User talk:FreshUdon

April 2019

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:49, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete that PROD template again, or the "unreferenced" template, which has been valid for 11 years now. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:50, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}}

Hello Drmies, thanks for the advice, I would like to make adjustments and fixes to the page in order to avoid deletion, any advice on how I should do that? FreshUdon (talk) 17:56, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
FreshUdon, it looks like you're trying to improve Neptune (owarai)? The best way to help out at that page would be to find significant mentions of the group in reliable sources. Does that answer your question? --valereee (talk) 18:13, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the thing is that many sources are in Japanese only, would that still be considered as a reliable source? FreshUdon (talk) 18:21, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
FreshUdon, if the sources are reliable, it's no problem that they're in Japanese. Reliable sources are major daily newspapers, respected nationally-distributed magazines, books published by traditional publishers, etc. What are the sources you're finding? --valereee (talk) 19:13, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging GreenRunner0 who offers to translate Japanese; GreenRunner0 would you be able/willing to help FreshUdon assess Japanese sources in support of their attempt to improve an article? --valereee (talk) 19:26, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I'm not super proficient in translation. I do some proof-reading where I see it necessary, but I might not be the best choice for this. Thanks for reaching though! Green Runner 0 00:52, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
GreenRunner0, no worries, I'll see if someone else can help! Thanks! --valereee (talk) 12:39, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Many sources come from Television programs, for example interviews, talk shows etc. The subject comedy group Neptune (owarai) appear frequently on Japanese TV and the Japanese wikipedia article have a filmography section for all their current and past television program appearances. I assume that news articles from established news websites such as Natalie (website) should also be okay. FreshUdon (talk) 19:29, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
FreshUdon, I'm not seeing any discussion of Natalie (website) at WP:RSN which is where we discuss the reliability of sources. I'll go ask there. --valereee (talk) 12:41, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I've started a discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Natalie_(website)_reliable_for_showing_notability_of_Neptune_(owarai)?, you can feel free to go add to the discussion or clarify the question. --valereee (talk) 12:52, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FreshUdon, did you see that the folks at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_263#Natalie_(website)_reliable_for_showing_notability_of_Neptune_(owarai)? did say that Natalie was generally reliable as long as the coverage was significant? --valereee (talk) 17:09, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thanks for letting me know. FreshUdon (talk) 17:32, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, FreshUdon. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 17:51, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Haraichi (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Haraichi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Haraichi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 18:58, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FreshUdon! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chetsford (talk) 18:58, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chidori (comedy duo) (April 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Atlantic306 was:

No claims of significance, you need to explain in detail what they are famous for such as tv shows or films etc

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chidori (comedy duo) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chidori (comedy duo), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Atlantic306 (talk) 18:54, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chidori (comedy duo) has been accepted

Chidori (comedy duo), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 20:54, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yoshimoto New Star Creation moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yoshimoto New Star Creation, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:23, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Haraichi has been accepted

Haraichi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 18:42, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

article creation

It looks like you're having some success with article creation! --valereee (talk) 23:21, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited London Hearts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sanshiro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:13, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yoshimoto New Star Creation (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Atlantic306 was:

Can you please add some more references to independent reliable sources please

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yoshimoto New Star Creation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yoshimoto New Star Creation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Atlantic306 (talk) 21:49, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello, I'm TJRC. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Nozomi Sasaki (model), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 19:00, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks for letting me know FreshUdon (talk) 19:05, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Much better, thank!. Also, please don't mark your edits as minor if they are not minor. See Help:Minor edit for help on what's really minor. Thinks like format and spelling corrections are minor; adding information such as a marriage aren't.

Happy editing! TJRC (talk) 19:10, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've made quite a few other unsourced changes in other articles, too. I won't drop you any notifications on them, I know that can be kind of annoying, but if you can go back and fix those up, re-adding with sources, that would be great. TJRC (talk) 19:15, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks! FreshUdon (talk) 19:27, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Small punctuation correction

Hi FreshUdon!

Thank you so much for your recent articles on Japanese entertainment! This is a very small thing, but I'd appreciate it if in the future you could put the punctuation before the reference, not after. I know the convention on Japanese Wikipedia is to have the references inside the punctuation, but it's the other way around on English Wikipedia. I've already made the changes on Yuzuki Akiyama and Ayaka Hironaka, but please keep an eye out for that in the future. Thank you! Mcampany (talk) 23:53, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, I will do that from now on. FreshUdon (talk) 13:02, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Panther (owarai)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Panther (owarai) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Neil S. Walker (talk) 14:49, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Panther (owarai) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Panther (owarai) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panther (owarai) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Neil S. Walker (talk) 07:12, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ametalk! moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ametalk!, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 14:48, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kamen Rider × Super Sentai: Ultra Super Hero Taisen (May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Atlantic306 was:

Needs references from multiple reliable sources with significant coverage such as reviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kamen Rider × Super Sentai: Ultra Super Hero Taisen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kamen Rider × Super Sentai: Ultra Super Hero Taisen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Atlantic306 (talk) 18:23, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wagyu (comedy duo)

Hello FreshUdon,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Wagyu (comedy duo) for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:31, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Panther (owarai)

@MA Javadi, Bakazaka, Spyder212, Epinoia, Atlantic306, and Neil S Walker: pinging the participants in the AfD.

Hi. I see you moved Panther (owarai) back into mainspace. When I undeleted it and moved it to draft, I had intended that you would submit it for review, not just move it back on your own. As C.Fred said in his DRV comment, If a revised page is then shown to meet WP:ENTERTAINER and WP:GNG, then we can restore to mainspace. I realize I didn't make the need to get a review explicit in my close (for which I apologize), but that certainly was the intent, and implied by, shown to meet. I'm going to move it back to draft space. Please let it go through the normal WP:AfC process this time. I have no opinion one way or the other on whether your improvements were sufficient to address the concerns raised in the AfD, I just want to give people a chance to take a look. Thanks. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:02, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yoshimoto New Star Creation has been accepted

Yoshimoto New Star Creation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 14:13, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Twin Planet moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Twin Planet, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq (talk) 16:54, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Twin Planet has been accepted

Twin Planet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Redalert2fan (talk) 18:43, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Panther (owarai) has been accepted

Panther (owarai), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 21:14, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shochiku Geino moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shochiku Geino, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Atlantic306 (talk) 15:02, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ohta Production moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ohta Production, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Atlantic306 (talk) 15:03, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shochiku Geino has been accepted

Shochiku Geino, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 19:58, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ohta Production has been accepted

Ohta Production, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 20:07, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ametalk! (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ametalk! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ametalk!, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 08:31, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ametalk! has been accepted

Ametalk!, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chris Troutman (talk) 16:34, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cube (talent agency) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cube (talent agency), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Atlantic306 (talk) 20:10, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cube (talent agency) has been accepted

Cube (talent agency), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 16:39, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Japanese comedians by year of debut moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Japanese comedians by year of debut, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. b uidhe 14:39, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Japanese comedians by year of debut has been accepted

List of Japanese comedians by year of debut, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-- RoySmith (talk) 02:00, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]