User talk:Jabbathehab

This is Jabbathehab's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lex Rex Institute (October 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lex Rex Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:49, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jabbathehab! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:49, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lex Rex Institute (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not one of the sources contributes anything towards notability per WP:ORG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lex Rex Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:01, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Lex Rex Institute has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lex Rex Institute. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:36, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Jabbathehab. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Lex Rex Institute, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:37, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lex Rex Institute (October 19)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CFA was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

C F A 💬 23:22, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lex Rex Institute moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lex Rex Institute (COI review). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and submission was rejected outright just 2 days ago. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GPL93 (talk) 21:21, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed the conflict of interest guidelines, and I do not believe I have any conflict of interest. The issues addressed in the rejection have been corrected. Jabbathehab (talk) 21:29, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this organization is not notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Please don't remove the rejection notice from the draft. If you try to bypass the draft stage and create it outright, it has a near-100% chance of being deleted. C F A 💬 21:51, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lex Rex Institute (COI review) (October 21)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bobby Cohn was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is not a Wikipedia article, this is an advertisement. This was also previously rejected at Draft:Lex Rex Institute.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 21:54, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello Jabbathehab. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jabbathehab. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jabbathehab|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Bobby Cohn (talk) 21:54, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits. Jabbathehab (talk) 19:59, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]