User talk:GalaxyDog/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions with User:GalaxyDog. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Welcome!
|
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi GalaxyDog! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 02:29, Friday, December 27, 2019 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi GalaxyDog! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 22:28, Saturday, April 4, 2020 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Welcome to the GOCE!
Welcome to WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors "Make it say what it means and mean what it says" – Wikipedia: How to copy edit |
Hello GalaxyDog and welcome to the Guild of Copy Editors (GOCE)! We are glad that you have decided to help us in our mission to improve the quality of writing on the English Wikipedia! Here are some links that you might find helpful to get started on your copy-editing journey!
- A how-to guide to Wikipeda copyediting
- Wikipedia's Manual of Style (MOS), a helpful guide to refer to while copy editing
- A quick guide to writing on Wikipedia
You can help with copy-editing requests if you already have familiarity with the MOS and considerable English copy-editing skills, or start with articles tagged for copy editing to gain experience.
Thank you so much for joining the GOCE, we appreciate it!
For the GOCE, --Puddleglum2.0(How's my driving?) 17:04, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi GalaxyDog, you may be already be aware but just in case, Twinkle is a gadget you can can enable in your preferences that makes certain tasks easier, such as reverting edits, leaving notices on talk pages, tagging pages, etc. You may find it quite handy. :) S0091 (talk) 21:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notice S0091. I've heard of it and briefly enabled it to learn about it, but haven't really used it. Perhaps I should try it, thanks. --GalaxyDog (talk) 21:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
- @S0091: I've started using it now, and I agree that it's very useful! Thanks again! --GalaxyDog (talk) 16:36, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Awesome! :) S0091 (talk) 17:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- @S0091: I've started using it now, and I agree that it's very useful! Thanks again! --GalaxyDog (talk) 16:36, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
thanks for welcoming a new user
I suppose I found my way here via the Teahouse. I see you've taken a lot of time recently to help one new user begin to make constructive contributions. I admire your speed of response and patience of explanation. I wish all the schoolkids at home with Covid-19 had such helpful and supportive guidance. Well done. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 21:55, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Carbon Caryatid: Thanks, this comment made my day. I'm glad that I was able to be of help to them. :) --GalaxyDog (talk) 21:57, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 April 2020
- News and notes: Unbiased information from Ukraine's government?
- In the media: Coronavirus, again and again
- Discussion report: Redesigning Wikipedia, bit by bit
- Featured content: Featured content returns
- Arbitration report: Two difficult cases
- Traffic report: Disease the Rhythm of the Night
- Recent research: Trending topics across languages; auto-detecting bias
- Opinion: Trusting Everybody to Work Together
- On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?
- In focus: Multilingual Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: The Guild of Copy Editors
Copying your “lives in USA” userbox
Just a quick question, can I copy your “USA” userbox from your userpage to mine? Thanks in advance. Stay safe and well, --Total Eclipse 2017 (talk) (Origin of the username) 19:18, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Total Eclipse 2017: Sure! I don't really care. I hope you're staying safe too :D --GalaxyDogtalk 21:03, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! Also, I’m going to let you in on a little secret: the “stay safe and well” is part of my sig, since I wanted to share the sentiment without writing it out every single time... it is sincere, though. I’ll eventually take it off in 6 months or so. Stay safe and well, --Total Eclipse 2017 (talk) (Origin of the username) 21:05, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. Well, have a nice day, Total Eclipse 2017! --GalaxyDogtalk 21:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! Also, I’m going to let you in on a little secret: the “stay safe and well” is part of my sig, since I wanted to share the sentiment without writing it out every single time... it is sincere, though. I’ll eventually take it off in 6 months or so. Stay safe and well, --Total Eclipse 2017 (talk) (Origin of the username) 21:05, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- You too. Stay safe and well, --Total Eclipse 2017 (talk) (Origin of the username) 21:22, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 15
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (April 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 15th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
|
- Wikipedia:User scripts/Most imported scripts now also shows the number of active users for each script. It will now be updated by a bot periodically.
- Twinkle's Morebits library added a new
Morebits.date
class to replace the moment library. It can handle custom formatting and natural language for dates, as well as section header regexes. If you were usinggetUTCMonthName
orgetUTCMonthNameAbbrev
withDate
objects, those have been deprecated and should be updated. - User:SD0001/find-archived-section was made a gadget. You can enable it from your gadget preferences, in the Browsing section.
Hope everyone stays safe. --DannyS712 (talk) 20:27, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
You want to join the 10th anniversary drive?
You’re missin’ all the fun there... Stay safe and well, --Total Eclipse 2017 (talk) (Origin of the username) 21:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Total Eclipse 2017: Eh, probably too late now... --GalaxyDogtalk 19:09, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 May 2020
- From the editor: Meltdown May?
- News and notes: 2019 Picture of the Year, 200 French paid editing accounts blocked, 10 years of Guild Copyediting
- Discussion report: WMF's Universal Code of Conduct
- Featured content: Weathering the storm
- Arbitration report: Board member likely to receive editing restriction
- Traffic report: Come on and slam, and welcome to the jam
- Gallery: Wildlife photos by the book
- News from the WMF: WMF Board announces Community Culture Statement
- Recent research: Automatic detection of covert paid editing; Wiki Workshop 2020
- Community view: Transit routes and mapping during stay-at-home order downtime
- WikiProject report: Revitalizing good articles
- On the bright side: 500,000 articles in the Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia
GOCE June newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors June 2020 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the June newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since March 2020. You can unsubscribe from our mailings at any time; see below. All times and dates stated are in UTC. Current events
Election time: Nomination of candidates in our mid-year Election of Coordinators opened on 1 June, and voting will take place from 00:01 on 16 June. GOCE coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought about helping out at the Guild, or you know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. June Blitz: This blitz begins at 00:01 on 14 June and ends at 23:59 on 20 June, with themes of articles tagged for copyedit in May 2020 and requests. Drive and blitz reports
March Drive: Self-isolation from coronavirus may have played a hand in making this one of our most successful backlog elimination drives. The copy-editing backlog was reduced from 477 to a record low of 118 articles, a 75% reduction. The last four months of 2019 were cleared, reducing the backlog to three months. Fifty requests were also completed, and the total word count of copy-edited articles was 759,945. Of the 29 editors who signed up, 22 completed at least one copy edit. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. April Blitz: This blitz ran from 12 to 18 April with a theme of Indian military history. Of the 18 people who signed up, 14 copyedited at least one article. Participants claimed a total of 60 copyedits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. May Drive: This event marked the 10th anniversary of the GOCE's copy-editing drives, and set a goal of diminishing the backlog to just one month of articles, as close to zero articles as possible. We achieved the goal of eliminating all articles that had been tagged prior to the start of the drive, for the first time in our history! Of the 51 editors who signed up, 43 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Other news
Progress report: as of 2 June, GOCE participants had processed 328 requests since 1 January, which puts us on pace to exceed any previous year's number of requests. As of the end of the May drive, the backlog stood at just 156 articles, all tagged in May 2020. Outreach: To mark the 10th anniversary of our first Backlog Elimination Drive, The Signpost contributor and GOCE participant Puddleglum2.0 interviewed project coordinators and copy-editors for the journal's April WikiProject Report. The Drive and the current Election of Coordinators have also been covered in The Signpost's May News and Notes page. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Baffle gab1978, Reidgreg, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 15:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC).
Using rollback
Regarding RedWarn - you might want to request rollback permissions over at WP:RFP/R, then, once successful, changing RedWarn's rollback method in your preferences from "rollback-like" to "rollback". It does make a slight speed difference, which may be convenient for your counter-vandalism efforts. Ed6767 talk! 00:30, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Ed6767: Thanks for the tip, I'll consider requesting the permissions. Thanks for letting me know! —GalaxyDogtalk • contribs 00:40, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- GalaxyDog, no problem. Also, what are your thoughts on having a RedWarn mobile app? Ed6767 talk! 00:41, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Ed6767: Well, you're the developer, so if you think it's necessary, then I'd say go for it! If you really want to know my personal opinion, though, I'd question whether it is necessary. That's just my personal view of the matter, though. Again, if you think it would be a beneficial addition to the anti-vandalism toolset, then I'd say go for it! —GalaxyDogtalk • contribs 00:48, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- GalaxyDog, thanks for the feedback! Ed6767 talk! 00:54, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- No problem, Ed6767! —GalaxyDogtalk • contribs 00:55, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- GalaxyDog, thanks for the feedback! Ed6767 talk! 00:54, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Ed6767: Well, you're the developer, so if you think it's necessary, then I'd say go for it! If you really want to know my personal opinion, though, I'd question whether it is necessary. That's just my personal view of the matter, though. Again, if you think it would be a beneficial addition to the anti-vandalism toolset, then I'd say go for it! —GalaxyDogtalk • contribs 00:48, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- GalaxyDog, no problem. Also, what are your thoughts on having a RedWarn mobile app? Ed6767 talk! 00:41, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
RedWarn - Quick Survey
Hello GalaxyDog! Thank you so much for testing RedWarn so far. I kindly ask that you fill in a short survey regarding the future of RedWarn and to help me visualise general user opinion surrounding certain features.
To access the survey, visit: https://devices.edxt.net/redwarnSurvey
Thank you again for your continued feedback and support, it is greatly appreciated. Ed6767 talk! 22:15, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
If you'd like to opt-out of receiving messages regarding RedWarn, or have any questions, please let me know on my talk page.
- Ed6767, I'm sorry for not responding.. —GalaxyDogtalk • contribs 21:40, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- GalaxyDog, it's no problem! Ed6767 talk! 21:42, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Rollback granted
Hi GalaxyDog. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Anarchyte (talk • work) 10:32, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Anarchyte, thank you! I appreciate it. —GalaxyDogtalk • contribs 13:53, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Anarchyte, I have a question, if you don't mind: it says on Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback that "... [rollback] should not be used for edits that were made in good faith (even if problematic)." However, does this still apply if I'm adding a edit summary to the rollback through a tool such as RedWarn? The reason I'm asking this is because RedWarn has an option to add an edit summary to your rollback (if the edits you're rolling back are not vandalism/nonconstructive). One of the reasons I requested this permission was so I can enable the "rollback" setting in the preferences of RedWarn, rather than "rollback-like" (what I was using before), so I think it will take unnecessary time to switch back to "rollback-like" if I see a good-faith edit that still needs to be reverted. In short: does this rule still apply if there is an appropriate edit summary along with the rollback, added through an external tool? Thanks, —GalaxyDogtalk • contribs 14:34, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Simply put, if it is not obvious vandalism, an edit summary should be included. This includes when you're using external tools. Anarchyte (talk • work) 16:00, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Anarchyte: Thanks for replying, but I don't think you understand my question. Sorry if I wasn't clear. I was asking whether it's okay to use rollback to revert good-faith edits as long as an edit summary is included. I know that an edit summary should be included, but is it okay to use rollback to revert good-faith edits as long as I do include that edit summary? Thanks, and sorry for the trouble. —GalaxyDogtalk • contribs 16:11, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- In other words, I'm asking whether good-faith edits can be reverted using rollback, as long as that one condition is met (that there's an edit summary). Again, sorry for the trouble. —GalaxyDogtalk • contribs 16:13, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- If it's a good-faith edit, it cannot be reverted with rollback without an edit summary (but then that would defeat the purpose of rollback being a one click undo button). Revert good-faith edits with the undo button. Anarchyte (talk • work) 17:21, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Anarchyte: Yes, but I'm not talking about the core rollback feature — I'm talking about using rollback with RedWarn, which allows you to add an edit summary. For example, this revert of mine. Even though it has an edit summary that I typed in, it has the "rollback" tag. Is it okay to revert good-faith edits this way, rather than using the "undo" button? —GalaxyDogtalk • contribs 17:25, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry if I'm bothering you, I just want to make sure I'm doing the right thing :/ —GalaxyDogtalk • contribs 17:29, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Anarchyte: Yes, but I'm not talking about the core rollback feature — I'm talking about using rollback with RedWarn, which allows you to add an edit summary. For example, this revert of mine. Even though it has an edit summary that I typed in, it has the "rollback" tag. Is it okay to revert good-faith edits this way, rather than using the "undo" button? —GalaxyDogtalk • contribs 17:25, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- If it's a good-faith edit, it cannot be reverted with rollback without an edit summary (but then that would defeat the purpose of rollback being a one click undo button). Revert good-faith edits with the undo button. Anarchyte (talk • work) 17:21, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- In other words, I'm asking whether good-faith edits can be reverted using rollback, as long as that one condition is met (that there's an edit summary). Again, sorry for the trouble. —GalaxyDogtalk • contribs 16:13, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Anarchyte: Thanks for replying, but I don't think you understand my question. Sorry if I wasn't clear. I was asking whether it's okay to use rollback to revert good-faith edits as long as an edit summary is included. I know that an edit summary should be included, but is it okay to use rollback to revert good-faith edits as long as I do include that edit summary? Thanks, and sorry for the trouble. —GalaxyDogtalk • contribs 16:11, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Simply put, if it is not obvious vandalism, an edit summary should be included. This includes when you're using external tools. Anarchyte (talk • work) 16:00, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Yes, that's okay, @Anarchyte is talking about standard rollback. ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 00:31, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- Alright, thanks for the clarification, Prahlad balaji. I presume Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback was too, then. —GalaxyDogtalk • contribs 01:39, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- Yup. ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 01:40, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- Correct. The edit being tagged with rollback doesn't mean anything, really. The one-click rollback should only be used for vandalism, but any other forms of rollback (Twinkle, RedWarn, etc) that might tag with rollback but allow for edit summaries are fine for other uses, too. Anarchyte (talk • work) 10:06, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- Anarchyte, thanks for clarifying. —GalaxyDogtalk • contribs 13:07, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- Correct. The edit being tagged with rollback doesn't mean anything, really. The one-click rollback should only be used for vandalism, but any other forms of rollback (Twinkle, RedWarn, etc) that might tag with rollback but allow for edit summaries are fine for other uses, too. Anarchyte (talk • work) 10:06, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- Yup. ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 01:40, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Cookie [Header added by talk page owner for organizational purposes]
Hungry? Here's a little snack for you on your birthday, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day, GalaxyDog! --◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 15:59, 17 June 2020 (UTC) |
- Thank you, Prahlad balaji! I didn't even know it was my Wikipedia birthday! Also, I hope you do not mind that I added a header to your message. —GalaxyDogtalk • contribs 16:05, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
- No problem; you're welcome. Happy bday! ◊PRAHLADbalaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 16:06, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 June 2020
- News and notes: Progress at Wikipedia Library and Wikijournal of Medicine
- Community view: Community open letter on renaming
- Gallery: After the killing of George Floyd
- In the media: Part collaboration and part combat
- Discussion report: Community reacts to WMF rebranding proposals
- Featured content: Sports are returning, with a rainbow
- Arbitration report: Anti-harassment RfC and a checkuser revocation
- Traffic report: The pandemic, alleged murder, a massacre, and other deaths
- News from the WMF: We stand for racial justice
- Recent research: Wikipedia and COVID-19; automated Wikipedia-based fact-checking
- Humour: Cherchez une femme
- On the bright side: For what are you grateful this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Black Lives Matter
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 16
News and updates associated with user scripts from the past two months (May and June 2020).
Hello everyone and welcome to the 16th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:
Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
|
|
If anyone else would like to contribute to future issues, please comment at Wikipedia talk:Scripts++. --DannyS712 (talk) 20:13, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
You removed one of my edits???
You removed one of my edits (see link: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:170.253.105.132). This was NOT a test. I can't remember which edit it was, as I don't remember editing the page, but I don't do test edits. All edits I make are intentional, and in the case of these sorts of pages, is very often to remove racist language, as Indigenous pages are absolutely abundant with them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.253.105.132 (talk) 07:45, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- As Doug Weller said on your talk page, this was the edit I reverted (you changed "South America" to "South Americam"). That seemed like a test edit to me. —GalaxyDogtalk 18:01, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
That wasn't me. I may have changed it the other way around, as again, I mostly just do typos and spelling mistakes, but I don't do test edits. Problems with sharing an IP address. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.253.105.132 (talk) 01:26, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- Alright, then no need to worry about it then. Let's hope the message reached its intended recipient. :) —GalaxyDogtalk 01:31, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 August 2020
- Special report: Wikipedia and the End of Open Collaboration?
- COI and paid editing: Some strange people edit Wikipedia for money
- News and notes: Abstract Wikipedia, a hoax, sex symbols, and a new admin
- In the media: Dog days gone bad
- Discussion report: Fox News, a flight of RfAs, and banning policy
- Featured content: Remembering Art, Valor, and Freedom
- Traffic report: Now for something completely different
- News from the WMF: New Chinese national security law in Hong Kong could limit the privacy of Wikipedia users
- Obituaries: Hasteur and Brian McNeil
The Signpost: 30 August 2020
- News and notes: The high road and the low road
- In the media: Storytelling large and small
- Featured content: Going for the goal
- Special report: Wikipedia's not so little sister is finding its own way
- Op-Ed: The longest-running hoax
- Traffic report: Heart, soul, umbrellas, and politics
- News from the WMF: Fourteen things we’ve learned by moving Polish Wikimedia conference online
- Recent research: Detecting spam, and pages to protect; non-anonymous editors signal their intelligence with high-quality articles
- Arbitration report: A slow couple of months
- From the archives: Wikipedia for promotional purposes?