User talk:FrenchPeople

Sadie Katz

If you're the IP editor who's been adding unsourced birth dates to Sadie Katz, you need to cite your sources. Keep in mind that a biography of living person has requires high quality reliable sources. Gossip sites, self-published blogs, databases with user-generated content (such as the IMDb), and primary sources (such as court transcripts) are not usable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:15, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

FrenchPeople, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi FrenchPeople! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:FrenchPeople/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:FrenchPeople/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:19, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: FrenchPeople (April 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FrenchPeople and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:FrenchPeople, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:54, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: FrenchPeople (April 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FrenchPeople and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:FrenchPeople, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:03, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:FrenchPeople has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:FrenchPeople. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:04, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: FrenchPeople (April 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FrenchPeople and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:FrenchPeople, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 05:38, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: FrenchPeople (April 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FrenchPeople and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:FrenchPeople, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 14:39, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: FrenchPeople (April 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by C.Fred was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FrenchPeople and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:FrenchPeople, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—C.Fred (talk) 15:24, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Internet Plan (April 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Internet Plan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Internet Plan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:10, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:FrenchPeople/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:FrenchPeople/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:15, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Sadie Katz. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:56, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Internet Plan (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiDan61 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Internet Plan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Internet Plan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:48, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sadie Katz. Stop adding unsourced and poorly-sourced content to a biography of a living person. We do not accept content from user-generated websites like the IMDb. If you continue adding this poorly-sourced content in violation of our policies, you will likely be blocked from editing. Please take the time to read WP:RS, WP:BLP, and WP:EW. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:11, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: FrenchPeople (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FrenchPeople and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:FrenchPeople, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Fana TV. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 18:09, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Old Fashion (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hammersoft was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Old Fashion and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Old Fashion, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hammersoft (talk) 15:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Your draft creations

Hello. In the week that you have been editing here, you have created drafts for Adi Mutluluk at the following locations:

• Draft:FrenchPeople
• Draft:Internet Plan
• User:FrenchPeople/sandbox
• Draft:Old Fashion

You have been told to add reliable sources multiple times. You have been told that IMDB is not a reliable source multiple times. You have been told not to create drafts at a new name with the same content. You have been told to stop submitting drafts when nothing changes. Your drafts for this topic have been rejected 11 times. You have been told why.

I do not mean to be hostile towards you. However, your actions are wasting the time of other editors on the project. You do not seem to understand what it means to add reliable sources. You do not seem to understand why your drafts keep getting rejected.

Therefore, I am asking to to STOP resubmitting or creating new drafts. Please ask questions to help you. Continuing to resubmit/create new drafts without adding reliable sources or making significant changes may lead to a block of your editing privileges. Please, discuss. Do not continue as you have been. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:13, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Tamrat Desta. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 18:23, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Old Fashion has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Old Fashion. Thanks! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:38, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

You have created drafts for the same topic (a television show named Adi Mutluluk) in at least three different places now:

• Draft:FrenchPeople
• Draft:Internet Plan
• Draft:Old Fashion

You have been asked before to not create new drafts, but rather to concentrate on addressing the problems mentioned in the initial draft (Draft:FrenchPeople). Please do that. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:41, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  5 albert square (talk) 19:56, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 22:19, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Paramparça (TV series)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FrenchPeople (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have a reliable resource for this article

Decline reason:

No, your addition consists of copying content from [1] which is a breach of copyright. Nthep (talk) 21:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Paramparça (TV series)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FrenchPeople (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. You forgot to tell us your IP address so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using WhatIsMyIP. If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to provide the IP address privately. Yamla (talk) 10:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

April 2018

Your addition to Paramparça (TV series) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is a final warning, if you continue to include copyrighted content you will be blocked again. Nthep (talk) 14:10, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

It's clear from your continued resubmission of the same stuff, and continued violation of copyright rules after being warned multiple times, that you're not here to help build the encyclopedia. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:21, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

{{unblock | reason = I have been blocked from editing because of repeatedly resubmit article "Adi Mutluluk". I am sorry and I won't do the same for the future. Please I wants to unblock me for my edits as soon as possible. FrenchPeople (talk) 20:41, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FrenchPeople (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have been blocked from editing because of repeatedly resubmit article "Adi Mutluluk". I am sorry and I won't do the same for the future. Please I wants to unblock me for my edits as soon as possible.

Decline reason:

You have been warned multiple times and blocked before. I have nothing to indicate that this will be any different. It has become quite apparent that you are not here to build an encyclopaedia 5 albert square (talk) 22:34, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FrenchPeople (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My blocking expiration date hasn't been set yet. Please can you tell me the exact date?

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block. However, I will tell you that there is no date set for you to be unblocked - your block is indefinite. 5 albert square (talk) 20:44, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yegna

{{unblock| reason = Clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia: Repeated re-submissions of drafts with no improvement, repeated copyvios after being warned, this user is a time-sink and net negative to the project. FrenchPeople (talk) 19:29, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:FrenchPeople

{{unblock| reason = Clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia: Repeated re-submissions of drafts with no improvement, repeated copyvios after being warned, this user is a time-sink and net negative to the project. FrenchPeople (talk) 20:28, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: FrenchPeople (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FrenchPeople and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:FrenchPeople, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor ^Talk 05:00, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:FrenchPeople

Draft:FrenchPeople, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:FrenchPeople and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:FrenchPeople during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 05:11, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Unblock me I did fault but I want to edit for this time please. FrenchPeople (talk) 14:15, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Please unblock me, because another article which is done by me, is reverted. So I have edit for this time. FrenchPeople (talk) 15:50, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

User:FrenchPeople

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FrenchPeople (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sorry for resubmittion of Draft:FrenchPeople. I won't do this in the future. I have an article which is reverted by User:Wallas for this time only

Decline reason:

I have no reason to believe that you will behave any differently if unblocked. As I have said above, you have had chances before which you have not taken. The fact that you have also issued unblock requests within minutes of each other is coming across as trolling now and disruptive. For that reason, I am going to withdraw your talk page access. 5 albert square (talk) 20:49, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

April 2018

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 5 albert square (talk) 20:54, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Block evasion

This user has engaged in block evasion in May, 2018, as MojoYoung (talk · contribs). This user attempted to mislead the Wikipedia community about the nature of the WP:EVASION. --Yamla (talk) 14:31, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

This user has engaged in block evasion as of December, 2018. --Yamla (talk) 11:47, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Talk page access

Per Special:Permalink/882336341#Not to evading block, I've restored your talk page access so you can appeal your block. Please read this advice page about appealing blocks. You should also read about the standard offer, which is probably what people are going to suggest. It suggests that people go six months without any block evasion or sock puppetry. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:37, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

I also suggest you list all of the accounts you have used. We know you have previously lied about this. This is your opportunity to show we can trust you again, that you are willing to be honest with us. Think very, very carefully about this. --Yamla (talk) 11:40, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Appealing for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FrenchPeople (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Per https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PermanentLink/882336341#Not_to_evading_block, the blocking admin suggested to appeal for unblock this account.

Decline reason:

Good for you. This is not an unblock appeal, however, so if you want to keep your talkpage access I suggest you actually make an appeal, addressing the specific issues raised by Yamla below as well as this issues that led to the block in the first place. Yunshui ^雲_水 13:14, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To be clear, are you refusing to list all accounts you've used, as I requested above? If not, please list all accounts and IP addressed you've used since this account was blocked. When was the last time you evaded your block? Be careful here, I have specific evidence that you've been evading your block more recently than noted above. --Yamla (talk) 13:08, 8 February 2019 (UTC)