And the fact that this eluded the Australian Government is but a testament to their poorly planed study.

"It is considered a pseudoscience." What aspect of rolfing is considered pseudoscience? This comment is an insult to the intelligent, and is VANDALISM.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.127.24.86 (talk) 12:32, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

That's what the wp:reliable sources state.Jim1138 (talk) 20:03, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

William Stringellow

Jim I'm glad for any help you an give ethis new user. I've written five books either about or concrned with Stringfellow, plus a number of articles in academic journals. I was attempting to cite those and publications of others referenced in the article. I can forebear the youtube video, though it is of a lecture I gave at Loyloa University on exactly the topice of Berrign and stringfellow and was posted by the Hank Center for Catholic Intellectual Thought. Bwkellermann (talk) 05:00, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Corrections to the Miguel Caballero article

The corrections i made are from a new telegraph source which was already listed among the references, so i didnt think i needed to include it again. They are not personal deductions or conclusions. its actually a quote from the telegraph article on it. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Questruce (talk • contribs) 10:15, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Replying on editor's talk page. Jim1138 (talk) 10:19, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Goku

Thanks for this. Cheers. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 10:52, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

apologize for my mistakes

hi jim

i'm really really sorry for the edit in the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajeshyadav007 (talk • contribs) 07:17, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Error

Misagh Bahadoran

Hello, I removed that part as it just a destructive comment on his performance. However, at the same period he played for his national team (Philippine) and chosen as the man of the match twice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramtinka (talk • contribs) 08:28, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

@Ramtinka: Wikipedia simply reflects what wp:reliable sources (RS) state. In this case the source is Fox Sports Asia in this article. A person may not fit nor function well in some groups. It happens all the time. Have Fox Sports Asia retract the story and it will be removed from Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 08:53, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

List of Jimmy Neutron Characters

I’ve changed it now, so just leave it alone

Thanks SamuelWong9 (talk) 15:11, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

reverting because i don't provide references

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/SpaceGhostPurrp

You reverted every single ounce of editing I had done, even ones I provided references with. Can you please take a look at what I've done more carefully and revert the 2008–2011: Beginnings and Blackland Radio 66.6 section at least because I had updated it with better grammar structure, deleted unnecessary information, added references and the ones I've missed I will provide them if you revert it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kese123 (talk • contribs) 20:43, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Dude

I erased it myself. Relax a bit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rchristo100 (talk • contribs) 04:32, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

@Rchristo100: You didn't remove it, I did here. Also, please sign your talk per help:talk pages#Identifying yourself. I "singed" for you with the {{unsigned}} template. Please stop making messes? Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 04:42, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Change in article "list of taekwondo grandmasters"

Hello Jim1138, I am sorry to have added my taekwondo master Young Ki Seo Bae 9th dan if I provide documentation, I attached press links where they talk about my master when he received the bronze medal of the IOC (Spanish Olympic Committee) and his belonging to 9 dan de taekwondo, the article is from the spanish press but you can use the google transalator, if you need any other proof of the membership of my master Young Ki Seo will contribute without problems ... thank you very much for your time without other particular I leave you press links and other information ...

Young Ki Seo Bae Master 9 dan taekwondo President of the Asturian Federation of Taekwondo Bronze medal to the sports merit of the Spanish Olympic Committee

Press links:

https://www.elcomercio.es/deportes/mas-deportes 201706/17/medallas-bronce-merito-deportivo-20170617001605-v.html

https://www.lne.es/tags/young-ki-seo-bae.html

Please see help:referencing for beginners to see how to add a citation. Your edits have been saved in the wp:page history. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 19:28, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Time travel in fiction

Is TV Tropes considered a reliable source on Wikipedia? 2A00:23C5:2E01:FB01:B4C4:1DAE:E327:4C30 (talk) 14:55, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Wikis, including this Wikipedia, are wp:selfpublished and are not considered wp:RS. Generally, if the source is not under editorial review it is suspect. Jim1138 (talk) 17:47, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. 2A00:23C5:2E01:FB01:B4C4:1DAE:E327:4C30 (talk) 21:44, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018

Hi Jim,

I just created a Wikipedia account in the hopes of creating my own person (albeit small) Wikipedia page. I decided to just jump in a see if I could make one. I found this page: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:How_to_create_a_page and as I understand it, I needed to surround a new page name in double square brackets like this to find a red link which I can use to create a new page. I couldn’t find the red link but since I got your attention I must have done something. As far as adding a citation to the content I didn’t add one because I didn’t have one other than myself. Also note there were no other citations provided to any of the other names on that page. However I would like to know if you have any information on how I can create my own Wikipedia page. Thanks Jim CharieChan (talk) 12:38, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

@CharieChan: What TideRolls left on your talk page is quite pertinent. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 21:51, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Dear Jim1138

Can you help me to protect this place, Muangthong United because it has been attack by non-member user for 2 day and they change every infomation with rumour news and unsource news. This make the info changing to unreference source. I warn them twice but no action.

PS I confuse with request protection, you can help me to request protection to it? Thank You Ministerboy (talk) 23:13, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

@Ministerboy: The anon is changing team names and number. Unfortunately, that section does not have a citation. Is this the team roster? http://www.mtutd.info/muangthong-united-academy - under Team|Academy / First view? If so, please wp:cite that source. See help:referencing for beginners (try the wp:RefToolbar/2.0) Or, if that is the source, add this at the end of "non-FIFA nationality." after the period / full-stop ("."):

• <ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.mtutd.info/muangthong-united-academy |title= SCG Muangthong United 2018 (click on Team{{!}}Academy / First team for roster) |work= SCG Muangthong United |accessdate= 26 October 2018}}</ref>

Note: that {{!}} makes a "|". Adding a "|" instead will break things. Also, leave off the nowiki stuff. You can request page protection at wp:RfPP. Be sure to read the instructions and double-check that a request is within guidelines. You can also undo all edits with one undo. See wp:page history. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 00:00, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

• Ministerboy, there are things we can do, but I really can't do much if you don't provide edit summaries for your reverts. I can't guess which numbers or whatever are right or wrong, and if you don't say what's what, admins can't do much of anything. Drmies (talk) 00:03, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank Jim1138 and Drmies for telling me but some of solution I don't understand and the non-member user still attack again. But Thank You for your attentiveness. Ministerboy (talk) 06:22, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Replying on Ministerboy's page. Jim1138 (talk) 07:40, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

citation: no date

Hello Jim, thank you for your message the other day. I'm working on an article about International Albinism Awareness Day. I was asked to revise two sources because I had cited them with "no date". Unfortunately, I'm not able to find out when the cited information was posted on the respective website. From my days in academia, I'm used to solve the issue with referring to "no date". Does it work another way on wikipedia? Snoopanda (talk) 12:04, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

@Snoopanda: A date is preferred, but not necessary. Often simple URLs are added as citations (no date, no title, no author, etc.) which is definitely not the preferred format! You are doing a good job! I see an admin changed your dating from "no date" to "n.d.". So it appears that another thinks it is OK! May I suggest wp:RefToolbar/2.0 for citations. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 17:48, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

@Jim1138: Alright, thanks a lot for your quick reply. Snoopanda (talk) 18:03, 28 October 2018 (UTC)