User talk:Itsmeblondie90
| This is Itsmeblondie90's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Murder of Rachel Morin (November 2)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Murder of Rachel Morin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Hi! I'd love some help on making this more quality. This is the first time I've ever created a page and I thought I had written it in a NPOV (I read Wiki all the time so I thought I got it). I know I struggled with how to properly cite within the text itself (I don't understand code and I didn't see a shortcut in the bar) but I know the information I shared was accurate. Help please? Itsmeblondie90 (talk) 20:25, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- A couple things, some of the sources themselves are not really reliable, specifically the Daily Mail and Reddit. I would first look for sources that are considered reliable for the article. Second, I'm not sure if this murder is notable enough for an article in itself. It was big news around here locally for sure, but I don't recall seeing a larger story about it overall. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:29, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- It's gotten some national play here and there. Personally, I find it interesting enough and true crime fans in my life sure are curious. Regardless, does that mean it can't have its own article? I can remove Daily Mail and Reddit. Any other notes? Itsmeblondie90 (talk) 20:33, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if it passes our notability guidelines over all. However, I could be wrong on that too. What I'd recommend, since it is a draft, is find good sources for this article first of all. That's going to be a big factor. Also, the language is a bit non-neutral. For example the Background section has "She's been described by a friend as "a fighter" who was working hard to raise her children. In her free time, Rachel loved listening to music, reading, exercising and dancing. She was a spiritual person and found strength in her faith. Rachel kept up with her fitness would walk the Ma and Pa Trail regularly." Almost all of that is not needed. You could say "She would walk the Ma and Pa Trail regularly." but drop the part about being a "fighter" and what she did in her free time. That's stuff that isn't encyclopedic. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:47, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ahhhh good note. I could have sworn I've seen similar lines quoting others and describing their likes in prior articles but I'm picking up what you're throwing down. Thanks for your help! 173.49.0.64 (talk) 01:28, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if it passes our notability guidelines over all. However, I could be wrong on that too. What I'd recommend, since it is a draft, is find good sources for this article first of all. That's going to be a big factor. Also, the language is a bit non-neutral. For example the Background section has "She's been described by a friend as "a fighter" who was working hard to raise her children. In her free time, Rachel loved listening to music, reading, exercising and dancing. She was a spiritual person and found strength in her faith. Rachel kept up with her fitness would walk the Ma and Pa Trail regularly." Almost all of that is not needed. You could say "She would walk the Ma and Pa Trail regularly." but drop the part about being a "fighter" and what she did in her free time. That's stuff that isn't encyclopedic. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:47, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- It's gotten some national play here and there. Personally, I find it interesting enough and true crime fans in my life sure are curious. Regardless, does that mean it can't have its own article? I can remove Daily Mail and Reddit. Any other notes? Itsmeblondie90 (talk) 20:33, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- A couple things, some of the sources themselves are not really reliable, specifically the Daily Mail and Reddit. I would first look for sources that are considered reliable for the article. Second, I'm not sure if this murder is notable enough for an article in itself. It was big news around here locally for sure, but I don't recall seeing a larger story about it overall. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:29, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
|
Hello, Itsmeblondie90!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 20:20, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: The Murder of Rachel Morin (November 2)
[edit]Concern regarding Draft:The Murder of Rachel Morin
[edit]
Hello, Itsmeblondie90. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Murder of Rachel Morin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:The Murder of Rachel Morin
[edit]
Hello, Itsmeblondie90. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Murder of Rachel Morin".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:43, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Ferris Wheel Incidents (November 13)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Ferris Wheel Incidents and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.