Jump to content

User talk:JendoCalryssian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

JendoCalryssian, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi JendoCalryssian! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Blaze The Wolf (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Thomas Ashcraft has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Thomas Ashcraft. Thanks! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you-- this is very helpful advice, and I appreciate the reference to the el guideline. I've trimmed down the external links in the draft. Will also work on reformatting some of the papers and conference posters for a "publications" section, which I've seen on other scientists' profiles. JendoCalryssian (talk) 15:56, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Thomas Ashcraft has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Thomas Ashcraft. Thanks! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 18:05, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Thomas Ashcraft has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Thomas Ashcraft. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:09, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the actionable feedback on the external links list (in the draft for Thomas Ashcraft's page). I pared down the ELs from 28 to 6. This was a very helpful comment. JendoCalryssian (talk) 17:07, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi JendoCalryssian! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:45, Friday, April 8, 2022 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, JendoCalryssian. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ARoseWolf 15:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

A belated welcome!

[edit]
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, JendoCalryssian! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! ARoseWolf 15:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi JendoCalryssian! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Question about contributing biographies of women sceintists, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Thomas Ashcraft has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Thomas Ashcraft. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 03:24, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Ashcraft has been accepted

[edit]
Thomas Ashcraft, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~Kvng (talk) 14:21, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jennifer Dunne has been accepted

[edit]
Jennifer Dunne, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 02:33, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hi JendoCalryssian! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Sprite (lightning) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 14:55, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're right-- it is not minor by this definition. Is there a way for me to go back and uncheck the "minor edit" box? Thanks for the feedback -- it's a huge help :-) JendoCalryssian (talk) 15:12, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's not possible to undo it, so it's more just advice for the future. :) -Kj cheetham (talk) 15:57, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Got it-- thank you! JendoCalryssian (talk) 16:02, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Erich joos moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Erich joos, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 18:45, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Erich joos

[edit]

Information icon Hello, JendoCalryssian. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Erich joos, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Erich joos

[edit]

Hello, JendoCalryssian. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Erich joos".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:58, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message! I’m unable to work on the page right now, so feel free to delete it. 2601:8C3:857F:75E0:5D9E:D66C:C233:4E7D (talk) 19:57, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]