User talk:IronGargoyle/Archive 17

	Archives
	1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

This is an archive of past discussions about User:IronGargoyle. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 10

←

Re : Deletion of Dogomizer:

Hi , am I allowed to create an article talking about it's software and how it can help other people ?

Thanks ! Dogomizer (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 01:31, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Re : List of classical piano duos (performers):

Hi Is there an explanation available for the twice deleted inclusion of Duo Va i Ve (being Valentina Seferinova and Venera Bojkova) in the above page list ?

Grateful for your comment(s) back. Regards MLADENOVA (talk) 10:43, 5 December 2014 (UTC)MladenovaMLADENOVA (talk) 10:43, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

The duo is non-notable and its only reference is a link promoting the group. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on lists of people. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:55, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

List of Egyptologists

Since when is a .edu address on the List of Egyptologist's page inaccurate?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wthowerto (talk • contribs) 22:59, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

They are not sufficient because they are simple faculty bios. They say nothing about the notability of the individual. You need reliable, independent sources to establish that. Simply having a .edu domain is not sufficient to make a source reliable and independent. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Martha Jackson Jarvis

Hello. I removed the contents of Martha Jackson Jarvis in order to create a page with a non-hyphenated title. I wasn't able to remove the hyphen, which if you notice is not used in the artist's official website.Krisvec (talk) 21:31, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

I fixed the issue for you. Please read over Help:How to move a page if you encounter similar issues in the future. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:36, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

List of newspaper columnists

Hi I would like to know why three entries were removed from the list. Specifically one from the Philippines section and two from the Mexico (in Spanish) section. Thanks. Josejmcriollo (talk) 15:15, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Because the entries were not notable. Please see WP:LISTPEOPLE which details the criteria for including individual names in lists of people. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:20, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

RE: The IP you've just warned

They've made a couple of fairly nasty personal attacks prior to that warning, most of which were in edit summaries. I'd warned them for that and for the unsourced/original research editing, and both of the warnings were blanked. Just a head's up. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 20:40, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

The IP seems to have already been blocked. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:17, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Monterrey

Hola. Re the changes to the Monterrey site. I reside in Monterrey. I am the source. Come and help me wash my car every 3 days and pressure wash the sidewalk. It is well known and not so nice side of Darwinian capitalism.

Richard Vance

Please review WP:RS to understand the type of reliable sourcing that Wikipedia requires. Your personal opinion or observations do not suffice. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:17, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Nice Job

I apologize for unnecessary editing. I was just checking how active are administrators. I am pretty sure, despite the number of administrators, you people could not manage all articles? What is the rectification ratio? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.205.47.199 (talk • contribs)

Pizza Underground

Pizza Underground is Corey McCulkin's worst idea ever. Even worse than Home Alone. Source: Real Life — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.54.222.156 (talk) 03:37, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

That's just your point of view. If there is consensus from critics about this, it can be referenced from verifiable, reliable sources and mentioned in a "reception" section. Otherwise, your statement is a violation of Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:43, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

I am as qualified to critique Pizza Underground as any supposed "critic". Why I could start a blog now and say it's a critic blog. I would also say that the end of the article in which Pizza Underground was booed offstage to a chorus of pint glasses in England is a fairly representative review of Corin McCorklin's awful ideas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.54.222.156 (talk) 03:48, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Blogs are not generally considered to be reliable sources. Promoting your own blog would also be a conflict of interest. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Well then Mr. Gargoyle, it seems the only resolution would be to remove this article for failing to be noteworthy enough for inclusion on Wikipedia, at least outside of Corwin McConklin's personal page. Without Corky McCullen's name attached, Pizza Party Underground would not have a single mention on this site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.54.222.156 (talk) 03:55, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

IP edits of Fuschia (color)

Hello. Would you mind adding semi-protection to Fuchsia (color) for a couple of weeks? The IP you recently blocked isn't static, and this kind of thing has been going on for days over several pages (Red-violet, Shades of pink , and others) with zero talk-page comments. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 04:24, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Done. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:35, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, I appreciate it. Grayfell (talk) 04:36, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Yalda article

Yalda Persian History.

Unless you are Persian you have no right.telling me what information is right and wrong. Every piece of nonsense posted about Mithraism and Paganism is unjust and illogical. People are destroying Persian History and sourcing it from fake historical websites. I know Persian History and you can't tell me what to edit. If you ban me from posting the truth I will report the ban to Wikipedia for unethical ban on members.

Darius — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darius250000 (talk • contribs) 04:54, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

@Darius250000: If you want to add content, please provide a reliable source to back it all up, instead of edit warring with me and IronGargoyle. Please also take a look at WP:Neutral point of view, because it appears that you may have a conflict of interest if you feel so passionately about the topic. — kikichugirl ^speak up! 04:58, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Yeah let me get up in this mix too! lets stop this blind deletion! I wish my Pizza Underground edits to be reinstated or the article to be deleted from wikipedia as not noteworthy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.54.222.156 (talk) 06:54, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Travis Kalanick

I deleted the info in the Travis Kalanick page because it was not cited. I will delete it again, and I would like a firm explanation of why you do not understand this.

Gabi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angry Orchard Hard Cider (talk • contribs)

The material you removed wasn't uncited. It was cited to the New York Times. That's about as good of a source as you can get. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:04, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

RE: link on Moliere page

RE: CHANGE TO MOLIERE PAGE IronGargoyle, you removed an external link I added to the Moliere page, under the section "Portrayals of Moliere." The section includes links for one literary biography and three films. I added a link to a stage play about Moliere, 'GOD OF LAUGHTER," which is a drama that portrays Moliere as the central character. It is a published play and I referenced the publisher in the entry.

Why would you allow references (or links) to films about Moliere and not include stage productions?? Was there something missing that would make my entry allowable? Gcbennett76 (talk) 03:38, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Please review Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy. Wikipedia is not for promoting your own work. In addition, if it was noteworthy, a secondary source (added by someone else) would be the appropriate link and not a link to the publisher. IronGargoyle (talk) 07:14, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

The Islamic State (Caliphate) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Islamic State (Caliphate). Since you had some involvement with the The Islamic State (Caliphate) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Legacypac (talk) 11:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For all the time you've invested here. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 20:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! :) IronGargoyle (talk) 21:01, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Clegg Hoyt

i am sorry iron gargoyle but that last time i was trying to insert an image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Curt215 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Airsoft link

The link I tried to include in the Airsoft article provided verifiable information surrounding the rules and laws governing airsoft in the US and UK with outbound links to other verifiable sources. Why was this inclusion removed from the article's reference list? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrbrianspencer (talk • contribs) 18:16, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

It's primarily a commercial website, and you're not actually referencing anything. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:23, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Krystian Bielik

Hello, could you please semi-protect Krystian Bielik. A lot of unsourced speculation being added about a move to Arsenal, which is not confirmed by the club. Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 18:21, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Done. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:24, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

California Valley Miwok Tribe

All of the facts written on the page you edited were true, written by the tribe itself, and supported by attorneys. Check your facts. Firetopaz (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:24, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

They are not referenced to reliable sources and they contain some pretty serious accusations. If you persist in restoring this negative unsourced information you will be blocked. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:47, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Landmark Worldwide

Hello! With this edit you restored a very large block of text, including multiple potential BLP issues, to the article - and you marked the edit as minor. I recommend that you review the talk page and history. I believe the anon IP was correct in the removal, but your judgment may vary. Thanks! --Tgeairn (talk) 19:25, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Colossus of Rhodes (film)

The film takes place in Hellenistic times and King Serse of Rhodes (Italian spelling used in the movie) is an invented character, not the 5th century Persian ruler. If you have any evidence to the contrary, please cite it. 166.216.165.22 (talk) 04:31, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Morgentaler

Sorry. It seems I left a warning for a revert that you made due to an edit conflict. Meters (talk) 21:23, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

No need for an apology. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:50, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Steve Harrison

Thank you for removing the error page — Preceding unsigned comment added by RedJulianG40 (talk • contribs) 21:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Not a problem. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:50, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

RE: adding link to official James Taylor Website Removed

Hi,

You removed my link to the official James Taylor Website I entered it was the official website and I don't know why you removed it. The website was genuine and I think it was removed incorrectly

I will revert the undo and you can message me on my page if you would like to talk further — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.44.85.110 (talk • contribs)

External links of this type are not appropriate on a disambiguation page. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:50, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Michael Carter-Williams

Socks? —George8211 / T 22:21, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Could be, but I think more likely just a high volume of troublemakers latching onto the NBA trade news. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:34, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Pecorino (grape)

Hi IronGargoyole, you should notice that the top picture in the page of Pecorino grape shows a specific bottle (a specific brand) of this wine. I do not think it is correct to associate the image of this wine to a specific winery, as there are several wineries producing it in Italy (in Abruzzo and Marche regions). That's why I have dropped the picture. Hope this can convince you. Please let me know what do you think about it. Giorgia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.206.48.68 (talk) 18:57, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

That seems reasonable. It helps to provide justifications like this is the edit summary. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:59, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

I don't get it.

If i edit bjp redirect to disambig page. It is reverted. If i redirect AAP to party page it is reverted. What a trash wikipedia has become. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bolterc (talk • contribs) 19:04, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Rahul

[1] Rahul has needed permanent semiprotection for years - thanks for doing it :) -- stillnotelf is invisible 18:38, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

wtf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.131.50.137 (talk) 19:37, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Amritsar

Hi, I am from Amritsar, a tourist hub city. I knows much about my city, places & food points which are world famous & which opened 24 hours. Whenever any person about to come Amritsar, he/she searched City. So what i have edited, is quite beneficiary for all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MICHAEL JIMMY ATQ (talk • contribs) 18:54, 20 March 2015‎

One Direction

Hello! I wanted to let you know that I have just full-protected the article One Direction for 3 days; the history was beyond nuts. You seem to be the only admin who regular patrols that page, so if something needs doing or undoing, can you take care of it? You might want to check if I protected the right version. Also, when the full protection expires, I assume it will be necessary to restore the indefinite semi-protection. You may want to do that, or if you are not comfortable doing it, give me a shout. --MelanieN (talk) 22:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Also ridiculously trivial. Yours, Quis separabit? 23:43, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Battle of Chamkaur

Ak107839 (talk) 15:40, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

I have absolutely no vested interest in the page you are talking about. I was simply preventing an editor from blanking the page without explanation. I would suggest, however, that you review Wikipedia's guidelines on disruptive editing IronGargoyle (talk) 15:57, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

This user has been spamming many people's user talk with this info, and is now blocked. I suspect it's copyrighted material from somewhere so I'm removing it from people's talkpages. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:11, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Cynthia Olavarria - birth year

Again, there's a unregistered user (ip 174.106.141.74 and 24.126.7.21) that change everyday the birth year of Cynthia Olavarría. She was born in 1982, NOT 1987. Refer to her Talk Page for more information. Thank's. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frosta (talk • contribs) 14:58, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Christadelphians

Hello IronGargoyle,

This is to respond to my edits to the Christadelphians. To be honest if I am to be neutral about something I should tell it honestly. Individuals who claim they are Christians must hold to the trinity, and the Christadelphians do not. Therefore they are heretics. This term is not at all a term to bash them it is just to tell the world what they really are. I would move their page to a page of Christianity under Heretical if such a page existed, but since you seem to be a resonable person I figure you would allow me to keep my original edits, because I have done a LOT of research on this point, and I could cite many references to back up my regular edit if that will help my edit remain.

Thanks, Mabojang (talk) 20:55, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

It's not a definitional characteristic, just something that the majority of denominations subscribe to. Please review WP:NPOV. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:33, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

You

How Dare you show sympathy for Christine Weick? She's nothing but a vile women

VIVA LA REVOLUTION MOFO — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.209.94.217 (talk) 21:53, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Possible sock of User:Ak107839

You might take a look at user:Jasmeen-229. This editor has the same mannerisms in their typing as User:Ak107839, who is a sock of Amanharleen. Thanks. --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:21, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Arthur Thrall

Arthur Thrall has indeed died. How do we make that stick? http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/jsonline/obituary.aspx?pid=174399867 https://blogs.lawrence.edu/news/2015/03/arthur-thrall-1926-2015-earned-international-acclaim-for-his-painting-printmaking.html Beauxlieux (talk) 16:13, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

List of expeditions of Muhammed

Hello , thank you for messaging me. Firstly, I have reasons to believe that the article's info. is false and biased. Most references are unreliable sources. Zakat isn't a tax. Muslims are forbidden from attacking Women,Children,priests and the disabled. I took a look at the http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Occupation_of_Mecca and found that the casualties provided by the article " List of expeditions of Muhammed " don't match with the "Occupation of Mecca" article. the Last battle "Expedition of usama bin zayed" has written on it" Local population "slaughtered" by Muslims, "destroying, burning and taking as many captives as they could" according to Moshe Gil of Cambridge University[338]" Muslims don't slaughter because as I said before, Muslims are forbidden from attacking Women,children,priests,and the disabled. "The killing of innocent non-combatants is forbidden. According to Sunni tradition, ‘Abu Bakr al-Siddiq, the first Caliph, gave these instructions to his armies: “I instruct you in ten matters: Do not kill women, children, the old, or the infirm; do not cut down fruit-bearing trees; do not destroy any town . . . ” (Malik’s Muwatta’, “Kitab al-Jihad.”)". Quran 5:53 says, “… whoso kills a soul, unless it be for murder or for wreaking corruption in the land, it shall be as if he had killed all mankind; and he who saves a life, it shall be as if he had given life to all mankind.”. I will provide more information if requested. Quran.com is my reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.234.68.170 (talk) 20:24, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Magna Utah, Lavender Town

Why did you erase the Lavender Town contribution from the Magna Utah page? 2601:7:7E02:FC02:685B:FA9C:E600:6564 (talk) 20:58, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Because Wikipedia is not for promoting non-notable bands. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:12, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

ref to IIHS edit -

The membership requirements are hidden form the public: Auto insurer's are required to provide the Institute a certain percentage of their profits to become a member, so the more an insurance company profits - the more money IIHS gets from them. Therefore, do not assume IIHS and HLDI studies are neutral. Their studies are going to benefit the insurance industry to not only help generate insurance profits, but allow insurance companies to justify charging consumers higher rates. Proof of this information is simple: request from them the astronomical payment schedules and amounts each insurance company "member" pays to this non-profit organization.

I can understand if you want to remove the part about the former CEO, but membership requirements are important as they show IIHS tests are not necessarily neutral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.45.118.121 (talk) 22:20, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

The edit still wasn't sourced. See WP:V, WP:OR and WP:NPOV. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:46, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Hugo Nunes Coelho

Hi there IG, from Portugal,

do you mind telling me why did my edit merit to be reverted? Please check both of the external links of his article, he is not attached to any club at the moment, and I also updated the statistics in his box.

The other thing I did was to add a template form to the external link #2, nothing wrong with my actions I believe. Please do "feedback" me. Attentively --84.90.219.128 (talk) 21:35, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

A major change like this involving a living person requires a reference, but I think you've clarified from your follow-up edit that the change exists in a pre-existing reference so it should be fine. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:46, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, continue the good work. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 21:59, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

TWL HighBeam check-in

Hello Wikipedia Library Users,

You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at WP:HighBeam.
Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see Wikipedia:HighBeam/Citations
Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you. Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:46, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Newspapers.com check-in

Hello IronGargoyle,

You are receiving this message because you have a one-year subscription to Newspapers.com through the Wikipedia Library. This is a brief update, to remind you about that access:

Please make sure that you can still log in to your Newspapers.com account. If you are having trouble let me know.
Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, to include citations with links on Wikipedia. Links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. Also, keep in mind that part of Newspapers.com is open access via the clipping function. Clippings allow you to identify particular articles, extract them from the original full sheet newspaper, and share them through unique URLs. Wikipedia users who click on a clipping link in your citation list will be able to access that particular article, and the full page of the paper if they come from the clipping, without needing to subscribe to Newspapers.com. For more information about how to use clippings, see http://www.newspapers.com/basics/#h-clips .
Do you write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let me know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate it if you filled out this short survey. Your input will help us to facilitate this particular partnership, and to discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you,

Wikipedia Library Newspapers.com account coordinator HazelAB (talk) 19:10, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Neurotherapy

Hi, please stop erasing my improvements to the neurofeedback page. I am trying to update information on uses and research for ADHD. The preponderance of valid research is supportive. Although the rest of the page is great, the research section is non-neutral and biased toward negative and mixed results from poor studies. This ignores the clearly supportive conclusions of the majority of high quality, peer-reviewed research into neurofeedback for ADHD -- which have been conclusive and consistently positive for decades. Please read the majority of literature to better inform your opinions. I recommend you start with professional peer-reviewed journals found at ISNR.org and AAPB.org.

Thanks, Tom

tdiamond@telus.net

You have a clear conflict of interest in the material and you are adding removing information cited from legitimate peer-reviewed sources. I suggest reviewing WP:NPOV as well. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:05, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Please check again -- I have not removed any citations. I am a neurotherapist who is well educated on the research in this field. Clearly you are not an expert but an interested citizen -- that's great and your article is much appreciated. Please let experts add their opinion to yours. This is essential to the quality of wikipedia and democracy. I do not wish to play ping pong on the edit revisions, so I invite you to please avoid blanket dismissal and engage in thoughtful discussion that will allow us to reach a reasonable agreement. If I have removed any citations it was by mistake -- please let me know which ones and I will replace.

Please don't make assumptions about my level of expertise. Note also that when you are selling neurofeedback and you are removing the criticisms of it, it certainly should raise a few eyebrows. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:36, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Please do not make false accusations. I did not remove any citations, critical or otherwise. If I did it was an error--please identify any missing references and I will be happy to replace, or please do so yourself. I only revised the inaccurate and negatively biased characterization of the leading research in the field, which overwhelming supports the efficacy of neurofeedback for ADHD -- as good as medication benefits, safer and much longer lasting. This positive view is held by most mainstream experts in the neurofeedback, as well as some medical authorities, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics. Your critical citations are mostly from secondary courses who have a financial interest in supporting medication and minimizing its competitors. Most original high quality, mainstream research studies by qualified researchers published in reputable peer-reviewed journals have supported neurofeedback for ADHD for many years. Please read original research before rendering an opinion on a whole field of scientific pursuit. I am certainly open to reviewing word choice or adding critical statements that you would like to see, but wholesale deletion of my content is not fair nor respectful. Please respond with respectful disagreement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.244.32.166 (talk) 18:00, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Stopping using a company that flogs neurotheraphy [2] as source and reading WP:MEDRS would be a good start. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

I'll look for more references, though free reputable links for full text articles are not easy to find -- but I do understand the importance of this and will work on it. However, a second problem is similar to early medical views on the role of diet where, for a long time, there was a big gap between reputable mainstream research findings and secondary source medical reviewers, many of whom held a bias against recognizing diet as an important component of disease and health, despite mountains of high quality research. The current state of neurofeedback should be characterized similarly; that is, one top secondary source conducted a thorough and accurate review of mainstream neurofeedback research and concluded with strong support for neurofeedback as a top level ADHD treatment (The American Academy of Pediatrics, 2012). Yet other medical reviewers have displayed bias by taking a cursory view of the field, cherry-picking a minority of negative results from poorly designed studies, and ignoring the majority of well-established, high quality mainstream research findings on neurofeedback. So, when secondary sources are bias, it is critical to offer other views. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.244.32.50 (talk) 20:09, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Wykop.pl

Hello, I undid last revision in this page, as it is still being vandalized. Since November, this article was still edited by anonymous trolls (see [3]). Section "Controversies" about films about John Paul II should be deleted in this site. These films weren't made by Wykop, but by karachan.org, a local mutation of 4chan. Some users of Wykop with its chairman, Michal Bialek, checked authors of these films and committed it to prosecutors, so users of karachan.org started to sign the films with Wykop.pl logo. Link about it in Polish [4] Links used in this section are not reliable - none links directly to wykop.pl, one [5] links for a blog, other - to "films" [6]. Everyone can make and post into YouTube a film containing e.g. Wikipedia logo - then we will talk about controversy of Wikipedia? Looking in history of IPs, they often troll in their editions and reasons of editions often contain Polish vulgar words. As you can notice on revision history, due to persistent trolling edition of this site it was blocked since December 2014 for 3 months, but after this time finished, it again become started to vandalizing. So, I think that this site should be again blocked for non-registered IPs, but, at this time, forever, which I requested for [7]. Regards, --CzakNoris (talk) 19:30, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

query regarding tna knockouts page

Hello,

I tried to edit the taryn Terrell bit seeing as she's now equalled kims longest reign of days but I've never used wiki before so I was unsure how to do it.

I normally just go on the page and hit save to update it but I was trying to edit her as the longest reign.

Apologies for that. Just glad you managed to restore it.

Sorry if I caused any trouble :).

Regards,

Liam (I don't have an account so best to use the IP page like you already did.)

Re: April 2015

Hi, I saw your message. Sorry about anything vandalism I seem to have committed, I am on a shared IP. If more vandalism happens from this IP go ahead and do a block, whoever's vandalizing probably won't listen to you. So yeah... sorry man. —166.109.13.7 (talk) 17:23, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

cranial nerves

I have documented everything I've added or deleted on the Talk page so I don't quite understand your comment. Further, the sentence that you put back is this one: he cranial nerves commonly enter and exit the skull together, for example nerves II, III, IV, V, and VI all pass through foramina near the pituitary fossa.[3]

That sentence has no real value - it adds nothing to the Discussion. And actually it is not at all true. Many of the nerves exit the skull separately. I am trying to correct many errors in this important page. I am an anatomy prof who has taught cranial nerve anatomy for more than 34 years.Anatomyczar (talk) 19:19, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

An edit summary is a great place for explaining that. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:32, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Not good faith

This https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Baby_%282015_film%29&diff=658746949&oldid=658155998

gandu means asshole , chutiya means pimp amd lora means dick in Urdu. I opened this account to inform you .— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lundbaaz King Shaan Shahid (talk • contribs)

They say that the first words you learn in a new language are always the swear words. Now I know my first words of Urdu. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:33, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

The 50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal

		The 50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
		Congratulations for achieving 50 DYK creations/expansions! — ₳aron 13:43, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! IronGargoyle (talk) 18:53, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Recent redirect

I think this was a poor choice. The author of the original article has come to Wikipedia for one purpose only: to air her grievances against Miami-Dade Transit and the State of Florida in general. The subject lawsuit was a completely non-notable suit (so much so that I can't even find the results to know whether Molina won or lost her suit), and is not mentioned at the Miami-Dade Transit page, so the redirect serves no purpose. The page either should have been speedily deleted or relegated to AFD. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:51, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Deleted. I didn't think it fit a CSD A7 at first, but on further reflection I think a court case is arguably an organized event. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:55, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

I'm not sure I agree with that reasoning either. I would have tagged it with a PROD rather than a Speedy, but the end effect is the same at this point. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:35, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Scientology Edits

Are you a Scientologist? — Preceding unsigned comment added by G8675309 (talk • contribs) 05:36, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Um, no. What Scientology edits you are talking about? It's possible I reverted some vandalism on a topic-area article once, but I don't recall ever substantively editing anything in this area. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:46, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/66.203.38.252

Hey there! Just wanted to let you know that I've increased the duration of your block on this IP from 31 hours to 6 months. The rationale being it is both a school IP and it resumed vandalizing shortly after the previous 3 month block. I hope this was okay! And if not I will quickly restore your block settings. — MusikAnimal ^talk 18:50, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Not a problem. I'm still getting used to Huggle 3 (not a huge fan, but Huggle 2 officially stopped working for me). Do you know if there's a way to easily display the block log from the program? IronGargoyle (talk) 18:53, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

I was going to bring that up, as I'm Huggle'r myself. I do not believe there is a way to see the block log, or the WHOIS for that matter. Personally I do a rather painstaking task, which is to (1) revert, see that a block is needed, (2) hit back, (3) go to User > Show user contributions (4) check the WHOIS which opens in a new window, (5) use a test version of the soon-to-be-released Twinkle Block module, which shows if there's a block log and (6) pick the appropriate block settings.

That's a lot of work, but the best way I know to do it right now. Perhaps we should make a feature request at WT:HG. Were there any features like this is in Huggle 2? — MusikAnimal ^talk 19:01, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Yep, Huggle 2.x would pop-up the block log whenever you were past a final warning and about to block an editor. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:04, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

9/11 for truth

I posted on 9/11 for truth, and everything i said on there was correct, i said nothing 'bad', because all i said was the truth

i don't post lies, I'm not a bigot or a troll, I'm here to spread the truth about things, if you don't like it that's a whole other conversation, but do not delete what I'm posting, at least go fact check it yourself — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.30.104.162 (talk) 17:51, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

I would suggest reviewing WP:NPOV. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:54, 1 May 2015 (UTC)