User talk:Iowawrwrkshp

Welcome!

Hello, Iowawrwrkshp!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 13:26, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bennett Sims (author) has been accepted

Bennett Sims (author), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 14:58, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aamina Ahmad (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Aamina Ahmad instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aamina Ahmad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aamina Ahmad, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Iowawrwrkshp! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Shattuck moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ben Shattuck, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:55, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've moved this article back into the draft space. It appears to me based on your user name that you are likely to have a conflict of interest (COI), and for that reason you should submit your draft for review via the Articles for Creation (AfC) process rather than publishing directly.

I have not submitted the draft for review yet; you are welcome to do so by clicking the blue 'Submit' button.

I will post a separate message below to help you deal with any COI issue.

Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Iowawrwrkshp. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Ben Shattuck, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:01, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Naomi Jackson moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Naomi Jackson, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:06, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are a paid editor. See WP:PAID. You may not move any draft to main space. You are expected to know the rules here, however new you may be. That is what you are paid to do 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:14, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok dude thanks dude Iowawrwrkshp (talk) 08:31, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naomi Jackson (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

I returned this to Draft space. This is WP:BOMBARD, whcih is prima facie evidence that this is an advert

Far too much text in lists of things.

We need to know what people have written about her, not what she has written.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Naomi Jackson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Naomi Jackson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:13, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Jung moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jack Jung, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:16, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Every piece of information is referenced and uses citations from reliable, independent sources. Feel free to give information about what either of these qualifications refer to. Iowawrwrkshp (talk) 08:30, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You might get a Wikipedian who is prepared to teach you. But, since you are paid to edit here you will find that very few editors have any interest in helping you earn your living. Yoiu mustleanr what is required and only submit your drafts when they are ready.

Paid editors may be allowed, but it is that you are tolerated, not welcomed. Your job is to learn yoiur trade without troubling the rest of us. Please use your payments and learn what it takes to get your articles accepted here.

Work well and there is almost a guarantee of acceptance. Work poorly and you will find your clients do not pay your invoices. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:21, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Paid editors may not move drafts to main space 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:20, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Bread Loaf Writers' Conference. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 10:17, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naomi Jackson (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

Submitted with no substantive improvement. Do that again an d there is a 90% probability that it will be rejected You are a paid editor. Your paid job is to know and work within our rules. Please do the work and only resubmit once you are 199%^ sure it will be approved. This is an amateur project and our role is not to help you to earn money

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Naomi Jackson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Naomi Jackson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:13, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not paid but simply trying to create pages of writers of color with national awards who are sorely underrepresented. You seem to have a personal vendetta and a need to gatekeep which is very odd. There are many pages I have referenced with less notability and fewer sourcing that you have not made it a personal mission to attack. I have never written anything untoward and have included negative reviews. Hope you have a good day. Iowawrwrkshp (talk) 17:14, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But you state on your user page that you have been paid by University of Iowa for your contributions to Wikipedia? Theroadislong (talk) 17:26, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For the first page I made which was accepted. Not for the two you took down. Have a great day. Iowawrwrkshp (talk) 00:25, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Jung (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NAUTHOR fails WP:NPROF As a paid editor you must learn your trade. You are paid for your work, we are not.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack Jung and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jack Jung, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:15, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ben Shattuck has been accepted

Ben Shattuck, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans ^{Talk to the Beans?} 05:22, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:A. Naomi Jackson

Hello, Iowawrwrkshp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:A. Naomi Jackson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jack Jung

Hello, Iowawrwrkshp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jack Jung, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Naomi Jackson

Hello, Iowawrwrkshp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Naomi Jackson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Naomi Jackson

Hello, Iowawrwrkshp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Naomi Jackson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:43, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]