User talk:Http iosue

Welcome!

Hi Http iosue! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Fahads1982 (talk) 09:53, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nmplol (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tutwakhamoe were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nmplol and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 23:04, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Http iosue! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tutwakhamoe (talk) 23:04, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nmplol (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nmplol and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 14:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jynxzi has been accepted

Jynxzi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sahaib (talk) 17:52, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Callux (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Callux and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 09:16, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

theres multiple articles about him and the only source for social media and youtube are his early life and birth date. are u sure u have reviewed all of the articles, or is this a bot declining the draft? Http iosue (talk) 09:22, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sketch (streamer) has been accepted

Sketch (streamer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-- NotCharizard ^🗨 06:19, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

A goat for you!

Good work on the streamer pages.

Cxhd (talk) 06:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jynxzi Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jynxzi Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quackity (YouTuber) has been accepted

Quackity (YouTuber), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sahaib (talk) 17:05, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Esfand (streamer) has been accepted

Esfand (streamer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jamiebuba (talk) 18:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tubbo has been accepted

Tubbo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 14:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Maya Higa shaving her head for fundraiser.png

Thank you for uploading File:Maya Higa shaving her head for fundraiser.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 10:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Removing deletion tags

Do not remove the tags of File:Maya Higa shaving her head for fundraiser.png. The tag says "do not remove this notice from files you have uploaded". The file fails WP:NFC. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 10:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

oh it says for me "Please remove this template if you have successfully addressed the concern." which i addressed by adding more details in the image. Http iosue (talk) 11:00, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

It says discuss this on the talk page. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 11:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Maya Higa shaving her head for fundraiser.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Maya Higa shaving her head for fundraiser.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ph1Lza has been accepted

Ph1Lza, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-- NotCharizard ^🗨 14:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Http iosue. Thank you for your work on Ph1Lza. Another editor, B3251, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work! If you haven't tried this out yet, you may be able to nominate this article (as well as other new articles you potentially create in the future) for a "Did you know?" at WP:DYKNOM.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|B3251}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

B3251 (talk) 17:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: WillNeff has been accepted

WillNeff, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MKsLifeInANutshell (talk) 10:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of most-subscribed Twitch channels has been accepted

List of most-subscribed Twitch channels, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MKsLifeInANutshell (talk) 10:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The YouTube Barnstar
		For your great work on creating articles related to Youtube and Twitch!

-- NotCharizard 🗨 12:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: ChrisMD has been accepted

ChrisMD, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-- NotCharizard ^🗨 12:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

File:ChrisMD YouTube Icon.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ChrisMD YouTube Icon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 02:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Sketch (streamer) icon.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sketch (streamer) icon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. – Pbrks ^(t·c) 15:08, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

File:TGFbro YouTube Icon.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TGFbro YouTube Icon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 08:31, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Alinity has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Alinity. Thanks! Zanahary (talk) 23:45, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: True Geordie (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:True Geordie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:17, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alinity (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PARAKANYAA was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alinity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:35, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Callux

Hello, Http iosue. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Callux, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:PirateSoftware

Hello, Http iosue. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:PirateSoftware, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:07, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

Hello, I'm Pilaz. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sidemen, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please read WP:ONUS: all additions can be challenged on the grounds that, while verifiable, not every piece of information is relevant to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of everything (WP:NOTEVERYTHING), and we should strive to be synthetic, not exhaustive. We are also not in the business of promotion. This is not the first time you re-add that brand of cereal to the Sidemen article. Do not add it again without proper justification or discussion at Talk:Sidemen first. Tubefilter is not a reliable source, either. Pilaz (talk) 16:51, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

based on this discussion, tubefilter is considered reliable. i've been using tubefilter on a lot of my edits, so i don't get why only on this page it got removed for not being reliable. Http iosue (talk) 18:42, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:PirateSoftware

Hello, Http iosue. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "PirateSoftware".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:03, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Do not move redirects to draft space

Please be aware that redirects should not be moved to draft space. If you believe a redirect should not exist in main space you should nominate it for deletion at WP:RfD. Hey man im josh (talk) 21:37, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

ah my bad, will do in the future Http iosue (talk) 21:38, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Warning Issued

Hi Http iosue! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of One True King several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:One True King, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you Lambert73 (talk) 22:29, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

i have asked multiple times for your reasoning for reverting my edits, and you never responded and keep reverting my edits. Http iosue (talk) 22:46, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

December 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on One True King. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 00:29, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

understood, can you warn the other user too please, i have tried to ask multiple times the reason he keeps reverting my edits with no answer, he just kept reverting my edits Http iosue (talk) 00:31, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

(edit conflict) You were at ...42+ reverts within approximately 24 hours. Rather than going back and forth in a way that violates WP:3RR 14 times over, next time, please take it to an article's talk page if you edit is challenged and discuss it with other users (the one for One True King is at Talk:One True King). If the other users continue to revert you and do not engage in discussion, then you can report them to the the edit warring noticeboard—but please do not go past the WP:3RR unless an exception obviously applies. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 00:32, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

gotcha, will do in the future. Http iosue (talk) 00:34, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

he just deleted my talk discussion page for no reason Http iosue (talk) 01:02, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

sorry, i meant my discussion section on Talk:One True King Http iosue (talk) 01:04, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

he deleted my discussion section again. its twice now. are you sure you dont want to banned this dude? Http iosue (talk) 01:13, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

also i have no idea how to make the report, it seems too hard to understand. Http iosue (talk) 01:19, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

its the third time now he deleted again. Http iosue (talk) 01:25, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

I've indefinitely blocked the other user. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 01:57, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

hey i don't know if this is possible but can you check "User:Mach9Wikia" and IP Address "174.234.107.19". i have a suspicion that this is the alt account of Lambert73. the moment the protection page got removed, these accounts added back edits from Lambert73. i have provided talk discussion in the talk page since the edit war last week, but none of these accounts even bother to discussed it and accuses me of censoring information. Http iosue (talk) 00:08, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

he tried to report me to admin noticeboard about last week edit warring, even though i already got banned for a day. Http iosue (talk) 02:07, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

@Red-tailed hawk sorry for pinging you again. Http iosue (talk) 02:08, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

@Red-tailed hawk can you help me please, another admin have blocked me for one week for my last week edit warring, even though i already served my ban. Http iosue (talk) 02:32, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

I did not block you for your previous edit-warring but for your two recent reverts reinstating the information that got you blocked last week.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:49, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

but i have stated my reasoning why, i have added discussion section on the talk page about my edits since last week but none of the user responded until an hour ago after he reported me. how is it fair im the only one got banned but the other guy did not even though he reverted my edits too?

also for the record about that edit, the editor wants to add an allegation about someone, even though the org never made any statements regarding it. he just added stuff based on his assumptions, even though on previous situation involving other members, the org has made statements regarding it. Http iosue (talk) 03:12, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

am i just supposed to ignore an edit thats based on assumption by a random user that's created like 2 days ago, and an IP address user. even though i have provided my reasoning last week on the talk page. how am i supposed to respond then? without it being accused of edit warring? Http iosue (talk) 03:17, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

also those accounts that makes the edits is awfully suspicious for being an alt account of the previous user that got indefinitely banned last week. i dont know if possible to check if its the same guy or not. Http iosue (talk) 03:19, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

also the fact that a new account knew exactly about wikipedia stuff like edit warring, reporting to admin noticeboard, etc. can you please investigate that account, im sure its an alt account of that dude that got banned last week. Http iosue (talk) 03:25, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:44, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Regarding Recent Activity

Hi Http iosue! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of One True King several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable. All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:One True King, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mach9Wikia (talk • contribs) 01:52, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

i literally have provided discussion on the talk page and stated my reasoning, if you disagree feel free to tell me why at the talk page instead of pretending to be an admin. Http iosue (talk) 01:59, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

December 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at One True King. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 02:29, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

can you explain why please, i have been blocked last week for my edit warring for one day, i haven't edit warred ever since then. Http iosue (talk) 02:30, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

You don't need to ask for admin help, which potentially flags this question up to every single admin on the project; you can just ping the admin who blocked you. Or if you wish to appeal your block, do that instead. My advice, however, would be to just sit out the short block, and take this time to think about edit warring and what makes it such a pointless pursuit.

And yes, you did go back to the OTK article and revert an edit you disagreed with, and when you got reverted yourself, you did it again. That suggests you haven't quite overcome your tendency to edit war. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:22, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

i'm not the one putting the "admin help" template btw, i have no idea why a random user randomly put that today. also yeah my bad for that one, i dont know edit warred also count for 2 reverts, i thought there's a 3 reverts rule to count as edit war. Http iosue (talk) 09:03, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

I stumbled across your talk page whilst doing some other editing and noticed that you asked a question about the block; I put the {{Admin help}} on there because otherwise an admin might not notice it. The three-revert rule is our guideline for deciding when edit warring is serious enough to be penalised, but conducting unexplained reverts below that threshhold instead of following the WP:BRD mantra doesn't reflect highly on editors either. Passengerpigeon (talk) 23:14, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Can you explain how I should respond to it, considering I have provided discussion and explained with sources the reason for my edits/reverts on the talk page? The person that disagreed did not even engage in the discussion until they reported my accounts, and that discussion didn't go anywhere either. How do we resolve the disagreement then? considering that none of the admins or experienced editors even bothered to help resolve it and instead banned both of us without first resolving it. Http iosue (talk) 00:43, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angryginge (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ibjaja055 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Angryginge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ibjaja055 (talk) 13:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Http iosue! The thread you created at the Teahouse, moving my draft page to mainspace, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:11, 25 December 2024 (UTC)