User talk:Indy beetle/Archives/2019
|
Archives
|
Your GA nomination of Battle of Entebbe
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Entebbe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 23:41, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Entebbe
[edit]The article Battle of Entebbe you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Battle of Entebbe for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 08:02, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLIII, January 2019
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Congratulations from the Military History Project
[edit]
|
Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) | |
| On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) for October to December 2018 reviews. MilHistBot (talk) 01:06, 8 January 2019 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste |
Congratulations from the Military History Project
[edit]
|
The Military history A-Class medal | |
| On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the A-Class medal for Operation Grandslam, Jean-Baptiste Ouédraogo, and Fall of Kampala. MilHistBot (talk) 00:30, 11 January 2019 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Battle of Masaka
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Masaka you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 07:22, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| For Battle of Entebbe - great work!! Buckshot06 (talk) 12:45, 15 January 2019 (UTC) |
DYK for Battle of Tororo
[edit]
On 16 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Tororo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Ugandan military indiscriminately bombarded rebel fighters, civilians, and even their own forces during the Battle of Tororo? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Tororo. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Battle of Tororo), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:02, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Masaka
[edit]The article Battle of Masaka you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Masaka for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 03:41, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Masaka
[edit]The article Battle of Masaka you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Masaka for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 07:41, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Tororo
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Tororo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 20:41, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Tororo
[edit]The article Battle of Tororo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Tororo for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 21:21, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Photos
[edit]Hello Indy beetle! I wanted to ask whether you could add photos of Isaac Maliyamungu and Juma Butabika to their articles? At least photos of the former can be found in Cross the Gun to which you have access. The only photos of Maliyamungu I was able to find belong to Alamy and therefore do not fall under fair use. Applodion (talk) 15:48, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Applodion: Cross to the Gun was a book I acquired through my university's inter-library loan system. I returned it a couple weeks ago, but have just submitted another request to check it out. It should take a few days for it to be delivered. I do not recall any photos of Maliyamungu in there but I'll check again. I'd also like top take this time to ask you if Wars and Insurgencies of Uganda 1971–1994 says anything about the Battle of Sembabule? Both Cross to the Gun and Avirgan and Honey's War in Uganda have something to say about it, but their information is very conflicting. -Indy beetle (talk) 19:57, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Ah, okay! Thank you for checking. I was asking due to the preview here, which shows Maliyamungu on one photo in the book. In regard to Wars and Insurgencies of Uganda 1971–1994: The book is rather short in general, and is mostly based on works you have access to, though the authors did their own research as well - most of the latter is focused on aircraft / air warfare, however, as that is Cooper's forte. The book devotes roughly half a page to Sembabule, and essentially records the battle like this:
A Tanzanian task force advance from Mbarara toward the north-west, and its 205th Brigade is ordered to intercept the Tiger Regiment. Inexperienced in hill combat, the 205th Brigade runs into elements of the Tiger Regiment, entrenched near Sembabule. The Tanzanians first retreat, regroup, and then attack and capture the Ugandan positions, but the Tiger regiment retakes them on the next day. For two weeks, back-and-forth fighting takes place, and the Ugandans regularily decapitate and set up the corpses of Tanzanian soldiers, demotivating parts of the 205th Brigade to such an degree that they essentially start to avoid combat. About 20 Tanzanians are killed during this time.
Then, Brig Muhiddin Kirmario takes over command of the brigade from Maj-Gen Myunga, and changes the approach to combat. He goes to the frontline, meets and reassures the 205th's officers and soldiers, telling them that he will fight alongside them. Furthermore, instead of using small-units tactics like his predecessor, he orders "advance to contact" tactics to use the strength of the entire brigade to overwhelm the Ugandans. This way, the 205th manages to take the Tiger Regiment's positions, killing 25 Ugandans and forcing the rest to flee. Nevertheless, combat in the area does not end, and Sembabule is only captured later on 5 April. At the same time, elements of the Tiger Regiment stalled parts of the 206th Tanzanian Brigade during their advance on Ntungamo further south. Applodion (talk) 22:13, 27 January 2019 (UTC) - The Tanzania-Uganda war in pictures might also have images of Maliyamungu. Applodion (talk) 22:29, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Applodion: Thank you for the summary of Cooper & Fontanellaz. It sounds like they're using Avirgan & Honey's material. Also, The Tanzania-Uganda war in pictures, which I currently have, does not contain any such pictures. It's a compilation of photos taken by a Tanzanian journalist, who traveled through Uganda in the TPDF's wake. He has pictures of all the important Tanzanian and UNLF commanders, but none of any of the Amin regime. -Indy beetle (talk) 00:22, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- One of the references for the section about Sembabule is indeed Cooper & Fontanellaz. However, Cooper & Fontanellaz also reference Yoweri Museveni's Sowing the mustard seed, namely pages 98-100, for the battle at Sembabule, though I am not sure whether Museveni reports much about it. Applodion (talk) 10:48, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Applodion: I've just checked those pages in the book, and Museveni says nothing about it. Sembabule is only mentioned directly once, on page 101, and it doesn't offer any new information. -Indy beetle (talk) 13:06, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, then the Museveni reference was probably for the concurrent fighting in southern and western Uganda that the authors mentioned in the same paragraph as Sembabule. Anyway, this article by a Tanzanian soldier states that the battle lasted "three weeks", that the Tanzanians fought the Suicide Regiment there, that the officer replacement took place, and that the town fell on 5 April 1979. Sorry that I could not help more. Applodion (talk) 17:23, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Applodion: That actually throws some clarity on the situation, because that source reconciles some of the differences between Avirgan & Honey and Rwehururu. I've started a draft here, if you're interested. Once I get Cross to the Gun back it will be easier to make some progress on it. -Indy beetle (talk) 22:51, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Applodion: Photo of Maliyamungu added. -Indy beetle (talk) 04:15, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- Great, thank you! I will help with your draft when I find the time. Applodion (talk) 11:49, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, then the Museveni reference was probably for the concurrent fighting in southern and western Uganda that the authors mentioned in the same paragraph as Sembabule. Anyway, this article by a Tanzanian soldier states that the battle lasted "three weeks", that the Tanzanians fought the Suicide Regiment there, that the officer replacement took place, and that the town fell on 5 April 1979. Sorry that I could not help more. Applodion (talk) 17:23, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Applodion: I've just checked those pages in the book, and Museveni says nothing about it. Sembabule is only mentioned directly once, on page 101, and it doesn't offer any new information. -Indy beetle (talk) 13:06, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- One of the references for the section about Sembabule is indeed Cooper & Fontanellaz. However, Cooper & Fontanellaz also reference Yoweri Museveni's Sowing the mustard seed, namely pages 98-100, for the battle at Sembabule, though I am not sure whether Museveni reports much about it. Applodion (talk) 10:48, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Applodion: Thank you for the summary of Cooper & Fontanellaz. It sounds like they're using Avirgan & Honey's material. Also, The Tanzania-Uganda war in pictures, which I currently have, does not contain any such pictures. It's a compilation of photos taken by a Tanzanian journalist, who traveled through Uganda in the TPDF's wake. He has pictures of all the important Tanzanian and UNLF commanders, but none of any of the Amin regime. -Indy beetle (talk) 00:22, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Ah, okay! Thank you for checking. I was asking due to the preview here, which shows Maliyamungu on one photo in the book. In regard to Wars and Insurgencies of Uganda 1971–1994: The book is rather short in general, and is mostly based on works you have access to, though the authors did their own research as well - most of the latter is focused on aircraft / air warfare, however, as that is Cooper's forte. The book devotes roughly half a page to Sembabule, and essentially records the battle like this:
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:06, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 2
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Lukaya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jinja (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLIV, February 2019
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Antoine Gizenga
[edit]
On 24 February 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Antoine Gizenga, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:11, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 32
[edit]
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 32, January – February 2019
- #1Lib1Ref
- New and expanded partners
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:30, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Battle of Lira
[edit]Hello, Indy beetle! As you have already seen, I have created "Battle of Lira" and used Google snippets from Avirgan & Honey in order to piece together their account. While doing so, I was unable to access certain parts of their description of the events, so that the prelude and battle section are incomplete. If you have some time in the future, could you perhaps fill out the missing parts? Applodion (talk) 08:47, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Applodion: I am fairly busy this week, but I will certainly cross-reference with Avirgan and Honey when I have the time. I was also flipping through Baldwin Mzirai's book last night and found a chapter where he discusses some of the action at Lira, so I will also see if he has any other information to add. -Indy beetle (talk) 16:54, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you! It is great that Mzirai might have more information on the battle. Perhaps his account will explain why one Ugandan soldier who wrote a book and mentioned the Battle of Lira (Survival: A Soldier's Story; it is self-published, and thus unusable for the article), described the fighting at Lira as among the heaviest of the entire war, whereas all other sources I read so far basically portray it as completely one-sided. Applodion (talk) 17:44, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Lukaya
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Lukaya you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bryanrutherford0 -- Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 18:41, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Fall of Kampala scheduled for TFA
[edit]This is to let you know that the Fall of Kampala article has been scheduled as today's featured article for April 10, 2019. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 10, 2019, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. We also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors on the day before and the day of this TFA. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:10, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the article "about the fall of Kampala, the capital of Uganda, to Tanzanian and Ugandan rebel forces in April 1979. This marked the first time an African state had captured the capital of another African state, and meant the overthrow of Idi Amin's murderous regime."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:53, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Lukaya
[edit]The article Battle of Lukaya you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Lukaya for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bryanrutherford0 -- Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 16:02, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLV, March 2019
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Gamal Abdel Nasser Airbase
[edit]Hi Indy beetle. I won't be reverting your edit, but let me clear some confusion, for future reference.
Digital Globe, Landsat/Copernicus, Airbus/CNES, et al. images are primary sources.
Google Earth, Google Earth Historical Imagery, Google Maps, Bing Maps, and HERE Maps are secondary sources, not primary sources.
Google Earth editors select and combine imagery from these sources to best show features that the editors feel are important. They stitch together patches and align them to WGS84, homogenize color variations, then overlay elevation data from USGS NED and other sources. They also overlay other features like borders, roads, town names, etc. Their historical imagery are likewise edited.
Then they publish on the internet. Maybe half the smartphones on the planet use their published maps and data.
Cptmrmcmillan (talk) 18:53, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Cptmrmcmillan: Ok, but are they describing what is present on the airbase? In terms of the information relevant to the Gamal Abdel Nasser Airbase article, if we are interpreting elements of the photograph that have no secondary description (unlike when Google Maps labels roads and lakes and we discuss that, for example), then how would it be any different than looking at any other photo and citing it as a source? -Indy beetle (talk) 20:37, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
- Good point. I usually use the historical imagery for verification of other information, e.g. when there is no airport at the coords we have for it. The older imagery might show that it was there, but they built apartments on the land after some date. Google Maps uses the same image as Google Earth, which normally has the image date at the bottom, but Earth editors don't always use the most current image. Cptmrmcmillan (talk) 04:24, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Robert K. A. Gardiner
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Robert K. A. Gardiner you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Guettarda -- Guettarda (talk) 15:01, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Robert K. A. Gardiner
[edit]The article Robert K. A. Gardiner you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Robert K. A. Gardiner for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Guettarda -- Guettarda (talk) 01:41, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Battle of Bukulula (Lukuya ?)
[edit]Hello, Indy beetle! I want to ask for your opinion on the fighting discussed in this artucle: Musuya: The Tanzanian general who ruled Uganda for three days. Musuya describes several battles of the war, including one at Bukulula. Musuya served as commander of the 19th Battalion which was part of the 208th Brigade, so his story should be at least somewhat reliable. At first, I assumed that the conflict for Bukulula was a separate battle, sometime after the Battle of Masaka and before the Battle of Lukaya. However, this does not fit into any other account of the war, not to mention that a "Battle of Bukulula" is mentioned nowhere else. However, after re-reading the article, I am inclined to believe that this battle for Bukulula (which is close to Lukaya and on the road to Masaka) was actually part of the Battle of Lukaya:
- First, Musuya tells us that Amin ordered 2,500 soldiers under Isaac Maliyamungu to retake Masaka. This fits into the prelude for Lukaya (about 3,000 soldiers amassed for a counter-attack, Maliyamungu being one of the Ugandan commanders). He also explains that inexperienced Tanzanian forces were beaten at Bukulula. This probably refers to the 201st Brigade's defeat at Lukaya. As Bukulula is close to Lukaya, it is not a strech to imagine that this location was usually subsumed under Lukaya in most accounts of the battle.
- Musuya tells us that he was ordered to capture Bukulula, and that there was some fighting in the night. On the next morning, his unit lured the Ugandans into attacking them, and routed them, and then advanced toward Lukaya. This part of his story appears to be new, and seems to contradict the usual accounts which state that the Ugandan-led forces did almost nothing after capturing Lukaya, and were directly overwhelmed by the 208th Brigade's counter-attack on early 11 March. However, Musuya commanded just one battalion, so his account of the fighting is probably limited to Bukulula and was a smaller engagement than he suggets. Accordingly, the accounts about artillery bombardement routing the Ugandan-led troops possibly took place after the limited Ugandan attack near Bukulula.
- He tells us that another night went by (he say that the battle lasted three days). This is a problem, but perhaps here he is simply not correctly rembering things. Musuya recounts that "the same night Amin's soldiers wanted to do a counterattack from Lukaya where they had relocated. From Bukulula they ran towards Lukuya which has only one route towards the Katonga Bridge". This is somewhat confusing, but it seems like he wants to say that the Ugandans attempted an counter-attack, but their forces fled from Bukulula and Lukaya in disarray, allowing the Tanzanians to take Lukaya. This fits the existing narrative of other accounts quite well. The attempted counter-attack was probably Sule's tank assault.
What do you think? If Musuya is really retelling the Battle of Lukaya, we could quite a lot more details to the battle's article. Applodion (talk) 11:44, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Applodion: Msuya is most probably speaking of the Battle of Lukaya, but if we were to incorporate his narrative I'm not sure how this could be done. For one, his account includes info that is not even touched upon by Kisuule, Avirgan & Honey, or Mzirai (and Mzirai interviewed many high and lower ranking officers of the TPDF to create his book; thus the fact that Msuya is not named in his account of the Lukaya engagement makes me concerned). Furthermore, Msuya's unit was part of the 208th Brigade. The 208th Brigade seems to have been brought into action around the northern flank of Lukaya according to other accounts, not to the south, where most maps on the internet seem to place Bukulula. Msuya also suggests that Lukaya was taken by the TPDF's pursuit of Ugandan soldiers, whereas the other sources suggest that the town was occupied after the forces stationed there were subject to a devastating pincer attack. -Indy beetle (talk) 05:17, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- While it is true that Msuya is not mentioned in other accounts that does not mean that he or his unit were not present at the battle; honestly, I think that if he were lying about his experiences, he would have described the battle as commonly done, and not included Bukulula, which is not mentioned elsewhere. His story is probably vastly exaggerated (600 Ugandan dead, etc.), but it might still be true. Regardless, after thinking about it, you are right. If his info currently contradicts the other accounts, we should exclude it from the main part. Perhaps we could add a note, however, stating that Msuya's account exists though its reliability remains unclear. We can only hope that a historian will sort out this mess in the future. Applodion (talk) 14:47, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Applodion: I've added a small note about his account. -Indy beetle (talk) 21:26, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- While it is true that Msuya is not mentioned in other accounts that does not mean that he or his unit were not present at the battle; honestly, I think that if he were lying about his experiences, he would have described the battle as commonly done, and not included Bukulula, which is not mentioned elsewhere. His story is probably vastly exaggerated (600 Ugandan dead, etc.), but it might still be true. Regardless, after thinking about it, you are right. If his info currently contradicts the other accounts, we should exclude it from the main part. Perhaps we could add a note, however, stating that Msuya's account exists though its reliability remains unclear. We can only hope that a historian will sort out this mess in the future. Applodion (talk) 14:47, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Congratulations from the Military History Project
[edit]|
|
Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) | |
| On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) for January to March 2019 reviews. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:32, 3 April 2019 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste |
The Bugle: Issue CLVI, April 2019
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:00, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Alpha Phi Omega
[edit]I took the sentences that you deleted from Alpha Phi Omega and I hope restated them in a more non-promotional way which does not directly compare and contrast to Social Fraternities and Sororities. I hope these work better. Note, I do have a COI as a member of Alpha Phi Omega, but I've also worked on a large number of Fraternity and Sorority articles over the years.Naraht (talk) 18:44, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Lira
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Lira you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 06:21, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Lira
[edit]The article Battle of Lira you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Lira for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:21, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Jinja
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Jinja you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 07:02, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
About the Battle of Jinja article
[edit]Congratulations for this article, I hope it will pass the Good Articl review!
The New York Times article Slow‐Motion Conquest in Uganda explains: "As he spoke, three. Tanzanian tanks, a Chinese version of the Soviet‐made T‐54 and two Chinese‐made T‐34's, moved up the road." Are you sure that the tanks had been correctly identified. Maybe the journalist made a confusion between a T-34 and a Type 62 tank? Tanzania is known to have used Type 62 tanks during the war but not any T-34s - Tanzania received 30 Type 62 in 1970-1972 (select China and Tanzania), and Uganda is said by this self-published blog article to have been fielding T-34s against the Tanzanian Type 62. Maybe the mention of the type of tanks should be removed.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 08:30, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Lira
[edit]The article Battle of Lira you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Lira for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:02, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Jinja
[edit]The article Battle of Jinja you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Jinja for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 00:42, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Congratulations from the Military History Project
[edit]|
|
The Military history A-Class medal | |
| On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the A-Class medal for Battle of Entebbe, Battle of Masaka, and Battle of Lukaya Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:30, 29 April 2019 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Battle of Karuma Falls
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Karuma Falls you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KCVelaga -- KCVelaga (talk) 16:42, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Karuma Falls
[edit]The article Battle of Karuma Falls you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Karuma Falls for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KCVelaga -- KCVelaga (talk) 06:02, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLVII, May 2019
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:04, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 14
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Mutukula, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lukaya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 33
[edit] The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 33, March – April 2019
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Mutukula
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Mutukula you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 11:22, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Bombo
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Bombo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 21:22, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Bondo
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Bondo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 21:22, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Mutukula
[edit]The article Battle of Mutukula you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Mutukula for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:21, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Bombo
[edit]The article Battle of Bombo you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Bombo for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 10:21, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Bondo
[edit]The article Battle of Bondo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Bondo for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 10:42, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Mutukula
[edit]The article Battle of Mutukula you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Mutukula for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 03:01, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Bombo
[edit]The article Battle of Bombo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Bombo for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 12:02, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]
|
Hi Indy beetle! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Photographer's Barnstar |
| Thank you for your fabulous North Carolina photos. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:06, 28 May 2019 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Antoine-Roger Bolamba
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Antoine-Roger Bolamba you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 01:01, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Antoine-Roger Bolamba
[edit]The article Antoine-Roger Bolamba you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Antoine-Roger Bolamba for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 15:21, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Antoine-Roger Bolamba
[edit]The article Antoine-Roger Bolamba you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Antoine-Roger Bolamba for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 02:02, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
1969 Curacao uprising
[edit]Hi,
Sorry to bother you, but I was wondering if you might take another look at this FAC. I hope that I've addressed all your comments.--Carabinieri (talk) 17:53, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLVIII, June 2019
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Writer's Barnstar |
| For your hard work on Uganda military history, on articles such as Battle of Entebbe and Battle of Bondo. Great to see quality for Africa! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:55, 20 June 2019 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for June 29
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Kampala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canteen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:45, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Congratulations from the Military History Project
[edit]|
|
Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) | |
| On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) for participating in 9 reviews between April and June 2019 Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:30, 4 July 2019 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste |
Books & Bytes Issue 34, May – June 2019
[edit] The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 34, May – June 2019
- Partnerships
- #1Lib1Ref
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:21, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLIX, July 2019
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:01, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Kampala
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Kampala you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 19:41, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 26
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jyles Coggins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Statesville (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:11, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Barthélemy Mukenge
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Barthélemy Mukenge you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 18:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Barthélemy Mukenge
[edit]The article Barthélemy Mukenge you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Barthélemy Mukenge for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 00:21, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:42, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Kampala
[edit]The article Battle of Kampala you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Kampala for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 11:01, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Kampala
[edit]The article Battle of Kampala you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Kampala for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 08:42, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Air campaign of the Uganda–Tanzania War
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Air campaign of the Uganda–Tanzania War you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:21, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Air campaign of the Uganda–Tanzania War
[edit]The article Air campaign of the Uganda–Tanzania War you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Air campaign of the Uganda–Tanzania War for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:41, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Invasion of Kagera
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Invasion of Kagera you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 20:21, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Air campaign of the Uganda–Tanzania War
[edit]The article Air campaign of the Uganda–Tanzania War you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Air campaign of the Uganda–Tanzania War for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 04:42, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Laurent Eketebi
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Laurent Eketebi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Willbb234 -- Willbb234 (talk) 06:21, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Laurent Eketebi
[edit]The article Laurent Eketebi you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Laurent Eketebi for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Willbb234 -- Willbb234 (talk) 08:21, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Barnstar
[edit]
|
The Special Barnstar |
| I had not yet thanked you properly for your great contributions and help in creating magnificent, high-quality articles about the Uganda–Tanzania War. It has been a pleasure to work with you on these articles! Applodion (talk) 09:48, 2 September 2019 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Invasion of Kagera
[edit]The article Invasion of Kagera you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Invasion of Kagera for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 14:02, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Rémy Mwamba
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rémy Mwamba you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vanamonde93 -- Vanamonde93 (talk) 01:41, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Simba Hills
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Simba Hills you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 06:42, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Simba Hills
[edit]The article Battle of Simba Hills you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Simba Hills for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 09:23, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Needham B. Broughton
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Needham B. Broughton you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MX -- MX (talk) 15:41, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Needham B. Broughton
[edit]The article Needham B. Broughton you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Needham B. Broughton for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MX -- MX (talk) 16:20, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Rémy Mwamba
[edit]The article Rémy Mwamba you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rémy Mwamba for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vanamonde93 -- Vanamonde93 (talk) 00:21, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXI, September 2019
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Simba Hills
[edit]The article Battle of Simba Hills you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Simba Hills for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 05:41, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Invasion of Kagera
[edit]The article Invasion of Kagera you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Invasion of Kagera for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 15:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Rémy Mwamba
[edit]The article Rémy Mwamba you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rémy Mwamba for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vanamonde93 -- Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:01, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Clarence Lightner
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Clarence Lightner you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vanamonde93 -- Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:20, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of John Butler Walden
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Butler Walden you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 10:01, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Sembabule
[edit]The article Battle of Sembabule you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Sembabule for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 10:41, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of John Butler Walden
[edit]The article John Butler Walden you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:John Butler Walden for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 12:41, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 35, July – August 2019
[edit] The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 35, July – August 2019
- Wikimania
- We're building something great, but..
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- A Wikibrarian's story
- Bytes in brief
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Needham B. Broughton
[edit]The article Needham B. Broughton you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Needham B. Broughton for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MX -- MX (talk) 14:02, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of John W. Winters
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John W. Winters you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vanamonde93 -- Vanamonde93 (talk) 21:41, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Clarence Lightner
[edit]The article Clarence Lightner you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Clarence Lightner for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vanamonde93 -- Vanamonde93 (talk) 00:41, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
More tools
[edit]Hi Indy beetle. I couldn't help wondering, given all the work you do with obscure figures (or at least those obscure to the English-speaking intelligentsia) whether you would find the admin tools useful in your work. I know you primarily do content creation, but the ability to move pages and view deleted content is often helpful; and I thought it possible that you would be interested in working at DYK. If you're at all interested, let me know; I don't think you're ready just yet but you could be without too much effort. Vanamonde (Talk) 00:42, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
- Hello Vanamonde93. It's kind of you to suggest that I might benefit from admin tools, but frankly in my work for content creation I don't really see them being necessary. Viewing deleted content would be hypothetically helpful and I have found myself at times wishing I had better page moving tools (and wishing I could block those IP vandals who think they're clever enough to disrupt an obscure page), but I don't see them as a must. A better library and translator would do me far more good! And frankly, the kind of admins Wikipedia needs right now are more on the maintenance and dispute intervention side of things, which aren't what I'd be ready to pledge myself to. However, the DYK section does sound more interesting, as I am always open to finding more ways to promote obscure but informative content. -Indy beetle (talk) 05:26, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Why don't you explore DYK, and we can revisit this conversation in a few months. Vanamonde (Talk) 14:40, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
AfroCine: Join the Months of African Cinema this October!
[edit]
Greetings!
After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.
The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.
On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:
- Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
- Diversity winner
- Gender-gap fillers
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of John W. Winters
[edit]The article John W. Winters you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John W. Winters for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vanamonde93 -- Vanamonde93 (talk) 02:41, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of John Butler Walden
[edit]The article John Butler Walden you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John Butler Walden for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 19:22, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Congratulations from the Military History Project
[edit]
|
Military history reviewers' award | |
| On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 1 review between July and September 2019. Peacemaker67 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:30, 5 October 2019 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste |
Libya Wikiproject revamp
[edit]Hello, I am very knowledge able about the Middle East and MENA and its conflicts. I was very surprised to see that Wikiproject:Libya was not entirely as interactive and attractive as Wikiproject:Syria or Wikiproject:Israel and others for that matter. Please send me a message on your take or ideas on the matter, and if you want to join in. P.S. I saw that you nominated someone on the Wikiproject Libya page, this is why you are getting this message. Max Pigeon (talk) 13:11, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXII, October 2019
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:41, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Libyan–Egyptian War
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Libyan–Egyptian War you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 10:20, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Libyan–Egyptian War
[edit]The article Libyan–Egyptian War you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Libyan–Egyptian War for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 08:01, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
2019 US Banknote Contest
[edit].png){kind=logo}
|
US Banknote Contest | 
|
|---|---|---|
| November-December 2019 | ||
|
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here | ||
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)
- Indy beetle/Archives (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Yeetmastersuprme". The reason given for Yeetmastersuprme's block is: "Clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia".
Accept reason: I've lifted the autoblock. There were only 8 hours left on the autoblock anyway, and it looks pretty obvious behaviorally that you and "Yeetmastersuprme" are unrelated. Mz7 (talk) 07:09, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]
|
The Signpost Barnstar | |
| for all the good stuff Smallbones(smalltalk) 00:53, 1 November 2019 (UTC) |
- @Smallbones: Thanks for the opportunity. If it's all the same to you, I might linger around more often to contribute to ITM or the news. -Indy beetle (talk) 01:27, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Definitely! ITM is a very good way to get some ideas and keep on top of things (from a non-Wikipedian's POV - which all us "insiders" need). News stories from the inside view (N&N, Discussion report, etc) is our weak point right now. We could use 3 people doing that! Smallbones(smalltalk) 01:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXIII, November 2019
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Siege of Masaka
[edit]On 19 November 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Siege of Masaka, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that soldiers were reduced to eating rats during the Siege of Masaka? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Siege of Masaka. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Siege of Masaka), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
valereee (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Books & Bytes – Issue 36
[edit] The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 36, September – October 2019
- #1Lib1Ref January 2020
- #1Lib1Ref 2019 stories and learnings
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
[edit] | |
| Three years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:44, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jyles Coggins
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jyles Coggins you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of G. Moore -- G. Moore (talk) 15:41, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jyles Coggins
[edit]The article Jyles Coggins you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jyles Coggins for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of G. Moore -- G. Moore (talk) 14:41, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Stop Vandalising Atrocities in Congo Free State Page
[edit]If you believe my contributions are not suited well to the text, feel free to rephrase them. Do not blatantly remove information.
131.111.5.153 (talk) 04:54, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- I'm not "vandalising" the article. You're adding information without a proper citation, and so I'm removing it because otherwise its information that is not verified. I would not be removing the entirety of your contribution if it were not for that problem. -Indy beetle (talk) 04:57, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- You could have taken this to the talk page rather then remove the entire content just because it doesn't fit to your narrative. It is getting harder to AGF with you.
131.111.5.153 (talk) 05:00, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
- Um, please do tell me what my "narrative" is, and why the info you were adding "doesn't fit" into it. I was acting in according with principles of WP:VERIFY. However, seeing as the source has been located (I was confused because the sfn you were using had a different year than the Journal article you alluded to), I don't think this is an issue anymore. -Indy beetle (talk) 05:10, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXIV, December 2019
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:48, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Gayaza Hills
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Gayaza Hills you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 05:21, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Belated holiday greetings
[edit]
↠Pine (✉) 06:01, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Gayaza Hills
[edit]The article Battle of Gayaza Hills you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Gayaza Hills for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 07:21, 29 December 2019 (UTC)