User talk:Georgesben

This is Georgesben's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manuel Rosenberg (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gpkp was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manuel Rosenberg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Manuel Rosenberg, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Georgesben! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Manuel Rosenberg has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Manuel Rosenberg. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 19:03, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the editing suggestions and comments! Very helpful. I will look into the Daily Herald vs London Herald note. I'm finding that newspapers.com has a number of useful potential citations. Please let me know if you have any suggestions for other possible reference or citation sources. Thanks! Georgesben (talk) 19:10, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manuel Rosenberg (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As has already been stated, there are still large chunks of this submissions that are unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manuel Rosenberg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Manuel Rosenberg, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 04:14, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Manuel Rosenberg has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Manuel Rosenberg. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 08:56, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the editing suggestions and comments! Very helpful. I will look into the Daily Herald vs London Herald note. I'm finding that newspapers.com has a number of useful potential citations. Please let me know if you have any suggestions for other possible reference or citation sources. Thanks! Georgesben (talk) 19:10, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manuel Rosenberg has been accepted

Manuel Rosenberg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 16:38, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! This is my first wikipedia article! Very exciting. Will do my best to develop and improve it. Georgesben (talk) 20:01, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anita Rosenberg (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anita Rosenberg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 08:12, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thank you for reviewing Draft:Anita_Rosenberg. I would like to note that the article does show significant coverage about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. The sources include IMDB, The Independent, vice.com, Philadelphia Daily News, the Cincinnati Post, a review by Roger Ebert on his website (rogerebert.com), among others. IMDB lists actual film credits. The news publications are objective sources containing reviews and interviews. Could you offer any specific help, suggestions, or advice as to how to improve/edit the article so that it would qualify for a Wikipedia article. It seems to me that there are sufficient reliable sources. Are there specific statements that are missing references? Are there sections of the article that should be deleted?

Thank you for your help,

George Benainous Georgesben (talk) 00:27, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anita Rosenberg (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lewolka was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

does not pass WP:FILMMAKER

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anita Rosenberg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lewolka (talk) 05:28, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Anita Rosenberg has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Anita Rosenberg. Thanks! Lewolka (talk) 13:40, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anita Rosenberg has been accepted

Anita Rosenberg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 03:57, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!!! Very happy to see this article get accepted! Georgesben (talk) 04:01, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Georgesben/sandbox

Hello, Georgesben. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Georgesben/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Georgesben/sandbox

Hello, Georgesben. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:12, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]