Jump to content

User talk:Itcouldbepossible/Archive 2022/March

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Tech News: 2022-09

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

  • When searching for edits by change tags, e.g. in page history or user contributions, there is now a dropdown list of possible tags. This was a request in the 2022 Community Wishlist Survey. [1]
  • Mentors using the Growth Mentor dashboard will now see newcomers assigned to them who have made at least one edit, up to 200 edits. Previously, all newcomers assigned to the mentor were visible on the dashboard, even ones without any edit or ones who made hundred of edits. Mentors can still change these values using the filters on their dashboard. Also, the last choice of filters will now be saved. [2][3]
  • The user group oversight was renamed suppress. This is for technical reasons. You may need to update any local references to the old name, e.g. gadgets, links to Special:Listusers, or uses of NUMBERINGROUP.

Problems

  • The recent change to the HTML of tracking changes pages caused some problems for screenreaders. This is being fixed. [4]

Changes later this week

  • The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 1 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 2 March. It will be on all wikis from 3 March (calendar).

Future changes

  • Working with templates will become easier. Several improvements are planned for March 9 on most wikis and on March 16 on English Wikipedia. The improvements include: Bracket matching, syntax highlighting colors, finding and inserting templates, and related visual editor features.
  • If you are a template developer or an interface administrator, and you are intentionally overriding or using the default CSS styles of user feedback boxes (the classes: successbox, messagebox, errorbox, warningbox), please note that these classes and associated CSS will soon be removed from MediaWiki core. This is to prevent problems when the same class-names are also used on a wiki. Please let us know by commenting at phab:T300314 if you think you might be affected.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

22:58, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:46, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your help

Hi there, thanks for preventing the vandalism of articles that I have edited to add Indigenous placenames in Australia. It's a lot of work doing the research and digging through the citations, and then politically motivated individuals can run through and delete it in seconds. It means a lot to me that you prevented that. Poketama (talk) 01:34, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Poketama for your comment. I am really sorry for answering this late. I was actually on a wiki break. I actually revert a huge amount of vandalism, and so I don't remember which australian article you are taking about. Would you mind telling me the specified articles? It would help me in reverting more vandalism. Regards. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 12:10, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

No worries, you're not late at all! You reverted all these edits by an Anonymous user, which would have wiped alot of my work within a 30 minute period. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/220.244.117.3 Thanks. Poketama (talk) 05:13, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

@Poketama Thanks. I remember about those now. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 12:03, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Teahouse

Please refrain from answering queries at Teahouse until you learn the correct information. One way to do this is to read existing Teahouse Q&As, including archived content. Then, start with replies only when you are sure of the correct information. It is not necessary to apply to be a Teahouse host (see Wikipedia:Teahouse/Host start), but do note that there is a recommendation to have had an account for more than 30 days, and edited more than 500 articles. David notMD (talk) 13:27, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

@David notMD I actually meant they will leave the general remarks on the talk page of the author as to why the draft wasn't accepted. It is always written like your submission xxx was not accepted this time, and then the reason is written. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 13:55, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Actually, you are correct on this. When a reviewer posts a Decline on the draft page, it automatically posts the same message on the Talk page of the person who submitted it. I was thinking when I wrote my comment to you that the declining reviewer is not writing a post of the Talk page.

Also, do not submit other people's drafts. David notMD (talk) 13:30, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

@David notMD Ok, but earlier, I have submitted others drafts also. Whats the wrong in doing that? ItcouldbepossibleTalk 13:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Creators of drafts may not be ready to have their draft sent to a reviewer, either because draft process not finished, or else have not fully addressed why the draft was declined. You are free to edit other people's drafts (which they may or may no appreciate) but not submit. David notMD (talk) 14:19, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
@David notMD But he was asking for his draft to be reviewed. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 14:20, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Not exactly. He was asking at Teahouse for an opinion as to whether the revised draft was good enough to resubmit, not for someone to submit it. David notMD (talk) 14:24, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
@David notMD And what about that leaving remarks thing. For example see my talk page archive for draft declined messages. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 14:52, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-10

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Problems

  • There was a problem with some interface labels last week. It will be fixed this week. This change was part of ongoing work to simplify the support for skins which do not have active maintainers. [5]

Changes later this week

  • The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 8 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 9 March. It will be on all wikis from 10 March (calendar).

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

21:15, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

AWB

@Itcouldbepossible

I saw your question on the Teahouse regarding AWB. I use it alot so if you have any questions do let me know. Rlink2 (talk) 19:51, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi Rlink2 Thanks for showing your interest to answer my question. Can you answer the same question that I asked at Teahouse. Also, what do you do using AWB? What type of edits do you make, and what parameters do you use for making a list? ItcouldbepossibleTalk 05:08, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
AWB is a powerful tool that allows you to make mass edits across articles. For example, if you wanted to add a template to a bunch of articles, or remove an template, AWB could help you with that. It can also help fix typos, as you have discovered. AWB also has search and replace, so you can replace any given text with another one across all articles. I used this in Novemember to do some link repair regarding the web archiving service Archive.today. While archive.today is one website, they have mulitple domains, but the one Wikipedia should link to is "archive.today". Therefore, I used AWB to get all articles with the other domains of the same service, and replaced them with "archive.today". I also converted insecure HTTP to secure HTTPS links for two other web archiving services, archive.org and ghostarchive.org. Such tasks would be hard to do without AWB since the browser interface does not make it easy for mass edits like this. I mostly use AWB for preventing WP:LINKROT.
Another popular use of AWB is categorization and filling in short descriptions for articles. I have not done this before with AWB, so if this is what you want to do you are better off asking someone experienced with AWB categorization.
You can also customize AWB with a script to do something custom that AWB isn't able to do on its own. If you know what you want to do, you can easily create a script. Some might already have scripts they are willing to share.
The way you make lists depend on what you want to do. If you are looking for all articles with something specific (for example: all articles with a lowercase "youtube" instead of YouTube), then create a search term and/or "regex" to find those articles. If you want to get all articles in a certain category (actual category or maintenance category), AWB can do that. if you want to find newly created articles, AWB can also do that. I really only use the search term functionality though, along with the data dumps (that's a slightly more advanced topic)
If you want to get some practice with AWB and don't know what to do, there is plenty to do. I would recommend sticking with simple stuff (like the typo fixes) first just so you can get a hang of the tool. If you don't know what you are doing, the cleanup can be massive. So best to ease in to AWB usage with small steps.
Hope that helps. Rlink2 (talk) 05:37, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
@Rlink2 Thanks man for such a detailed explanation. I never imagined you would be giving me such a detailed explanation.
Ok, but for the time being, tell me something. Recently I have discovered Category:Pages using infobox television with unnecessary name parameter. I want to remove the name parameter from all such articles. I can make a list from a category. But how do I remove the name parameter from articles using AWB. I think that can be done as you said For example, if you wanted to add a template to a bunch of articles, or remove an template, AWB could help you with that. Can you tell me the procedure. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 05:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Yes, that is possible. You would need to create something known as a regular expression. If you don't know how, there are some good tutorials. Maybe I can find some I like and share it with you. Otherwise, search up tutorials Google or DuckDuckGo. My favorite website for experimenting with regex is https://regexr.com/, you can paste the text and see if the regex matches it. An regex to remove the "name" parameter would be "\|[\s \n]*name[\s \n]=[\s \n][^}|]*". You can find an explaination of the regex along with an example on https://regexr.com/6gq1i . To use this in AWB, you would put this in search and replace, and set it to replace any text in this format with a blank space. Note that the regex would remove this "name" parameter from any template, and not necessarily just the Television template, so just be careful that it doesnt remove a name template from a non-television infobox. If you see something like that in AWB, just double click on the wrong one on the top window and it will revert that one. I don't think the "name" parameter is used anywhere else other than TV infoboxes, so I don't think you will have to worry about it. Rlink2 (talk) 15:04, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
@Rlink2 Ok thanks. But what will I replace with what? I mean what parameter should I put in find and what parameter should I put in replace with? ItcouldbepossibleTalk 15:10, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Since you want to remove the name parmeter, you would replace it with nothing. The regex will find the parameter, that's the whole point. See Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/User_manual#Find_and_replace for how to actually put this in.
If you still need help, I can send you a config file that has everthing placed in, so you can learn by example Rlink2 (talk) 15:20, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
@Rlink2 Yes, I know how to do find and replace, but should I tick the box labelled as regex? ItcouldbepossibleTalk 15:23, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Yes, i think. Rlink2 (talk) 15:51, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
@Rlink2 You can also send me the config file for AWB. How do you want to send it? ItcouldbepossibleTalk 15:27, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
I can email you Rlink2 (talk) 15:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
@Rlink2 Then please do so. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 16:22, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Just sent it to you Rlink2 (talk) 19:13, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
@Rlink2 Thanks a lot. I almost made 1000 edits today. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 12:17, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
@Rlink2 Can you tell me something more. I wanted to change http in pages to https. So in the normal settings, I set change http to https. But it ran into a lot of error. Http was being changed to https, but the https was being changed httpss. Can you tell me what to do? Also what was the need to use regex? We could have changed |name to a dash or blank space. How can I figure out what regex value to use. Lots of questions. Please answer them when you get time. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 12:19, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Http was being changed to https, but the https was being changed httpss. Can you tell me what to do? you need to make sure you replace http: (with the colon) with https: (with the colon) to avoid that issue. "http" is in "https" so if you dont add the colon that will happen. Keep in mind we should not be changing all websites to https, since some websites are still http only. I changed http to https for sites that I knew had an https and http connection avaliable (archive.org and ghostarchive.org). 99% of sites with HTTPS only offer HTTPS and HTTP will automatically redirect to the HTTPS version, so for most sites the change is not necessary.
Also what was the need to use regex? Well, if you just did "|name" without the regex, it wouldn't work when there are spaces in between (like " | name=TV show", or "| name = TV show". The regex has the capability to replace the name parameter even when there is spaces in between the parameter name, equal sign, and value of the parameter.
How can I figure out what regex value to use. There are good tutorials out there, but I can also find some and share them with you if you wish. Once you know the basics you can create a value that suits your operation. This link , https://regexr.com/6gs7g, explains what the regex I gave you does in detail (under the "explain" tab) Rlink2 (talk) 15:29, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
@Rlink2 Ok, I got what you said. Now can you provide me with some good tutorials? Also I can I use regexr.com to compute a regex value? Can you tell me the way? I am trying since the day. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 14:25, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
http://regextutorials.com looks like a good resource to get started.
Also I can I use regexr.com to compute a regex value? yes, once you know how to "compute a regex value". It's what I use to test the regex I made before putting it in AWB. Rlink2 (talk) 14:44, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
@Rlink2 Sorry, in my hurry I wrote in a wrong manner. I wanted to mean Also how can I use regexr.com to computer or find a regex value. Please answer it this way. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 16:11, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Well you need to make the regex first. Once you do that, you can paste that into regexr.com along with the sample text (in this case, wikicode) and see if the match is correct. Rlink2 (talk) 17:48, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Ok and what and how do you do to fill in bare urls. 95% of your contributions are in for bare ref fixing. Is that also automatic? If yes, then how does AWB automatically find the archived urls? And how many config files do you own? ItcouldbepossibleTalk 01:59, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
I have a config file for each editing task I do. So one for bare refs, and a couple for archiving/verifiability (since there are multiple types of those runs). So it adds up to being quite a few files.
Yes, I used AWB to fill bare refs, and while I still could, I am choosing not to because there is a bot request for approval and I have other stuff to do. If I finish the other stuff, and the bot still isn't approved, maybe I could go back to filling refs. We'll see. Right now I'm working on some other tasks related to linkrot and wp:v with AWB.
Is that also automatic? Well it fills in the bare refs automatically, but you still need to look at all your edits before submitting them to make sure its right.
Did you want to help with WP:LINKROT? There is alot of stuff to do. Rlink2 (talk) 03:51, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
@Rlink2 Ok. But how do you add the archives of urls using AWB.
No, I am presently thinking of clearing the maintenance category that I am currently working on. I will think about working on linkrot later. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 13:37, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
But how do you add the archives of urls using AWB? Using a more complicated regex.
I am presently thinking of clearing the maintenance category that I am currently working on. Keep up the good work, I saw you were doing some of that. Rlink2 (talk) 14:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Rlink2 Oops, forgot to ping you. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 02:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Another Sock

See this [6] 117.227.16.163 (talk) 05:40, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Good. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 08:49, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Itcouldbepossible! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, AWB editing, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Info

See this what I found [7]

2409:4060:2D8F:5CB0:0:0:5888:2E0A (talk) 17:42, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi

What do you think about ManaliJain 2409:4063:410E:F205:A5AB:6215:F64:4BAB (talk) 07:08, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Primefac Looks like it is time to protect my talk page again. Please do it for atleast a month. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 08:01, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-11

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

  • In the Wikipedia Android app it is now possible to change the toolbar at the bottom so the tools you use more often are easier to click on. The app now also has a focused reading mode. [8][9]

Problems

  • There was a problem with the collection of some page-view data from June 2021 to January 2022 on all wikis. This means the statistics are incomplete. To help calculate which projects and regions were most affected, relevant datasets are being retained for 30 extra days. You can read more on Meta-wiki.
  • There was a problem with the databases on March 10. All wikis were unreachable for logged-in users for 12 minutes. Logged-out users could read pages but could not edit or access uncached content then. [10]

Changes later this week

  • The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 15 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 16 March. It will be on all wikis from 17 March (calendar).
  • When using uselang=qqx to find localisation messages, it will now show all possible message keys for navigation tabs such as "View history". [11]
  • Access to Special:RevisionDelete has been expanded to include users who have deletelogentry and deletedhistory rights through their group memberships. Before, only those with the deleterevision right could access this special page. [12]
  • On the Special:Undelete pages for diffs and revisions, there will be a link back to the main Undelete page with the list of revisions. [13]

Future changes

Events

  • The Wikimedia Hackathon 2022 will take place as a hybrid event on 20-22 May 2022. The Hackathon will be held online and there are grants available to support local in-person meetups around the world. Grants can be requested until 20 March.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

22:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Name parameter removal

Hi! You removed the name parameters from infoboxes in The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin, which is fine for the first infobox, but leaves the second infobox (which should be "The Legacy of Reginald Perrin") with the wrong name. Do you have any checks as to whether the name parameter you remove is the same as the article title? - Ttwaring (talk) 14:29, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Also this edit has left the soundtrack infobox as "Untitled" in Familiar Wife. Ttwaring (talk) 15:55, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
@Ttwaring Oops, my first AWB mistake noted by someone else. Whenever I used to make mistakes, I used to undo it myself. But somehow this slipped from my eye. Thanks for bringing it on. For the first case, actually I have nothing to do. I removed the name parameter from articles with infobox television. So when I see an article having a name parameter and a television infobox, I remove the name parameter. But there are some cases which are rare and unexceptional like this. The second infobox has a different name. So, when the infobox takes the name from {{PAGENAMEBASE}}, it is the one which is needed. So to avoid this kind of error, I think I should be careful when I see two television infoboxes, and remove one manually. But the fun part is that I remember in maybe 5 or 6 articles there were two television infoboxes, and I had removed that swiftly without thinking about what problem would happen. So just waiting for more issues on to come up.
For the second case, it was my mistake. I didn't see in that I had removed the name paramter from infobox album parameter, which generally I manually undo, but this slipped from my eyes.
Just to note, I have made all the necessary changes. You can check the pages again. Thanks again for bringing the issue to my talk page. It would be really nice if you look over my AWB edits. Regards, ItcouldbepossibleTalk 12:16, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Removing unnecessary parameter Category:Pages using infobox television with unnecessary name parameter)

If you could share your find and replace for AWB, I'll try to take some chunks as well.Naraht (talk) 22:29, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

@Naraht Oh, it would be a pleasure. Thanks for showing your interest to help me. Could you send please send me a mail so that I can get your email. I can give you the config file in the return mail. I won't have asked for your email if Wikipedia had a system to attach files to the inbuilt mail system they have. I promise not to disturb you or harass you using your email. Just for sending the config file. And I am really sorry for the late reply. I should have replied earlier. Regards, ItcouldbepossibleTalk 16:16, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Useful vs useless

Since you are doubling down, I can make an argument that reflecting the correct number of episodes is more useful for an encyclopedia than a purely cosmetic change like removing an unnecessary infobox parameter. I'm not interested in making that argument, I'm just pointing out that what's useful and useless is something that community decides and if you think something is useless, instead of badgering editors with such strongly worded comments, go start an RfC to make up consensus or work on a script/template-based solution or something else along those lines. Hemantha (talk) 03:58, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

@Hemantha Well yes, I could have done many things. But you know what, I wanted to make this as simple as possible and go step wise to solve the problem. Things like this are ought to be sorted out on user talk pages and not some discussion board or RFC. I could have put this up at the DRN or ANI, but always it is said to try and clear out the problem at the base. If not, then gradually steps can be taken, and finally the ArbCom is there to solve everything out here. So there is literally no need to create an RfC for this problem. You can ask anyone who is experienced in this matter. If aren't interested in this, then you can start an RfC yourself. And if you thing my contributions are not in favour of building up an encyclopedia, then sorry to say, you are highly wrong. I am working on a maintenance category, and there is a need to clear out the maintenance category. If my edits are 'purely cosmetic' then gosh!, so many editors edits will also be regarded as 'purely cosmetic' according to you. I hate to think the number of editors who regularly use AWB to do maintenance job and here you are saying those edits are purely cosmetic. And neither did I make any harsh comment, nor did I badger them with anything. If you see the first message that I wrote, it was just a general message and not something really rough. I told him not to update episode counts everyday, but never told him don't you ever update episode counts. And I linked him to the task center so that he knows what else he can do, if he doesn't already know about it. Which one do you think are strongly worded comments? And if you still regard these as strong comments, then you might want to know that, many editors made stronger comments on my talk page at the beginning of my career, but I didn't complain about those. In comparison with those, the comments I made are really simple and civil. As a matter of fact, you showed that you are botherless in this matter by telling Pri2000 to freely remove the discussion from his talk page. Now I can call this as uncivil and say you, of all the people, are no one to ask someone to remove a discussion from their talk page or call the whole discussion irrelevant especially when consensus is yet to be reached, since it looks like you didn't pay any heed to my words, and instead tried to encourage Pri2000 in whatever he is trying to do.
I am also requesting comments from all talk page watchers, both mine and Pri2000's. Also pinging Nick Moyes, Bonadea, FormalDude, David Biddulph, ClaudineChionh, Primefac, DanCherek, Rlink2, JBW, Girth Summit for commenting regarding this matter. Regards. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 04:59, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
The amount of mischaracterisation, in what little I read, of my fairly small and neutral post shows that this discussion isn't productive. I'll only say that if I see something like that original post again from you, I'll revert and if continued, report you to appropriate boards for assumption of bad faith and WP:PA. Hemantha (talk) 05:12, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Hemantha Please, don't drag these things further, when the reply of the user being talked about does not come. It seems that you are deliberately dragging this thing, you seem to have some personal interest. If you have any problem then direct contact with Admin..– B203GTB  • (talk)  • 05:43, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Hmm? What am I dragging further? Since my first post, I was asking ICBP to drop this, but he's continued his baseless claims of "useless" and "not improving articles" more and more vocally. Your own contribution there wasn't as helpful as you'd think and shows your comment here in poor, partisan light. Hemantha (talk) 05:55, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Ok, so the comment that you made on my talk page was really nice and civil, and the comment that I made on Pri2000's talk was really bad? Now let me make something straight Hemanta. I am really at a fail to understand what you are trying to do, but whatever you are doing or saying is not in the right way. You must understand how the community works, instead of just taking things in your own way. You are a lot senior to me, but still I have to say that any further unruly comment made by you in this regard would leave me no option except to open a case against you at ANI. I really don't want to go that way for I respect both you and your presence here. I really don't see why you would want to get into trouble. The discussion was going between me and Pri2000, and suddenly you came in and now we are fighting, and the funny thing is that this case has nothing to do with you. So now you can choose your own path. Regards, ItcouldbepossibleTalk 12:17, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
@Itcouldbepossible: Please stop. ––FormalDude talk 16:28, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Sorry for pinging so many editors. FormalDude has informed me off-wiki that I am making a bigger deal of this than is necessary, and I've decided to let it go. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 17:09, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Yes, this was the right choice. I had a detailed response typed up but the best option is to let this go and any further commmentary may rekindle this unnecessary debate.
Thanks to @FormalDude for also helping to deflate the situation. Rlink2 (talk) 17:33, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Just for the record, you don't have to ping a (talk page stalker) ;-) Primefac (talk) 14:42, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-12

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

New code release schedule for this week

  • There will be four MediaWiki releases this week, instead of just one. This is an experiment which should lead to fewer problems and to faster feature updates. The releases will be on all wikis, at different times, on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday. You can read more about this project.

Recent changes

Future changes

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

15:59, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Tech News: 2022-13

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

  • There is a simple new Wikimedia Commons upload tool available for macOS users, Sunflower.

Changes later this week

  • The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 29 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 30 March. It will be on all wikis from 31 March (calendar).
  • Some wikis will be in read-only for a few minutes because of regular database maintenance. It will be performed on 29 March at 7:00 UTC (targeted wikis) and on 31 March at 7:00 UTC (targeted wikis). [18][19]

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

19:53, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Itcouldbepossible/Archive_2022/March&oldid=1112200946"