User talk:Hamath-Zobah 17

Welcome!

Hello, Hamath-Zobah 17, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 21:59, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war warning

Your recent editing history at Jus sanguinis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 01:17, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Ham (son of Noah) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Chris Troutman (talk) 05:33, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note that if you used one you might not have been reverted. Having been reverted you should have used the talk page. But I was struggling with small print I couldn't enlarge on my iPad, and now I'm on my PC I almost agree with your last change. Take a look now and if you still disagree please use the article's talk page. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 14:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Archimedes'_screw shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. AgentCDE / Talk / 20:16, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indecency

@AgentCDE: I am the one who added the main content then this Wtshymanski had reverted twice what I have added ! Check the edit summary and you can tell who started this edit conflict by mentioning lame remarks which reflect his indecent upbringing ! the content that I added describes the equipment used by Sennacherib to lift the water, and it is just one sentence !! so who the hell is that Shame-baloski to dictate what people need to read or not ?! I wont waste my time keep reverting that Shame-baloski lame remarks, so I would let you AgentCDE have the final saying regarding this issue ! Hamath-Zobah 17 (talk) 20:27, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COPYVIO?

Where did you get the text for Siege of Ctesiphon (637)? This article was deleted last year for being a copyright violation and you seem to have created the article in a single edit with no footnotes. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:28, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Chris troutman: the article has been fully translated from the Italian version, no violation of copyrights whatsoever ! Hamath-Zobah 17 (talk) 22:33, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Then per WP:TFOLWP, you need to properly attribute that. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:44, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Battle of Babylon (636)

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Hamath-Zobah 17, thanks for creating Battle of Babylon (636)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for 1 issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 18:28, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Syrian Basketball Federation

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Hamath-Zobah 17, thanks for creating Syrian Basketball Federation!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains (talk) 03:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Syria Basketball Federation (SBF).jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Syria Basketball Federation (SBF).jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 09:45, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@MifterBot: I totally agree.. please delete the file. Hamath-Zobah 17 (talk) 09:53, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

— Berean Hunter (talk) 19:28, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hamath-Zobah 17 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What has just happened?! Why am I blocked?! It seems that you block the whole IP and my account is mentioned elsewhere with another blocked account ! Is it a crime to have the same IP with others? Now you would claim that I am his or her sock puppet even though this account is older !! Hamath-Zobah 17 (talk) 06:38, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The evidence is very clear. Appeal your block on your original account. TPA revoked. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 14:15, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Results posted here. No mistake.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 12:13, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Berean Hunter you must be kidding me !! why do you always link accounts to blocked ones ?! so you can easily ban them by saying they are just sockpuppets ! you even blocked an account dates back to 2014 !! I wonder what went wrong regarding that account which you tag me with ! I can tell this ip is shared with 6 people in this house !! I dont know if someone here has a wikipedia account ! Hamath-Zobah 17 (talk) 12:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Al-Jaish SC sections

Template:Al-Jaish SC sections has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:57, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Jalaa SC sections

Template:Jalaa SC sections has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:35, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Al-Ittihad SC sections

Template:Al-Ittihad SC sections has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]