User talk:Goodknowme

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Goodknowme, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Rahio1234 10:08, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

England women's cricket team in South Africa in 2024–25 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to England women's cricket team in South Africa in 2024–25. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Future event, may be TOOSOON, but current sources do not demonstrate notability. Drafted until after event. Current sources are routine mill sports news. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.  // Timothy :: talk  01:35, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Zimbabwean cricket team in Ireland in 2024 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zimbabwean cricket team in Ireland in 2024 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zimbabwean cricket team in Ireland in 2024 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 // Timothy :: talk  04:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Delete Goodknowme (talk) 04:48, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Deletion is better than drafting. Some times draft may not submit for review Goodknowme (talk) 04:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of England women's cricket team in Ireland in 2024 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article England women's cricket team in Ireland in 2024 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/England women's cricket team in Ireland in 2024 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

 // Timothy :: talk  04:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Then you can delete this page. Goodknowme (talk) 04:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Delete for now Goodknowme (talk) 04:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Wikiproject invitation

Hello, Goodknowme! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject Women's Premier League (cricket), an collaborative group which aims to support development of Women's Premier League related articles in Wikipedia. We thought you might be interested, and hope that you will join us. We trust you, Goodknowme, and we know that you have a lot of interest in this area. So why wait? Join fast by signing your name here! Thanks, and happy editing! You can also invite others by placing {{subst:User:Vestrian24Bio/Wikiproject Women's Premier League (cricket)/Invitation}} in their talk page. This Wikiproject is still in the Proposal state; for it to be created a minimum number of participants needs to sign-up, I personally think you'd be interested in participating and left you this invite. Your participation is appreciated.

Vestrian24Bio (U • T • A • C • S) 05:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

AfD outcomes

Hi. While the consensus outcomes of AfD discussions are not "immutable", and consensus can (and often does) change, those discussions and outcomes should not be unilaterally ignored. And their outcomes actively obscured. In short, please stop recreating articles (or moving draft articles) without consideration or acknowledgement of the previous related AfD outcomes. As you did here and here (without any explanation). And, also, please stop actively removing reference to previous AfD discussions. As you did here and here (again without any explanation). If you think the outcome of an earlier AfD discussion needs revisiting (as time passes or things change or more sources become available), then open a discussion on (at least) the related article/draft Talk page. And invite discussion. To confirm whether/if/how consensus has changed. Just "ignoring" previous AfD discussions (as if they didn't happen or should be swept-under-a-rug) is not in keeping with one of the core project tenets. Namely WP:CON. See also WP:IDHT. Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 12:26, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

The article have enough evidence to remains as article, just like this. Goodknowme (talk) 13:02, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi. RE:

• "article has enough coverage to remain as article". Please read the related AfD discussion. The consensus outcome of which was that there was NOT enough coverage (of the topic) to warrant an article. Your opinion doesn't override or supercede the consensus outcome of an AfD discussion. As above.
• "just like this". Please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. The existence of another or similar article, which may have its own issues and may not yet have been reviewed or subject to consensus-confirming discussion, also doesn't override or supercede AfD discussions.

My point remains (and is even further bolstered by your comments above): Your opinion, while welcome and contributory to consensus, doesn't "trump" the opinions or inputs of other contributors. Or AfD outcomes. Or project policy/guidelines. Guliolopez (talk) 13:27, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Okay, I am waiting for AFD discussion or Afd outcomes. Thank you. Goodknowme (talk) 13:42, 2 July 2024 (UTC)